隨著建築產業加速邁向數位轉型與淨零碳排，建築資訊建模（BIM）與人工智慧（AI）已成為關鍵技術。然而，台灣廣大的中小型建築事務所正面臨商業軟體授權成本高昂，以及生成式 AI 硬體算力建置門檻過高的雙重困境，導致數位落差日益擴大。
本計畫旨在提出一套基於「開源自由軟體（FOSS）」與「數位雙生 AI 算力共享」的整合解決方案。研究核心採用 Blender 搭配 Bonsai (原 BlenderBIM) 作為原生 IFC 編輯環境，並導入 Model Context Protocol
(MCP) 作為 AI 與建模工具間的標準化通訊協定，試圖打破專有軟體的封閉性。同時，為解決硬體資源不足問題，本計畫建構了一套分散式算力共享架構，透過加密傳輸與動態負載平衡技術，讓閒置的 GPU 資源得以跨網域共享。
後續計畫將聚焦於「社會住宅標準單元」的實務驗證，利用已開發之工具鏈進行結構與外覆系統的設計決策輔助（造價與能耗模擬），並產出符合 ISO 16739 標準之 IFC 交付模型。本研究最終將釋出相關開源套件與操作手冊，期能有效降低技術與成本門檻，協助中小型事務所導入 AI 輔助設計，落實建築產業智慧轉型與資源共享之政策目標。
", "英文摘要": "As the architectural industry accelerates toward digital transformation and netzero emissions, Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) have emerged as pivotal technologies. However, a vast number of small and medium-sized architectural firms in Taiwan face a dual challenge: the prohibitive licensing costs of commercial software and the high barrier to establishing the hardware computing power required for generative AI. These factors have led to a widening digital divide within the industry.
This project aims to propose an integrated solution based on "Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)" and "Digital Twin AI Computing Power Sharing." The core of this research adopts Blender paired with Bonsai (formerly BlenderBIM) as a Native IFC editing environment. It introduces the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as a standardized communication protocol between AI and modeling tools, attempting to break through the closed ecosystem of proprietary software.
Furthermore, to address the issue of insufficient hardware resources, this project constructs a distributed computing power sharing architecture. Through encrypted transmission and dynamic load balancing technologies, this architecture allows idle GPU resources to be shared across networks.
Subsequent phases of the plan will focus on the practical verification of standard units in social housing. The developed toolchain will be utilized for design decision support regarding structural and cladding systems—specifically in cost estimation and energy simulation—and will produce IFC delivery models that comply with the ISO 16739 standard. Ultimately, this research intends to release relevant open-source packages and operation manuals. The goal is to effectively lower technical and cost barriers, assisting small and medium-sized firms in adopting AI-aided design, thereby implementing the policy objectives of intelligent transformation and resource sharing in the construction industry.
", "相關檔案": "114年度「開源自由軟體與數位雙生AI算力共享整合技術之研究－以社會住宅為例」業務委託之專業服務案成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339207/2397dde5-8033-43d7-8073-1402734f9f5b.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340886", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 10 Sep 2026 05:35:00 GMT", "title": "建築物耐風設計之應用資料庫與分析模式研析", "計畫主持人": "羅元隆", "協同主持人": "王人牧", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-10-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-08-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "工程技術組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "建築物耐風設計規範、互動式網頁平台、氣動力資料庫、科普教育推廣、風洞試驗與數值模擬品質要求", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "我國因地理環境特殊，長年面臨地震與強烈颱風之威脅。雖然社會對強震之災防意識較高，但對於強風所造成之長期經濟損失與居住舒適度影響卻時常忽略。現行2015年版「建築物耐風設計規範」實施逾十年，已難以完全接軌國際最新研究成果。爰此，內政部建築研究所於2023年完成第三版規範草案研擬，大幅修訂了基本設計風速與風場特性相關的內容，並且根據最新版的美、日兩國規範，新增了許多產業界可參考用以設計的圖表。然而，面對日益複雜的公式運算與實務需求，產業界急需一套具備公信力且能自動化執行規範草案計算的數位工具。因此，本計畫旨在開發一套以規範草案為核心的互動式網頁平台，透過數位轉型解決技師手算誤差之痛點，並結合風工程科普教育，提升工程師對於風洞試驗及數值模擬品質的評估能力。
本計畫已完成以PHP/CI4框架為核心的網頁平台建置，包含「主要抗風系統」、「局部構材及外部被覆物」及「最高居室樓層角隅處振動尖峰加速度」三大核心評估模組開發，以及「耐風規範草案閱覽」、「知識科普」、「評估說明」與「氣動力資料庫」四大附加功能。計畫期間，研究團隊透過專家座談會議蒐集意見，針對介面友善性與計算精確度進行改善，確保計算邏輯與規範草案及學術數據一致。未來將持續透過各大技師公會舉辦的推廣講習與產、官、學的回饋機制，持續完善的本耐風設計輔助工具，期能為我國建築物耐風設計品質的提升與韌性城市之建構貢獻實質技術支持。
", "英文摘要": "Due to its distinctive geographic setting, Taiwan is exposed to both frequent earthquakes and intense typhoons. While public awareness of seismic disaster mitigation is relatively high, the long-term economic losses and reductions in living comfort caused by strong winds are often underestimated. The current Wind-Resistant Design Code for Buildings (2015 edition) has been in use for more than a decade and can no longer fully reflect the latest international research developments. To address this gap, the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI), Ministry of the Interior, completed the drafting of the third-edition code in 2023, substantially revising provisions related to basic design wind speeds and wind-field characteristics. In addition, numerous design charts and reference tables were introduced based on the latest U.S. and Japanese standards to better support engineering practice. However, as design formulas and practical demands become increasingly complex, the industry urgently requires an authoritative and automated digital tool capable of implementing the new code calculations reliably. Therefore, this project aims to develop an interactive web-based platform centered on the new draft code, enabling digital transformation to mitigate hand-calculation errors while integrating wind-engineering outreach to enhance engineers’ ability to evaluate the quality of wind tunnel testing and computational simulations.
The project has achieved phased outcomes to date. A highly stable web platform has been established using a PHP/CodeIgniter 4 (CI4) framework, and three core assessment modules have been completed: (1) evaluation for main wind-force-resisting systems, (2) evaluation for local components and cladding, and (3) verification of rooftop acceleration criteria. Practical feedback has been collected through expert panel meetings to improve user interface friendliness and computational accuracy, while ensuring that the calculation logic is highly consistent with the draft code and supporting academic data. The in-depth validation, including large-scale cross-comparisons with existing expert systems and wind tunnel reports, incorporation of an interactive knowledge module for public outreach and professional learning, and promotion workshops hosted with major professional engineering associations. Through feedback mechanisms among industry, government, and academia—together with system certification procedures—this project seeks to deliver a government-endorsed wind-resistant design assistant tool that provides substantial technical support for enhancing wind-resistant design quality and advancing resilient-city development in Taiwan.
", "相關檔案": "建築物耐風設計之應用資料庫與分析模式研析_成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340886/27384283-5fb4-4867-b6b7-e4c6f2dd99f3.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340050", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 07 Aug 2026 01:45:00 GMT", "title": "人工智慧物聯網科技對應智慧建築環境社會與公司治理指標之研究", "計畫主持人": "欒中丕", "協同主持人": "李訓谷", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-10-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "人工智慧物聯網(AIoT)、智慧建築、環境及社會與公司治理（ESG）、永續發展、臺灣", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
在全球面臨氣候變遷、能源短缺與社會結構快速變動的背景下，如何透過科技手段回應永續發展的挑戰，已成為各國政府與企業的重要課題。特別是建築部門，其能源消耗與碳排放量長期佔據整體能源結構的相當比例，被視為實現淨零轉型與落實永續發展目標（SDGs）的關鍵領域。另一方面，隨著投資人與利害關係人對企業責任的要求日益提高，ESG（環境、社會與公司治理）逐漸成為衡量企業競爭力與永續績效的標準。如何將智慧建築技術與 ESG 指標有效連結，不僅涉及節能減碳的技術問題，更涉及企業治理透明化與社會責任實踐的管理議題。
在此脈絡下，人工智慧（AI）與物聯網（IoT）的整合，即人工智慧物聯網（AIoT），被廣泛視為推動智慧建築發展的重要驅動力。AIoT 不僅能即時蒐集並分析大量感測數據，進而優化能源調度與設備運作，還能在社會面與治理面上發揮影響，例如強化安全管理、提升住戶互動，以及提供具可追溯性的數據報告，以因應永續揭露需求。對臺灣而言，這樣的發展尤為迫切：臺灣不僅是高密度都市化國家，能源進口依賴度極高，並且在國際供應鏈壓力與全球投資評比的雙重驅動下，建築環境如何導入 AIoT 技術以回應 ESG 指標，已成為不可迴避的重要研究課題。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究在方法設計上採取質性與量化並行的策略，透過理論建構與案例實證交互驗證，以確保研究結果的完整性與應用性。首先，在理論層次，本研究廣泛蒐集並分析國內外有關智慧建築、人工智慧物聯網（AIoT）及 ESG 評估架構的相關文獻，藉此建構出「AIoT 技術功能—ESG 指標」的初步對應模型，並作為後續實證研究的理論基礎。其次，在案例選取上，研究特別聚焦於臺灣具代表性的智慧建築標章場域。此選擇兼顧了不同建築用途、能源需求與管理模式，能夠全面呈現 AIoT 技術在不同場域的應用差異與挑戰。
在研究過程中，採用了多元方法進行資料蒐集與分析。其一，透過專家訪談方式，邀請建築師、工程顧問、能源管理顧問與 ESG 評估專家，收集其對 AIoT 技術導入與 ESG 對應的專業見解；其二，進行智慧建築與ESG永續治理相關文獻蒐集與分析，重點涵蓋能源消耗、室內環境品質（例如溫濕度、二氧化碳濃度、PM2.5）以及安全監控等面向之AIOT技術；其三，建立 AIoT 技術功能與 ESG 三大構面之對照矩陣，並透過數據分析與比較，檢視技術應用對於環境效益、社會價值與治理透明度的貢獻。最後，本研究依據蒐集的資料進行交叉驗證，並整合專家觀點與量化數據，提出成效評估與問題歸納，以確保研究成果兼具學術嚴謹性與實務參考價值。
三、重要發現
本研究透過系統性分析2016年版與2024年版臺灣智慧建築標章與GRI ESG架構之對應關係，發現智慧建築標章在ESG三大構面中呈現顯著的「社會面向優先」特色，此特色貫穿兩版本修訂並持續強化。在2016年版八大指標基本規定110個評估項目之ESG分類中，社會面向(S)項目最多，達55項占45%，其次為治理面向(G)36項占29%，環境面向(E)32項占26%，另有13項具有雙重或三重屬性，顯示智慧建築評估制度本質上以保障使用者安全、健康與便利生活為核心價值。2024年版六大指標評估項目之ESG分類延續此一特色，社會面向項目仍為最多達46項占44%，主要涵蓋涵蓋安全、健康、便利生活等面向，環境面向則提升至28項占29%，集中於節能、水資源、智慧建材等領域，治理面向為24項占27%，聚焦於聚焦管理系統、資訊安全、數據治理等項目。此一分析結果揭示三項重要發現：首先，智慧建築標章跨越版本修訂均維持社會面向為首要的評估重點，透過安全防災、健康舒適、資訊通信等指標，確保建築使用者之生命財產安全、身心健康福祉與數位平權，此特色有別於國際部分綠建築標章偏重環境面向之設計邏輯；其次，2024年版在維持社會面向優勢的同時，顯著提升環境面向占比(從26%提升至29%)，強化節能管理與智慧建材評估，呼應國家2050淨零排放政策；第三，治理面向在兩版本中維持穩定占比(2016年29%、2024年27%)，但2024年版更強調聚焦管理系統、資訊安全與數據治理等面向，為AIoT技術應用建立資訊治理基礎。綜合而言，臺灣智慧建築標章在ESG對應上展現獨特的「社會優先、環境強化、治理支撐」之三維整合架構，此一特色不僅反映我國建築政策對使用者福祉之重視，更為智慧建築與國際ESG評估框架接軌提供明確之定位，使智慧建築從單純的物理空間提升為支撐永續社會發展的關鍵基礎設施。
臺灣智慧建築標章與國際GRESB標準之間的高度互補性是本研究另一項研究成果。透過系統性比較分析，研究團隊發現臺灣智慧建築標章的八大指標體系，雖然在設計初衷上並非以ESG評估為導向，但其內容架構與評估項目卻與GRESB的ESG評估框架存在著顯著的對應關係。在環境構面，智慧建築標章的節能管理指標涵蓋了能源監視、能源管理系統、設備效率、需量控制等項目，這些要求與GRESB對能源績效監測的標準高度一致。智慧建築要求設置的數位電錶、水錶、能源管理系統等基礎設施，正是GRESB進行能源與水資源績效評估所需的數據來源。在社會構面，健康舒適指標對室內環境品質的要求，以及安全防災指標對生命財產保護的規範，直接對應了GRESB中租戶滿意度、使用者福祉、員工健康安全等評估項目。而在治理構面，系統整合指標所強調的中央監控系統整合效能，以及設施管理指標對組織管理、維運管理、資產管理的要求，為GRESB所需的政策程序、風險管理、報告揭露等治理機制提供了技術與制度基礎。
四、主要建議事項
本研究透過系統性的理論建構與實證分析，深入探討人工智慧物聯網技術應用於智慧建築以對應環境、社會與公司治理指標之可行性與實務架構。為擴大本研究產出後續實質成果，提出下列建議：
建議一：
既有建築之智慧化評估手冊納入智慧建築採用AIoT技術對應ESG準則，以量化呈現國家淨零永續目標貢獻之建議：立即可行建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所。
協辦機構：智慧建築標章評定機構、社團法人臺灣智慧建築協會。
依據全球永續發展趨勢與ESG評估框架之演進，建議在既有建築智慧建築標章評估手冊中系統性納入AIoT技術應用對不同利害關係人ESG表現之對應關係，以強化智慧建築與ESG之關聯性並提升標章制度之國際競爭力。智慧建築標章過去主要聚焦於技術導入與智慧化功能，較少明確闡述這些技術對環境、社會、治理三大面向之實質貢獻，然而在GRESB等國際永續評估體系日益重視實際績效表現之趨勢下，智慧建築標章應明確建立AIoT技術應用與ESG效益之對應機制。建議手冊中針對建設公司應說明AIoT技術如何降低營建階段碳排放並改善勞工安全等社會責任，針對建築物業者應闡明AIoT技術如何支援能源管理、環境監測、使用者健康福祉提升及ESG數據揭露等管理需求，針對居民使用者應強調AIoT技術如何促進永續生活型態並提升生活品質與安全保障，針對保全業者應說明AIoT技術如何提升安全防護效能並貢獻建築物整體治理表現。透過在評估手冊各項指標中明確標註AIoT技術應用對ESG之對應關係，並建立智慧建築標章與企業永續報告之數據對接機制，使取得標章建築物所產生之環境社會效益可直接應用於業主或物業管理公司之ESG報告編製，此舉最終可使智慧建築標章在節能減碳、資源效率提升、社會福祉改善等面向建立量化評估指標，具體呈現智慧建築對國家2050淨零排放路徑與永續發展目標之實質貢獻度。
建議二：
推動臺灣智慧建築標章與國際GRESB認證評估體系接軌之納入，提升不動產ESG競爭力：中長期可行建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所。
協辦機構：財團法人台灣建築中心、中華民國不動產協進會。
依據GRESB全球不動產永續性標準之建築認證評估架構分析，臺灣智慧建築標章具備納入GRESB Performance Component中Building Certifications項目並獲得認可計分之條件。GRESB建築認證評估體系要求認證制度必須滿足五項最低要求包括聚焦不動產與永續性並在資產層級評定、評估流程與標準文件公開且嚴謹、技術發展由治理機構監督、基於技術文件審查或現場評估、由獨立第三方專業人員執行評估，臺灣智慧建築標章制度由內政部建築研究所頒布並透過財團法人台灣建築中心執行評定作業，採用基礎設施、維運管理、安全防災、節能管理、健康舒適及智慧創新等六大評估指標，在治理結構、評估流程及第三方審查機制等方面均符合GRESB基本要求。智慧建築標章之節能管理指標直接對應GRESB之能源效率及溫室氣體排放管理主題，健康舒適指標對應室內環境品質及使用者滿意度主題，智慧創新指標則涉及創新應用與再生能源，特別是2024年版評估手冊因應淨零碳排趨勢提高節能管理指標比重並與建築能效標示對接，此方向與GRESB強調實際績效表現之策略高度契合。建議由內政部建築研究所評估向GRESB提交認證評估申請並準備完整中英文證明文件，強化永續性連結論述包括節能管理與碳排放之關聯性、提供取得標章建築物之實際節能績效數據、結合綠建築、綠建材標章展現整合性永續效益，若成功納入GRESB認可清單將可提升臺灣建築產業在國際ESG評比之能見度並有助於吸引永續投資。
", "英文摘要": "I. Research Background：
Against the backdrop of global challenges such as climate change, energy shortages, and rapid social transformations, the question of how technological solutions can address sustainability has become a pressing issue for governments and enterprises alike. The building sector, which accounts for a significant share of total energy consumption and carbon emissions, is widely recognized as a key domain for achieving net-zero transitions and fulfilling the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). At the same time, as investors and stakeholders increasingly demand corporate accountability, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) has emerged as a benchmark for evaluating both competitiveness and sustainability performance. The effective integration of smart building technologies with ESG indicators is therefore not merely a technical challenge of reducing energy and carbon emissions, but also a managerial issue concerning corporate transparency and fulfilling social responsibility.
Within this context, the convergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT)—commonly referred to as AIoT—has been widely regarded as a critical driver of smart building development. AIoT enables real-time data collection and analysis to optimize energy distribution and system operations, while also exerting influence in the social and governance domains, such as enhancing safety management, improving resident interaction, and generating traceable data reports to meet sustainability disclosure requirements. For Taiwan, this issue is particularly urgent: as a highly urbanized society with heavy reliance on imported energy and facing both international supply chain pressures and global sustainability ratings, exploring how AIoT technologies can be applied to align with ESG indicators in the building sector has become an unavoidable and essential research question.
II. Research Methods：
This study adopts a mixed-methods approach integrating qualitative and quantitative strategies, employing iterative validation between theoretical construction and empirical case studies to ensure the comprehensiveness and applicability of research outcomes. At the theoretical level, this research extensively collects and analyzes both domestic and international literature of smart buildings, Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT), and ESG assessment frameworks. Through this process, a preliminary correspondence model of "AIoT Technology Functions—ESG Indicators" is constructed, serving as the theoretical foundation for subsequent empirical investigations. Regarding case selection, the research specifically focuses on representative smart building certification sites in Taiwan. This selection encompasses diverse building typologies, energy demands, and management models, thereby comprehensively demonstrating the application variations and challenges of AIoT technologies across different contexts.
The research employs multiple methodologies for data collection and analysis. First, through expert interviews, architects, engineering consultants, energy management consultants, and ESG assessment specialists are invited to provide professional insights on AIoT technology implementation and ESG correspondence. Second, a comprehensive collection and analysis of literature related to smart buildings and ESG sustainable governance is conducted, with an emphasis on AIoT technologies that cover energy consumption, indoor environmental quality (including temperature, humidity, carbon dioxide concentration, and PM2.5), and security monitoring aspects. Third, a correspondence matrix is established between AIoT technology functions and the three ESG dimensions, and through data analysis and comparison, the contributions of technological applications to environmental benefits, social value, and governance transparency are examined.
Finally, this study conducts cross-validation based on the collected data, integrating expert perspectives with quantitative data to propose performance assessments and problem categorization, thereby ensuring that research outcomes possess both academic rigor and practical reference value.
III. Important Findings of this Research Project
Through systematic analysis of the correspondence between the 2016 and 2024 versions of Taiwan's Smart Building Label and the GRI ESG framework, this study finds that the Smart Building Label presents a significant "social dimension priority" characteristic across the three ESG dimensions, a feature that persists and strengthens through both version revisions. In the ESG classification of 110 assessment items in the eight basic indicators of the 2016 version, the social dimension (S) has the most items at 55 (45%), followed by the governance dimension (G) with 36 items (29%), and the environmental dimension (E) with 32 items (26%), with an additional 13 items having dual or triple attributes, indicating that the smart building assessment system essentially centers on ensuring user safety, health, and convenient living as its core values. The ESG classification of the 2024 version's six indicator assessment items continues this characteristic, with social dimension items still being the most numerous at 46 (44%), mainly covering safety, health, and convenient living aspects; the environmental dimension has increased to 28 items (29%), concentrated on energy conservation, water resources, and smart building materials; the governance dimension has 24 items (27%), focusing on management systems, information security, and data governance. This analysis reveals three important findings: First, the Smart Building Label maintains the social dimension as the primary assessment focus across version revisions, ensuring building users' life and property safety, physical and mental health and welfare, and digital equity through safety and disaster prevention, health and comfort, and information and communication indicators, a characteristic that differs from the design logic of some international green building labels that emphasize environmental aspects; Second, while maintaining its social dimension advantage, the 2024 version significantly increases the environmental dimension proportion (from 26% to 29%), strengthening energy management and smart material assessment, responding to the national 2050 net-zero emission policy; Third, the governance dimension maintains a stable proportion in both versions (29% in 2016, 27% in 2024), but the 2024 version emphasizes management systems, information security, and data governance more, establishing an information governance foundation for AIoT technology applications. In summary, Taiwan's Smart Building Label demonstrates a unique three-dimensional integrated framework of "social priority, environmental strengthening, and governance support" in ESG correspondence. This characteristic not only reflects our nation's building policy emphasis on user welfare but also provides clear positioning for aligning smart buildings with international ESG assessment frameworks, elevating smart buildings from simple physical spaces to critical infrastructure supporting sustainable social development.
The high degree of complementarity between Taiwan's Smart Building Label and international GRESB standards is another research finding of this study. Through systematic comparative analysis, the research team discovered that Taiwan's Smart Building Label's eight-indicator system, although not originally designed with ESG assessment orientation, has a content structure and assessment items that show significant correspondence with GRESB's ESG assessment framework. In the environmental dimension, the Smart Building Label's energy management indicators cover energy monitoring, energy management systems, equipment efficiency, and demand control items, requirements that are highly consistent with GRESB's energy performance monitoring standards. The digital meters, water meters, and energy management systems required by smart buildings are precisely the data sources needed for GRESB's energy and water resource performance assessments. In the social dimension, the health and comfort indicators' requirements for indoor environmental quality, as well as the safety and disaster prevention indicators' regulations for life and property protection, directly correspond to GRESB's assessment items such as tenant satisfaction, user well-being, and employee health and safety. In the governance dimension, the system integration indicators' emphasis on central monitoring system integration effectiveness, along with the facility management indicators' requirements for organizational management, operations management, and asset management, provide technical and institutional foundations for the governance mechanisms required by GRESB, such as policy procedures, risk management, and reporting disclosure.
IV. Main Recommendations
Through systematic theoretical construction and empirical analysis, this study deeply explores the feasibility and practical framework of applying Artificial Intelligence of Things technologies in smart buildings to correspond with Environmental, Social, and Governance indicators. To expand the subsequent substantial outcomes of this research output, the following recommendations are proposed:
Recommendation 1: Incorporating AIoT technology correspondence with ESG criteria in smart building assessment manuals for existing buildings, with recommendations for quantitatively presenting contributions to national net-zero sustainability goals: Immediately feasible recommendation
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (TAIWAN).
Collaborating Organizations: Taiwan Architecture and Building Center, Taiwan Intelligent Building Association
Based on global sustainable development trends and the evolution of ESG assessment frameworks, it is recommended to systematically incorporate the correspondence between AIoT technology applications and ESG performance for different stakeholders in the existing building Smart Building Label assessment manual, to strengthen the correlation between smart buildings and ESG and enhance the international competitiveness of the certification system. The Smart Building Label has primarily focused on technology adoption and intelligent functions in the past, with less explicit articulation of these technologies' substantive contributions to environmental, social, and governance dimensions. However, with international sustainability assessment systems like GRESB increasingly emphasizing actual performance, the Smart Building Label should clearly establish correspondence mechanisms between AIoT technology applications and ESG benefits. The manual should explain to construction companies how AIoT technologies reduce carbon emissions during construction phases and improve labor safety and other social responsibilities; clarify to building owners how AIoT technologies support energy management, environmental monitoring, user health and well-being enhancement, and ESG data disclosure management needs; emphasize to resident users how AIoT technologies promote sustainable lifestyles and enhance quality of life and safety assurance; and explain to security service providers how AIoT technologies enhance safety protection effectiveness and contribute to overall building governance performance. By clearly marking the correspondence between AIoT technology applications and ESG in each indicator of the assessment manual, and establishing data interfacing mechanisms between Smart Building Labels and corporate sustainability reports, the environmental and social benefits generated by certified buildings can be directly applied to owners' or property management companies' ESG report compilation. This ultimately enables the Smart Building Label to establish quantitative assessment indicators in aspects such as energy conservation and carbon reduction, resource efficiency improvement, and social welfare enhancement, concretely demonstrating smart buildings' substantive contribution to the nation's 2050 net-zero emission pathway and sustainable development goals.
Recommendation 2: Promoting the integration of Taiwan's Smart Building Label with the international GRESB certification assessment system to enhance real estate ESG competitiveness. Medium to long-term feasible recommendation
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (TAIWAN).
Collaborating Organizations: Taiwan Architecture and Building Center, The Real Estate Association of R.O.C.
Based on the analysis of GRESB's global real estate sustainability standard building certification assessment framework, Taiwan's Smart Building Label possesses the conditions to be included in GRESB Performance Component's Building Certifications category and obtain recognition scoring. The GRESB building certification assessment system requires certification schemes to meet five minimum requirements, including: focusing on real estate and sustainability with asset-level certification, open and rigorous assessment processes and standard documentation, technical development supervised by governance institutions, based on technical document review or on-site assessment, and assessment performed by independent third-party professionals. Taiwan's Smart Building Label system is promulgated by the Architecture and Building Research Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and implemented through the Taiwan Architecture & Building Center for certification operations, using six major assessment indicators, including infrastructure, operations management, safety and disaster prevention, energy management, health and comfort, and smart innovation. It meets GRESB's basic requirements in terms of governance structure, assessment processes, and third-party review mechanisms. The Smart Building Label's energy management indicators directly correspond to GRESB's energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emission management themes, health and comfort indicators correspond to indoor environmental quality and user satisfaction themes, and smart innovation indicators relate to innovative applications and renewable energy. Particularly, the 2024 version assessment manual increases the weight of energy management indicators in response to net-zero carbon emission trends and interfaces with building energy efficiency labeling, a direction highly aligned with GRESB's strategy emphasizing actual performance. It is recommended that the Architecture and Building Research Institute evaluate submitting a certification assessment application to GRESB and prepare complete Chinese and English documentation, strengthen sustainability linkage discourse, including the correlation between energy management and carbon emissions, provide actual energy-saving performance data from certified buildings, and integrate green building and green building material labels to demonstrate integrated sustainability benefits. If successfully included in GRESB's recognized list, this would enhance the visibility of Taiwan's construction industry in international ESG ratings and help attract sustainable investments.
", "相關檔案": "人工智慧物聯網科技對應智慧建築環境社會與公司治理指標之研究v.6送印(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340050/e7dae97d-1fc7-4ceb-a357-29eb051f1b04.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336823", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:54:00 GMT", "title": "建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊精進之研究", "計畫主持人": "蔡匡忠", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-08-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "安全防災組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "防火避難、避難安全性能、煙層時間驗證、煙層高度驗證", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
台灣地狹人稠，土地資源之有效利用已成為重要課題之一，建築物逐漸朝向都市集中，為滿足居住與使用需求，建築物已有高層化、集合化、大型化及多元複合化發展之趨勢，傳統規格式法規(Route A)適用時常無法完整評估建築物之火災風險，進而發展出性能式法規。以往利用煙層時間驗證法(B1)評估建築物防火避難安全性能之驗證法以越趨不足，煙層時間驗證法係基於將避難過程拆解為「避難開始時間+步行時間+出口通過時間」三者之和，與火災產生的煙層下降時間(至1.8 m)之比較。而日本於2023年提出新型評估之避難安全性能驗證法-煙層高度驗證法(B2)，此驗證法為當樓層或建築物中所有人員結束避難所需時間經過時，確認該樓層或建築物中發生火災產生之煙或有毒氣體高度不低於對避難有障礙之高度方法，並說明其適用之範圍較廣且評估後之避難安全性能更高。因此本研究將探討日本避難安全驗證法最新發展及更新之處，包含日本告示474號至476號等法令，及探討國內與日本執行上之現況，並利用計算範例分析煙層時間驗證法(B1)及煙層高度驗證法(B2)之差異性。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究將以資料蒐集、手冊內容研討及專家座談諮詢三方式進行彙編與增修工作:
1.資料蒐集
蒐集日本最新版之性能驗證方法(煙層高度驗證法(B2))及相關法規(474號、475號及476號等)，我國防火避難評定機構之討論記錄及問題分析，以提供修訂國內建物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊修訂之參考。
2.手冊內容研討
針對目前「建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊」再次進行研討及勘誤，以提出增修手冊之建議方案，其中建研所相關研究之結果將為主要之研討方向，例如簡易二層驗證法之研究成果，將輻射熱計算納入，讓煙層模擬計算更合理優化。
3.專家座談諮詢
擬定「建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊」修訂版之初步架構與議題後，將彙整各領域專家及建管、消防行政審查人員及業界團體之意見，檢討本研究之課題內容，並邀請實際執行建築設計及防火安全避難驗證之專家擔任本研究之專家諮詢委員。
三、重要發現
一、探討國內現行之煙層時間驗證法(B1)及日本提出之煙層高度驗證法(B2)之差異性，並比較分析兩者針對不同類型同一案件之安全性能評估。:
1.不同驗證法(B1/B2)應用於居室避難驗證法，其於計算上具相當大之差異性，煙層高度驗證法(B2)新增出口滯留時間、煙層上升溫度及煙層下端高度等計算，且於熱釋放率及避難開始時間皆增加不同參數之考量。
2.以往煙層時間驗證法(B1)無法適用於特定場所(醫院、療養院等)，然隨社會發展、老年人口增長，使相關場所增加而提高避難安全驗證之重視。因此日本發展之煙層高度驗證法(B2)可針對特定場所之避難安全驗證及考量消防設備之功用，且精確評估煙氣產生量與避難時間可更貼近實際情況。
3.以高層辦公大樓為例，分別採用B1及B2之驗證計算方式，以B1法驗證可符合安全性能，但採用B2法進行驗證，則因其熱釋放率會隨時間而呈現急遽變化，因標準層辦公室避難完成時間較長，故熱釋放率較高造成煙層下端高度低於1.8 m，進而使得整體的驗證避難安全性能不合格。
4.以托嬰中心為例，可發現B1法於小空間計算居室避難驗證時，容易因煙層下降時間過快造成避難失敗，然B2法可較有彈性之適用於小空間計算。但於整棟避難驗證中B1法可驗證合格，而B2則因其樓梯相鄰居室之煙層上升溫度及煙層下方高度之驗證，使得整棟驗證不合格。
二、研提建築物防火避難安全性能之煙層高度驗證法(B2)草案:
1.煙層高度驗證法(B2)草案包含居室、區劃、樓層及整棟避難安全驗證之公式計算及相關依據，並提出其各別驗證之定義。
2.煙層高度驗證法(B2)擺脫僅以時間差為依據之侷限，改為要求避難完成時，起火居室與鄰接空間的煙層下端高度仍應≥ 1.8 m，且煙層溫度需<180°C。避難時間計算則取「步行時間與出口滯留時間中較長者」，反映出口可能擁擠之真實避難情況。
3.煙層高度驗證法(B2)可提高建築物設計之靈活性(如內裝修材料之使用)，消防設備之運用及火源設計與煙氣產生量皆能更符合實際情況，並提出避難完成時間上限，避免特定空間驗證過程之避難時間無上限，高估其建築物之避難安全性能。
三、探討國內業界團體及建管機關於實務應用及審查評定過程中所產生之疑義，進行探討及改善，彙整國內及日本文獻及專家座談意見之結果，提出「建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊第三版」進行編審與定稿:
1.提出新版建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊之勘誤修正、驗證技術更新、計算範例新增及定義說明與假設參數增列等事宜，並配合內政部建研所最新版煙層簡易二層法，修正納入手冊專節。
2.召開「建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊第三版」手冊編審會議，提出美編排版之格式，提出第三版手冊完整檔。
四、主要建議事項
建議一：
提出第三版建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
本研究依據113年度內政部建築研究所執行行政院國家科學技術發展基金管理會補助計畫之「都市風廊評估與智慧建築材料驗證精進計畫」，針對建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊之研析內容進行手冊新版之研擬。修正建築物防火避難安全驗證手冊之勘誤與詞句文意不通順等，並新增煙層簡易二層驗證法更新章節及高層辦公大樓計算範例，及新增設計單位及評定機構之手冊修訂事項，以更符合我國目前之使用現況。
建議二：
探討日本煙層高度驗證法(B2)於我國之可行性分析：中長程建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署、財團法人台灣建築中心
本研究研析煙層高度驗證法(B2)後，提出B2法較B1法能有效提升各類空間之驗證適用性。而B2法於提升建築物驗證適用性的同時，是否會與Route C所適用之類型有所重疊，若有重疊，應如何評估適用之驗證方法，以及確認該驗證法之合理性及有效性，係有必要深入研究B2法於我國之可行性。
", "英文摘要": "Reasrch bakground
Taiwan is a densely populated country with limited land resources, making the effective utilization of land one of the most critical issues today. As urbanization intensifies, buildings are increasingly developing toward greater height, density, scale, and functional complexity to meet residential and commercial needs. However, traditional prescriptive fire codes (Route A) often fall short in fully assessing the fire risks associated with such complex buildings, which has led to the development of performance-based codes. In the past, the Smoke Layer Time Verification Method (B1) was commonly used to assess the fire safety performance of buildings in terms of evacuation. This method evaluates whether the available safe egress time, calculated as the sum of pre-movement time, walking time, and exit time, is shorter than the time it takes for the smoke layer to descend to 1.8 meters above the floor. However, this approach is increasingly seen as insufficient for modern, complex buildings. In 2023, Japan introduced a new evaluation method for evacuation safety performance: the Smoke Layer Height Verification Method (B2). This method assesses whether, by the time all occupants on a given floor or within a building have completed evacuation, the height of the smoke or toxic gas layer remains above a level that would obstruct safe evacuation. This new method offers broader applicability and is considered to provide a higher level of evacuation safety performance.
Therefore, this study aims to examine the latest developments and updates in Japan’s evacuation safety verification methods, including relevant regulations such as Notifications No. 474 to 476, and to compare current practices between Taiwan and Japan. Furthermore, the study analyzes the differences between the Smoke Layer Time Verification Method (B1) and the Smoke Layer Height Verification Method (B2) through calculation examples.
Research method
This study will be carried out by data collection, factory fire simulation analysis, and expert discussions and consultation methods:
1. Data collection
Relevant information will be gathered on the latest performance-based verification method in Japan—Smoke Layer Height Verification (Method B2)—as well as associated regulations (e.g., Notifications No. 474, 475, and 476). In addition, discussions and issue analyses from Taiwan’s fire protection and evacuation safety evaluation institutions will be collected to serve as a reference for revising the Technical Manual for Performance-Based Verification of Fire and Evacuation Safety in Buildings.
2. Manual Content Review
A thorough review and correction of the current Technical Manual for Performance-Based Verification of Fire and Evacuation Safety in Buildings will be conducted. Based on the review, proposals for revisions and enhancements will be made. The research results from the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI) will serve as a primary basis for discussion—for example, the outcomes from studies on the simplified two-layer verification method, which incorporate radiant heat calculations to optimize smoke simulation models for more reasonable and accurate assessments.
3. Expert discussion and consultation
After drafting the preliminary framework and key topics for the revised edition of the manual, feedback will be solicited from professionals across various fields, including building officials, fire safety reviewers, and industry associations. These opinions will be integrated into a comprehensive review of the study’s content. Furthermore, experts with practical experience in architectural design and performance-based fire and evacuation safety verification will be invited to serve as members of the expert advisory committee for this study.
Major Findings
A, Analysis of Differences Between Taiwan’s Current Smoke Layer Descent Time Verification Method (B1) and Japan’s Proposed Smoke Layer Height Verification Method (B2), with a Comparative Evaluation of Safety Performance Across Different Building Types for the Same Case:
1. The calculation logic of Methods B1 and B2 diverges significantly when applied to residential room evacuation verification. Method B2 introduces new factors such as exit congestion delay, smoke layer rise temperature, and lower smoke layer height, while also incorporating different parameters in determining heat release rate and evacuation start time.
2. The previous Smoke Layer Time Verification Method (B1) is not suitable for specific building types (e.g., hospitals, nursing homes) where occupants may not be able to evacuate quickly. However, due to demographic changes such as population aging, the number of such facilities is increasing. Japan’s Method B2 addresses the evacuation safety needs of these vulnerable occupancies more accurately, taking into account the effectiveness of fire protection systems and providing more precise assessments of smoke generation and evacuation timing in realistic conditions.
3. Using a high-rise office building as an example, comparative calculations with B1 and B2 methods show different outcomes. Under B1, the building passes evacuation safety requirements. However, using B2, due to the rapid change in heat release rate over time and the longer evacuation completion time in typical office floors, the smoke layer lower boundary drops below 1.8 meters, resulting in a failed safety performance assessment.
4. Taking a child-care center as an example, it can be observed that when using Method B1 for evacuation verification in small rooms, evacuation failure is likely to occur due to the rapid descent of the smoke layer. In contrast, Method B2 allows for more flexibility and is more suitable for calculations in small spaces. However, in the verification of evacuation for the entire building, Method B1 is able to meet the requirements, whereas Method B2 fails because the verification of the smoke-layer temperature rise and the smoke-layer height below the adjacent stairwell does not satisfy the criteria.
B. Proposal for a Draft Version of the Smoke Layer Height Verification Method (B2) for Evaluating Fire and Evacuation Safety Performance in Buildings:
1. The proposed B2 method includes formulas and criteria for performance verification at various levels: room, fire compartment, floor, and entire building. Clear definitions are also provided for each verification level.
2. The Smoke Layer Height Verification Method (B2) breaks away from the limitations of relying solely on time-based comparisons. Instead, it requires that at the time evacuation is completed, the lower edge of the smoke layer in both the fire-origin room and adjacent spaces must remain at or above 1.8 meters, and the smoke layer temperature must not exceed 180°C. Evacuation time is calculated based on the longer of walking time or exit congestion delay, better reflecting real-world evacuation scenarios involving potential crowding at exits.
3. Method B2 offers greater flexibility in architectural design, such as allowing for broader use of interior finishing materials, and enables more realistic configurations of fire sources, smoke generation rates, and fire protection equipment. It also introduces a maximum allowable evacuation time, avoiding scenarios where evacuation time is theoretically unlimited—thus preventing an overestimation of evacuation safety performance in certain spaces.
C. Investigation of Practical Issues Faced by Domestic Industry Groups and Building Authorities During Application and Review, with Integration of Expert Opinions and Literature from Taiwan and Japan to Develop the Final Version of the Third Edition of the Technical Manual:
1. Propose revisions, updates to verification techniques, additions to calculation examples, definitions, and assumptions for the new version of the Technical Manual for Verification of Fire Prevention and Escape Safety Performance of Buildings. Also, revise and incorporate the latest version of the Simplified Two-Layer Smoke Layer Method from the Building Research Institute of the Ministry of the Interior into a dedicated section of the manual.
2. Convene the editorial and review meeting for the “Third Edition of the Technical Manual for Performance-Based Verification of Fire Safety and Evacuation in Buildings,” present the proposed layout and design format, and submit the complete file for the third edition of the manual.
Main Recommendation
Recommendation 1:
Proposal for the Third Edition of the Technical Manual for Performance-Based Verification of Fire and Evacuation Safety in Buildings –Medium and long term recommendations
Responsible Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Co-responsible Agency: National Land Management Agency, Ministry of the Interior; Taiwan Architecture & Building Center
This study is conducted in accordance with the 2024 project funded by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) and implemented by the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI), Ministry of the Interior—entitled “Urban Wind Corridor Assessment and Enhancement of Smart Building Material Verification Project.” Based on the research and analysis of the current technical manual for performance-based verification of fire and evacuation safety in buildings, a proposal for the third edition of the manual has been drafted.
Recommendation 2:
Feasibility Analysis on the Application of Japan's Smoke Layer Height Verification Method (B2) in Taiwan: Immediate Implementation Recommendation
Responsible Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Co-responsible Agency: National Land Management Agency
This study, after analyzing the Smoke Layer Height Verification Method (B2), suggests that the B2 method offers broader applicability across various types of spaces compared to the B1 method. While the B2 method enhances the applicability of performance verification for buildings, it is necessary to examine whether its scope overlaps with that of Route C. In case of such overlap, it is essential to evaluate the appropriate verification method to adopt and to confirm the rationality and effectiveness of the selected method. Therefore, an in-depth study on the feasibility of applying the B2 method in Taiwan is considered necessary.
", "相關檔案": "建研所-成果報告(114年)1150119加協辦單位(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336823/f28d38e7-fede-4f12-a856-a70d2f26aca8.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340254", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:40:00 GMT", "title": "建築物導入淨零創新技術應用示範計畫", "計畫主持人": "簡仁德", "協同主持人": "黃瑞隆、洪英彰", "執行單位": "財團法人工業技術研究院", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-01", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "淨零建築、節能減碳、2050淨零排放路徑", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "為因應氣候變遷挑戰，並落實我國2050淨零排放政策，建築部門已成為關鍵推動領域，並由內政部主責推動淨零建築相關政策與行動。依循國際淨零建築發展趨勢，並配合國發會公布之2050淨零排放路徑，我國以提升建築能源效率、導入再生能源及發展近零碳建築技術為核心方向，逐步推動新建與既有建築轉型。本計畫爰依淨零建築轉型發展推動計畫之展示推廣與產業拓展策略，本計畫係依據「淨零建築轉型發展推動計畫」中展示推廣與產業拓展之策略規劃執行，重點工作內容包括系統性彙整國內外淨零建築創新技術與應用案例，編撰具實務參考價值之淨零建築創新解決方案與案例指引；同時以公有既有建築為示範對象，導入創能、儲能、控能等淨零創新技術，進行實證示範與成效驗證，建立可複製之技術應用模式。此外，透過輔導民間既有建築進行能源診斷、設備改善及建築能效提升，協助其逐步邁向近零碳建築，並累積實務經驗作為政策推廣與產業發展之參考。本計畫期能建構可複製、可推廣之應用模式，作為未來新建及既有建築邁向近零碳及淨零建築之重要參考，逐步推動我國建築產業朝向淨零轉型與永續發展。
一、計畫緣起
為因應氣候變遷，及響應全球淨零行動，行政院於110年1月成立「淨零排放路徑專案工作組」，責成各部會針對工業、能源、交通運輸、農業、環境及建築等部門規劃淨零路徑藍圖，內政部主責「淨零建築」路徑規劃及推動。我國淨零建築轉型路徑的規劃是參考日本、美國、歐盟及國際能源總署等國際發展概念，先建築節能50%，其餘用電再以綠電碳中和至零碳排，至2050年達成100%新建建築物及超過85%建築物為近零碳建築，其路徑規劃已整合涵蓋於2022年3月28日國發會發布的2050淨零路淨規劃。同時，內政部建築研究所2022年版「綠建築評估手冊－建築能效評估系統」也在中華民國111年1月1日起實施，在推動多年的綠建築標章基礎上，建立建築能效評估及標示制度，發展近零碳建築技術，提升建築能源使用效率，在在顯示政府推動淨零排放的決心。淨零建築之推動規劃由公有建築物帶頭做起，引導民間建築跟進，針對新建建築先採取鼓勵方式，再逐步修訂法規強制實施；至既有建築因數量龐大牽涉民眾權益，因此對於民間既有建築採鼓勵之獎補助方式為主，公有既有建築則採強制實施；同時研擬強化家電節能措施，並投入建築節能減碳技術及再生能源等之研發與應用工作，透過淨零建築四大推動主軸：一、提高新建建築物能源效率；二、改善既有建築物能源效率；三、提升家電、設備能源效率；四、建築節能減碳新技術及工法研發與推廣應用，據以推動淨零建築發展，並獲行政院核定通過據以執行。
內政部建築研究所為推廣落實淨零建築概念及節能減碳技術，除持續落實政策推動外，同時促進產業技術發展交流，協助產業技術轉型升級，達成進一步拓展淨零建築產業邁向國際化發展之目標，因此依據淨零建築轉型發展推動計畫四大主軸項下七大推動策略中之（7）展示推廣與拓展產業國際化推動策略項下工作項目，規劃辦理編撰建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引、辦理公有既有建築（建研所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用場域實證示範，以及辦理民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用場域實證示範等相關工作事項。由公有建築帶頭做起，引領民間建築跟進方式，期望透過相關近零碳及淨零建築創新技術與應用手法及高效率建築設備之建置，延續在材料實驗中心進行規劃評估並建置導入方案，而所規劃導入之相關創新技術與應用手法及高效率建築設備，將可作為未來新建建築或既有建築邁向淨零轉型之參考，以逐步推動建築產業邁向淨零建築發展。因此，本計畫辦理目的有二，一為彙整112~113及本（114）年蒐集的國內外淨零建築創新技術應用解決方案及達成淨零建築目標案例資料，編撰建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引，以供各界參考。其二，期望透過以公有建築帶頭，引領民間建築跟進方式，導入淨零創新及零碳再生能源技術，協助建築物轉型成為近零碳建築甚至成為淨零建築，相關成果將作為未來公有及民間新建建築或既有建築邁向淨零轉型之參考以進一步促進近零碳建築朝淨零建築邁進，作為未來新建建築或既有建築邁向淨零轉型之參考，以逐步推動建築產業邁向淨零建築發展。
二、執行方法及過程
本年度「建築物導入淨零創新技術應用示範計畫」業務委託之專業服務案，共可區分為【編撰建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引】、【辦理公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用實證示範】與【辦理輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用以提升改善能源效率】三個分項計畫執行，其方法與內容如下：
(一) 分項一、編撰建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引
1.持續蒐集國內外淨零建築創新技術應用解決方案，並系統性分類彙整歸納提出各類創新關鍵技術。
2.完成今年度國內外淨零建築創新技術應用解決方案總體需研究20項創新技術與10項國內外淨零創新技術應用案例研析，提出本（114）年度彙整歸納國內外淨零建築創新技術應用解決方案與案例研析報告1份。
3.完成近三年(112~113及本（114）年)所蒐集之 42 項淨零建築創新技術與 31 個示範案例之彙整，完成《建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引》（草案）1份，以供各界參考。
(二) 分項二、辦理公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用實證示範
1.於112~113年導入建置高效率空調及照明設備、屋頂型高效率太陽光電發電（PV）模組、儲能系統、建築能源管理系統及彩繪太陽能板等技術之基礎，同時考量以建築物安全為前提，強化建築物自主發電以平衡能源消耗及產出前提下，提出本（114）年度導入淨零創新技術應用項目內容規劃，並於建置前送內政部建築研究所核備，內容可包含以下項目：
(1)提升建築能源效率之節能技術項目，如導入創新隔熱材料、燃料電池、能源管理系統可視化及監控內容擴充等技術項目。
(2)強化建築自主發電之零碳再生能源技術項目，如導入不同材料類型之高效率太陽光電發電（PV）模組、建築整合型太陽能光電（BIPV或BAPV）、或風力發電等技術項目。
2.進行本（114）年度導入淨零創新技術應用建置：
(1)完成公有既有建築物（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心辦公棟）淨零建築創新示範場域改善項目規劃報告書之各項工程規劃及經費編列。
(2)建置完成項目需符合前揭規劃並編列建置項目清單。
(3)完成建置後需依建置項目清單內容逐項確認功能是否正常運作，並提出公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）淨零創新技術應用場域實證示範之建置報告1份，內容包含建置之項目、內容及最終經費等。
3.於114年12月24日辦理公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用場域實證示範宣導推廣活動1場次。
(三) 分項三、辦理輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用以提升改善能源效率
1.以「第一銀行太平分行」為輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用提升改善能源效率之實證示範場域至少1處，並進行該場域現況調查與診斷。
2.完成民間既有建築「第一銀行太平分行」之空調能效計算，並提供改善建議與經費規劃書。
3.已完成空調設備更新工程及改善後空調設備Tab及Cx性能量測、完工後長期量測及能效報告書撰寫。
4.輔導民間既有建築完成導入淨零創新應用技術改善建置之建築能效申請案已通過綠建築E-BERS標章審查，證書核發中。
三、重要發現
本年度「建築物導入淨零創新技術應用示範計畫」業務委託之專業服務案完成下表所有工作事項，並提出幾點具體發現與建議。
工作項目 | 編號 | 工作子項 | 工作內容 | 實際執行狀況 |
| 分項一：編撰建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引 | （一） | 持續蒐集國內外淨零建築創新技術應用解決方案，並系統性分類彙整歸納提出各類創新關鍵技術。 | 提出本（114）年度彙整歸納國內外淨零建築創新技術應用解決方案與案例研析報告1份。 | 完成今年度國內外淨零建築創新技術應用解決方案總體需研究20項創新技術與10項國內外淨零創新技術應用案例研析。 |
（二） | 持續蒐集國內外運用創新技術達成淨零建築目標案例，並進行案例研析 | |||
| （三） | 彙整112~113及本（114）年蒐集資料，編撰含括國內外建築物之淨零創新解決方案與案例內容之指引（草案） | 提出包含112~113及本（114）年蒐集資料之建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引（草案）1份。 | 完成《建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引》（草案）1份。 | |
分項二：辦理公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用實證示範 | （一） | 公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用實證示範 | 完成提出公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）淨零創新技術應用場域實證示範之建置報告1份，內容至少應包含建置之項目、內容及最終經費等 | 已完成114年度公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用實證示範修正更新建置規劃報告書核備。 |
| （二） | 辦理公有既有建築（內政部建研所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用場域實證示範宣導推廣活動 | 完成辦理公有既有建築（內政部建研所材料實驗中心）淨零創新技術應用實證示範場域宣導推廣活動1場次。 | 於114年12月24日辦理完成，共64人次參與。 | |
| 分項三：辦理輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用以提升改善能源效率 | （一） | 辦理輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用以提升改善能源效率 | 完成提出本（114）年度輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新術應用場域至少1處之改善項目規劃與建置報告1份，內容至少應包含改善建置之項目、內容及最終經費等。 完成輔導民間既有建築完成導入淨零創新應用技術改善建置至少1處，並協助申請或取得至少達到1級之建築能效標示或候選建築能效證書。 | 完成民間既有建築「第一銀行太平分行」之空調能效計算，並提供改善建議與經費規劃書。 輔導民間既有建築完成導入淨零創新應用技術改善建置之建築能效申請案已通過已協助申請綠建築E-BERS標章，證書核發中。 |
1.編撰建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引
本年度計畫以技術盤點、案例蒐集與指引編纂為核心，系統性建構我國淨零建築創新技術之應用框架；完成節能、創能、儲能、控能及低碳材料等 20 項技術盤點，多數已達 IEA技術成熟度界在6–10的範圍；同時蒐集 10 件熱帶與亞熱帶近（淨）零建築案例，歸納高溫高濕與高密度城市之關鍵設計與能源整合策略，並完成《建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引（草案）》架構，彙整30項技術與20項案例，作為我國邁向 2030 與 2050 淨零目標之實務與政策參考基礎。
1.以 AI 與自動化系統整合關鍵技術：
在高溫高濕的亞熱帶氣候條件下，淨零建築的核心挑戰不僅在於單一設備效率，而在於整體系統的協同最佳化。研究顯示，AI、AIoT 與能源管理系統之整合，已成為近（淨）零建築的重要趨勢。透過即時感測資料、負載預測與自適應控制，可有效提升空調、照明、通風、儲能與再生能源之協同運作效率，並結合被動式設計優先原則，精準降低冷房與除濕需求，使建築在動態環境中維持高效與低碳運作。
2.標準化說明支援淨零建築轉型：
本手冊透過系統性彙整創新技術與國際實證案例，建立標準化的技術與案例架構，為政策制定、設計實務、產業投資與金融評估提供共同語言。未來可進一步透過產學合作、實證基地與綠色金融機制，將手冊內容轉化為選型工具、評估指引與政策依據，促進技術擴散、降低導入風險，並支撐我國建築部門邁向長期淨零與永續發展目標。
2.辦理公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用實證示範
(1)延續前期計畫成果，本年度持續規劃導入再生能源設施及儲能設施，包括：垂直型立面太陽能板、垂直軸風力發電系統及鈣鈦礦創能電池；在加強建築能源調節與自用方面，建議增設室外儲能設備與燃料電池。同時強化能源管理系統的數據蒐集與控制功能，以達到智慧管理。
(2)於114年12月24日完成辦理公有既有建築（內政部建研所材料實驗中心）淨零創新技術應用實證示範場域宣導推廣活動，共64人次參與。
3.辦理輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用以提升改善能源效率
(1)目標輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用提升改善能源效率之實證示範場域至少1處，並進行該場域現況調查與診斷。已完成民間既有建築「第一銀行太平分行」之空調能效計算，並提供改善建議與經費規劃書。
(2)輔導民間既有建築完成導入淨零創新應用技術改善建置之建築能效申請案已通過已協助申請綠建築E-BERS標章，證書核發中。
四、主要建議事項
建議一：編撰建築物淨零創新解決方案與案例指引
主辦機關： 內政部國土管理署、內政部建築研究所
執行機關： 無
近程：系統性盤點高減碳潛力之淨零建築關鍵技術，並依技術成熟度與適用情境建立分級導入清單；同步優化建築能效標示、EEWH、智慧建築與綠建材標章等制度之評估指標，以提升創新技術導入誘因。
中程：在示範成果與實證數據基礎上，由政府主導建置跨域淨零建築示範場域，導入 AIoT、能源管理系統與高效外殼、空調、再生能源與儲能技術，並建立標準化績效量測與資料蒐集機制，作為市場採納與政策設計之基礎，逐步導入誘導性與規範性政策工具並行之推動機制，促進新建與既有建築同步納入淨零轉型路徑。
長程：配合 2050 淨零排放目標，逐步將建築淨零性能要求納入國家法規、公共工程規範與政府採購制度，形成具強制力之市場驅動機制；同時促進建築與能源系統深度整合，透過持續更新之技術指引、示範基地網絡與綠色金融支持，建構具在地韌性、智慧化與低碳化特質的建築淨零生態系，作為我國邁向永續城市與淨零社會之關鍵支柱。
建議二：辦理公有既有建築（內政部建築研究所材料實驗中心）導入淨零創新技術應用實證示範
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
執行機關：內政部國土管理署、經濟部能源署、地方政府建管及工務單位
近程：短期建議以既有公有近零碳建築為核心示範場域，持續推動再生能源與高效率設備之實地導入與驗證，作為由近零碳邁向淨零建築之關鍵實踐。政策重點應聚焦於提升建築自主發電能力，擴大再生能源設施配置比例，同時增設儲能設備及燃料電池等能源調節與自用系統，以提升用電調度彈性與能源韌性。並同步強化建築能源管理系統之數據蒐集、監控與控制功能，透過即時監測與分析，確保節能與創能措施之實際效益，建立具體且可量化之淨零成果，作為後續政策推動與技術應用之基礎。
中程：中期建議以公有建築示範成果為基礎，系統性彙整再生能源、儲能設備、燃料電池及智慧能源管理之整合經驗，建立適用於不同類型公有既有建築之淨零轉型技術操作模式。透過標準化技術指引、設計原則與管理流程，降低後續公有建築導入門檻，並逐步擴大示範範圍。同時，建議將示範場域之實證數據與成效分析，作為政策規劃、補助機制及法規研修之參考依據，強化政策工具與技術應用之連結，提升整體推動效率。
長程：長期政策建議以公有建築成功示範為引領，逐步擴散至民間既有建築，透過鼓勵措施與制度誘因，促進民間建築導入再生能源、儲能及智慧能源管理系統，推動由近零碳建築邁向淨零建築之轉型。政策上可著重於建立長期能源數據應用與管理機制，透過累積實證案例與運轉數據，逐步形成具市場可行性的淨零建築發展模式，加速我國建築部門邁向2050淨零排放目標。
建議三：辦理輔導民間既有建築導入淨零創新技術應用以提升改善能源效率
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
執行機關： 地方政府建管處及環保局、相關產業公協會等
近程：建議由內政部建築研究所整合既有資源，建立以既有建築為對象之淨零與節能技術媒合與輔導機制，彙整國內成熟可行之能源管理、設備改善與智慧化解決方案，提供建築所有權人、管理單位及產業界進行媒合與交流。同時可透過辦理說明會、工作坊及產業交流活動，協助中小型技術服務業者與大型系統整合商或能源服務業者建立合作關係，並選定具代表性的公有或民間既有建築進行示範輔導，累積實務經驗，形成可供參考與複製的案例基礎。
中程：建議透過補助計畫或評選機制，發展涵蓋規劃、設計、建置與後續維運的一站式整合服務，以提升既有建築導入智慧與節能技術之完整性與可行性。並可彙整前期示範成果，研擬適用於不同建築類型之既有建築節能與智慧化改造指引，提供地方政府及民間於推動相關計畫或審查案件時參考，同時評估將改造成效納入既有建築整建維護、都市更新或相關補助計畫之政策誘因機制，強化實際推動效果。
長程：建議持續引導相關產業由傳統一次性設備銷售模式，逐步轉型為結合能源管理、效能保證與系統維運之服務型或訂閱式商業模式，以降低建築端初期投資負擔，並確保長期節能效益。透過建築能源與設備運轉數據的蒐集與應用，不僅可作為政府政策成效評估與制度改善之依據，也有助於業者持續改善服務品質，加速我國既有建築邁向淨零轉型。
", "英文摘要": "To address the challenges of climate change and advance Taiwan’s 2050 Net-Zero Emissions Policy, the building sector has been identified as a key area for action, with the Ministry of the Interior designated as the lead authority for net-zero building policies. In line with international developments, Taiwan is progressively transforming both new and existing buildings by focusing on improved energy efficiency, the integration of renewable energy, and the development of near-zero carbon building technologies.
This project is implemented under the framework of the Net-Zero Building Transition and Development Promotion Program, specifically its strategies for demonstration, promotion, and industrial development. Key activities include the systematic collection and analysis of innovative net-zero building technologies and application cases from both domestic and international sources, as well as the preparation of practical guidelines on net-zero innovation solutions and case studies. At the same time, existing public buildings are used as demonstration sites to implement innovative net-zero technologies—such as on-site energy generation, energy storage, and energy management systems—through real-world application and performance validation, thereby establishing replicable and transferable implementation models.
In addition, the project supports existing private-sector buildings through energy assessments, equipment upgrades, and improvements in building energy performance, assisting them in gradually progressing toward near-zero carbon buildings. By consolidating practical implementation experience from both public and private sectors, the project aims to develop scalable and replicable application models that can serve as key references for the future transition of new and existing buildings toward near-zero and net-zero performance, ultimately supporting the building sector’s long-term net-zero transition and sustainable development in Taiwan.
本年度計畫執行期間為114年7月2日至115年1月31日止，本年度計畫進度與目標皆依計畫進度進行，各分項推動細項內容與成果進度概述如下：
分項一：住的淨零綠生活推廣
(一) 編訂住的淨零綠生活宣導手冊一冊
已完成手冊章節內容規劃及手冊版面，以「淨零設計」、「省電行動」、「能源管理」為三大主題，從建築物設備硬體面到軟體面的使用維護，再以能源管理的介紹統整軟硬體的整合，內容裡也針對各項主題延伸不同子議題提供民眾日常生活使用時可參考之實用知識。
(二) 製作住的淨零綠生活宣導摺頁
已完成宣導摺頁內容規劃及摺頁美編版面，以「建築節能設計-打造淨零住宅」與「日常節能手法-省電生活指南」為出發點，以利大眾快速瞭解國家政策規劃方向與可被落實於日常生活中之節能方法。
(三) 製作淨零綠生活5分鐘宣導動畫影片4部
影片動畫主題分為四篇章(認識淨零綠生活、打造淨零住宅、省電生活指南與生活節能管家)，已完成4部影片動畫製作，將「住的淨零綠生活」宣導手冊章節重點濃縮製作成5分鐘影片，增加建築節能知識的趣味性外，也更生動的向民眾傳達綠生活的生活態度。
(四) 辦理6場次宣導推廣講習活動
已完成辦理6場次宣導推廣講習活動，以「住的淨零綠生活」為主軸，對應政策推廣及宣導教育，並聚焦於社會溝通與知識傳達，為住宅部門於政策推動、產業轉型及行為改變同步前進。
(五) 辦理3場次老宅整建維護技術交流論壇
已完成老宅整建維護技術交流論壇之執行方法及議程安排，於12月15日、19日、29日完成辦理，讓民眾更了解及願意使用低碳材料進行整建維護或裝修，以助於整建維護及近零碳建築之擴散效益。
(六) 辦理「住的淨零綠生活」參訪活動6場次
已完成辦理參訪活動6場次。透過綠建築、智慧建築、綠能等案例進行參訪活動規劃，以提升民眾對於綠建築、智慧建築等建築節能設計手法與概念的體驗和宣導為主，進影響民眾對生活環境改變和自身改變之目的。
(七) 指派1名專職計畫執行人員進駐建築研究所協助辦理本計畫業務相關事宜
已於114年7月2日完成派駐人員張雅雲工作契約之簽訂，並於同日契約核定通過10天內檢送中建智字第1141261167號及「住的淨零綠生活推廣應用計畫」業務委託之專業服務案派駐人員張雅雲勞動契約影本一式一份於貴所，且於114年9月2日建研環字第1147620640號同意備查。
分項二：探討建築淨(近)零化之願付價格(WTP)架構與因子
(一) 分析影響建築淨(近)零化的支付意願(WTP)框架和關鍵因素
透過文獻分析、國內與跨國專家研討、問卷調查分析，評估民眾為提高能源效率、減少建築能耗而有意願之經濟投入，並找出影響他們決定的主要因素；並進一步透過案例與觀念之分享交流與推廣擴大本案相關成果之效益。
(二) 收集關於建築淨(近)零化的能源效率的民眾支付意願
深入瞭解一般民眾對於建築淨零化技術的接受程度，以及對相關能源效率提升方案的支付意願。透過數據分析並依據不同的問卷訪問方式，有助於建構更完善的近零碳建築發展藍圖，並讓未來的策略不僅以標準化方式可實現淨零環保價值，更能真正滿足市場需求與民眾期待。現已製備問卷初稿，調查進行中，問卷調查人數以達91人。
(三) 舉辦2場次專家座談會
已於12月26日及114年1月2日完成辦理兩場次專家座談會，邀請相關產學界之代表討論關於今年度執行情況及明年度執行建議。
(四) 舉辦1場次國際論壇
已於11月7日完成辦理國際論壇。論壇辦理旨在回應全球淨零碳排趨勢，透過亞洲各國近零碳建築與綠生活的經驗交流，吸取不同法規、技術與市場應用的最佳實踐，找出最適合台灣發展的策略。同時，藉由建構產官學界合作橋樑，提升政策可行性與落實度，並透過案例分享與跨國合作推動區域知識共享。論壇成果將數位化公開，擴大社會參與與認知，提升永續建築理念影響力，進一步促進政策落地，加速台灣邁向淨零轉型。
(五) 舉辦1場圓桌會議
已於11月7日完成辦理圓桌會議，以問卷調查數據為基礎，聚焦「民眾對近零碳建築政策的接受度與理解度」，深入探討影響因素、政策工具修正方向及跨部門協作策略，涵蓋國際專家、國內學者、政策制定者、研究團隊及產業代表，透過對話凝聚共識，優化政策推動與社會接受度。
(六) 編訂國際論壇成果專輯1冊
已完成國際論壇成果專輯及成果影片，內容包含完整紀錄論壇之主題演講、討論內容、彙整政策建議、技術案例與國際經驗。
", "英文摘要": "The implementation period of this year’s project is from July 2, 2025 to January 31, 2026. All project objectives and progress have proceeded according to schedule. The sub-project tasks and end-of-year progress are summarized as follows.
Sub-project I: Promotion of Net-Zero Green Living
(I)Compilation of the “Net-Zero Green Living” Outreach Handbook
The handbook’s content structure and layout design have been com-pleted. Organized into three main themes—Net-Zero Design, Energy-Saving Behaviors, and Energy Management—the handbook introduces hardware (building systems and equipment) and software (operation and maintenance practices), followed by integrated energy management guid-ance. Each theme includes subtopics that provide practical knowledge for everyday use by the public.
(II)Production of the “Net-Zero Green Living” Outreach Brochure
The brochure’s content planning and layout design have been com-pleted. It highlights two main concepts: “Energy-Efficient Building De-sign—Creating a Net-Zero Home” and “Everyday Energy-Saving Tips—A Guide to Power Savings,” enabling the public to quickly understand na-tional policy directions and practical energy-saving strategies applicable to daily life.
(III)Production of Four 5-Minute Promotional Animation Videos
Four five-minute animated videos have been completed, summarizing key content from the Net-Zero Green Living Handbook and presenting en-ergy-saving concepts in an engaging and accessible way.
(IV)Organizing Six Outreach Workshops
Five of the six outreach workshops have been completed, with the fi-nal session scheduled for December 24. The workshops focus on the theme of “Net-Zero Green Living,” aligning with national policy dissemination and public education. The activities emphasize social communication and knowledge transfer to support policy advancement, industry transfor-mation, and behavioral change in the residential sector.
(V)Organizing Three Old House Renovation Technology Exchange Forums
The implementation plan and agendas for three forums have been fi-nalized, with events scheduled on December 15, 19, and 29. These forums aim to help the public better understand and adopt low-carbon materials for renovation and maintenance, thereby promoting the diffusion of both tradi-tional building upkeep and near-zero carbon building concepts.
(VI)Organizing Six “Net-Zero Green Living” Site Visits
。Execution plans and agendas for all six site visits have been com-pleted. Two visits have already been held, and the remaining four will take place on the morning and afternoon of December 5 and 17. These visits feature green building, smart building, and renewable energy cases to help the public experience energy-efficient building design and understand how such approaches can improve their living environment and everyday life.
(VII)Deployment of One Full-Time On-site Project Staff Member at the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI)
The employment contract for staff member Ms. Chang Ya-Yun was signed on July 2, 2025. Within ten days, all required documents—including the contract copy and official submission (Document No. 1141261167)—were delivered to ABRI. ABRI formally acknowledged and approved the assignment on September 2, 2025 (Document No. 1147620640).
Sub-project II: Exploring the Framework and Factors for Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Net-Zero Buildings
(I)Analysis of Framework and Key Factors Influencing WTP for Net-Zero Buildings
Through literature review, domestic and international expert discus-sions, and survey analysis, the project assessed the public’s willingness to invest economically in improving building energy efficiency and reduc-ing energy consumption. Key influencing factors were identified, and findings are being disseminated through case sharing and conceptual out-reach.
(II)Collection of Public WTP Data for Net-Zero Building and Energy-Efficiency Measures
The project examines public acceptance of net-zero building technolo-gies and their willingness to pay for energy-efficiency improvements. On-going data collection—including multiple survey formats—supports the development of a more comprehensive roadmap for near-zero carbon build-ings that responds to both environmental goals and market expectations. A preliminary survey draft has been developed, and data collection is in pro-gress, with 91 respondents reached to date.
(III)Organization of Two Expert Seminars
Initial plans and agendas for the expert seminars have been prepared. Using survey data on public willingness to pay, the seminars aim to explore how findings can be translated into actionable policy measures that balance consumer needs and industry development. Meeting minutes and consoli-dated feedback will be completed by late December 2025.
(IV)Organization of One International Forum
The international forum was successfully held on November 7. It ad-dressed the global trend toward net-zero emissions by facilitating knowledge exchange on near-zero carbon buildings and green living across Asian countries. The forum reviewed best practices in regulations, technologies, and market mechanisms to identify strategies most suitable for Taiwan. By strengthening cross-sector collaboration among industry, government, and academia, the forum enhanced policy feasibility and im-plementation, promoted regional knowledge sharing, and supported Tai-wan’s acceleration toward net-zero transformation. Forum outcomes will be digitally published to expand public engagement and awareness.
(V)Organization of One Roundtable Meeting
The roundtable meeting was held on November 7. Based on survey data, it focused on public understanding and acceptance of near-zero car-bon building policies. Discussions explored influencing factors, policy tool adjustments, and strategies for cross-agency collaboration. Partici-pants included international experts, domestic scholars, policymakers, re-search teams, and industry representatives. The dialogue helped strengthen consensus and optimize policy implementation and societal acceptance.
(VI)Compilation of One International Forum Proceedings
The proceedings compile keynote speeches, roundtable discussions, policy recommendations, technical case studies, and international insights. The initial layout design and structure of the corresponding digital video content have been completed. Content refinement and design enhance-ments are ongoing, with final completion expected by mid-January.
", "相關檔案": "114住的淨零綠生活推廣應用計畫_成果報告書(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340366/f1ba095d-f00b-4015-9eac-5cc534aaeb67.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340251", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:32:00 GMT", "title": "淨零建築智慧化暨產業溝通轉型升級計畫", "計畫主持人": "孟義超", "協同主持人": "許恆壽、蕭輔民", "執行單位": "社團法人台灣智慧淨零建築產業聯盟", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "智慧建築、淨零建築、既有建築、2050淨零排放路徑、建築能效", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "本計畫目的在因應全球節能減碳趨勢，推動智慧淨零建築的發展，協助台灣達成 2050年淨零碳排目標。透過蒐集國內產業園區及相關產業的需求與建言，研擬推動策略，並辦理智慧淨零建築推廣、示範、參訪及論壇等活動，促進政策與法規的制定與完善、資金與金融支持、技術創新與應用以及跨產業合作平台的建立。期望藉此提升智慧淨零建築的普及與應用，實現節能減碳與永續轉型，並為後續政策及措施的制定提供產業建言。
計畫團隊成員由產業經驗豐富並熟悉建築研究相關策略之人員共同組成，成員具有產業交流、研討推廣活動以及彙整產業建言與推動策略之豐富經驗，因此本年度參與本服務案之工作相關內容，以「蒐集國內相關產業園區推動淨零建築之產業需求」、「辦理建築能效評估場域實證」、「輔導既有建築能效改善示範點」、「辦理我國智慧淨零建築相關推廣及參訪活動」、「彙整推動智慧淨零建築產業發展具體建議」等五大工作項目為主軸，達到本計畫推廣淨零建築概念及節能減碳技術，促進建築相關產業交流並兼顧產業發展之目的，落實推展本年度業務委託專案所託付之各項工作。說明如下：
一、蒐集國內相關產業園區推動淨零建築之產業需求
為瞭解國內相關產業園區在推動淨零建築方面的需求與挑戰，計畫團隊已於8月12日、9月15日、10月21日，分別舉辦三場跨領域產業交流座談會。座談會邀請到內政部官員、智慧淨零建築業者、跨領域產業相關公協會代表參與。座談會中，與會者針對工業區廠辦建築、租賃住宅與公寓大廈社區建築、旅館建築及營造業等類型之智慧淨零策略進行深入探討，並蒐集了不同產業間的看法與建議，以供後續政策研擬及推動參考。此外也在10月3日、11月5日、12月10日完成三場產業園區淨零建築智慧創新技術應用論壇，希望透過論壇來進行經驗分享與綜合座談，促進產業間的知識及技術交流。此外為鼓勵國內外淨零建築領域之交流，本計畫亦於11月19日舉辦智慧淨零建築國際交流研討會，邀請亞洲國家智慧淨零建築領域的專家學者來台交流，分享各國政策規劃與實務案例，強化我國在智慧淨零建築發展上的國際連結與合作。
二、辦理建築能效評估場域實證
本計畫依據建築研究所最新公布的RU-BERS 既有住宅能效評估系統，於選定場域進行實證操作。場域實證鎖定住宅類建築，於北、中、南各選取一案住宅建築（可為公寓或透天），作為實測案例。參與者將依建築能效評估平台草案操作流程，輸入基本資料與建築物外殼、空調、照明、爐台、熱水器等五項耗能因子之資訊，計算後產出總減碳率TCRR及初判之能效等級。此實證不僅驗證RU-BERS在實務應用上的可行性與準確性，也提供制度持續優化與推廣的重要依據。
三、輔導既有建築能效改善示範點
本計畫同時推動產業園區廠辦及公寓大廈社區的能效改善示範，預計兩類各輔導5件案例，共10件案例。輔導團隊協助進行全面能效診斷，針對能源使用效率低落的問題提出具體改善方案，包括建材優化、照明與空調設備更新、隔熱結構改造、導入再生能源與能源系統升級等。透過這些具代表性的示範案例，建立可供其他廠房與社區借鏡的節能改造模式，提升既有建築整體能效表現，並形成具標竿效益的推廣經驗。
四、辦理我國智慧淨零建築相關推廣及參訪活動
計畫團隊規劃兩場智慧節能減碳創新技術宣導推廣活動，旨在提高跨產業對智慧淨零建築的認識與接受度，激發參與熱情。其中第一場已於9月3日辦理完畢、第二場則在11月28日辦理完畢。推廣活動邀請專家學者介紹相關創新技術，並透過實際案例導入規劃設計，強化智慧淨零建築節能減碳技術的應用及推廣。此外，計畫團隊也規劃二場智慧淨零建築標竿案例觀摩示範參訪活動，選擇具有代表性和先進性的智慧淨零建築案例，讓參與者更直觀地感受創新科技的影響，促進產業間的知識交流，第一場參訪已於11月20日完成，第二場則在12月23日舉辦。在此項目內，計畫團隊也製作智慧淨零建築及建築能效評估推廣說明資料1000份，以及製作智慧淨零建築與建築能效評估推廣成果影片(活動紀錄成果影片)2支。
五、彙整推動智慧淨零建築產業發展具體建議
本計畫綜整前述產業座談、技術論壇、國際研討會、場域實證與示範輔導等成果，系統化梳理目前智慧淨零建築與建築能效制度在推動端、使用端與市場端所面臨之共通課題，並歸納產官學研及公協會之建言，提出分短期（1 年）、中期（2–3 年）與長期（3–5 年）三階段推動建議。建議內容包括：強化制度操作指引與推廣工具、提升建築能效評估與查核量能、建置全國能效資料庫並推動跨部會政策連結，及研議地價稅減免、所得稅節能扣除額等誘因機制，以擴大民眾申請意願；並於長期導入 AI 智慧化查核、一站式服務平台與住宅性能資訊揭露，促使能效評等與實價登錄、金融評估及市場交易形成連動，作為政府後續推動智慧淨零建築與調整相關法規及配套措施之重要參考。
", "英文摘要": "This project aims to advance the development of smart net-zero buildings in response to global trends in energy conservation and carbon reduction, thereby supporting Taiwan’s 2050 Net-Zero Emissions goal. Through the collection of needs and recommendations from domestic industrial parks and related sectors, the project formulates promotion strategies and organizes a series of activities—including outreach events, demonstration programs, technical visits, and professional forums—to foster policy and regulatory refinement, financial and investment support, technological innovation, and cross-sectoral collaboration. These efforts seek to accelerate the adoption of smart net-zero buildings, facilitate energy-saving and carbon-reduction practices, and provide valuable industry input for future policymaking.
The project team comprises professionals with extensive experience in industry engagement, architectural research, technical promotion, and strategic development. Accordingly, this year’s work focuses on five key components: (1) collecting industry needs for promoting net-zero buildings in domestic industrial parks; (2) conducting field validation of the RU-BERS residential energy performance assessment; (3) providing guidance for energy-efficiency improvement demonstration sites in existing buildings; (4) organizing national promotional events and benchmarking visits on smart net-zero buildings; and (5) compiling concrete recommendations for advancing Taiwan’s smart net-zero building ecosystem. These actions collectively support the project’s goals of enhancing public understanding of net-zero building concepts, promoting energy-saving technologies, strengthening industry exchange, and contributing to sustainable development.
1. Industry Needs Assessment for Net-Zero Buildings in Industrial Parks
To better understand the challenges faced by industrial parks in transitioning to net-zero buildings, three cross-sectoral stakeholder roundtables were held on August 12, September 15, and October 21. Participants—including officials from the Ministry of the Interior, smart net-zero building solution providers, and representatives from industry associations—discussed strategies for factory buildings, rental housing, condominium communities, hotels, and construction sectors. Additionally, three “Net-Zero Building Innovative Technology Forums” were held on October 3, November 5, and December 10 to promote knowledge exchange. To further strengthen international collaboration, the project organized an international symposium on November 19, inviting experts from Asia to share policies and best practices.
2. Field Validation of the RU-BERS Assessment System
Based on the latest RU-BERS existing residential energy assessment framework released by the Architecture and Building Research Institute, field validation was conducted across selected residential buildings in northern, central, and southern Taiwan. Participants input building-related data—including envelope performance, HVAC, lighting, cooktops, and water heaters—into the prototype assessment platform to generate Total Carbon Reduction Rate (TCRR) and preliminary energy ratings. The results validated RU-BERS’ applicability and provided essential feedback for future refinement.
3. Demonstration Projects for Existing Building Energy Improvements
The project guided ten demonstration cases—five in industrial parks and five in condominium communities—to identify energy inefficiencies and propose improvement solutions, such as upgrading materials, lighting and HVAC systems, insulation enhancements, renewable energy integration, and energy system optimization. These demonstrations establish replicable models for energy retrofits in existing buildings and generate best-practice references for broader industry adoption.
4. Promotional Activities and Benchmark Visits
Two major smart net-zero building outreach events were held on September 3 and November 28 to increase cross-sector awareness and encourage participation. Two benchmarking visits were also organized to showcase exemplary net-zero building cases, enabling participants to directly experience innovative technologies. The project additionally produced 1,000 promotional brochures and two documentary-style videos on smart net-zero buildings and energy performance assessment, to be completed by the end of December.
5. Recommendations for Advancing Smart Net-Zero Building Development
Based on the synthesis of stakeholder roundtables, technical forums, international exchanges, field validations, and demonstration cases, this project identifies common challenges across implementation, user experience, and market adoption. It provides short-, medium-, and long-term recommendations, including: strengthening guidelines and outreach tools; expanding assessment and inspection capacity; establishing a national energy-performance database; enhancing cross-ministerial policy alignment; and exploring incentives such as land-value tax reductions or income-tax energy-saving deductions. In the longer term, the introduction of AI-enabled inspections, an integrated one-stop service platform, and structured disclosure of building performance will support linkages with property transactions, financial assessments, and market mechanisms—serving as a key reference for future regulatory enhancement and policy design.
", "相關檔案": "114「淨零建築智慧化暨產業溝通轉型升級計畫」結案報告finnal(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340251/1aa1cabb-8740-49b9-ae2a-164e8d262d0f.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340249", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 13 Aug 2026 07:18:00 GMT", "title": "淨零建築關鍵先進能源技術應用推廣計畫", "計畫主持人": "林奉怡", "協同主持人": "蘇梓靖、莊瑞誠", "執行單位": "財團法人工業技術研究院", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "淨零建築, 先進能源技術, 太陽光電, 儲能, 能源管理系統", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
全球已有逾 150 國宣示 2050 淨零排放目標，近年 COP28、COP29 亦強調須倍增能源效率、加速再生能源並逐步淘汰化石燃料。COP30則將減碳行動從「設定目標」轉向「落實實踐」。我國於 2022 年公布《2050 淨零排放路徑》，建築部門設定 2030 年所有公有新建達能效 1 級或近零碳、2040 年以前50%既有建築更新為建築能效1級或近零碳、2050 年100%新建及85%以上建築物達近零碳。內政部建研所亦推動能效雙軌標示制度，2024年建築能效評估手冊中定義建築物在取得能效1+級（近零碳），且全年綠能量大於或等於全年用能量，即符合「淨零建築」。另在 2025 年發布《建築物設置太陽光電發電設備標準》，要求新建建築面積達1,000 m²以上，或增加之建築面積達1,000 m²以上，或改建時變更之屋頂面積達1,000 m²以上者，建築須依比例設置太陽光電，預期上述政策將進一步推動光電與儲能在建築領域之普及。
二、方法及過程
因應上述趨勢，本計畫將透過文獻蒐集、實地訪查完成下列工作項目，包括：蒐集國際先進能源技術發展趨勢及推動作法；國內外建築導入先進能源技術案例研析；國內外建築立面PV(Photovoltaics, 太陽光電)設置效益及面臨問題研析；住宅、商業及工業建築屋頂加設太陽光電之評估；我國建築物能源使用全電化之影響及衝擊評估；研提我國建築節能、再生能源及儲能系統之能源整合方式；調查國內建置太陽光電及儲能系統之案場使用情形與綠電效益。另外，本計畫也協助辦理與執行以下工作項：檢視「建築導入太陽光電和儲能系統技術應用指引」內容；建置建築導入太陽光電及儲能系統線上評估平台；辦理三場專家諮詢會、三場建築導入太陽光電和儲能技術應用推廣講習會及三場建築導入太陽光電和儲能技術標竿案場觀摩參訪；派駐所內人員1名；製作建築導入太陽光電和儲能技術應用宣導推廣懶人包草案等，目的是提升非專業族群對建築再生能源導入之理解與接受度。
三、重要成果
本計畫盤點太陽光電、儲能、地熱、小型風力機、小水力、生質能、智慧能源管理系統、充電樁與微電網在國內外的技術發展趨勢、政策與案例。因太陽光電及儲能系統技術最成熟且受到的環境限制小，是各國主要推動項目。另發現國際上在推動方向上逐漸從單一建築往社區尺度規劃，並朝向多元能源策略發展，降低單一能源依賴、強化城市與社區韌性。建築立面設置PV(簡稱立面PV)以上午與下午的發電量較佳，模擬國內環境發現立面PV年在傾斜角90°之發電量約為屋頂型的33~57%。目前立面PV的建置與維運成本仍偏高，但歐盟與新加坡等地已將立面PV列入補助推動項目。
建築屋頂加設太陽光電可能會面臨其它法規要求或使用需求之競合問題，包含屋頂避難平台、屋頂綠化及其它設備(如冷卻水塔)放置需求，建議設計階段需通盤檢視屋頂使用需求，提前整合綠化、設備與再生能源配置。我國住宅建築物若要推動全電化的障礙在於烹飪習慣不易改變，且在我國再生能源占比仍低情況下，過早全電化可能造成用電增加，增加供電壓力，且因發電碳排仍高，不一定有立即減碳效果。全電化推動必會衝擊 LPG產業就業，需先規劃完善相關轉型配套。建築節能、再生能源及儲能系統之能源整合在美國與新加坡多依賴公共資金補助建置，主因是法規整合不足及商業模式不成熟，建議國內推動可先從防災韌性微電網之角度進行補助與推動。
此外，本計畫透過實地訪查、資料蒐集與模擬分析之方式，分析國內建置太陽光電及儲能系統之案場的綠電使用效益。根據建築規模與PV容量大小，僅小規模建築較有機會達到綠電量大於用電量，但當 PV 發電量遠大於負載和儲能的吸收能力時，其自發自用佔比反會下降，故PV容量不宜一味放大，需搭配合適的負載與儲能配置，才能兼顧綠電使用佔比與自發自用效率。本計畫分別於2025年9月17日、11月13日及12月15日辦理3場專家諮詢會，就淨零建築關鍵先進能源技術應用與推廣策略、太陽光電及儲能技術應用指引，以及線上評估平台與懶人包內容進行深入討論。
本計畫亦完成建築導入太陽光電及儲能系統線上評估平台之建置，可供一般民眾使用並進行簡單的太陽光電及儲能系統設置容量與效益初估。另於2025年10月3日、10月16日及11月4日辦理北、中、南三場技術推廣講習會，並發布新聞稿2則；於2025年10月30日、11月10日及11月18日完成北、中、南三場標竿案場觀摩參訪活動，並發布新聞稿1則。完成5則建築導入太陽光電與儲能技術應用宣導推廣懶人包草案，涵蓋線上平台操作、建築標章納入再生能源評估指標、屋頂設置太陽光電法規重點，以及太陽光電與儲能基本原理介紹。另配合共同參與及協助辦理淨零建築相關會議，完成政策說明與簡報文件撰擬，並處理本計畫相關臨時交辦行政事務，合計7件，整體成果有助於強化建築再生能源應用之推廣與實務落實。
四、建議事項
綜觀上述成果，本計畫提以下建議事項：
1.持續系統性掌握先進能源技術與建築整合之發展趨勢，並強化跨尺度整合研析
鑑於國內外先進能源技術與建築整合模式持續演進，建議建立長期追蹤與定期研析機制，系統性掌握太陽光電、儲能、微電網及其他新興能源技術之發展趨勢、應用條件與相關制度法規，作為我國推動淨零建築政策與技術指引滾動修正之重要參考。
2.提前因應立面太陽光電需求增加，深化既有建築立面導入之工法與實務問題研析
考量建築屋頂面積有限且法規與使用需求競合情形日益明顯，未來建築立面導入太陽光電之需求勢將增加，建議優先針對既有建築立面 PV 設置所涉及之工法選擇、界面整合、結構安全、維護更替及成本效益等實務問題進行深入研析，作為後續技術指引與政策推動之重要參考基礎。
3.彙整國內建築導入太陽光電與儲能之實務經驗，強化設計與推廣參考性
蒐集並整理國內具代表性之建築導入太陽光電與儲能系統案例，涵蓋其設置背景、系統配置、容量規模、設計重點、實際效益及維運經驗，並編撰為案例集，作為政府推動建築再生能源政策宣導，以及建築師與相關從業人員於規劃設計階段之實務參考。
", "英文摘要": "In response to global warming and climate change, more than 150 countries have pledged to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. In recent years, COP28 and COP29 have emphasized doubling energy efficiency and accelerating the deployment of renewable energy, while COP30 has further shifted the focus toward the concrete implementation of decarbonization actions. In line with these international developments, Taiwan announced its 2050 Net-Zero Emissions Pathway in 2022, clearly defining phased targets for the building sector to achieve nearly zero-carbon and net-zero buildings. Through the dual-track building energy performance labeling system and regulations related to photovoltaic (PV) installation, the government has been progressively promoting the adoption and mainstreaming of renewable energy and energy storage systems in the building sector.
Against this backdrop, this project systematically examines the domestic and international development trends, policy approaches, and application practices of advanced energy technologies—including photovoltaics, energy storage, geothermal energy, small wind power, micro-hydropower, microgrids, and smart energy management systems—through literature review, field surveys, and simulation analyses. The study further investigates the performance benefits and practical constraints of building-integrated façade PV, as well as regulatory and functional conflicts associated with rooftop PV installations. In addition, the project evaluates the potential impacts and challenges of building electrification and explores integrated strategies combining energy efficiency, renewable energy, and energy storage. By surveying domestic building projects equipped with PV and energy storage systems, the study analyzes green electricity utilization and self-consumption characteristics to inform recommendations on system sizing and configuration.
The findings indicate that photovoltaics and energy storage systems remain the core technologies for advancing net-zero transitions in the building sector, owing to their technological maturity and relatively limited environmental constraints. International trends also show a gradual shift from single-building applications toward community-scale planning, integrating multiple energy sources to enhance overall system resilience. Under Taiwan’s climatic conditions, façade PV demonstrates a certain level of power generation potential; however, high installation and operation costs continue to pose challenges, underscoring the need for supportive policies and demonstration projects. The study also reveals that oversized PV capacity without proper alignment with building loads and storage capacity may reduce self-consumption rates, highlighting the importance of integrated energy system design.
This project has also completed the development of an online evaluation platform for building-integrated PV and energy storage systems, organized expert consultation meetings, technical training workshops, and benchmark site visits, and prepared case compilations and outreach materials. These efforts aim to enhance both professional and public understanding of renewable energy applications in buildings. Based on the overall findings, it is recommended that Taiwan continue to monitor advancements in energy technologies and related policy frameworks, prioritize in-depth technical and practical research on emerging applications such as façade PV, and compile representative domestic case studies as key references for design practice and policy promotion, thereby accelerating the transition toward net-zero buildings.
", "相關檔案": "淨零建築關鍵先進能源技術應用推廣計畫_成果報告_v2(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340249/237753f3-d6f9-4697-a3ff-e265f1e3edce.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340248", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 13 Aug 2026 07:09:00 GMT", "title": "室內家電、設計導入能效機制應用計畫", "計畫主持人": "周光宙", "協同主持人": "王婉芝", "執行單位": "社團法人台灣綠建築發展協會", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-01", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "室內家電、建築能效、補助機制、近零碳建築", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "自2021年國際能源署（IEA）在「IEA2050淨零路徑（Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector）」報告中，提出淨零路徑里程碑以作為各國政府的行動準則，例如2025年禁售化石燃料鍋爐、2030年新車有60%為電動車、2040年全球電力達淨零排放、2050年70%的電力來自太陽能和風力等；此外還分析了低碳技術發展對經濟、能源產業、全球自然資源開採、能源安全等不同面向的影響，該報告同時提出；建築產業應發展高能效且直接使用再生能源或全脫碳能源的近零碳建築。
為因應氣候變遷，蔡英文總統於2021年1月1日新年談話，宣布將積極與各界展開對話，找出最符合臺灣未來永續發展的氣候治理路徑，為臺灣的永續發展找出新方向；接續在2021年10月10日國慶大會演說中正式宣告政府將積極朝向「淨零轉型」目標邁進。依行政院2022年3月30日公布之「2050淨零排放政策路徑藍圖」，2050年近零碳建築目標為100%新建建築物及超過85%建築物達到近零碳建築，依內政部規劃之淨零建築路徑藍圖，將採分年分階段方式辦理，以公有建築帶頭做起，引導民間跟進，並由相關部會署及地方政府共同推動；同時針對耗能量大之建築物優先推動，逐步擴展至其他建築物，以邁向近零碳建築。
賴清德總統於2024年4月22日「世界地球日」以錄影致詞方式出席地球解方2024永續設計行動年會，宣告上任後的淨零轉型5大策略，包括啟動第2次能源轉型、數位與綠色的產業雙軸轉型、形塑淨零永續的綠生活、政府做淨零轉型後盾、不遺落任何人的公正轉型。2024年5月20日在賴總統宣示中提出國家希望工程，以綠色成長與2050淨零轉型為國家願景，透過希望工程五大策略作為策略方針，並利用六大部門減碳旗艦計畫與淨零12項關鍵戰略作為行動計畫。其中住宅部門減碳行動以推廣近零建築作為主要策略，內容包含研提建築能效制度、近零碳建築評估、既有建築減量管理與推廣綠建築等，用以推動建築能效改善與智慧淨零雙軸轉型，以達成2030年與2050年減碳目標。
國家發展委員會於2025年1月公布「臺灣總體減碳行動計畫」由上而下聚焦六大部門「減碳旗艦計畫」，加碼減碳力道，並由部會由下而上提出「部門自主減碳計畫」，滾動調整推動策略，其中住商部門對於減碳行動計畫，提出執行對於既有建築推動「室內家電、設計之能效指標」，協助民間既有建築節能診斷及改善，引導建築能效提升及汰換高耗能家電。
然而，國內既有建築物約占全國建築物總量97%，許多早期興建的建築物，當時尚無建築節能法規，普遍存在耗能、耗水等等問題，其中我國住宅總量逐年增加，目前約有920多萬戶，其中30年老屋約有520萬戶，皆有潛力進行能效改善。目前自願性的既有建築物能效診斷與改造，可透過相關專業人員到建築現場，針對建築外殼、空調、照明、熱水及再生能源等現有設備效率及營運狀況進行專業診斷，因此本計畫將針對建築物室內家電及室內設計階段導入建築能效評估，透過室內設備（空調、照明、熱水、電梯等）、節能材料及施作方式等的設計規劃及查核，達到降低能源、減少材料耗損，並進一步達到減少碳排放量之目的，以促進2050淨零建築之實踐。
本計畫已收集彙整國內外文獻資料，包含日本、韓國、新加坡、德國、美國、英國及加拿大等七國近年推動淨零排放、建築能效制度，以及國內現行政策、法規、標章與補助等制度。其次在導入能效機制之執行方式，目前已完成建築物室內家電與設計導入能效標準作業流程、舊建築住宅汰換老舊設備檢核表、室內家電與設計能效診斷表、舊建築汰換室內材料之補助機制（草案）等項目，並已完成5案能效試評作業，以驗證其可行性與準確性；另外於11月17日(北部場)、11月28日(中部場)、12月3日(南部場)召開3場專家諮詢會議，接著亦召開12月23日(北部場)、12月24日(中部場)、115年1月5日(南部場)3場產業交流座談會，並已彙整專家學者及產業交流座談會共6場會議紀錄，以確保室內家電導入能效機制之執行方式與補助機制符合實務需求與使用情境。
目前「室內家電與設計之能效規劃原則或操作指引（草案）」已完成，另外也同時初步規劃1款封面設計，並進行最後校稿與美編排版；也於114年12月5日、115年1月2日、115年1月15日召開完成3次工作會議，並邀請學者、建築師、空調技師、室內裝修、電機技師等專家學者，共同討論與修正內容，期望建立一套系統化、可操作且具實用性的能效改善操作指引，以提供設計者或民眾作為室內規劃之參考，藉此鼓勵大眾進行評估，以提升既有建築物內部之能源效率。
", "英文摘要": "Since the International Energy Agency (IEA) released Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector in 2021, a series of net-zero transition milestones have been proposed as action guidelines for governments worldwide. These include banning the sale of fossil fuel boilers by 2025, achieving 60% electric vehicle sales among new cars by 2030, reaching net-zero global electricity by 2040, and generating 70% of electricity from solar and wind power by 2050. The report also analyzes the impacts of low-carbon technology development on the economy, energy industries, global natural resource extraction, and energy security. It further emphasizes that the building sector should develop near-zero carbon buildings with high energy efficiency, powered directly by renewable energy or fully decarbonized energy sources.
In response to climate change, President Tsai Ing-wen announced in her New Year’s address on January 1, 2021, that the government would actively engage in dialogue with all sectors of society to identify a climate governance pathway best suited to Taiwan’s sustainable development and to chart a new direction for sustainability. Subsequently, in her National Day address on October 10, 2021, she formally declared that the government would actively advance toward the goal of “net-zero transition.” According to the 2050 Net-Zero Emissions Policy Pathway Blueprint released by the Executive Yuan on March 30, 2022, the target for near-zero carbon buildings by 2050 is for 100% of new buildings and more than 85% of all buildings to meet near-zero carbon standards. Based on the net-zero building pathway blueprint planned by the Ministry of the Interior, implementation will be carried out in phases over time, with public buildings taking the lead to encourage private-sector participation. Relevant central government agencies and local governments will jointly promote the initiative, prioritizing high-energy-consuming buildings and gradually expanding to other building types to achieve the transition toward near-zero carbon buildings.
On April 22, 2024 (Earth Day), President Lai Ching-te delivered a recorded address at the Earth Solutions 2024 Sustainable Design Action Annual Conference, announcing five major net-zero transition strategies for his administration: launching the second energy transition, promoting dual-axis industrial transformation through digitalization and green development, shaping a net-zero and sustainable green lifestyle, positioning the government as a strong backbone for net-zero transition, and ensuring a just transition that leaves no one behind. On May 20, 2024, President Lai further introduced the National Project of Hope, establishing green growth and the 2050 net-zero transition as Taiwan’s national vision. This vision is guided by five core strategies, supported by six sectoral decarbonization flagship programs and twelve key net-zero strategies as action plans. Within this framework, the residential sector identifies the promotion of near-zero buildings as its primary decarbonization strategy, including the development of building energy efficiency systems, near-zero carbon building assessments, emissions reduction management for existing buildings, and the promotion of green buildings. These efforts aim to advance building energy efficiency improvements and the dual transformation toward smart and net-zero development, in order to achieve the 2030 and 2050 carbon reduction targets.
In January 2025, the National Development Council released the Taiwan Comprehensive Decarbonization Action Plan, which adopts a top-down approach focusing on six sectoral “decarbonization flagship programs” to intensify emissions reduction efforts, complemented by bottom-up “sector-led decarbonization action plans” proposed by individual ministries, with strategies adjusted dynamically. Within the residential and commercial sectors, the decarbonization action plan includes the implementation of “energy efficiency indicators for interior appliances and design” for existing buildings, supporting private-sector energy efficiency diagnostics and improvements, guiding building energy performance enhancement, and encouraging the replacement of high-energy-consuming appliances.
However, existing buildings account for approximately 97% of Taiwan’s total building stock. Many early-built structures were constructed before building energy efficiency regulations were in place and generally suffer from issues such as high energy and water consumption. Taiwan’s total number of residential units continues to increase and currently exceeds 9.2 million households, of which approximately 5.2 million are over 30 years old. These older buildings possess substantial potential for energy efficiency improvement. At present, voluntary energy efficiency diagnostics and retrofits for existing buildings can be conducted by qualified professionals through on-site assessments of building envelopes, air conditioning, lighting, hot water systems, and renewable energy equipment, evaluating their performance and operational conditions. Accordingly, this project proposes integrating building energy efficiency assessment into the interior appliance replacement and interior design stages. Through the planning and verification of interior equipment (such as air conditioning, lighting, hot water systems, and elevators), energy-efficient materials, and construction methods, the project aims to reduce energy consumption and material waste, thereby further reducing carbon emissions and promoting the realization of near-zero carbon buildings by 2050.
This project has collected and reviewed domestic and international literature and policy frameworks, including recent net-zero initiatives, building energy efficiency systems, and related policies, regulations, labeling schemes, and subsidy programs from seven countries—Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada—as well as Taiwan’s current systems. In terms of implementation mechanisms, the project has completed the development of standard operating procedures for introducing energy efficiency standards into interior appliances and design, checklists for replacing outdated equipment in existing residential buildings, interior appliance and design energy efficiency diagnostic forms, and a draft subsidy mechanism for replacing interior materials in older buildings. In addition, five pilot energy efficiency assessments have been completed to verify feasibility and accuracy. Furthermore, three expert consultation meetings were held on November 17 (Northern region), November 28 (Central region), and December 3 (Southern region), followed by three industry exchange forums on December 23 (Northern region), December 24 (Central region), and January 5 (Southern region). A total of six sets of meeting minutes from expert and industry forums have been compiled to ensure that the implementation approach and subsidy mechanisms for integrating energy efficiency into interior appliances align with practical needs and real-world application scenarios.
At present, the Principles or Operational Guidelines for Energy Efficiency Planning of Interior Appliances and Design (Draft) have been completed. A preliminary cover design has also been developed, and the document is undergoing final proofreading and graphic layout. In addition, three working meetings were convened on December 5, 2024, January 2, 2025, and January 15, 2025, bringing together scholars, architects, HVAC engineers, interior renovation professionals, and electrical engineers to jointly review and revise the content. The objective is to establish a systematic, operable, and practical set of energy efficiency improvement guidelines to serve as a reference for designers and the general public in interior planning, thereby encouraging broader participation in energy efficiency evaluation and enhancing the overall energy performance of existing buildings.
", "相關檔案": "室內家電設計導入能效機制應用計畫-成果報告1150113(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340248/e229f607-6ed8-4268-b54e-7895dbcb39cf.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340247", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:58:00 GMT", "title": "建築物淨零轉型評估推廣計畫", "計畫主持人": "崔懋森", "協同主持人": "王婉芝、江友直", "執行單位": "財團法人台灣建築中心", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "2025近零碳建築設計獎、近零碳建築轉型發展推廣說明會、公有既有建築物盤點及能效評估、智慧近零碳建築示範場域導覽規劃", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "本案「建築物淨零轉型評估推廣計畫」透過近零碳建築設計獎競賽、建築能效標示推廣說明會、社會溝通會議、政策宣導文宣、宣導影片，以及公有既有建築物盤點與能效評估等多元措施，擴大社會各界的參與與理解。並進一步與各級政府協力，輔導公有建築物管理者熟悉能效評估、評定填報與管制機制，建立跨部門合作基礎。藉由本計畫之推動，期能研議並落實公有建築物能效改善措施，強化近零碳建築政策的推廣效益。
本年度計畫執行期間為114年7月至115年1月31日止，本年度計畫進度與目標皆依計畫進度進行，各分項推動細項內容與期中進度概述如下：
分項一：推動建築物建築能效評估及標示
(一) 舉辦2025年近零碳建築設計獎競賽活動
2025近零碳建築設計以實體建築場域或模擬建築導入近零碳建築手法，截至10月20日統計報名組數，大專院校組共44組，產業組共17組，於11月4日完成辦理初選評選會議，共選出大專院校組11組及產業組10組入圍12月2日的決選評選會議，已於12月23日完成辦理頒獎典禮暨成果發表。
(二) 辦理近零碳建築轉型發展及能效標示推廣說明會4場次
本次4場次推廣說明會已於12月3日、12日、17日、19日完成辦理，從政策目標、推動做法、建築能效填報平台、能效自主評估流程說明等面向出發，內容涵蓋近零碳建築轉型策略與相關政策、「公有既有建築物能效填報平台」基本資料填報及能效自主評估流程說明。透過這一系列說明，旨在建構全臺公有既有建築物的能效清冊，推動建築能效的諮詢與輔導機制，並促進跨部會協力，加速我國邁向2050淨零轉型的實踐進程。
(三) 蒐集分析國內外近零碳建築發展之政策措施與執行機制
有鑑於目前國際上發展近零碳建築發展之政策有其不同定義及目標，且提出相關策略僅適用於特定情境，為此，本團隊已蒐集於近零碳建築發展之國家，分別為新加坡、英國二者，藉由歸納相關政策規劃及演進，有助於我國近零碳建築發展之政策推動參照。
(四) 辦理近零碳建築轉型發展之社會溝通會議1場次
本次「當前住宅政策座談會」原係以近零碳建築為主題，後因應2050淨零排放政策整體推動脈絡及社會對住宅議題的高度關注，拓展為涵蓋住宅政策全盤面向的討論，座談會共有153人次與會，主要為建築工協會代表、建築師及專業技師等產業專責管理階層，討論聚焦於住宅政策核心議題，展現產業與社會高度關注。
(五) 製作近零碳建築轉型發展政策宣導文宣(懶人包)
依建築研究所之「近零碳建築轉型發展」報告內容並已完成宣導圖卡、宣導摺頁、廣宣文稿及淨零減碳說帖之內容，作為本次政策宣導文宣(懶人包)聚焦於建築淨零轉型的推動方向。
(六) 拍攝近零碳建築宣導影片2部
影片共分為「既有建築能效評估指引說明」及「內政部建築研究所宣導影片」兩部主題，前者著重於以知識導向與視覺化數據呈現既有建築能效診斷與改善流程，協助大眾理解並實際應用相關工具；後者則透過政策研究成果、標章制度推動以及示範場域的展示，全面展現研究所在引領我國建築邁向淨零、智慧與安全發展中的專業定位與引導角色，藉此深化社會共識並擴散永續價值。
分項二：辦理公有既有建築物盤點及能效評估
(一) 維運及擴充公有既有建築物能效調查填報系統功能
針對平台維運更新項目分為基本資料與初評計算填報更新、前臺填報統計分析功能、後臺系統填報統計功能、操作指引更新及地理圖資串接，五大項維護更新功能皆已更新完成，並針對畫面顯示與填報閱讀方式優化調整。基本資料及初評計算內容皆依2024年版建築能效評估手冊內容調整修正，並增加專家評估法計算系統於初評計算，系統內也將自動分流不同種類之建築物至其適用之評估方法。平台也將持續更新填報資料至GIS地理資訊圖臺內，已追蹤全臺填報情形。
(二) 辦理公有既有建築能效盤點資料彙整分析及研擬建築能效改善策略措施
已於平台內將既有填報之資料進行使用類組上之分類，後續填報上也將依使用類組將其分流至其適用之評估法，同時也於平台前臺頁面增加填報階段之完成與否，方便單位快速查閱案件填報進度與已完成之階段。針對建築改善策略除公有既有建築物之改善策略外，另提供拓展至民間之相關執行建議及規劃，加強全臺既有建築物改善策略之完整性，並加速達成2050之淨零目標。
(三) 滾動更新公有既有建築物能效調查填報系統操作手冊、教學影片及問答集
操作手冊、Q&A問答集、操作影片皆已更新完成。操作手冊依最新平台更新畫面及填報機制調整修正。Q&A問答集分別針對帳號及登入、建築能效管制、基本資料建立、能效自主評估、能效專業人力、分析報表產出及其他問題各列5-10項常見之問題說明，總計約50題之常見Q&A，並於附件提供填報之流程圖、各階段所需之表單及專業人力培訓名單供單位查找。
(四) 辦理追蹤彙整各機關填報情形及輔導更新填報內容
已完成平台內案件填報情型統計分析功能，且配合114年「永續長聯盟推動永續發展成果獎勵要點」之研商結果，將各單位於內政部權責下之永續評分項目接軌，系統內可依填報狀態統計出機關建築物填報數量、自主評估完成案件比例、改善中案件、取得正式能效標示案件數方便機關單位與權責機關於填報統計後可快速統計分析，檢視自身之填報情形並加以調整。
(五) 辦理提供填報作業快速回應諮詢服務
已將Q&A內相關問題及名詞解釋作為提示功能，方便填報者於填報階段無需翻閱Q&A即可點擊畫面問號標示了解該名詞內容，並於各填報階段導入階段說明，讓填報者了解該階段之填報目標為何。有關帳號相關問題亦於登入頁面導入相關帳號問題篩選，系統將自動寄申請密碼重置信於系統管理員，系統管理員也於收信後快速了解單位帳號狀態並協助調整。
(六) 規劃公有既有建築物能效評估管制機制
已建立建築物能效各管制階段所需填報表單，並且將相關表單內容配合「公有既有建築能效調查平台」填報階段與流程。讓完成專家診斷之評估單位可就專家診斷後提供之診斷表單及數據填報上傳至平台內，若能效未達1級之案件則需另請專家規劃能效改善規劃報告並上傳至平台內，以利平台追蹤全臺既有建築能效管制與改善規劃之情形。
(七) 辦理既有建築物能效評估專業人員培訓與登錄
已完成辦理一場次既有建築能效評估專家培訓，日期為114年12月8號(一)上午9:00至16:00。培訓課程由冷凍空調技師公會全國聯合會一同協辦擔任講師，共計255人次與會參加，本年度擴大培訓對象至建築師、機關專責人員、指定評定機構及相關公協會、學會。
(八) 輔導公有既有建築物辦理建築能效初評及詳評作業，並媒合申請建築能效標示評定及認可
由於今年度7月1日起正式實施2024年版建築能效評估手冊，因此本案除2022年版外亦提供2024年版能效輔導。截止至11月底本案已完成25件能效初評，並協助其中13案進行能效詳評。並已媒合其中10案能效詳評為1級以上之輔導案件媒合送審能效標示之申請。
(九) 指派1名專職計畫執行人員進駐建研所協助辦理近零碳建築轉型發展推動計畫公共建設計畫業務相關事宜
已於114年7月2日完成派駐人員林宣宇工作契約之簽訂，並於同日契約核定通過10天內檢送中建智字第1141260963號及「建築物淨零轉型評估推廣計畫」業務委託之專業服務案派駐人員林宣宇勞動契約影本一式一份於貴所。
分項三：辦理智慧近零碳建築示範場域展示導覽系統之規劃建置
(一) 規劃建置貴所建築材料實驗中心辦公棟智慧近零碳建築示範導覽項目
針對新建置的綠能設施與儲能系統進行規劃性展示，透過展櫃與說明牆，搭配圖文、示意圖與流程圖，說明太陽能發電、儲能電池及能量轉換機制之功能與運作原理，協助民眾理解再生能源應用。同時優化能源管理系統，以直觀儀表板呈現發電量、儲電量、用電量及負載分布等數據，達成教育推廣與資訊透明的效果。
(二) 製作智慧近零碳建築示範場域展示內容，與既有導覽系統整合
展示專區以3D剖面透視圖、燈光效果、說明牆、影片與導覽平面圖，整合節能、創能、儲能與控能系統，完整呈現智慧建築邁向近零碳排的應用。燈光引導協助理解能源流向，互動體驗區以趣味問答深化學習，讓參觀者直觀體驗智慧近零生活，提升永續建築與能源轉型的認同與參與意願。
(三) 辦理智慧淨零示範場域展示影片或動畫製作
透過實景拍攝，展示建築材料實驗中心與智慧化居住空間展示中心的再生能源與智慧系統應用。材料實驗中心結合屋頂及立面太陽能板、風力發電機與儲能電池模組，展現創能與儲能的實際運作；居住空間展示中心則透過智能照明、空調與監控系統，達成節能與控能效果，體現創能、儲能與能源管理的協同運作。另強調未來建築可依用電需求靈活調度，再生能源與台電電力互補，並透過社區電力共享，提升能源效率、降低成本，推動永續智慧淨零生活。
", "英文摘要": "The “Building Net-Zero Transition Assessment and Promotion Project”employs multiple measures- including the Near-Zero Carbon Building Design Award competition, energy-efficiency labeling promotion seminars, social communication forums, policy outreach materials, promotional videos, and public existing building inventory and energy-efficiency assessments-to expand public participation and awareness. In collaboration with all levels of government, the project further assists public-building managers in mastering energy-efficiency assessment, reporting procedures, and regulatory mechanisms, thereby establishing a cross-agency foundation. Through this project, the aim is to examine and implement energy-efficiency improvement measures for public buildings and strengthen the effectiveness of near-zero carbon building policy promotion.
The implementation period for this year’s project is from July 2025 to January 31, 2026. All project objectives and progress are aligned with the work plan. The key tasks and mid-term progress for each sub-project are summarized as follows.
Sub-project I: Promotion of Building Energy Efficiency Assessment and Labeling
(I) Organizing the 2025 Near-Zero Carbon Building Design Award Competition
The 2025 competition focuses on integrating near-zero carbon strate-gies into real or simulated building sites. As of October 20, the university division received 44 submissions, while the industry division received 17. The preliminary review meeting was held on November 4, selecting 11 university teams and 10 industry teams to enter the final evaluation on December 2. An award ceremony and results presentation are planned for late December.
(II) Organizing Four Sessions of the Near-Zero Carbon Building Transition and Energy Labeling Promotion Seminar
All agendas and schedules for the four sessions have been finalized, to be held on December 3, 12, 17, and 19. The seminars will introduce policy objectives, implementation strategies, the Public Existing Building Energy Reporting Platform, and autonomous energy-efficiency assessment proce-dures. Aimed at establishing a national inventory of energy performance for existing public buildings, the seminars support advisory and mentorship mechanisms, promote inter-agency collaboration, and accelerate Taiwan’s progress toward 2050 net-zero goals.
(III) Collecting and Analyzing Domestic and International Near-Zero Carbon Building Policies and Mechanisms
Given that definitions and policy approaches for near-zero carbon buildings vary internationally and are often applicable only to specific contexts, the project team has collected policies from countries advancing near-zero carbon building development—particularly Singapore and oth-ers. Summarizing these developments provides useful policy references for Taiwan’s near-zero carbon building roadmap.
(IV) Organizing One Session of the Near-Zero Carbon Building Social Communication Forum
Originally planned as a forum focusing on near-zero carbon build-ings, the “Current Housing Policy Roundtable” expanded to broader housing-policy themes in response to the national 2050 net-zero pathway and heightened public attention to housing issues. The forum attracted 153 participants, mainly from builders’ associations, architects, and pro-fessional engineers. Discussions centered on key housing-policy issues, reflecting the high level of engagement from industry and society.
(V) Producing Policy Outreach Materials (Infographic Package) for Near-Zero Carbon Building Transition
Based on the “Near-Zero Carbon Building Transition Development Report” by the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI), the outreach materials focus on the building-sector net-zero transition roadmap. Draft versions of policy infographics, pamphlets, communica-tion scripts, and carbon-reduction briefing materials have been completed.
(VI) Producing Two Promotional Videos on Near-Zero Carbon Building Transition
Guidelines for Existing Building Energy Efficiency Assessment – presenting diagnostic and improvement processes using visualized data; ABRI Promotional Video – showcasing research outcomes, labeling mechanisms, and demonstration sites. Together, the videos highlight ABRI’s role in guiding Taiwan's buildings toward net-zero, smart, and safe development, strengthening societal consensus and public engage-ment.
Sub-project II: Inventory and Energy Efficiency Assessment of Public Existing Buildings
(I) Maintenance and Enhancement of the Public Existing Building Energy Reporting System
Platform updates cover five aspects: basic data and preliminary assess-ment forms, front-end analytical tools, back-end statistical functions, updat-ed user guides, and GIS integration. All updates have been completed, in-cluding adjustments in line with the 2024 Building Energy Efficiency As-sessment Manual and the addition of the expert-evaluation method. The platform now automatically assigns appropriate assessment pathways and synchronizes data with the national GIS system.
(II) Compilation and Analysis of Public Building Energy-Efficiency Data and Development of Improvement Strategies
Existing submissions were categorized by building use type, and the system now automatically routes cases to the applicable assessment method. New features display assessment progress and completion status. Beyond strategies for public buildings, the project also developed recommendations for private-sector buildings to strengthen the overall national strategy for reaching 2050 net-zero goals.
(III) Updating User Manuals, Tutorial Videos, and FAQ Content
User manuals, FAQ documents, and tutorial videos have all been up-dated. The FAQ includes approximately 50 common questions across ac-count login, regulatory control, basic data entry, autonomous assessment, professional personnel requirements, reporting outputs, and others. Sup-porting documents such as flowcharts, forms, and training lists are provided as appendices. Videos are divided into five sections: platform overview, basic data entry, autonomous assessment, document uploads, and platform support features.
(IV) Tracking Submission Progress and Assisting Agencies with Content Updates
Statistical features for tracking submission progress have been com-pleted. In line with the “Sustainable Development Achievement Incentive Guidelines,” the platform analyzes submission counts, completion rates of autonomous assessments, improvement-in-progress cases, and certified cas-es. This allows agencies to monitor progress and adjust accordingly.
(V) Providing Rapid Consultation Support for Reporting Procedures
FAQ-based tooltips are embedded directly in the platform, allowing users to access definitions without leaving the page. Each stage includes goal descriptions for guidance. Account-related troubleshooting is automat-ed through password-reset workflows, enabling system administrators to re-spond efficiently.
(VI) Planning the Regulatory Mechanism for Public Building Energy-Efficiency Assessment
All required forms for each regulatory stage have been established and integrated into the reporting platform. After expert evaluation, assessment results can be uploaded and automatically linked to energy-efficiency lev-els. For buildings that do not meet Level-1 requirements, improvement plans must be submitted for monitoring of national compliance and im-provement progress.
(VII) Organizing Training and Registration for Professional Evaluators of Existing Building Energy Performance
A training workshop is scheduled for December 8, 2025 (Monday). Co-organized with the Taiwan Association of Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, the workshop is expected to attract over 150 par-ticipants. The program has expanded to include architects, agency person-nel, designated rating institutions, and relevant associations. All qualified personnel will be registered on the reporting platform.
(VIII) Assisting Public Buildings with Preliminary and Detailed Energy-Efficiency Assessments and Mediating Applications for Energy Labeling
Following the implementation of the 2024 Assessment Manual on Ju-ly 1, the project provides support for both the 2022 and 2024 versions. As of the end of November, 25 preliminary assessments and 13 detailed as-sessments have been completed, with 10 cases achieving Level 1 or above and submitted for energy-label certification.
(IX) Assigning One Full-time On-site Project Staff Member at ABRI
A full-time staff member, Ms. Lin Hsuan-Yu, was assigned on July 2, 2025. All contractual, administrative, and filing procedures have been completed and approved.
Sub-project III: Planning and Development of the Smart Near-Zero Carbon Building Demonstration Site Tour System
(I) Planning the Demonstration Features of ABRI’s Building Materials Laboratory Office Building
A new exhibition area has been designed to showcase solar PV sys-tems and energy-storage modules through display cases, wall graphics, il-lustrations, and process diagrams. The energy management system has been optimized to present real-time data on generation, storage, consump-tion, and load distribution through intuitive dashboards.
(II) Producing Demonstration Content and Integrating It with the Existing Tour System
The exhibition integrates 3D cutaway renderings, lighting effects, display walls, videos, and tour maps to explain energy-saving, energy-generation, energy-storage, and energy-control systems. Interactive fea-tures guide visitors through energy-flow concepts, while gamified quizzes encourage engagement with sustainable energy concepts.
(III) Producing Demonstration Videos or Animations for the Smart Near-Zero Building Site
Live-action filming at the Building Materials Laboratory and the Smart Living Showcase Center highlights renewable-energy applications and smart-control systems. Demonstrations include rooftop and façade so-lar PV, wind turbines, and storage batteries, as well as smart lighting, air-conditioning, and control systems. The video emphasizes future scenarios where buildings can dynamically coordinate renewable energy with grid supply and share electricity across communities to enhance efficiency and reduce costs.
", "相關檔案": "114建築物淨零轉型評估推廣計畫_成果報告書(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340247/7dc77f4d-4146-4f61-b1e9-fb069881a61d.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340246", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:51:00 GMT", "title": "公有既有建築物能效評估補助作業及淨零示範計畫", "計畫主持人": "崔懋森", "協同主持人": "王婉芝、侯雅壹", "執行單位": "財團法人台灣建築中心", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "近零碳建築、建築能效、公有既有建築節能改善", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、緣起
面對全球智慧節能與建築永續發展的趨勢，我國推動建築能效改善提升，將在既有智慧綠建築與建築節能改善的基礎上，整合我國領先國際的資通產業技術，推動補助公有既有建築物及建築公共緊急避難空間能效改善及淨零示範工作，引導公私部門建築物提升能效，精進近零碳建築及建築節能產業發展，進而呼應聯合國永續發展目標（Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs）精神。
根據國家發展委員會於111年3月30日公布之「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明」，針對建築部門設定了不同階段的里程碑，其中2040年需達成50%既有建築物更新為建築能效1級或近零碳建築。為達上述階段目標，亟需分階段推動公有既有建築物實施建築能效評估及改善，由公有建築物帶頭做起，引導民間建築跟進，全面提升既有建築能效，以逐步邁向我國近零碳建築的前瞻願景。
內政部建築研究所(以下簡稱建研所)依據行政院核定之前瞻基礎建設計畫第 5期（114年）公共建設類「 淨零建築轉型發展推動計畫」 ，針對公有既有建築物及建築公共緊急避難空間，辦理能效改善補助之先期作業，將建築能效改善後可達能效1級或近零碳建築者優先納入補助，以起示範效果，期創造公有建築物淨零示範與佈設建築公共緊急避難空間的雙贏目標，將可做為公有及民間既有建築淨零改善的示範指引，及未來相關推動策略訂定的參考依據。
二、計畫內容與成果
本計畫依約辦理 (1) 114年度中央政府公有既有建築物及建築公共緊急避難空間能效改善及淨零示範補助計畫輔導工作、(2) 115年度中央及地方政府公有既有建築物及建築公共緊急避難空間能效改善及淨零示範補助先期作業及(3) 既有建築能效改善實務推廣及淨零示範宣導等三分項計畫，已完成下列成果：
（一）依補助項目專業領域，成立建築能效評估及改善專業輔導團隊。計畫辦理期間，提供建築能效評估及改善相關規定說明及輔導等諮詢服務，確保本計畫各階段工作順利執行。並辦理114年度補助中央政府案件之受補助單位輔導、設計圖說審查、現場查核及改善效益評估等相關工作。今年度協助執行中央政府案件24案，包括3案補助設計案、21案補助整體改善案，辦理相關建築物能效評估輔導、設計圖說審查、招標文件檢視、協助邀標，及相關進度追蹤。並更新114年度完成改善案件成果網頁及BEMS資料庫網站，有效展現案件成果及追蹤改善效益。為持續精進輔導團隊功能並辦理一場次精進會議，針對行政及技術進行分享與討論。
（二）協助115年度公有既有建築物改善建築能效補助先期作業。本次受理申請各中央政府暨所屬(轄)計77個單位，共計136件申請案，本中心團隊依申請補助作業須知遴選原則辦理，初步建議68件申請案進入初選階段，經初選會議後，通過初選名單計70件，由本團隊進行現勘診斷，提出各案診斷報告書，包含診斷建議、改善項目及費用，於114年12月1日召開決選會議案件排序參考使用，最終選出57件。本中心團隊另受理各地方政府暨所屬(轄)計19個地方政府提出申請，共計126件申請案，本中心團隊依申請補助作業須知遴選原則辦理，初步建議58件申請案進入初選階段，經初選會議後，通過初選名單計63件，由本團隊進行現勘診斷，提出各案診斷報告書，包含診斷建議、改善項目及費用，於114年8月18日召開決選會議案件排序參考使用，最終選出57件。於115年1月9日完成辦理本計畫「114年度中央政府公有既有建築物及建築公共緊急避難空間能效改善及淨零示範補助計畫」補助說明會。
（三）加強既有建築能效改善推廣，針對建築相關專業人員進行培訓課程，釐清與一般建築設備改善案差異，讓後續推動改善時能更容易掌握改善重點。且針對建築從業人員舉辦工作坊，由相關領域專家分享建築能效改善設計及施工重點，讓參加之從業人員對建築能效改善有更深入了解。並拍攝改善案例宣導影片，從建築節能、儲能及能源管理系統等技術項目，提升民眾建築節能知識，達到更多元之淨零宣導。
三、結論
本計畫（114）年度已依約完成分項計畫與工作項目，(1) 114年度中央政府公有既有建築物及建築公共緊急避難空間能效改善及淨零示範補助計畫輔導工作、(2) 115年度中央及地方政府公有既有建築物及建築公共緊急避難空間能效改善及淨零示範補助先期作業及(3) 既有建築能效改善實務推廣及淨零示範宣導，推動由公有建築物帶頭做起，引導民間建築跟進，後續成果將可做為公有及民間既有建築近零碳改善的示範指引，及未來相關推動策略訂定的參考依據，逐步邁向2050淨零目標。
", "英文摘要": "I. Background
In response to global trends in smart energy conservation and sustainable building development, Taiwan is promoting the enhancement of building energy efficiency. Building upon existing initiatives in smart green buildings and building energy conservation improvements, this program integrates Taiwan’s internationally competitive information and communications technology (ICT) industry to subsidize energy efficiency upgrades and net-zero demonstration projects for existing public buildings and public emergency shelter spaces. The initiative aims to guide both public and private sector buildings toward improved energy performance, advance the development of near-zero carbon buildings and the building energy conservation industry, and align with the spirit of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
According to the “Overall Explanation of Taiwan’s 2050 Net-Zero Emissions Pathway and Strategy” released by the National Development Council on March 30, 2022, milestone targets have been established for the building sector. One key target requires that by 2040, 50% of existing buildings be upgraded to Energy Efficiency Level 1 or near-zero carbon buildings. To achieve these phased targets, it is imperative to progressively promote energy efficiency assessments and improvements for existing public buildings. By taking the lead, public buildings can encourage private sector participation, comprehensively enhance the energy performance of existing buildings, and gradually move toward Taiwan’s forward-looking vision of near-zero carbon buildings.
Based on the Executive Yuan–approved Phase 5 (FY 2025) Forward-Looking Infrastructure Development Program—Public Construction Category: Net-Zero Building Transformation and Development Promotion Program—the Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as ABRI), has undertaken preliminary operations for subsidizing energy efficiency improvements for existing public buildings and public emergency shelter spaces. Priority is given to projects that can achieve Energy Efficiency Level 1 or near-zero carbon building standards after improvement, thereby creating demonstration effects. This initiative seeks to achieve a dual objective of establishing net-zero public building demonstrations and deploying public emergency shelter spaces, providing reference guidelines for net-zero improvements of existing public and private buildings and serving as a basis for future policy development.
II. Program Content and Achievements
This program was implemented in accordance with contractual requirements and consisted of three sub-projects:
(1) Guidance services for the FY 2025 Central Government Subsidy Program for energy efficiency improvements and net-zero demonstrations of existing public buildings and public emergency shelter spaces;
(2) Preliminary operations for the FY 2026 Central and Local Government Subsidy Program for energy efficiency improvements and net-zero demonstrations of existing public buildings and public emergency shelter spaces; and
(3) Promotion of practical energy efficiency improvements for existing buildings and net-zero demonstration outreach.
The following achievements have been accomplished:
ⅰ.Establishment of a professional guidance team for building energy efficiency assessment and improvement.
A professional guidance team was formed based on the expertise required by the subsidy items. During the program period, consultation services were provided, including explanations of relevant regulations and guidance on building energy efficiency assessments and improvements, to ensure the smooth execution of all project phases. Guidance was also provided to subsidized central government projects in FY 2025, including support for beneficiary units, design drawing reviews, on-site inspections, and improvement effectiveness evaluations.
This year, assistance was provided for the implementation of 24 central government projects, including 3 design-subsidy projects and 21 comprehensive improvement projects. Services included energy efficiency assessment guidance, design drawing reviews, tender document reviews, assistance with bid invitations, and progress tracking. The FY 2025 completed project results webpage and the Building Energy Management System (BEMS) database website were also updated to effectively showcase project outcomes and track improvement benefits. Additionally, one enhancement workshop was held to further strengthen the guidance team’s capabilities through administrative and technical sharing and discussions.
ⅱ.Support for preliminary operations of the FY 2026 subsidy program for energy efficiency improvements of existing public buildings.
Applications were received from 77 central government agencies and affiliated units, totaling 136 applications. Based on the selection principles outlined in the subsidy application guidelines, the project team initially recommended 68 applications for the preliminary selection stage. Following the preliminary selection meeting, 70 applications were approved for on-site assessments. The project team conducted field inspections and prepared diagnostic reports for each case, including recommendations, improvement items, and cost estimates, which were used as references for case ranking at the final selection meeting held on December 1, 2025. Ultimately, 57 projects were selected.
Additionally, applications were received from 19 local governments and their affiliated units, totaling 126 applications. Based on the same selection principles, 58 applications were initially recommended for preliminary selection. After the preliminary selection meeting, 63 applications advanced to on-site assessments. Diagnostic reports were prepared and used as references for case ranking at the final selection meeting held on August 18, 2025, resulting in the selection of 57 projects. Furthermore, the subsidy briefing session for the FY 2025 Central Government Subsidy Program for Energy Efficiency Improvements and Net-Zero Demonstrations of Existing Public Buildings and Public Emergency Shelter Spaces was successfully conducted on January 9, 2026.
ⅲ.Enhanced promotion of energy efficiency improvements for existing buildings.
Training courses were organized for building-related professionals to clarify the differences between building energy efficiency improvement projects and general building equipment retrofit projects, enabling participants to better identify key improvement priorities in future implementation. Workshops were also held for building practitioners, featuring experts from relevant fields who shared design and construction best practices for building energy efficiency improvements, thereby deepening participants’ understanding.
In addition, promotional videos showcasing improvement cases were produced, covering technical aspects such as building energy conservation, energy storage, and energy management systems. These efforts aim to enhance public knowledge of building energy efficiency and promote diversified net-zero outreach.
III. Conclusion
In FY 2025, this program successfully completed all sub-projects and tasks as planned, including:
(1) Guidance services for the FY 2025 Central Government subsidy program;
(2) Preliminary operations for the FY 2026 Central and Local Government subsidy program; and
(3) Promotion of practical energy efficiency improvements for existing buildings and net-zero demonstration outreach.
By enabling public buildings to take the lead and encouraging private sector participation, the outcomes of this program will serve as demonstration guidelines for near-zero carbon improvements in both public and private existing buildings, as well as reference materials for future policy formulation. These efforts will contribute to Taiwan’s gradual progress toward achieving the 2050 net-zero emissions goal.
", "相關檔案": "114年公有既有建築物能效評估補助作業及淨零示範計畫-成果報告書V6(送印)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340246/3846ac9c-ffa1-46d8-8c01-6286f5faf9b3.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340245", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:32:00 GMT", "title": "健全近零碳建築評估制度建構及應用推廣計畫", "計畫主持人": "李魁鵬", "協同主持人": "林憲德、郭柏巖、黃國倉、嚴佳茹", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "淨零建築、建築能效評估系統、成本效益", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、計畫緣起
為因應國際淨零排放趨勢，國家發展委員會針對我國2050淨零排放目標，於111年3月30日公布臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略，其中內政部負責「淨零建築」路徑規劃及推動，採分年分階段方式推動建築物節能減碳，係以綠建築設計節能至少20%以上為基礎，進一步提升至50%達近零碳建築，其中淨零建築階段里程碑為：
(1) 2030年公有新建建築物達建築能效1級或近零碳建築。
(2) 2040年50%既有建築物更新為建築能效1級或近零碳建築。
(3) 2050年100%新建建築物及超過85%建築物為近零碳建築。
為提升我國建築物能源效率，內政部建築研究所參考國際趨勢，基於推動多年且成效良好的綠建築標章基礎上，推動綠建築之淨零轉型，業建立建築能效評估制度，需先達到近零碳建築目標，約可節能50%，其餘耗電再使用零碳排之再生能源，則可達淨零建築。
因此，內政部建築研究所依據行政院核定之前瞻基礎建設計畫第5期(115年)公共建設類「淨零建築轉型發展推動計畫」七大推動策略中之(1)健全新建建築物淨零設計規範與完備技術基礎、(2)淨零建築節能創能儲能及智慧能源管理策略與應用及(3)展示推廣與拓展產業國際化等，辦理相關工作事項。
內政部建築研究所於113年度業完成研訂可適用所有建築類型的能效評估系統(BERS)，主要分為非住宅建築專用與住宅專用的兩大系統，其下再分為六類次系統。非住宅建築專用系統內含「新建」的單一BERSn次系統，以及「既有」的BERSe、E-BERSe、BERSc三類次系統，共四類次系統，住宅專用系統則只含「新建」的R-BERSn、RP-BERSn二類次系統；另針對住宅類既有建築，辦理住宅類建築能效服務平台架構草案之測試調整及意見收集；並初步研擬申請建築能效改善之溫室氣體「增量抵換專案」之可行性研究與草案；以及研擬適用海拔800公尺以上地區建築物之能效評估草案等。
二、研究方法與過程
為完備建築能效評估制度及強化應用展示推廣，本計畫除延續推動健全近零碳建築及建築能效評估相關工作，包括研修訂既有住宅能效評估系統草案、開發既有住宅(如單戶)能效評估線上平臺系統(網頁或APP)、研修訂海拔800公尺以上地區之建築能效評估系統草案、研擬既有建築物能效改善申請溫室氣體碳權抵換之方法學草案、編修內政部建築研究所2025年版綠建築評估手冊EEWH-EB及EEWH-RN草案、研修公有建築工程全生命週期節能減碳作業指引(草案)納入建築能效評估及綠色採購相關規定、辦理既有建築能效改善專家診斷評估之人員培訓3場等；另並新增辦理輔導既有社會住宅公共空間能效改善補助及淨零示範相關工作，及輔導申請候選建築能效證書達第1+級(近零碳建築)，期由公有既有社會住宅帶頭示範，作為未來擴大推動既有住宅能效改善為近零碳建築之標竿範例。
三、重要發現
1.目前國外一些新型建築構造、立面組件或高科技設備產品之隔熱節能技術，如高反射率塗料、雙層外殼系統(Double Skin Facade, DSF)光電系統、建築外牆立面型太陽光電系統相變化材料(Phase Change Materials, PCM)整合於外牆、電致變色玻璃、光致變色玻璃、熱致變色玻璃等節能技術，節能效益報告均偏於局部空間、小規模建築之報告，節能效益恐有偏大傾向，但投資回收年限依然高達二、三十年，尤其如相變化材料或智慧玻璃雖具備節能潛力，但由於初期成本過高，回收期甚至超過建物壽命，缺乏實質的經濟可行性。
2.目前台灣建築節能法規已達「保障最基本居住舒適度」功能，在亞熱帶台灣進一步強化「外殼保溫隔熱」之節能效益有限，但是本計畫認為應該倡導「外殼保溫隔熱」作為「改善舒適度」 的策略，對尚有改善舒適度空間的部分提出「外殼保溫隔熱」建議，才能成為輔佐淨零政策的工具。目前在國民經濟可負擔前提下，值得進一步推動隔熱遮陽以改善舒適度的方向，並非無效率地推動全面建築隔熱遮陽，而必須只針對「住宅嚴重日曬熱點」來下手即可，對於辦公大樓、商業建築進行「外殼保溫隔熱」則效果有限。其原因在於一般辦公大樓、商業建築玻璃開窗面大、外牆面積小、夜間無人上班，無須投入經濟效益有限的「外殼保溫隔熱」，而住宅建築居住時間長、白天日曬傳熱會延伸至夜晚造成酷熱感，因此較有投資「外殼保溫隔熱」的理由。目前應該投入「外殼保溫隔熱」的「住宅嚴重日曬熱點」有二: 一是針對民國101年12月31日以前建造之既有建築頂樓房間等推動屋頂隔熱改善即可，二是只針對少部分「嚴重日曬房間」執行外牆隔熱，或新增活動百葉外遮陽、內貼節能膜即可。
3.國際訂有建築能效評估系統之國家或組織多要求建築能效評定需由經培訓持專業資格認證之評估人員來填報資料並提供給認證機構，經審核確認後才發給能效證書予評估案。考量既有住宅之能效評估牽涉機械設備效率判斷，且需評估外殼遮陽表現、通風性能判定、開窗率檢討等，本計畫建議可參考國際作法，制定能效評估專家之資格規範並擴大培訓制度，同時建立官方平台以利大眾查詢經認可之能效評估專家名單，以有效推動民間既有住宅能效評估。
四、主要建議事項
建議一：持續宣導具經濟成本效益之住宅外殼改善措施，避免投入高成本低效益之高科技設備產品之隔熱節能技術：立即可行建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
目前國內外常見的新型節能建築技術（如高反射率塗料、雙層外殼系統、相變化材料 PCM、智慧調光玻璃等）多以小規模建築或局部空間試驗為主，其節能效益普遍存在高估現象。然而初期投資金額普遍偏高，使投資回收年限動輒二至三十年，部分技術甚至超過建築物使用壽命，缺乏實質經濟可行性。建議持續加強宣導需審慎評估此類技術之成本效益、實際節能量、適用建築類型，避免誤導市場大幅投入高成本、低效益之節能措施，並優先推動具高經濟性、可普及性之建築節能策略，以確保節能改善推動之效益最大化。
建議二：建立我國既有建築能效評估專家制度暨公開查詢平台，健全既有住宅能效管理體系：中長期建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
國際建築能效制度（如英國 EPC、美國 Energy Star、歐盟 EPBD）均要求能效評估由具資格之專業評估人員執行，並設置官方查詢平台以確保評估品質與透明度。目前台灣既有建築能效評估尚缺乏專業資格制度，亦無可供民眾查詢之公開平台。本計畫建議參考國際作法，建立既有建築能效評估專家資格規範，擴大專業訓練與認證制度，並同步建置官方查詢平台，以利民眾查詢合格評估人員名單。透過制度化與透明化，可提升既有建築能效評估之公信力，並強化我國推動既有建築邁向近零碳之整體能力。
", "英文摘要": "In response to the global trend of net-zero emissions, the National Development Council (NDC) of Taiwan announced "Taiwan's 2050 Net-Zero Emissions Pathway and Strategy" on March 30, 2022. Within this framework, the Ministry of the Interior (MOI) is responsible for the planning and promotion of the "Net-Zero Building" pathway. This initiative adopts a phased, year-by-year approach to advance energy conservation and carbon reduction in buildings. The strategy is built upon the foundation of green building design, which mandates a minimum of 20% energy savings, with a further goal of increasing this to 50% to achieve the status of Nearly Zero-Carbon Buildings (NZCBs). Key milestones for this pathway are as follows:
(1) By 2030: All new public buildings must achieve Building Energy Efficiency Level 1 or NZCB status.
(2) By 2040: 50% of existing buildings are to be retrofitted to meet Building Energy Efficiency Level 1 or NZCB status.
(3) By 2050: 100% of new buildings and over 85% of all buildings must be NZCBs.
To enhance the energy efficiency of buildings in Taiwan, the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI) of the MOI has leveraged its successful Green Building Label program to facilitate a net-zero transition. A comprehensive Building Energy Efficiency Rating System has been established. The primary objective is to first achieve the NZCB target, which corresponds to approximately 50% in energy savings. The remaining energy consumption will then be offset by zero-carbon renewable energy sources to reach the final goal of Net-Zero Buildings.
Consequently, the ABRI is executing tasks aligned with the "Net-Zero Building Transformation and Development Promotion Plan," a public works project under the 5th phase (commencing in 2026) of the Executive Yuan-approved Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program. This work is guided by three of the plan's seven core strategies: (1) Strengthening design standards and technical foundations for new net-zero buildings; (2) Developing strategies for energy conservation, generation, storage, and smart energy management in net-zero buildings; and (3) Promoting demonstration projects and expanding the internationalization of the industry.
In 2024, the ABRI completed the development of a Building Energy Rating System (BERS) applicable to all building types. This system is divided into two main categories: non-residential and residential, which are further segmented into six subsystems. The non-residential category includes four subsystems: one for new constructions (BERSn) and three for existing buildings (BERSe, E-BERSe, BERSc). The residential category comprises two subsystems for new constructions (R-BERSn, RP-BERSn). Concurrently, for existing residential buildings, the ABRI conducted testing, adjustments, and feedback collection for a draft framework of an energy efficiency service platform. Furthermore, a preliminary feasibility study and draft proposal were developed for a greenhouse gas "incremental offset project" for energy efficiency retrofits, alongside a draft energy efficiency rating system for buildings located in regions above 800 meters in altitude.
To further develop the building energy efficiency rating system and enhance its application, demonstration, and promotion, this project continues the foundational work on NZCBs and building energy efficiency ratings. The scope of work includes several key tasks: Reviewing and revising the draft energy efficiency rating system for existing residential buildings; developing an online platform (web or mobile application) for energy efficiency assessment of existing residential units, such as single-family homes. Reviewing and revising the draft energy efficiency rating system for buildings in regions above 800 meters in altitude; drafting a methodology for claiming greenhouse gas (GHG) carbon credit offsets from energy efficiency improvements in existing buildings; editing and compiling the 2025 drafts of the ABRI's Green Building Assessment Manuals (EEWH-EB and EEWH-RN); revising the draft "Guidelines for Whole Life-Cycle Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction in Public Construction Projects" to incorporate building energy efficiency ratings and green procurement regulations; conducting three training workshops for professionals on expert diagnostic assessments for energy efficiency improvements in existing buildings.
In addition, this project introduces new initiatives, including providing guidance and subsidies for energy efficiency improvements in the common areas of existing social housing to establish net-zero demonstration projects. It also involves assisting projects in applying for the Candidate Building Energy Efficiency Label Level 1+ (NZCB). The objective is to leverage public social housing as an exemplary model, setting a benchmark for the future large-scale promotion of retrofitting existing residential buildings to NZCB standards.
", "相關檔案": "114健全近零碳建築評估制度建構及應用推廣計畫-成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340245/2425c086-f8de-4d56-9673-36b1e1e64438.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340225", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 12 Aug 2026 03:56:00 GMT", "title": "智慧化居住空間產業創新整合應用計畫", "計畫主持人": "劉俊伸", "協同主持人": "李彬州、簡仁德", "執行單位": "財團法人工業技術研究院", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "AIoT 智慧建築應用、智慧化居住空間創意競賽、AIoT系統整合技術、智慧社區解決方案技術、智慧建築獎勵計劃探討", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、計畫緣起
依據內政部建築研究所提出114年度「智慧化居住空間應用人工智慧物聯網科技計畫(3/4)」項下有關居住空間導入雲端運算、大數據、人工智慧與物聯網等相關科技之應用，及依循「智慧綠建築法規研究與人員培訓等業務(114年)」需求，持續規劃發掘智慧化居住空間相關AIoT創新科技技術及應用發展趨勢，推動在居住與建築空間中以人為本的相關創新整合應用，以減低高齡少子化與人力不足所帶來的相關影響，期望能藉此達到建築物導入應用AIoT科技發展，使人民有感、安全安心、健康照護、便利舒適及節能永續之目的。透過產官學研間的合作，除積極推展居住與建築空間結合AIoT等相關創新技術與應用外，持續精進居住環境與建築空間相關產業之發展，並評估創新應用服務的機會及促成創新應用的擴散，以達促進產業發展，提升居住品質。
二、執行方法及過程
本計畫的主要工作分為三大項：「AIoT導入建築空間創新應用環境建構」、「產業發展及政策推動基礎建構」與「建築社區智慧生活解決方案及應用推廣工作」，其方法與內容如下：
(一) AIoT導入建築空間創新應用環境建構
1.AIoT導入建築空間應用交流推動
(1)召開AIoT特別議題工作小組（Special Interest Group，SIG）會議：
持續AIoT特別議題工作小組（SIG）運作，本年度已完成三場AIoT特別議題工作小組專家會議(8/04、9/19、10/27)。
(2)發展趨勢與國內外解決案例分析：
完成AIoT智慧建築產業發展解決方案分析建議報告1份。
2.維運智慧化居住空間專屬網站
(1)國內外產業動態資訊蒐集、國內政策宣導與產業專題報導：
完成7-12月共256篇國內外產業動態資訊蒐集、國內政策宣導與產業專題報導6則、電子報6則；提供「建築與AIoT專區」國內外智慧建築及智慧城市市場發展的趨勢與成果及技術新知共40篇。
(2)專屬網站資料維護、維運及資安管理查核：
已於114年11月7日完成並通過內政部建研所進行實地稽核。
(3)配合競賽活動辦理，進行競賽網資料更新維護：
已依第十八屆「創意狂想 巢向未來」智慧化居住空間創意競賽時程完成更新。
(二) 產業發展及政策推動基礎建構
1.智慧建築產業發展關鍵人才能力建構
(1)配合「青年就業領航計畫」辦理職缺開發：
完成職缺開發共150名(超過45位名額目標，其中與智慧建築相關之職缺占約83%)。
(2)檢視職能基準內容：
完成「智慧綠建築建築設計人才」及「智慧綠建築綜合佈線人才」2項職能基準更新。
2.政策推動與計畫管理
(1)指派專職人力進駐：
派駐劉俊伸、龍沄共2人協助智慧化居住空間及智慧建築相關產業幕僚作業。
(2)定期管考彙報相關計畫工作項目執行情形。
(3)處理相關行政事務及其他臨時交辦事項。
3.辦理智慧化居住空間創意競賽
(1)辦理智慧化居住空間創意競賽：
完成辦理第十八屆「創意狂想 巢向未來」智慧化居住空間創意競賽。
(2)辦理競賽推廣宣傳與歷屆競賽推廣活動：
於9/12-23間，完成辦理4場次競賽推廣宣傳與歷屆競賽推廣活動。
(三) 建築社區智慧生活解決方案及應用推廣工作
1.辦理展覽活動：
完成參加2025智慧城市展(3/18-3/21)、第十八屆「創意狂想 巢向未來」創意競賽頒獎典禮暨成果分享會(12/10)。
2.辦理智慧居住空間解決方案技術推廣說明會：
已完成三場智慧居住空間解決方案技術推廣說明會(10/15、11/03、11/11)。
三、重要發現及主要建議
本年度「智慧化居住空間產業創新整合應用計畫」業務委託之專業服務案完成下表所有工作事項，並提出幾點具體發現與建議。
工作項目 | 編號 | 工作子項 | 工作內容 | 實際執行狀況 |
分項一：AIoT導入建築空間創新應用環境建構 | （一） | AIoT導入建築空間應用交流推動 | 1.召開AIoT特別議題工作小組（Special Interest Group，SIG）會議至少3場次(至少30人次)。 | 已於114/08/04、114/09/19、114/10/27完成三場次SIG特別議題工作小組會議，共31人次。 完成建議報告1份。 |
2.AIoT智慧建築產業發展解決方案分析建議報告1份。 | ||||
（二） | 維運智慧化居住空間專屬網站 | 1.維運智慧化居住空間專屬網站，提供最新產業動態資訊每週10則、政策宣導或產業專題報導每月至少1次，定期主動發送主題電子報。 | 完成7-12月共256篇國內外產業動態資訊蒐集、國內政策宣導與產業專題報導6則、電子報6則；「建築與AIoT專區」共40篇。 | |
分項二： 產業發展及政策推動基礎建構 | （一） | 智慧建築產業發展關鍵人才能力建構 | 1.配合教育部與勞動部共同推動之「青年就業領航計畫」職缺開發至少45名。 | 1.完成職缺開發150名。 2.完成「智慧綠建築建築設計人才」及「智慧綠建築綜合佈線人才」兩項職能基準內容更新。 |
2.檢視屆期之職能基準內容更新2項。 | ||||
（二） | 政策推動與計畫管理 | 指派專職人力2名協助處理政策推動相關事宜。 | 完成2名人員派駐。 | |
（三） | 辦理智慧化居住空間創意競賽 | 1.辦理智慧化居住空間創意競賽1場。 | 1.完成辦理第十八屆「創意狂想 巢向未來」創意競賽。 2. 完成四場次競賽推廣活動(114/9/12、15、16、23)。 | |
2.辦理競賽推廣宣傳與歷屆競賽優質案例推廣活動至少2場。 | ||||
分項三：建築社區智慧生活解決方案及應用推廣工作 | （一） | 辦理展覽活動 | 1.辦理展覽活動1場次 | 完成參與2025智慧城市展(3/18-3/21)。 完成辦理第十八屆「創意狂想 巢向未來」創意競賽頒獎典禮暨成果分享會。(12/10) |
（二） | 辦理智慧居住空間解決方案技術推廣說明會 | 1.辦理智慧居住空間解決方案技術推廣說明會3場 | 完成辦理3場次 114/10/15(北部場)、114/11/03(中部場)、114/11/11(南部場)。 |
（資料來源：本計畫製作）
(一) AIoT導入建築空間應用交流推動
完成智慧建築獎勵計劃、建築場域與數據交換與應用、與國內智慧建築發展趨勢三項議題研議。建議政府可以利用稅賦減免、住宅建築改造補助、綠色金融貸款等工具對新舊建築進行補助。對於我國智慧建築產業發展建議尋求大型企業合作與透過系統商整合，軟體服務可朝訂閱式服務發展。
1.智慧建築獎勵計劃：
台灣現行智慧建築政策對新建案誘因較高，既有建築智慧化多以補助推動，成效仍有限。參考美國、歐盟與日本經驗，可引入稅賦減免、住宅整體改造補助及綠色金融低利貸款等措施，鼓勵既有住宅升級。並建議將智慧建築標章、能耗等級納入補助與融資條件，提升一般住宅投入智慧化與淨零改造之意願。
2.國內智慧建築發展趨勢：
研究顯示，智慧建築解決方案擴散可透過與大型企業或系統商合作，加速中小企業市場拓展，並建立標竿案例。軟體服務商亦需具備或整合硬體設備能力，以提供一站式完整解決方案，促成跨域合作。整體而言，智慧建築軟體服務商的商業模式正由賣斷制逐步轉向訂閱式服務，顯示訂閱制將成為未來主流發展方向。
(二) 智慧建築推廣宣導成果
本年度辦理多場宣導活動，包含：
1. 參加2025智慧城市展：以智慧化居住空間創意競賽成果進行展覽，參訪人數約1200人次，轉介參觀民眾至廠商件數超過60件。
2. 辦理三場智慧居住空間解決方案技術推廣說明會：於北、中、南三區共舉辦三場技術推廣說明會，包括兩處場域域實地舉辦暨參訪觀摩。實際參與人數達 82 人次。根據現場互動回饋，參與者對於活動皆表示高度肯定，並期待未來有更多參與優良建築案例觀摩的機會。
3. 辦理競賽推廣宣傳與歷屆競賽推廣活動：於北、中、南三區共辦理4場次，參與師生154人次。並爭取與學校、教師合作，將競賽主題規劃進課程內，向下紮根進行人才培養，藉此提升作品的質與量。
4. 辦理第十八屆「創意狂想 巢向未來」創意競賽頒獎典禮暨成果分享會：共84人次參與，由評審團說明作品特色，並邀請得獎者分享經驗，現場展示入圍作品，促進交流與跨領域互動，激發創意並帶動產業發展。
四、 主要建議事項
建議一：研議創意競賽強化人工智慧建築應用提案徵求，回應行政院當前重要科技政策
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
執行機關： 無
立即可行建議：研議於創意競賽中新增人工智慧建築應用主題，引導參賽團隊聚焦智慧化、數位化技術構想，回應行政院當前重點科技政策方向。
中程：透過競賽機制逐步擴大人工智慧建築應用提案徵求，結合政策議題與實務需求，培育具政策對應性與落地潛力之創新構想。
長程：將創意競賽發展為人工智慧建築創新孵化平台，持續對接行政院科技政策，累積前瞻應用成果，強化本所於智慧建築領域之政策支撐角色。
建議二：專題網站增加智慧化居住空間科技計畫近8年成果專區，向外界展現本所科技計畫長期績效
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
執行機關： 無
立即可行建議：於專題網站新增「智慧化居住空間科技計畫近 8 年成果專區」，系統化彙整重點成果，快速對外揭露研究亮點與推動成效。
中程：逐步深化成果專區內容，結合數據分析、案例說明與多媒體呈現，強化科技應用脈絡，提升專題網站專業性與外界理解度。
長程：建構成果專區為長期知識平台，持續累積計畫績效與影響指標，作為政策溝通、跨域合作及展現本所永續研發能量之核心窗口。
I. Project Background
In accordance with the Ministry of the Interior Architecture and Building Research Institute’s (ABRI) FY2025 project “Application of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Technologies in Smart Living Spaces (3/4)” and the requirements of “Research on Smart Green Building Regulations and Personnel Training (FY2025)”, this project continues to explore innovative AIoT technologies and application trends related to smart living spaces.
By promoting human-centered integrated innovations in residential and building environments, the project aims to mitigate the impacts of population aging, declining birth rates, and labor shortages. Through the adoption of AIoT technologies in buildings, the project seeks to deliver tangible benefits to the public, including enhanced safety, health care, convenience, comfort, energy efficiency, and sustainability.
Through collaboration among industry, government, academia, and research institutions, the project not only advances the integration of AIoT technologies in living and building spaces but also strengthens related industries, evaluates opportunities for innovative services, and facilitates the diffusion of innovation, thereby promoting industrial development and improving living quality.
II. Implementation Methods and Process
The project comprises three main components: (1) Building an Innovative Application Environment for AIoT in Building Spaces, (2) Establishing the Foundation for Industrial Development and Policy Promotion, and (3) Promotion of Smart Living Solutions and Applications in Building Communities.
(1) Building an Innovative Application Environment for AIoT in Building Spaces
1. Promotion of AIoT Application Exchanges in Building Spaces
AIoT Special Interest Group (SIG) Meetings:
Continued operation of the AIoT SIG, with three expert meetings held this year (August 4, September 19, and October 27).
Trend Analysis and Domestic/International Case Studies:
Completion of one analytical report with recommendations on AIoT smart building industry solutions.
2. Operation and Maintenance of the Dedicated Smart Living Space Website
Information Collection and Policy Promotion:
From July to December, a total of 256 domestic and international industry updates were collected, along with 6 policy and industry feature articles and 6 e-newsletters. In addition, 40 articles were published in the “Architecture and AIoT Section” covering global trends, outcomes, and technological developments in smart buildings and smart cities.
Website Maintenance and Cybersecurity Audits:
Successfully passed an on-site audit conducted by ABRI on November 7, 2025.
Competition Website Updates:
Website content was updated in accordance with the schedule of the 18th “Creative Imagination: Nesting the Future” Smart Living Space Creative
Competition.
(2) Establishing the Foundation for Industrial Development and Policy Promotion
1. Capacity Building for Key Talent in the Smart Building Industry
Job Development under the Youth Employment Navigation Program:
A total of 150 job positions were developed (exceeding the target of 45), with approximately 83% related to smart buildings.
Review of Occupational Competency Standards:
Updated two competency standards: “Smart Green Building Design Professionals” and “Smart Green Building Integrated Cabling Professionals.”
2. Policy Promotion and Project Management
Assignment of Dedicated Personnel:
Two staff members, Chun-Shen Liu and Yun Lung, were assigned to support policy and administrative tasks related to smart living spaces and the
smart building industry.
Regular progress reviews and reporting.
Handling of administrative affairs and ad hoc assignments.
3. Organization of the Smart Living Space Creative Competition
Competition Implementation:
Successfully organized the 18th “Creative Imagination: Nesting the Future” Smart Living Space Creative Competition.
Competition Promotion Activities:
Four promotional and legacy competition events were held between September 12 and 23.
(3) Promotion of Smart Living Solutions and Applications in Building Communities
1. Exhibitions:
Participation in the 2025 Smart City Summit & Expo (March 18–21) and the awards ceremony and Results Sharing Session of the 18th Creative
Competition (December 10).
2. Technical Promotion Seminars:
Three technical promotion seminars on smart living space solutions were held (October 15, November 3, and November 11).
III. Key Findings
All planned tasks under the commissioned professional services of the “Smart Living Space Industry Innovation and Integration Application Project” were completed. The following key findings and recommendations were identified.
(1) Promotion of AIoT Applications in Building Spaces
Three major themes were examined: smart building incentive programs, building-site data exchange and applications, and domestic smart building development trends. It is recommended that the government adopt policy tools such as tax incentives, residential renovation subsidies, and green finance loans to support both new and existing buildings. For industrial development, collaboration with large enterprises and system integrators is advised, while software services should move toward subscription-based models.
1. Smart Building Incentive Programs:
Taiwan’s current smart building policies provide stronger incentives for new buildings, while incentives for smart upgrades of existing buildings remain limited. Drawing on experiences from the United States, the EU, and Japan, it is recommended to introduce tax reductions, comprehensive residential renovation subsidies, and low-interest green finance loans. Incorporating smart building certification and energy performance ratings into subsidy and financing criteria would further encourage residential upgrades and net-zero renovations.
2. Domestic Smart Building Development Trends:
Research indicates that the diffusion of smart building solutions can be accelerated through partnerships with large enterprises or system integrators, helping SMEs expand markets and establish benchmark cases. Software service providers must also integrate or collaborate with hardware suppliers to deliver comprehensive, one-stop solutions. Overall, business models are shifting from one-time sales to subscription-based services, which are expected to become the dominant model in the future.
III. Key Findings
All planned tasks under the commissioned professional services of the “Smart Living Space Industry Innovation and Integration Application Project” were completed. The following key findings and recommendations were identified.
(1) Promotion of AIoT Applications in Building Spaces
Three major themes were examined: smart building incentive programs, building-site data exchange and applications, and domestic smart building development trends. It is recommended that the government adopt policy tools such as tax incentives, residential renovation subsidies, and green finance loans to support both new and existing buildings. For industrial development, collaboration with large enterprises and system integrators is advised, while software services should move toward subscription-based models.
1. Smart Building Incentive Programs:
Taiwan’s current smart building policies provide stronger incentives for new buildings, while incentives for smart upgrades of existing buildings remain limited. Drawing on experiences from the United States, the EU, and Japan, it is recommended to introduce tax reductions, comprehensive residential renovation subsidies, and low-interest green finance loans. Incorporating smart building certification and energy performance ratings into subsidy and financing criteria would further encourage residential upgrades and net-zero renovations.
2. Domestic Smart Building Development Trends:
Research indicates that the diffusion of smart building solutions can be accelerated through partnerships with large enterprises or system integrators, helping SMEs expand markets and establish benchmark cases. Software service providers must also integrate or collaborate with hardware suppliers to deliver comprehensive, one-stop solutions. Overall, business models are shifting from one-time sales to subscription-based services, which are expected to become the dominant model in the future.
(2) Outcomes of Smart Building Promotion Activities
This year’s promotional activities included:
1. Participation in the 2025 Smart City Summit & Expo:
Exhibition of competition outcomes attracted approximately 1,200 visitors, with over 60 referrals made to participating vendors.
2. Technical Promotion Seminars:
Three seminars were held across northern, central, and southern Taiwan, with a total of 82 participants. Feedback was highly positive, and participants expressed interest in future case-study visits to exemplary buildings.
3. Competition Promotion and Legacy Events:
Four events were held nationwide, engaging 154 teachers and students. Collaboration with schools and educators integrated competition themes into curricula, strengthening talent cultivation and improving both the quality and quantity of submissions.
4. Awards Ceremony and Results Sharing:
A total of 84 participants attended the 18th Creative Competition awards ceremony and results sharing event, featuring jury insights, winner experience sharing, project exhibitions, and cross-disciplinary exchanges that stimulated creativity and industry development.
IV. Key Recommendations
Recommendation 1: Review the Enhancement of Proposal Solicitation for Artificial Intelligence Applications in Architecture through a Creative Competition, in Response to Current Key Science and Technology Policies of the Executive Yuan
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Implementing Body: None
Immediately Feasible Action: Consider introducing a dedicated theme on artificial intelligence applications in architecture within the creative competition to guide participating teams to focus on intelligent and digital technology concepts, in alignment with the Executive Yuan’s current priority science and technology policy directions.
Mid-term: Gradually expand the solicitation of proposals on artificial intelligence applications in architecture through the competition mechanism, integrating policy themes with practical needs, and fostering innovative concepts with policy relevance and implementation potential.
Long-term: Develop the creative competition into an incubation platform for innovation in artificial intelligence–enabled architecture, maintaining alignment with the Executive Yuan’s science and technology policies, accumulating forward-looking application outcomes, and strengthening the Institute’s role in providing policy support in the field of smart buildings.
Recommendation 2: Establish a Dedicated Section on the Project Website Showcasing Achievements of the Smart Living Space Technology Program over the Past Eight Years to Demonstrate Long-term Program Performance
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Implementing Body: None
Immediately Feasible Action: Add a dedicated section titled “Achievements of the Smart Living Space Technology Program over the Past Eight Years” to the project website, systematically compiling key outcomes to promptly present research highlights and implementation achievements to external audiences.
Mid-term: Gradually enrich the content of the achievements section by integrating data analysis, case descriptions, and multimedia presentations, thereby strengthening the narrative of technology applications and enhancing the professionalism of the website and public understanding.
Long-term: Develop the achievements section into a long-term knowledge platform, continuously accumulating performance results and impact indicators, and positioning it as a core interface for policy communication, cross-domain collaboration, and showcasing the Institute’s sustained R&D capacity.
", "相關檔案": "114年智慧化居住空間產業創新整合應用計畫-成果報告-final (2)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340225/fa411594-2574-4599-9680-781379f340dd.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340224", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 12 Aug 2026 03:28:00 GMT", "title": "強化低碳與循環經濟效益之再生綠建材推廣應用", "計畫主持人": "陳文欽", "協同主持人": "陳文卿", "執行單位": "財團法人環境與發展基金會", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "再生綠建材、淨零排放、循環經濟、產業聯盟", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、計畫緣起
為抑制全球升溫1.5℃以下，國發會於111年3月提出「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略」規劃，包括「能源轉型」、「產業轉型」、「生活轉型」及「社會轉型」等四大轉型策略。而在「產業轉型」中則包括高科技產業、傳統製造業、建築營造業、運具電氣化、食品農林、資源循環等。而在建築部門的產業轉型中，希望在2050年前所有的新建建築物及超過85%建築物為近零碳建築。
根據美國麥克阿瑟基金會(Ellen MacArthur Foundation) 2019年針對全球性減碳策略的研究，發現從能源策略著手，約可減少總碳排55%，剩下45%必須藉由循環經濟策略才能補得上。因此藉由興建綠建築，以及使用循環綠建材落實循環經濟，乃為佔全國排碳量三成的建築部門配合淨零排放最重要的策略。
此外，金管會也配合提出「公司治理3.0-永續發展藍圖」，要求上市櫃公司必須藉由ESG資訊揭露提出企業永續報告書。本所曾針對現行綠建材標章中與循環經濟關連最密切的「再生綠建材」進行效益評估，發現具有減少天然資源使用與廢棄物產生，因而減少二氧化碳排放的「三減」效益。因應營建業ESG需求之趨勢，近年再生綠建材標章之申請案件逐年增加，故應持續進行多元環境效益之評估研究，以彰顯對國家淨零排放之貢獻。
為加強再生綠建材之應用，內政部建築研究所於2010年成立「再生綠建材產業推動聯盟」，積極宣導再生綠建材之多元效益，並已成為產學研交流，及媒合需求端與供應端之重要平臺，因此應持續維持並加強運作。並將彙集聯盟業界與專家學者之意見，提出因應2050淨零排放之再生綠建材推動策略。
為強化再生綠建材推廣應用，建研所於2020年曾編印「再生綠建材應用推廣指引」，廣受各界歡迎。因應國家淨零排放政策與ESG之發展趨勢，配合2024年版「綠建材解說與評估手冊」之發行，將增修後之再生綠建材標章評定之內容納入，以及金管會於2024年12月31日公告「永續經濟活動認定參考指引」第二版，與再生綠建材之生產與使用相關內容，納入於2025年版「再生綠建材應用推廣指引」更新版，並經專家委員再次審查修正後，已呈建研所核定完成。印製發行後，將可提供營建業、建築師、設計業者參考使用，以利業界掌握最新資訊，強化再生綠建材之應用。
二、計畫執行方法與過程
本計畫工作項目之一為再生綠建材產業推動聯盟之運作，除建構聯盟網站宣導再生綠建材之多元效益外，並協助業者將市場推廣所遭遇之困難，向主管機關提出反映。
本計畫辦理2場再生綠建材產業推動聯盟交流座談會，及1場配合實地觀摩之推廣說明會。113年度曾探討再生綠建材推廣應用之各項課題，並完成SWOT分析，據此研擬再生綠建材整體之推動策略(草案)，爰邀請聯盟諮議委員及政府機關帶與公協會代表召開第一場座談會，針對該項推動策略提供意見。第二場交流座談會則邀集聯盟成員，討論目前再生綠建材推廣之問題，並提出克服相關法規障礙，以提高市場誘因之建議措施，提供各主管機關參考。
本計畫前期曾完成再生綠建材之多元效益分析，可提供營建業者使用再生綠建材之ESG資訊揭露依據，其中之減碳效益更為業者最關注之重點。國際碳盤查趨勢逐漸成熟，再生綠建材使用回收材料為原料，碳排盤查涵蓋自廢棄資源自回收起(含前處理)至再生綠建材可使用的回收材料，為再生綠建材生命週期原料階段盤查範疇，今年度將以再生綠建材使用各種回收材料所產生之減碳數據為基礎，進行納入嚴謹之評估，以利建材業者評估各項再生綠建材之碳效益。
再生綠建材除具有減廢、減碳效益外，尚有多項產品另具有輕質、隔熱、節能等功效。因此使用這類具優質特性的再生綠建材，將對於低蘊含碳建築有重大貢獻。本計畫探討回收材料之特性，並說明產生優質特性的原理，並提出多項代表性之優質再生綠建材，可廣為業界使用。
除綠建材標章外，目前各部會推動之綠色標章有經濟部「資源再生綠色產品」、環境部「環保標章」等。本計畫針對三類標章之評定基準進行比較分析，並提出再生綠建材標章之特性，做為未來各類標章整合之參考，並建議建材類之綠色標章應以回歸建築物專屬之綠建材標章為主。
配合2024年版「綠建材標章評估手冊」之修訂，針對2020年曾編撰之「再生綠建材推廣應用指引」進行編修。除將淨零排放、循環經濟之重要政策導入外，並針對增修之再生綠建材標章內容，針對獲再生綠建材標章產品之應用與生產做重點介紹，另外金管會於2024年12月31日公告「永續經濟活動認定參考指引」第二版，今年度已將與再生綠建材之生產與使用相關內容，納入再生綠建材應用推廣指引修訂版編修，並補充QA說明，以利業界掌握最新資訊，強化再生綠建材之應用。
三、重要成果與發現
(一) 再生綠建材產業推動聯盟是強化再生綠建材標章推動成效之重要溝通與成果展示平台，發揮推廣再生綠建材及保障標章使用者權益兩大功能。除建置聯盟網站，提供資源循環相關之法規與技術資訊外，並藉由各種場合持續宣導使用再生綠建材之多元效益。
(二) 辦理聯盟交流座談會，針對再生綠建材因應淨零碳排推動實務，以及市場應用遭遇之問題廣泛討論，將作為研擬因應淨零排放之再生綠建材推廣策略參考。
(三) 依據台灣建築中心針對綠建材標章申請與合發數量之統計，可發現再生綠建材申請數量及比例已逐年提高。藉由再生綠建材優質特性分析，可讓使用端更清楚瞭解再生綠建材除品質性能皆可符合國家標準外，更具有其他優質特性，用途更廣泛。
(四) 再生綠建材之多元效益分析，減碳效益更為業者最關注之重點。因此必須以再生綠建材使用各種回收材料所產生之減碳數據為基礎，進行嚴謹之評估，以利建材業者評估各項再生綠建材之碳效益，對建築產業之永續發展具重大貢獻。
(五) 配合2024年版「綠建材標章評估手冊」之修訂，針對2020年編撰之「再生綠建材推廣指引」作內容增編修。除增列淨零排放與綠建材關聯密切之論述外，再生綠建材之評定基準大幅度增修，廣納多項優質再生綠建材。今年度完成「再生綠建材應用推廣指引」編輯及出版，將可做為未來辦理各項說明會時，強化再生綠建材推廣應用之利器。
四、主要建議事項
依據本計畫執行成果，針對再生綠建材之推廣，提出以下建議，並分別從立即可行建議及中、長期建議事項列舉如下：
建議一
持續維持再生綠建材產業推動聯盟運作：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
說明：為強化再生綠建材推動，本年度針對再生綠建材產業推動聯盟運作進行規劃。目前包括綠建材業者、公協會及專家學者等在內，已達九十個業者與成員。聯盟可發揮推廣再生綠建材及保障標章使用者權益兩大功能，是內政部建築研究所強化綠建材標章推動成效之重要溝通與成果展示平台，應持續支持其運作。
建議二
持續辦理再生綠建材之行銷推廣活動：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
說明：本計畫辦理再生綠建材推廣說明會，獲得許多公民營機構辦理工程發包採購者之熱烈迴響。因此藉由2025年版「再生綠建材推廣應用指引」之發行，將可作為加強推廣行銷之利器。未來應可採取多元化之行銷推廣活動，以加強再生綠建材之使用。
建議三
建議獲綠建材標章定期申報產品之銷售數量：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
說明：為利於評估推動綠建材標章在整體環境效益，建議修正「綠建材標章申請審核認可及使用作業要點」，參考環境部環保標章、經濟部資源再生綠色產品認定之作業規定，要求或綠建材標章之業者定期申報產品之銷售數量等資訊，納入強制性規定，以利掌握即時資訊，進行整體之環境效益評估。
建議四
加強推動標章整合：長期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所、環境部、經濟部
(一) 說明：目前環境部之「環保標章」、經濟部之「資源再生綠色產品」皆有建材類之綠色標章，也都是建築技術規則所認可之綠建材。但這三項標章之評定基準與應用對象略有差異，對業者經常造成困擾。建議採取以下措施
(二) 三類標章進行整合，力求評定基準一致性。各類標章進行增修訂時，邀請他類標章執行機構參與，提供相關意見。
(三) 業者取得環境部、經濟部之標章後，若將再申請綠建材標章時，僅須針對差異部分作說明(或檢測)，其餘則可準用，反之亦然。
(四) 綠建材標章為建築物之專屬標章，建議未來新增建材類之評定項目以內政部綠建材標章為主，環境部、經濟部不再制定。
(五) 已取得他類標章，於申請請綠建材標章時，僅須提出原標章與綠建材標章之差異說明，提請綠建材標章分類委員會討論，並經現勘查核確認後，得同時取得再生綠建材標章。
建議五
加強推動標章效益：長期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所、行政院公共工程委員會
說明：目前行政院公共工程委員會金質獎之加分機制與相關誘因為業界相當重視，再生綠建材產品符合低蘊含碳等優質特性，建議可協調公共工程委員會卓參將此列入金質獎加分項目，以提高業者投入與使用意願。
", "英文摘要": "Taiwan’s National Development Council announced the “Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions in 2050” on March 30, 2022. For the construction and building sector, the roadmap specifies that all new buildings and more than 85% of existing buildings are to become nearly zero-carbon buildings by 2050. “Resource recycling and zero waste” is also identified as one of the 12 key strategies. Consequently, green building materials—particularly recycled green building materials - are expected to be widely adopted due to their significant contribution to the circular economy.
To promote the market adoption of recycled green building materials, the Recycling Green Building Materials Promotion Alliance was established in 2020 under the sponsorship of the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI), Ministry of the Interior. Since then, the alliance has served as an important platform for communication and dialogue between building-material manufacturers and the construction industry. A dedicated alliance website was also launched to provide market information and technical resources.
In 2024, two workshops were held to review and provide critical insights on the comprehensive promotion strategy for recycled green building materials. Through communication among alliance members, recommendations were proposed to overcome existing barriers and strengthen the application of recycled building materials.
In terms of sustainable finance, ESG information has become essential for reporting sustainable economic activities. This project examined the diverse benefits of using recycled building materials, including waste reduction, reduced consumption of natural resources, and decreased CO₂ emissions. The results provide valuable references for the construction sector to incorporate into ESG reporting when applying recycled building materials.
Recycled building materials offer outstanding effectiveness in waste minimization and carbon reduction. In addition, many recycled materials possess advantages such as lightweight properties and thermal insulation. These high-performance features contribute to energy savings in buildings and encourage broader adoption by the construction industry.
Currently, Taiwan has three types of green product labels, each with its own evaluation criteria for building materials. This project assesses the characteristics of the three labeling systems and provides integration recommendations for reference by relevant government ministries and agencies to facilitate future consolidation.
", "相關檔案": "114建研所成果報告v2.4(核定會議記錄調整)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340224/7ab42181-c639-4b52-97de-1640061a20b2.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339436", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:42:00 GMT", "title": "智慧營造與數位轉型之實證與應用推廣", "計畫主持人": "邱建國", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "工程技術組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "智慧營造、數位轉型、數位雙生、人工智慧", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "因應營造產業長期面臨缺工、高齡化、高風險作業及生產效率提升不易等結構性問題，智慧營造已成為各國推動營建產業升級與職業安全改善之重要政策方向。透過國際趨勢盤點可知，日本、新加坡、 歐盟及香港等國家，已將智慧營造納入制度化或具強制性之推動架構；相較之下，我國目前仍以示範、觀摩與競賽導向為主，顯示後續仍需透過政策制度與誘因設計，方能擴大推動成效。
本計畫聚焦於智慧營造之實務應用與推動路徑，先期以「科技防災與智慧工地管理」作為切入點，於實際工地場域完成智慧工地資訊管理系統（戰情平台）及多項模組之建置與串接，包含環境監測、人 臉辨識門禁、用電與碳排監測、電梯井與垃圾管道 AI 管制、塔吊監視輔助及火災警示等系統。實測結果顯示，透過即時監測與主動告警機制，可有效降低人員誤入高風險區域與不安全作業行為，並強化管理人員對工地安全、能源使用與作業狀態之即時掌握，驗證智慧工地於實務環境中具備可行性與穩定性。
此外，本計畫亦完成智慧機具之軟硬體雛形及初步應用案例，證實智慧機具可作為智慧工地之重要組成元素，並具備銜接後續自動化施工與遠端操控之發展潛力。在制度層面上，分析現行政府採購法、建築法、營造業法及相關施工品質與職業安全規範，指出對於數位證據採認、資料標準化、遠距稽核及智慧設備經費編列仍有不足，後續有必要配合智慧營造發展進行滾動式檢討與調整。
綜合本計畫成果，建議我國智慧營造推動可採短、中、長期循序發展策略：短期以科技防災與智慧工地管理為重點，透過公共工程示範案建立可複製模式；中期逐步導入自動化施工機具與測量設備，發展人機協作施工模式；長期則朝向遠端遙控與無人化施工發展，結合中央控制室、數位雙生及 AI 輔助決策，降低人員暴露於高風險環境，並提升整體施工效率與產業競爭力。透過政策誘因、法規調整及產業聯盟運作之配合，有助於推動智慧營造由示範走向制度化，形塑具延續性與規模化之發展路徑。
Facing long-term challenges such as labor shortages, workforce aging, high-risk operations, and limited productivity growth, smart construction has become a key policy approach for improving occupational safety and upgrading the construction industry worldwide. International experience shows that regions including Japan, Singapore, the European Union, and Hong Kong have adopted institutionalized or mandatory frameworks for smart construction, while Taiwan remains largely focused on demonstration-based initiatives, indicating a need for stronger policy mechanisms and incentives.
This project focuses on the practical implementation and promotion of smart construction, with technology-enabled disaster prevention and smart site management as the initial entry point. A smart construction site management platform and related systems were deployed and tested in an actual construction site, demonstrating that real-time monitoring and proactive alerts can effectively reduce unsafe behaviors and enhance site management efficiency and situational awareness.
Based on the project outcomes, a phased roadmap for smart construction is proposed: short-term promotion of technology-enabled safety management, medium-term adoption of automated construction equipment, and long-term development toward remote-controlled and unmanned construction. With supportive policies, regulatory adjustments, and industry collaboration, smart construction can gradually transition from demonstration projects to institutionalized and scalable implementation.
", "相關檔案": "114智慧營造與數位轉型之實證與應用推廣-結案報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339436/90d757df-120b-4a90-8d4b-8d126ad95037.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339328", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 01 Jul 2026 02:51:00 GMT", "title": "數位雙生技術於數位建築營運與永續發展實證及應用推廣", "計畫主持人": "李明澔", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "財團法人台灣建築中心", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "工程技術組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "數位雙生（Digital Twin）、BIM、淨零排放、智慧化管理、碳足跡追蹤、永續發展", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、計畫緣起
隨著全球建築產業加速數位化轉型，數位雙生（Digital Twin）技術已成為提升建築物全生命週期管理的關鍵工具。本計畫背景源於應對氣候變遷與資源耗竭的挑戰，特別是在聯合國永續發展目標（SDGs）與台灣 2050 淨零排放路徑的政策驅動下，建築部門因占全球碳排近 37%，面臨嚴峻的減碳壓力。
本計畫之動機在於結合智化物聯網（AIoT）、人工智慧（AI）與高精度氣象預測，實現實體建築與虛擬模型的無縫整合，以解決國內建築能效管理效率不彰與運維成本高昂等痛點。計畫目標旨在建立一套適用於國內建築環境的數位雙生技術標準與操作指南，透過場域實證驗證其可行性，並藉由產學聯盟的成立與技術推廣，助力建築產業達成深度節能與數位轉型的願景。
二、計畫成果
(一)數位雙生技術應用於建築營運與維護
本計畫奠定了建築運維的數據基礎建設，成功整合示範場域的空調與電梯系統。在設備監控方面，採用 Bac.Net 協議進行設備狀態監測，不僅降低硬體整合成本，更為後續 AI 建模提供穩定的數據源。研究實踐了從傳統的「預防性維護」轉向「預測性維護（Predictive Maintenance）」，透過大數據與 AI 演算法，在設備發生故障前主動偵測效能悖離，降低突發故障風險並提升管理效率。此外，結合物業管理系統，將異常告警轉化為自動派工單，有效緩解現場管理人力不足的問題。
(二)數位雙生技術於數位建築智慧化與自動化管理的實踐
計畫核心在於建立從 BIM 模型轉換至能源模型（BEM）的整合流程，利用 Rhino.Inside.Revit與 Grasshopper 等工具萃取建築幾何與材料參數，生成 EnergyPlus 可讀取的 IDF 檔案。此流程實現了建築資訊與能效分析的即時互通。在自動化管理上，計畫導入了「數位雙生驅動 AI 環境控制」，利用數位模型生成的高品質合成數據進行 AI 訓練，克服了現場實測數據收集不易的限制。經示範場域實證，導入數位雙生智慧控制後，在特定情境下可達到 15.9%的節能率。
(三)永續發展與碳排放管理
本計畫將碳排放管理貫穿建築全生命週期，開發了長期碳排預測 API，結合高精度氣象年資料，可模擬至 2050 年的碳排趨勢。透過建置視覺化的碳排管理儀表板，使用者能即時掌握各年度與月份的碳足跡。模擬結果顯示，在示範案場導入數位雙生優化方案後，至 2050 年預計可累積減少約 263 公噸-CO₂e 的排放。此外，計畫亦針對電梯儲能再生系統申請碳權之流程進行研究，為建築節能措施轉化為碳信用額度提供實務參考。
(四)場域實證與效益評估
計畫於內政部建築研究所 Living 4.0 智慧化居住空間展示中心與材料實驗中心進行多項實證。研究建立了建築物既有能效基線（BERSn），並透過 CFD 氣流模擬優化室內通風與空調佈置。在被動節能方面，實驗證實使用新型大地聚合材（Geopolymer）具有優異的隔熱性能，並透過模擬量化其對降低空調負荷的具體貢獻。最終產出的《建築產業數位雙生技術操作手冊與作業指南》，為產業提供了標準化的導入流程與自主檢核表。
(五)推廣與業界交流
為擴大計畫影響力，本案成功發起成立「建築數位雙生聯盟」，整合產、官、學、研各界資源，共同推動技術標準化與市場應用。計畫於 115 年 1 月辦理成果發表會暨聯盟成立大會，吸引超過 80 位來賓參與。此外，在材料實驗中心建置了實境體驗展示場域，運用 AR 擴增實境、科普影片與互動遊戲，向專業人士及大眾展示數位雙生技術在深度節能與減碳管理上的實際成效。
(六)創意回饋
計畫提出多項前瞻性創意回饋，包括應用智慧無人機進行建築施工巡檢與安全監造，利用AI 影像辨識確保工地安全帽配戴，並結合紅外線熱顯像技術檢查外殼隔熱效果 。同時，開發數位雙生防災避難應用，透過物聯網感測網路即時監測溫度異常，建立火災預警機制，並整合滅火器與緊急照明燈的自動巡檢模組，強化場域的應變韌性。
三、結論
本計畫建立一套完整的數位雙生技術導入架構，透過場域實證與產學聯盟的推動，證實了數位雙生技術能有效提升建築運行效率、精準管理碳排放，並創造實質的節能效益。計畫並編撰《建築產業數位雙生技術操作手冊與作業指南》，為台灣建築產業的數位轉型提供了可複製的路徑。
", "英文摘要": "", "相關檔案": "數位雙生成果報告書ALL_V2 1150630(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339328/d66fdb73-47e9-48fe-9faa-49934f1306c7.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339332", "ModifyDate": "Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:58:00 GMT", "title": "木構造建築耐震行為、震後防災原則及工法", "計畫主持人": "蔡孟廷", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "工程技術組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "Cross Laminated Timber (CLT)、豎向分配放大係數、RC-CLT 複合牆體、石膏板、防火時效", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究背景
我國位處於地震帶，因此建築物之耐震性能為重要課題，探究木構造建築與RC結構或鋼結構之結構系統的最大差別，在於木構造結構系統較難達到抗彎矩構架的性能要求，其主要耐震單元仰賴牆體或是斜撐來達到耐震需求。然而現代木構造技術日新月異，如近年來工法及技術漸趨成熟的直交集成板(Cross Laminated Timber, CLT)、以及各國競相多元開發的木構造節點接合型式。綜合來說，不同之木構造工法(CLT或是集成材)，乃至接合鐵件及接合型式等，其力學性能均會有不同。因此，如何透過一定程度的理論探討及驗證實驗，提出我國木構造規範中之修正建議，增加低蘊含碳木構造工法的多元應用，則為達到淨零碳排目標的重要一步。在既往研究成果的基礎上，如何進行更深入的研究及探討，並參考國外相關法令提出更去代表性的研究成果，作為後續法規修訂參考的基礎資料至關重要。因此，本研究立足於既往研究的基礎上，針對現有木構造規範在應用上急需之關鍵研究及資訊，包含混合型式木構造建築的設計方法、木構造牆體的結構性能、以及木構造建築在震後火災的防災機制等。
二、研究方法
本研究課題延續112年度協同研究計畫:國際木構造建築物設計技術發展與設計施工規範檢討更新之研究，並參考研究中國外相關針對高層木構造所提出的耐震設計原則，針對不同木構造結構牆體，主要為輕構架牆體系統、斜撐牆體系統、以及直交集成板牆體系統進行反覆加載測推實驗，透過遲滯迴圈所形成的包絡線進行牆體彈塑性模型的推導，進而求得不同牆體之設計強度、結構行為、以及彈塑性比。研究成果可為木構造規範中接合部章節重要的補充資料，彈塑性變形比亦可成為未來木構造牆體類型之韌性容量R值之修正參考依據。另外，本研究課題亦參考112年度協同研究計畫:國際木構造建築物設計技術發展與設計施工規範檢討更新之研究，研究中提出木構造建築物除了須考慮地震下之耐震能力及行為之外，由於木構造屬於可燃材料，因此在地震後所可能併發的例如火災等防災設計原則，亦屬本研究之重要研究課題。
三、重要發現
本年度研究延續前幾年度之成果，探討木構造混合結構及複合構件之結構行為，階段性成果主要針對木構造混合結構之耐震設計方法及驗證、木構造建築耐震牆體之結構行為(RC-CLT複合牆體、鋼木BRB構件)等進行理論探討及實驗驗證。研究成果彙整如下。
本研究針對立面鋼木混合結構上部木結構之地震力放大效應，基於既往年度之理論計算方法，結合振動臺實驗針對地震力調整係數進行深入探討。經由振動臺實驗與即時複合實驗，驗證既往年度所提出之考慮譜加速度隨結構週期變化（方法一）之計算方法。考慮到實驗誤差，本研究設定上部結構阻尼比範圍（2%至10%）計算理論值之上下限，並與實驗結果比對，顯示實驗所得地震力調整係數均位於理論值範圍內，證明該計算方法具有合理性。另外，本研究將RC-CLT複合牆體與董憲宏等人研究結果中之RC構架(BNF)做比較。結果顯示，以雲杉CLT牆板填入RC構架可提升結構強度，並同時提高結構之剛度，補強效率比為1.61。RC-CLT複合牆體於試驗初期，試體之結構行為由RC構架為主要控制，試驗中期，試體之結構行為由RC構架與CLT牆板、鐵件共同控制，而試驗後期則由CLT牆版與鐵件主要控制。以雲杉CLT牆板全牆補強之試體(CLT-RW)之結構強度於層間變位增大後逐漸接近RC/CLT試體，於層間變位2.0%時，最大側向力為745kN，高達RC/CLT的97%，由此可知，RC建築於地震後以CLT牆板進行補強，可使其結構強度回復到震前之97%。綜上所述，CLT作為RC構架震後補強之材料，於提高結構強度方面表現良好，補強效率高。
針對鋼木挫屈束制斜撐（STBRB）構件進行試驗、模擬及設計評估方面。實驗及分析結果顯示，ST-BRB 在循環載重下展現穩定之遲滯行為，其最大強度可達 1.3Py，顯示具有良好之耐震性能。當 T 型腹板進入塑性階段時，發生 T 型局部挫屈（T-buckling），並進一步誘發兩種圍束破壞模式，分別為劈裂模式 I 與劈裂模式 II。ST-BRB-L 與 ST-BRB-S 之比較，釐清了不同圍束配置對破壞模式之影響，並建立相符之強度預估模型，可作為設計檢核之依據。
四、主要建議事項
根據研究發現，本研究針對行政檢查業務委託民間辦理處理的法制化，提出下列具體建議。以下分別從立即可行的建議、及長期性建議加以列舉。
立即可行之建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
本研究針對立面鋼木混合結構上部木結構之地震力放大效應，上部結構阻尼比範圍（2%至10%）計算理論值之上下限，並與實驗結果比對，顯示實驗所得地震力調整係數均位於理論值範圍內，證明該計算方法具有合理性。建議後續可針對此設計方法進行設計案例之驗算，進行研擬及修訂技術手冊供業界參考。
中期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
以CLT牆板全牆補強之震後受損RC構架之結構強度於層間變位增大後逐漸接近RC/CLT試體，於層間變位2.0%時，最大側向力為745kN，高達RC/CLT的97%，由此可知，RC建築於地震後以CLT牆板進行補強，可使其結構強度在層間變位達2.0%時回復到震前相當強度。綜上所述，CLT作為RC構架震後補強之材料，於提高結構強度方面表現良好，補強效率高。進行研擬及修訂技術手冊供業界參考。
長期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
鋼木挫屈束制斜撐（STBRB）在循環載重下展現穩定之遲滯行為，其最大強度可達 1.3Py，顯示具有良好之耐震性能。長期而言，可針對此類型結構進行長期研究，並在研究成果較為成熟後，進行研擬及修訂技術手冊供業界參考。
", "英文摘要": "Taiwan is located in seismic zone, the seismic performance of buildings is a critical issue. Meanwhile, timber structure become a sustainable alternative in construction sector. The fundamental difference between timber structures and reinforced concrete (RC) or steel structures are the structural systems that meet the seismic resistance abilities. Unlike moment-resisting structure, seismic resistance ability for timber structures mainly relies on walls or bracing systems. Recently, construction methods and technologies such as Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) have become increasingly mature, and various types of timber connection systems have been actively developed.
This study investigates the amplification effect of seismic forces on the upper timber structure of a steel–timber hybrid structural system. The theoretical amplification for seismic force distribution were calculated for upper-structure with damping ratios ranging from 2% to 10%, the results were compared with experiment. The comparison shows that the seismic force amplification factors obtained from the experiments all fall within the theoretical range, demonstrating the rationality of the proposed calculation method. For the studies regarding seismic resistance elements, RC-CLT wall system, in which CLT was used as a post-earthquake strengthening material for RC frames, performs well in enhancing structural strength and demonstrates high strengthening efficiency based on the experimental results in this study. Additionally, Steel–timber buckling-restrained braces (STBRBs) exhibit stable hysteretic behavior under cyclic loading, with a maximum strength up to 1.3 Py, demonstrating good seismic performance.
", "相關檔案": "內政部建築研究所成果報告-最新版(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339332/a7e5aeb6-efe6-49d1-ac11-02d18f463c84.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339296", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:24:00 GMT", "title": "低蘊含碳建築評估標示制度宣導推廣計畫暨老屋延壽策略研析", "計畫主持人": "江欣政", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "財團法人台灣建築中心", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "工程技術組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "建築蘊含碳排標示、老屋延壽、淨零政策", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "為了因應全球氣候變遷挑戰，聯合國於2015年通過《巴黎協定》，致力於將全球升溫控制在不超過1.5°C為達成此目標，此後，美國、日本、韓國、歐盟等先進國家陸續承諾於2050年前達成淨零碳排，而中國則設定於2060年實現。我國亦於2021年地球日正式宣示「淨零碳排是臺灣的目標」，並於2022年由國家發展委員會公布「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明」，其中由內政部主責「淨零建築」路徑的規劃與推動，明確設定至2050年新建建築100%達到近零碳建築標準，且超過85%的建築物達成同等水準。
根據國際能源總署（IEA, 2022）的報告，全球建築與營建部門的溫室氣體排放約占37%。其中，建築物運行階段所產生的使用碳排（Operational Carbon, OC）約占28%，而來自建築材料製造、運輸、施工、修繕與拆除等生命週期早期階段的蘊含碳排（Embodied Carbon, EC）則占約9%。過去，國際間的淨零建築政策大多聚焦於使用碳排的減量。然而，隨著建築材料製造與營建過程的碳排比例逐步升高，蘊含碳的管控與減量已成為不可忽視的關鍵課題。為此，內政部建築研究所已於113年7月1日正式啟動「建築蘊含碳排標示評估制度」，推動營建產業在設計與建造初期即導入低碳材料與工法，協助臺灣建築業邁向全生命週期減碳。
本計畫的第一個核心任務，即延續既有基礎推動「低蘊含碳建築評估標示制度」的宣導與推廣。計畫舉辦北、中、南、東四場次低碳建築講習會，以及一場低碳建築標示授證典禮與論壇。活動結合案例分享、技術交流與影片製作，提升產業界與大眾對建築減碳政策、計算方法及成功案例的認知。同時，亦蒐集國內外淨零建築減碳工法與評估技術，建立知識資料庫，供未來政策與產業應用參考。
本計畫的另一個核心任務，則聚焦於「老屋延壽策略研析」。隨著臺灣邁入高齡化社會，大量老舊建築不僅面臨耐震不足、結構老化、漏水、外牆剝落、電線雜亂等安全隱憂，亦缺乏無障礙設施，造成高齡居住者行動不便。若能透過整建維護、補強加固及設施改善，不僅能減少約六至七成的重建碳排放，亦能提升居住安全與舒適度，達成在地安養與都市更新的雙重效益。因此，本計畫蒐集英國與日本在老屋延壽（建築再生學）方面的制度與案例，並透過國內案例歸納、專家訪談及討論會，分析老屋轉用（conversion）與延壽過程中的課題，進一步研擬我國推動老屋延壽的制度架構與法規建議。
總體而言，本計畫透過「低蘊含碳建築推廣」與「老屋延壽策略」雙軌並行，結合國際趨勢與在地實務，致力於推動產業技術升級、提升社會大眾對低碳建築的認知，引導大眾積極參與低蘊含碳建築的推廣與宣導活動，進而低蘊含碳建築的概念深入社會，強化民眾對低碳建築的認知與支持。
", "英文摘要": "To address the global climate challenge, the United Nations adopted the Paris Agreement in 2015, committing to limit global temperature rise to no more than 1.5°C. In pursuit of this goal, major economies such as the United States, Japan, South Korea, and the European Union pledged to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, while China set its target for 2060. Taiwan also officially announced its net-zero target on Earth Day in 2021, followed by the National Development Council’s release of the “Taiwan 2050 Net-Zero Pathway and Strategy” in 2022. Within this framework, the Ministry of the Interior is responsible for planning and promoting the net-zero building pathway, with the explicit target that by 2050, all new buildings will meet near-zero carbon standards, and over 85% of buildings will also comply with the same standard.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2022), the building and construction sector accounts for approximately 37% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Of this, about 28% comes from operational carbon (OC) generated during building operations, while around 9% comes from embodied carbon (EC), which arises from the manufacturing, transportation, construction, repair, and demolition of building materials. Historically, international net-zero building policies have focused primarily on reducing operational carbon. However, as the share of embodied carbon continues to rise, its regulation and reduction have become a critical issue. In response, the Architecture and Building Research Institute launched Taiwan’s embodied carbon labeling and assessment system on July 1, 2024, encouraging the construction industry to adopt low-carbon materials and methods at the early stages of design and construction to move toward whole-life-cycle carbon reduction.
The first core task of this project is to further promote the “Low Embodied Carbon Building Labeling and Assessment System.” The plan includes organizing four regional workshops in northern, central, southern, and eastern Taiwan, as well as hosting a certification ceremony and forum. These activities integrate case sharing, technical exchange, and video production to enhance industry and public awareness of carbon reduction policies, calculation methods, and successful examples. In addition, the project collects and analyzes low-carbon construction methods and assessment techniques from both domestic and international sources to establish a knowledge database for future policy-making and industry application.
The second core task focuses on developing strategies for extending the lifespan of old buildings. As Taiwan enters an aging society, a large number of old buildings face issues such as insufficient seismic resistance, structural deterioration, water leakage, facade detachment, tangled electrical wiring, and a lack of accessible facilities, which pose safety concerns and mobility challenges for elderly residents. Through proper maintenance, reinforcement, and facility improvements, it is possible not only to reduce demolition-related carbon emissions by 60–70% but also to improve safety and comfort, thereby achieving both aging-in-place and urban regeneration benefits. To this end, the project examines policies and practices from the United Kingdom and Japan on building longevity and regeneration, while conducting domestic case analyses, expert interviews, and stakeholder discussions to identify key challenges in building conversion and lifespan extension. Based on these findings, the project proposes appropriate institutional frameworks and regulatory recommendations for Taiwan.
Overall, this project advances a dual-track approach of promoting low embodied carbon buildings and developing building longevity strategies. By aligning international trends with local practices, it aims to upgrade industry capacity, enhance public understanding of low-carbon buildings, and encourage active participation in related promotion and outreach activities. Ultimately, the project seeks to embed the concept of low embodied carbon buildings within society, strengthen public support for sustainable construction, and accelerate Taiwan’s building sector toward the 2050 net-zero target.
", "相關檔案": "114年度-低蘊含碳建築評估標示制度宣導推廣計畫暨老屋延壽策略研析-成果報告書_0105(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339296/6fcaf017-03b4-4bd4-b1ff-01fbf4ac4768.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336832", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 12 Feb 2026 08:40:00 GMT", "title": "直交集成板(CLT)複合構造之固碳效益評估及防火技術應用計畫", "計畫主持人": "楊正裕", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "臺灣木結構工程協會", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "安全防災組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "Cross Laminated Timber (CLT)、複合構造、生命週期效益評估、石膏板、防火時效", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
有鑑於國內常見的住宅結構系統為RC梁柱建築物，本計畫探討CLT樓板和牆板應用的可行性，並建立「複合構造」結構系統的低碳評估方式。為了解CLT外牆系統於國內應用之效益，本年度研究將預鑄化CLT外牆系統模擬應用於實際建築案例，進行生命週期效益評估，探討此外牆系統實際應用於RC構造建築之可行性。另外，考慮到為來應用於複合構造結構系統之CLT樓板及牆板需要有1小時及2小時的防火時效，綜觀所內近期之研究課題，包含109年度完成扁柏CLT樓板、花旗松CLT樓板及柳杉CLT牆板之1小時耐火實驗，112年度完成柳杉CLT樓板、赤松CLT樓板及扁柏/柳杉CLT複合樓板之1小時耐火實驗，113年度完成雲杉CLT牆板及其被覆19mm石膏板之1小時耐火實驗、柳杉CLT牆板搭配 19mm石膏板2層、15mm石膏板2層以及15mm矽酸鈣板2層之2小時耐火實驗，目前尚缺樓板2小時防火時效資料。因此，本年度之研究預期補足CLT樓板之耐火2小時實驗，以期完備目前國內之CLT樓板/牆板之1小時及2小時防火時效相關研究及資料庫，以利未來應用於複合構造結構系統，提升CLT未來在我國建築產業的長期發展。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究首先透過蒐集國內外與CLT外牆系統設計、預鑄化系統應用、建築生命週期評估等相關文獻，進行系統性整理，並建立研究理論基礎，助於研究進行。透過比較分析（comparative analysis approach）將CLT外牆系統模擬應用於臺北市某公宅，並提出三種不同構件材料組合之建築模型，再參考EN15978建築盤查專用CFP-PCR系統邊界進行建築生命週期效益評估，針對建築60年生命週期之營運耗電量、碳排放量及成本進行分析及比較，探討CLT外牆系統於國內應用之可行性及效益。另外，本研究預計探討在石膏板被覆之條件下達到2小時防火時效之實驗及驗證，因此參考113年度CLT牆板防火被覆之實驗結果，規劃以3層19 mm 厚以及4層15mm厚之石膏板被覆進行2小時火害實驗。
三、重要發現
本研究主要發現CLT複合外牆使用了岩棉保溫板搭配空氣層設計，能大幅增加外牆隔熱能力，使整體熱傳透率低於RC外牆非常多，對建築節能有顯著的幫助。9cm與15cm的CLT相比，空調能耗差距並不大，因此可判斷CLT板厚對於節能效益之影響並不顯著，選用較薄的CLT複合外牆能在成本及節能減碳上取得平衡。Type-Hybird總蘊含碳量與Type-RC相比能減少36.98%的總蘊含碳量。研究結果顯示因木材蘊含碳量低於RC，因此，使用CLT複合外牆取代RC外牆對減少碳排放量有顯著的幫助。而9cm與15cm的CLT複合外牆相比，後者固碳效益較佳，但蘊含碳量增加的幅度比固碳量更多，因此，厚度較薄的CLT複合外牆在資材生產及運輸(A1~A4)階段的減碳效益較高。
另外，本研究延續113年度CLT牆板防火被覆之實驗，規劃4層15 mm 厚之石膏板被覆、以及3層19 mm厚之石膏板被覆，進行2小時火害實驗。實驗結果顯示，以4層15 mm 厚之石膏板被覆的情況下，CLT與石膏板交界處的測溫點顯示溫度約為100度左右，顯示可完延遲2小時的炭化。3層19 mm 厚之石膏板被覆則在CLT與19mm第一層石膏板間，於90分鐘燃燒後溫度超過100度，並在實驗結束時微升至120度，判斷對於形成炭化沒有太大的影響。整體而言，兩個類型的石膏板配置都可有效達到2小時的延遲炭化。
四、主要建議事項
建議1
CLT樓板火害實驗可補足CLT樓板之2小時耐火時效要求，完備目前國內之CLT樓板/牆板1小時及2小時防火時效相關研究及資料庫:立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
本年度之完成之CLT樓板火害實驗可補足CLT樓板之2小時耐火時效要求，完備目前國內之CLT樓板/牆板1小時及2小時防火時效相關研究及資料庫，有利未來應用於複合構造結構系統，提升CLT未來在我國建築產業的長期發展。根據近年之實驗結果，不同構造工法在不同載重下之防火設計及工法可以應用於現行木構造建築物設計及施工技術規範中，進行研擬及修訂。建議2
建議2
CLT板牆應用於國內既有住宅更新之工法研究:研擬後可執行之建議(中期目標)
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
近年來所內完成之CLT樓板火害實驗已滿足1小時及2小時防火時效，根據建築技術規則規定，當梁柱以鋼筋混凝土或是鋼構造作為主要建築結構時，樓板滿足基本防火需求即可應用。因此，本研究有利於推動於建築物，以CLT作為板牆構造單元的複合構造樣態，有利於推動我國近零碳目標。
建議3
CLT板牆之穿孔部及火害後之補強修復工法研議:長期目標
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
我國CLT構造處於萌發階段，待累績一定基礎資料後，應用於實際建築中所面臨的板穿孔之防火議題，以及火災後如何修復及補強等議題，均是未來須面對的潛在課題，可列為長期研究計畫中之一環，完善CLT於建築中之應用。
", "英文摘要": "This study first systematically collected and organized domestic and international literature related to CLT exterior wall system design, prefabricated system applications, and building life cycle assessment, establishing a theoretical foundation to support the research process. Through a comparative analysis approach, the CLT exterior wall system was simulated and applied to a public housing project in Taipei, and three building models with different combinations of component materials were proposed. Referring to the EN15978 building assessment–specific CFP-PCR system boundary, a life cycle performance evaluation was conducted, analyzing and comparing the 60-year building life cycle operational electricity consumption, carbon emissions, and costs, in order to explore the feasibility and benefits of applying CLT exterior wall systems in Taiwan. In addition, this study aims to investigate fire-resistance experiments and verification for achieving a 2-hour fire rating under gypsum board protection. Based on the 2024 experimental results of gypsum-board-protected CLT wall panels, this study plans to conduct 2-hour fire tests using configurations of three 19-mm layers and four 15-mm layers of gypsum board. The main findings indicate that the CLT composite exterior wall, using mineral wool insulation combined with an air cavity design, significantly enhances thermal resistance, resulting in a much lower overall thermal transmittance than that of RC exterior walls, which provides substantial benefits for building energy efficiency. The difference in cooling energy consumption between 9-cm and 15-cm CLT panels is minimal, suggesting that CLT panel thickness does not have a significant impact on energy-saving performance. Therefore, selecting thinner CLT composite exterior walls can achieve a balance between cost and carbon-reduction benefits. Furthermore, for the configuration with three 19-mm gypsum board layers, the temperature between the CLT and the first 19-mm gypsum board exceeded 100°C after 90 minutes of exposure and rose slightly to 120°C at the end of the test. This indicates minimal impact on charring formation.Overall, both gypsum board configurations effectively achieved a 2-hour delay in charring.
", "相關檔案": "直交集成板(CLT)複合構造之固碳效益評估及防火技術應用計畫成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336832/bd40daad-79b5-439f-92f2-3081cf800c23.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336831", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 11 Feb 2026 03:37:00 GMT", "title": "淨零木構造建築之固碳效益評估及接合部防火技術應用計畫", "計畫主持人": "卓志隆", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "中華木質構造建築協會", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "安全防災組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "低碳建築、複合構造、防火性能、接合部", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
為響應世界各國推動淨零碳排之趨勢，我國公布「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明」，期待臺灣建築部門透過跨域整合，目標在2050年達成100%新建建築及超過85%既有建築為近零碳建築的里程碑。其中在減碳技術與工法方面，以建築物導入節能技術與低碳工法研發為主軸，導入木竹構造…等技術，不僅與12項關鍵戰略項目中之節能、資源循環零廢棄、淨零綠生活等項目息息相關，更與多項聯合國之永續發展目標（SDGs）相呼應。國際能源總署（International Energy Agency, IEA）解析目前全球碳排主要來自建築產業，2021年更有高達38%的溫室氣體排放來自建築部門。
整體而言，欲邁向淨零需要結構性的改變，木竹等生態綠建材在建築上之應用是重要解方之一，不僅符合前述關鍵策略，更是發展低蘊含碳（Embodied carbon）建築的重要建材。採用工程木材取代鋼筋混凝土等構造，不僅可有效地在生產端減少碳排放以及對資源的消耗，同時木材不論是在環境友善、材料性能、工法等面向上都比RC結構有顯著的優勢。
另竹材生長與更新速率遠較林木所需時間短，在固定之年限下，單位面積竹林之固碳效率顯著高於一般經濟樹種，因而受到國際間重視，我國也開啟新興竹產業發展計畫，將國產之竹材或竹複合材料導入建材之研發與使用，除可符合淨零碳排與永續循環等效益外，亦可活絡國內之竹產業及建築材料產業，於政策端與產業端上達到雙贏之局面。
二、研究方法及過程
112~113年度（我國推動淨零建築與應用推廣計畫）之第一期研究重點著眼於國內民情及既有規範之規定，針對國內較常見以RC梁柱作為主要結構系統之建築物，探討木構件在RC建築中，樓板、牆板、以及室內裝修上應用的可能性，建立”複合構造”結構系統之設計方法。短期已完成木構建材之減碳評估之基礎以及建構本土化低碳（減碳）建材之基礎資訊與工程性質，建立符合室內裝修用之木竹建材耐燃等級設計、以及完成直交集成板與結構用集成材等工程木材於營建過程之碳排放評估；同時，也完成集成材（GLT）應用於複合構造之接合部防火性能評估及設計，包含集成材梁柱接合部以及完成直交集成板樓板與牆板接合部之標準耐火實驗驗證並提出設計建議。
綜合兩年的研究成果，針對第一期目標以木構造複合構造結構系統為主要推廣對象之低碳建築，提出可行之構造形式及工法，包含木竹構材應用於室內裝修時之耐燃性能，以及GLT與CLT應用於複合構造系統之梁柱及樓板/牆板接合部性能等。第二期（淨零建築轉型發展推動計畫）目標以增加木構造建築之樓板面積為目標，逐步透過研究及實驗驗證的方式，建立平面混用/立面混用的木構造複合結構系統。與此同時，亦透過整體目標及成果的盤點，精進第一期目標所建立之各項基礎資料。平面混用之木構造複合結構系統之構成以服務核（豎井）為RC結構或鋼結構，其餘空間為木構造為主之結構系統。立面混用的木構造複合結構系統之構成則以下層為RC構造/鋼構造，上層木構造之結構系統。此類型木構造複合結構系統作為第二期目標，不僅可以增加木構造此類低碳工法的應用，亦可透過此平面混用/立面混用的木構造複合結構系統慢慢建立民眾對於木構造建築的信心，邁向未來木構造建築不限規模及高度之長期目標前進，進而達到低碳木構造工法在建築產業的應用，實現淨零碳排的目標。
因此，在透過構件單元實驗取得一定的性能驗證之短期目標後，本研究進一步精進前期成果，提出符合淨零政策之低碳木構造建築以及防火設計。此外，本年度計畫亦規劃實尺寸木構造之防火性能實驗，作為第一期目標階段成果的驗證。
「木構接合部之防火設計驗證」將基於112年度的四組足尺寸、荷重狀態下GLT梁柱接合部耐火試驗成果，針對其中數個尚未充分探討的耐火遮蓋設計參數，本年度將透過木結構局部接合部的1小時耐火試驗，補足相關量化數據，評估其尺寸或增加部分位置的遮蓋對於耐火性能影響，以做為實務設計參考。實驗將利用建築研究所台南實驗室的小型多功能耐火爐，依照CNS 12514標準進行耐火實驗，試驗對象包含集成材的梁柱接合部以及直交集成板（CLT）接合部等處耐火遮蓋的性能驗證，試體將以柳杉、雲杉或花旗松等國內業界常用材種製作。此外，基於前幾年構件單元實驗成果，本年度計畫亦規劃實尺寸木構造之防火性能實驗，作為第一期目標階段成果的驗證。
三、重要發現
（一）木構造建材之節能與固碳效益評估
1.不同膠合劑中，PVAc阻燃效果最佳，總熱釋放量最低，EVA次之，強力膠最高。塗裝阻燃藥劑可有效降低總熱釋放量，達耐燃三級。竹、木單板作為面材建議厚度0.5 mm以下，搭配阻燃藥劑使用。
2.竹、木單板貼附於矽酸鈣板表面，經透明耐燃塗料塗佈後，總熱釋放量可下降約34%，符合耐燃二級。
3.將五層柳杉CLT或五層台灣杉CLT與0.5 mm竹薄片貼附12 mm矽酸鈣板結合，可提升熱抵抗值，由1.92 m2K/W，提高至2.11 m2K/W，較CLT單一材料有更好的隔熱效果。
4.本案柳杉集成材之固碳量646.78 kgCO2e/m3；而A1至A3階段碳排放量為71.85 kgCO2e/m3。顯示柳杉集成材具有相當優良之固碳效益。
（二）木構接合部之防火設計驗證
1.將接合鐵件位置自樑中心位置向上提升後有助於保護最下層的摩擦栓與鋼板，避免炭化深度延伸至摩擦栓附近而使其喪失強度。
2.梁柱接合部中摩擦栓外側、開口兩側以及樑底部開槽處以耐燃石膏板或木材填塞能夠得到相當程度的防火保護效果。
3.摩擦栓兩外側以其直徑兩倍寬度、厚度15 mm石膏填塞以及樑底部採用雙層15 mm厚石膏板填塞同時在施工時充分黏著後能夠得到良好保護效果。
4.CLT牆板接合鐵件以及樑柱接合部下端填塞採用雙層15 mm厚石膏板遮蓋的效果較採用單層25.4 mm厚石膏遮蓋有較好的保護效果。
四、主要建議事項
建議一：
木質裝修材料應用方面，建立完整的阻燃應用策略，確保耐燃等級與環境品質，提供優質安全建築環境：立即可行建議
主辦單位：內政部建築研究所
協辦單位：中華木質構造建築協會
本年度研究成果深入探討木竹裝修建材之耐燃特性，符合耐燃三級以上之要求；進一步複合於CLT面材更具有隔熱性，提升整體耐燃性能之效益。
建議二：
建構工程木材碳足跡評估資訊，以拓展木竹建材等綠色資材於建築材料上之應用：中長期建議
主辦單位：內政部建築研究所
協辦單位：財團法人台灣建築中心、中華木質構造建築協會
依生命週期評估法（LCA）建立國內工程木材之各階段碳排資訊，並定期更新，以利精進減碳措施，特別是在製程碳排瓶頸點，建立減少碳排放的最佳方案，以達低蘊含碳建材之效益。
建議三：
於木構造建築物設計及施工規範附錄或於木構造建築物防火設計施工參考手冊中增加接合部耐火設計建議作法：立即可行建議
主辦單位：內政部建築研究所
協辦單位：台灣建築中心、中華木質構造建築協會
112年至本年度累積數種針對木構接合部之數種不同遮蓋方式一小時耐火測試結果，可於相關規範或手冊中增加接合部防火設計的具體描述。
建議四：
提供2小時接合部耐火遮蓋的具體設計建議並投入火害後修復與性能補強之技術研究：中長期建議
主辦單位：內政部建築研究所
協辦單位：中華木質構造建築協會
鑒於木結構高層化的需求，建議持續透過實驗評估更高性能的接合部防火設計參數，同時探討接合部與構件於高時數火害後的剩餘強度評估方法。此外，國內木造建築數量逐年增加，加上未來木造建築高層化趨勢，有必要提升火害後修復與性能補強之相關技術，建議先收集國內外相關文獻，同時以實驗研究方式評估各種技術的性能並且得到量化成果供實務使用。
", "英文摘要": "I.Introduction
In line with the global drive for net-zero carbon emissions, Taiwan has established the "Taiwan 2050 Net-Zero Emissions Pathway and Strategy." This national strategy mandates that the building sector must achieve a major transformation, targeting 100% of new buildings and over 85% of existing buildings to become near net-zero carbon buildings by 2050 through robust cross-sectoral integration. A key component of this effort is the development and implementation of low-carbon construction methods and energy-saving technologies, notably the incorporation of timber and bamboo structures. This focus aligns directly with national priorities, including Energy Saving and Resource Circulation, and supports the broader United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This urgency is underscored by data from the International Energy Agency (IEA), which reported that the building industry accounted for a substantial 38% of global energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in 2021.To achieve this structural transformation, the strategic application of sustainable materials like timber and bamboo is crucial for developing buildings with low embodied carbon. Replacing conventional reinforced concrete (RC) with engineered timber significantly reduces production-phase carbon emissions and resource depletion, offering superior performance and environmental benefits. Furthermore, given its exceptionally rapid growth and high carbon sequestration efficiency, bamboo is emerging as a priority material. Taiwan is actively supporting this through the Emerging Bamboo Industry Development Program, integrating domestic bamboo and bamboo composite materials into building applications. This initiative not only advances net-zero emissions and sustainable circularity goals but also successfully revitalizes domestic industries, achieving a dual benefit for both policy and industrial development.
II.Methodologies
The main research focus of the first phase (Fiscal Years 112–113) of the (Taiwan Net-Zero Building Promotion and Application Plan) centered on domestic public sentiment and the provisions of existing regulations. Targeting buildings where RC (Reinforced Concrete) beams and columns are the main structural system, commonly seen domestically, the study explored the potential application of timber components in RC buildings for floor slabs, wall panels, and interior finishes, thereby establishing a design method for "hybrid structure" structural systems. In the short term, the research completed the basis for the carbon reduction assessment of wood building materials, established fundamental information and engineering properties for localized low-carbon (decarbonized) building materials, established fire-retardant class designs for wood and bamboo materials compliant with interior finishing use, and completed the carbon emission assessment during the construction process for engineered timber, such as Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) and Glued-Laminated Timber (GLT). Simultaneously, the fire performance assessment and design of connections for GLT applied in hybrid structures were completed, including standard fire test verification of GLT beam-to-column connections and CLT floor slab and wall panel connections, with design recommendations proposed.
Synthesizing the two-year research outcomes, feasible structural forms and construction methodologies were proposed for low-carbon buildings, with the timber hybrid structure system being the main subject for promotion in Phase I. These include the fire-retardant performance of wood and bamboo components when applied in interior finishes, and the performance of GLT and CLT connections (beam-to-column and floor/wall connections) in hybrid structural systems. The objective of the second phase (Net-Zero Building Transition Development Promotion Plan) is to increase the floor area of timber construction, gradually establishing planar-mixed / vertical-mixed hybrid timber structural systems through research and experimental verification. Concurrently, the various fundamental data established in Phase I will be refined through an inventory of overall goals and outcomes. The planar-mixed timber hybrid structural system is composed of an RC structure or steel structure for the service core (shaft), with the rest of the space being a timber-based structural system. The vertical-mixed timber hybrid structural system is composed of an RC structure / steel structure for the lower stories and a timber structural system for the upper stories. This type of hybrid timber structural system, as the objective for Phase II, can not only increase the application of timber as a low-carbon construction method but also gradually build public confidence in timber structures through this planar-mixed / vertical-mixed hybrid timber structural system, moving towards the long-term goal of future timber construction without limitations on scale or height, thereby achieving the application of low-carbon timber construction methods in the building industry and realizing the goal of net-zero carbon emissions.
Therefore, after achieving certain performance verification through component unit experiments as a short-term goal, this research further refines the previous phase's outcomes, proposing low-carbon timber architecture and fire safety design compliant with net-zero policy. Furthermore, this year's plan also schedules full-scale timber structure fire performance experiments to validate the staged outcomes of the Phase I objective. The "Fire Design Verification of Timber Connections" will be based on the four sets of full-scale, load-bearing GLT beam-to-column fire test results from FY 112. Targeting several fire-retardant covering design parameters that have not been fully explored, this year will supplement relevant quantitative data through 1-hour fire tests on localized timber structure connections. This will evaluate the influence of the covering's dimensions or the addition of covering in certain positions on the fire resistance performance, serving as a reference for practical design. The experiment will utilize the small multi-functional fire furnace at the ABRI Tainan Laboratory, conducting the fire tests in accordance with the CNS 12514 standard. The test subjects include performance verification of fire-retardant coverings on GLT beam-to-column connections and Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) connections. Test specimens will be made from timber species commonly used in the domestic industry, such as Chinese fir, spruce, or Douglas fir. In addition, based on the component unit experimental results from previous years, this year's plan also schedules full-scale timber structure fire performance experiments to validate the staged outcomes of the Phase I objective.
III.Results
(I)Energy Saving and Carbon Sequestration of Wood-Based
i.Among different adhesives, PVAc exhibited the best flame-retardant effect and the lowest total heat release (THR). EVA was secondary, and contact cement (強力膠) was the highest. Coating with flame-retardant agents can effectively reduce the THR, achieving Fire Resistance Class 3. When using bamboo and wood veneers as facing materials, a thickness of 0.5 mm or less is recommended in conjunction with flame-retardant agents.
ii.When bamboo and wood veneers are adhered to the surface of calcium silicate board and coated with a transparent flame-retardant coating, the total heat release can be reduced by approximately 34%, meeting Fire Resistance Class 2.
iii.Combining five layers of China-fir CLT or five layers of Taiwan-fir CLT with a 0.5 mm bamboo veneer attached to a 12 mm calcium silicate board can enhance the thermal resistance value (R-value). The R-value increases from 1.92 m2K/W to 2.11 m2K/W, demonstrating better thermal insulation performance than CLT as a monolithic material.
iv.The carbon sequestration volume of China-fir GLT in this project is 646.78 kgCO2e/m3. In contrast, the carbon emissions during stages A1 to A3 (raw material supply, transport, and manufacturing) are 71.85 kgCO2e/m3. This shows that China-fir GLT possesses a considerably excellent carbon sequestration benefit.
(II)Fire-Resistance Verification of Wood Joints
v.Elevating the position of the connecting steel plate/bracket from the beam's center line upward helps protect the lowest layer of friction dowels and steel plate, preventing the charring depth from extending near the dowels and causing them to lose strength.
vi.Using fire-resistant gypsum board or timber infill on the outer sides of the friction dowels, both sides of the opening, and the bottom groove of the beam in beam-to-column connections can provide a considerable degree of fire protection.
vii.Good protection can be achieved by using gypsum infill on the two outer sides of the friction dowels with a width twice the dowel diameter and a thickness of 15 mm. This requires simultaneously using double-layer 15 mm thick gypsum board infill at the beam bottom, ensuring sufficient adhesion during construction.
viii.For the connection steel plates of CLT wall panels and the lower end infill of beam-to-column connections, covering with double-layer 15 mm thick gypsum board provides better protection compared to covering with a single-layer 25.4 mm thick gypsum board.
IV.Recommendations
Recommendation 1
Regarding the application of wood interior finishing materials, establish a complete flame-retardant application strategy to ensure fire resistance class and environmental quality, providing a high-quality and safe built environment: Immediate Actionable Suggestion
Organizer: Ministry of the Interior Institute of Architecture and Building Research
Co-organizer: Chinese Wood Construction Building Association
This year's research results have thoroughly investigated the fire-retardant characteristics of wood and bamboo finishing materials, meeting the requirements of Fire Resistance Class 3 (or above) . Furthermore, compounding them with CLT facing materials offers enhanced thermal insulation, increasing the overall benefit of fire resistance performance.
Recommendation 2
Construct carbon footprint assessment information for engineered wood to expand the application of green materials like wood and bamboo in building materials: Medium to long-term recommendations
Organizer: Ministry of the Interior Institute of Architecture and Building Research
Co-organizers: Taiwan Architecture and Building Center; Chinese Wood Construction Building Association
Establish carbon emission information for each stage of domestic engineered wood based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method, and update it regularly. This facilitates the refinement of carbon reduction measures, particularly at bottleneck points in the manufacturing process, to establish optimal solutions for reducing carbon emissions, thereby achieving the benefits of low embodied carbon building materials.
Recommendation 3:
Add design recommendations for connection fire resistance to the appendix of the timber structure building design and construction specifications or to the timber structure building fire design and construction reference manual: Immediate Actionable Suggestion
Organizer: Ministry of the Interior Institute of Architecture and Building Research
Co-organizer: Taiwan Architecture and Building Center; Chinese Wood Construction Building Association
The accumulated results from Fiscal Year 112 to the present year—including multiple one-hour fire test results for various covering methods on timber connections—can be used to add concrete descriptions of connection fire safety design to relevant specifications or manuals.
Recommendation 4:
Provide specific design recommendations for 2-hour fire-resistant connection covering and dedicate research to post-fire repair and performance strengthening technologies: Medium- to Long-Term Recommendation
Organizer: Ministry of the Interior Institute of Architecture and Building Research
Co-organizer: Chinese Wood Construction Building Association
In view of the demand for high-rise timber structures, it is suggested to continue evaluating higher-performance connection fire safety design parameters through experiments. Simultaneously, research methods for assessing the residual strength of connections and components after high-duration fire damage should be explored. Furthermore, given the increasing number of domestic timber buildings year-by-year and the future trend of high-rise timber construction, it is necessary to enhance related technologies for post-fire repair and performance strengthening. It is recommended to first collect relevant domestic and foreign literature, and concurrently use experimental research to evaluate the performance of various technologies and obtain quantitative results for practical use.
", "相關檔案": "淨零木構造建築之固碳效益評估及接合部防火技術應用計畫成果報告1215(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336831/8c239081-f687-4253-8b98-9b3aa4ad0b1e.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336552", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 30 Jan 2026 05:55:00 GMT", "title": "淨零建築跨領域人才培育與產學研發展平台推廣計畫", "計畫主持人": "林杰宏", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "財團法人台灣建築中心", "執行行程": "2025-07-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-01-30", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "綜合規劃組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "建築能效、低蘊含碳、近零碳建築、淨零建築、淨零排放", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "ㄧ、緣起
為辦理淨零建築排放路徑規劃，及配合淨零轉型關鍵戰略計畫分工，內政部建築研究所引導由公有建築帶頭示範推動淨零建築與應用推廣，帶動民間建築參與發展，透過建築能效評估相關法規制度建構、建築物實施建築能效評估及改善方案研擬、跨領域淨零建築人才培育、公私協力全民共同執行、節能減碳新工法技術研議推廣，以及產業國際化，逐步加速擴大影響力。
本計畫係以跨領域淨零建築人才培育為核心，藉由教材研訂、講習培訓，以及跨領域產學研發展，達到培育專業人才，帶動產業減碳效益，協助引導建築淨零轉型，以逐步達成政府「2050年100%新建建築物及超過85%的建築物為近零碳建築」之政策目標。
二、計畫方法與過程
本計畫分為四項分項計畫：「研修淨零建築跨領域專業人才培訓課程教材」、「淨零建築跨領域專業人員及青年學生培訓活動」、「維運淨零建築產學研合作平台」及「全國住宅總量評估探討」，分別進行修訂或研訂淨零建築人才培訓相關課程教材3冊、辦理教材草案研訂座談會議或審查會議4場次、進行淨零建築產業人才需求分析結果，研提淨零建築領域相關專業人才職能基準1項，並應完成申請職能基準所須相關文件；研議協助大專院校開設符合產業需求之淨零建築相關課程之執行機制、辦理種子教師培訓課程3場次、辦理跨領域專業人員及青年學生相關人員講習培訓活動，培育淨零建築相關領域專業或從業人員，共計3,600人次，其中包含：(1)淨零建築相關領域專業人員講習培訓課程至少24場次，並達2,700人次、(2)辦理青年學生講習培訓活動至少4場次，並達900人次，並調查活動辦理滿意度、研議淨零建築跨領域專業人才認證制度、提供至少3場次培訓活動相關成果；維營運「淨零建築產學研推廣宣導平台」網頁，包括平台網站內容維護及更新、提供數位化人才培訓課程講義、針對淨零建築相關主題，拍攝數位課程影片4部、透過「淨零建築跨領域人才發展聯盟」之產學研交流平台，借助聯盟相關成員經驗及量能完成合作發展案3案，促進淨零建築跨領域合作發展，並派駐協助建研所推動本計畫之專職人員1名；探討全國老舊老宅住屋總量、樓地板面積及未來變化。
三、執行成果
1.邀請具實務經驗之相關領域專家學者進行教材草案研訂座談會議或審查會議，共計4場次，以完成研修訂「非住宅類新建建築能效評估實務(修訂版)、淨零建築設備管理維護實務、低碳(低蘊含碳)建築評估實務」之3冊教材。
2.透過職能文獻研究與專家訪談蒐集，分析「淨零建築室內設計與裝修專業技術人員」(暫定)能力資料，並經由專家焦點座談會議，完成職能基準。
3.完成研議協助大專院校開設符合產業需求之淨零建築相關課程執行機制。
4.完成種子教師培訓課程3場次。
5.完成跨領域專業人員及青年學生相關人員講習培訓活動，共計3,892人次，並提供至少3場次培訓活動相關成果。
6.完成研議淨零建築跨領域專業人才認證制度。
7.營運「淨零建築產學研推廣宣導平台網站」網頁，並針對淨零建築相關主題，拍攝數位課程影片4部，並於平台網頁中展示，以達推廣宣導目的。
8.透過「淨零建築跨領域人才發展聯盟」之產學研交流平台，完成合作發展案3案，促進淨零建築跨領域合作發展。
9.完成探討全國老舊老宅住屋總量、樓地板面積及未來變化。
四、後續建議事項
本計畫提出下列後續具體可行的建議事項：
建議一
持續充實網站平台內容以擴大人才培訓效益：立即可行建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
執行機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
鑒於「淨零建築」相關政策、規範等刻正推動與不斷滾動修正中，學員們對於相關機制規範、認證申辦、配套補助、查核制度等議題相當關切，建議後續可藉由「淨零建築產學研推廣宣導平台」網站，強化政府推動「淨零建築」之策略，後續亦可藉由案例，讓學員更清楚瞭解「淨零建築」之內涵。
建議二
加強與相關公協會密切合作以擴大產業界共同參與：立即可行建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：各地方縣市政府、相關公協會等
執行機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
為協助產業加速理解及應用淨零建築相關政策與技術，擴大淨零永續策略範疇，建議後續可持續藉由本計畫之「淨零建築跨領域人才發展聯盟」，偕同各相關地方縣市政府單位、公協會組織加強整合各界能量與產學資源，透過系統性的培育提升相關產業人才的參與及執行效益，協助我國建築相關產業在淨零時代持續成長，加速政策執行成效擴展。
", "英文摘要": "1.Study Origin
To handle the plan of net zero building emissions pathway, and in line with key strategic plans for net zero transformation, Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior will guide public buildings to take the lead in demonstrations to promote net zero buildings and applications. And then promote the participation of private buildings in the development. Gradually accelerate the expansion of influence through the construction of relevant laws and regulations on building energy efficiency assessment, implement building energy efficiency assessment and improvement plan development, cross-disciplinary net zero building talent cultivation, public-private cooperation enables all residents to jointly implement, discussion and promotion of new building methods for energy saving and carbon reduction, and industrial internationalization.
This program focuses on the cultivation of cross-disciplinary net zero building talents. Through the research and development of teaching materials, holding lectures and training, and cross-field industry-university-research development, to cultivate professional talents and drive industrial carbon reduction benefits. Assist in guiding the net zero transformation of buildings to gradually achieve the government's policy goal of "100% of new buildings and more than 85% of existing buildings are near zero carbon buildings by 2050".
2.Research methods and processes
This project is divided into three sub-projects: "Research and development of course materials for cross-disciplinary professionals in net zero buildings", "Instructive training for cross-disciplinary professionals in net zero buildings" and "Industry-university-research cooperation in building platform of net zero buildings " that conduct surveys and estimations on the current situation and demand of industrial talents respectively, establish functional benchmarks for professional talents. Developed 3 volumes of training materials for cross-field professional training courses on net zero buildings; and each with at least 4 sessions of conduct lectures and trainings for construction and mechanical and electrical design professional technical personnel, construction management and construction-related review personnel, and construction and property management personnel. Develop the website structure and operation management maintenance of the "net zero building cross-disciplinary talent cultivation" in the platform website and organize the industry-university-research exchange platform of the "cross-disciplinary talent development alliance for net zero construction", which is a public-private collaboration. Through the alliance meeting, exchange needs and experience, promote the development of industry-university-research cross-disciplinary cooperation, and handle the promotion of net-zero building talents.
3.Key findings
（1）Currently revising three textbooks titled “Practical Evaluation of Energy Efficiency for New Non-Residential Buildings (Revised Edition), Net-Zero Building Systems Operation and Maintenance in Practice”, and Low-Carbon Building Assessment in Practice”. Three draft review sessions were held with experts and scholars with practical experience in the relevant fields between August and September, with the fourth session scheduled for September 25, 2025.
（2）Through the collection of literature research and expert interviews, analyzed data of Net-Zero Building Interior Design and Technical Professional”. A list of experts has been drafted, and expert interviews are scheduled to take place in October 2025, aiming to gradually focus on this year's competency benchmarks, knowledge, and content.
（3）Collecting data on government subsidies for higher education institutions and university course regulations, in order to facilitate subsequent discussions on developing an implementation mechanism to assist universities in offering courses related to Net-Zero Building that also meet industry demands.
（4）Scheduled to complete 3 sessions of seed teacher training programs on September 29th and 30th.
（5）As of September 19th, 2025, two interdisciplinary professional and youth student training sessions have been conducted, with a total of 783 participants trained, including 144 youth students, and 639 participants from online courses.
（6）Collecting relevant data on cross-disciplinary professional certification systems for net-zero buildings, with an initial recommendation to develop an integrated competency and application platform (iCAP). Further data collection, compilation, and analysis will be continued to support the planning of a certification system for cross-disciplinary professionals in net-zero building.
（7）Continued optimization and operation management of the "Net-Zero Building Industry-Academia Promotion Platform Website" is being carried out to achieve the goal of promotion and public awareness.
（8）Scheduled the filming of the first video on net-zero buildings on September 25th, 2025, with the final video due for promotion on the website stated above.
（9）Through the interdisciplinary talent development alliance for net-zero buildings, an industry-academia-government-research exchange platform has been established to strengthen collaboration among the public sector, private sector, academia, and research institutions. Partnerships have been formed with the National Environmental Research Academy (Ministry of Environment), the National Architects Association of R.O.C, and the Kaohsiung City Industrial Development and Investment Promotion Committee. These efforts aim to generate impactful outcomes that benefit the net-zero building industry and its talent cultivation, thereby promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and development in the field of net-zero buildings.
（10）Conduct data collection on the total number of old residential buildings and their floor area nationwide, and their potential future changes.
3.Main Suggestions
Specific and feasible suggestions as follows:
Suggestion 1
Immediate actionable recommendations - Development of teaching materials for interdisciplinary training courses for professionals in net zero buildings.
Sponsor: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Co-organizers: Ministry of Labor and local governments
According to the latest " Green building evaluation manual -basic version （EEWH-BC）", " Green building evaluation manual - existing buildings （EEWH-EB）" and " Green building evaluation manual- Building-Efficiency Rating System （EEWH-BERS）" published by the Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior, in order to meet the market demand for construction-related industry development, we will use the "Introduction Course" to develop cross-field professional talent training course materials for net zero building on the types and issues of residential buildings, non-residential buildings, and building carbon footprints. , aiming at the needs of different professionals and building energy efficiency assessment as the core, to cultivate cross-disciplinary professionals in net zero buildings, and to promote the accumulation and diffusion of teaching resources for cross-domain integration of net-zero buildings.
Suggestion 2
Immediate actionable recommendations - Strengthen close cooperation with relevant public associations to expand industry participation.
Sponsor: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Co-organizers: Taiwan Architecture and Building Center
In order to help the industry accelerate the understanding and application of net-zero building-related policies and technologies, and expand the scope of net-zero sustainable strategies, it is recommended that the "Net-zero Building Cross-Sector Talent Development Alliance" of this plan can be used in the future to strengthen cooperation with relevant public associations. Integrate the energy and industry-university resources, improve the participation and implementation efficiency of relevant industry talents through systematic training, and accelerate the expansion of policy implementation results.
", "相關檔案": "260105-淨零建築跨領域人才培育與平台發展計畫(成果報告)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336552/7e74aed0-5a10-4792-a9d4-e23b8b23ebdd.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336830", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 12 Feb 2026 08:44:00 GMT", "title": "公寓大廈電動車停車場及鋰離子電池室內火災安全對策及管理措施之研究", "計畫主持人": "欒中丕", "協同主持人": "何岫璁", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-06-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "安全防災組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "電動車充電、儲能系統、住宅用儲能、鋰電池、熱失控", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "本研究針對公寓大廈地下停車空間與室內鋰離子電池儲能設備之火災風險，聚焦「電動車充電設備、建築物儲能系統、住宅用儲能設備」三類場域，旨在建構兼具制度性與可操作性的防災治理機制，作為政策修訂與實務導入之依據。首先以系統性文獻回顧與規範盤點，整理國內外對鋰電池火災特性、建築技術與管理制度及消防應變流程之關鍵要點，建立對策與指引建構的理論與制度基礎；並彙整近年全球電動車與儲能系統重大事故案例，分析起火誘因、系統缺失與應變困難，作為本案對策與管理流程設計之實證依據與校準條件 。在研究成果面，本案以場域為主軸提出防火對策與管理制度設計，一方面針對地下停車與室內儲能空間提出防火區劃、通風排煙、偵測與抑制／滅火系統配置等設計建議；另一方面建立由「預防—偵測—通報—應變」構成的管理流程。在制度化輸出上，本研究彙整為四大構面指引，分別為「設置安全方案、火災預防方案、緊急應變方案、消防搶救方案」，逐點列出設計與管理的核心控制項，有助於設計階段之設備與空間配置、營運階段之監測維運與異常通報，以及事故階段之管制作為與橫向協調，可供主管機關、檢核單位與管理實務據以採行的參照。為強化第一線人員能量，本研究同步編製模組化教育訓練教材大綱，涵蓋基礎認知、案例解析、操作模擬與分工訓練等模組，並對應不同對象（如管理單位、維運人員與支援人員）規劃差異化課程大綱與練習腳本，以確保教材與現場情境、職能需求相銜接。此外，研究規劃示範場域之火災模擬情境與人員分工，透過演練檢核管理流程與指引之可操作性，彙整場域回饋修訂教材與流程細節，並形成推廣建議。綜合言之，本研究明確界定地下停車與室內儲能空間之風險樣態與設計控制需求；建立可供審查與運行的管理流程與四構面指引，系統串連設計、維運與應變；建置模組化教材與演練腳本，透過訓練與演練驗證並持續精進，最終形成可推廣之標準化內容與工作規程。 研究成果可供主管機關建立教育訓練制度之參考，亦可支持建築管理單位與設備業者在落實風險辨識、預防性維護與緊急應變，提升面對電動車與室內儲能所帶來之火災風險的韌性。
", "英文摘要": "This study addresses the fire risks associated with underground parking spaces in apartment buildings and indoor lithium-ion battery energy storage systems, focusing on three key scenarios: electric vehicle charging equipment, building energy storage systems, and residential energy storage devices, with the objective of developing a disaster prevention and management framework that is both systematic and operational, serving as a basis for policy revision and practical implementation. The research begins with a systematic literature review and regulatory survey, consolidating domestic and international knowledge on lithium battery fire characteristics, building technologies, management systems, and fire response procedures, thereby establishing a theoretical and regulatory foundation for the development of countermeasures and guidelines. It further compiles and analyzes recent global incidents involving electric vehicles and energy storage systems, identifying ignition causes, system deficiencies, and response challenges as empirical evidence and calibration conditions for designing countermeasures and management workflows. Building upon this foundation, the study proposes fire protection strategies and management system designs centered on the three scenarios, offering recommendations for fire compartmentation, ventilation and smoke control, detection, and suppression or extinguishing system configurations for underground parking areas and indoor storage spaces, and establishing a management process structured around the sequence of “prevention–detection–notification–response.” For institutional output, the research consolidates its findings into four comprehensive guideline frameworks—“Installation Safety Plan, Fire Prevention Plan, Emergency Response Plan, and Firefighting and Rescue Plan”—detailing the core design and management control points to support equipment and space configuration during the design phase, monitoring, maintenance, and anomaly reporting during the operational phase, and command-and-control measures and horizontal coordination during the incident phase, thereby providing a practical reference for authorities, inspection agencies, and building management operations. To strengthen frontline personnel capacity, the study simultaneously develops a modular training curriculum that includes fundamental knowledge, case analysis, operational simulations, and role-based drills, with differentiated curricula and exercise scripts tailored for management units, maintenance staff, and emergency support personnel, ensuring that the training content is aligned with site-specific scenarios and functional requirements. Furthermore, the study incorporates fire simulation scenario planning and personnel role assignments at demonstration sites, using drills to verify the operability of the management process and guidelines, collecting feedback to refine training materials and procedural details, and ultimately formulating recommendations for wider dissemination. In conclusion, the study clearly defines the risk profiles and design control requirements of underground parking spaces and indoor energy storage areas, establishes a management process and four-framework guideline that can be reviewed and implemented, systematically linking design, operation, and emergency response, and develops modular training materials and exercise scripts that are continuously improved through training and drills, resulting in standardized content and operational procedures that can serve as references for government agencies in establishing training systems and assist building management entities and equipment suppliers in implementing risk identification, preventive maintenance, and emergency response, thereby enhancing resilience against the fire risks posed by electric vehicles and indoor energy storage systems.
", "相關檔案": "公寓大廈電動車停車場及鋰離子電池室內火災安全對策及管理措施之研究-資料蒐集分析報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336830/f89a2fb9-88b9-491e-9240-8d5c02f92dc2.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340202", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:07:00 GMT", "title": "綠建築、綠建材、智慧建築標章及建築能效標示資訊揭露", "計畫主持人": "崔懋森", "協同主持人": "李明賢、王婉芝、侯雅壹、江友直", "執行單位": "財團法人台灣建築中心", "執行行程": "2025-05-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "綠建築、綠建材、智慧建築、建築能效", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "自1992年「地球環境高峰會議」以來，環境保護議題成為各國關注的焦點，國際社會也展開了追求永續發展(Sustainable Development)的實際行動，陸續致力於環境永續政策，在人類居住環境的改善並與自然生態的共榮共存、積極提倡綠色都市、永續城市、溫室氣體減量等，都具體實踐永續發展之理念。
台灣除了法制化工作，在相關環境議題的響應上也不落人後，2001至 2007年推動之「綠建築推動方案」，將環境永續徹底落實在營造建築物上，在公有新建建築物管制綠建築設計、舊有建築物辦理綠廳舍改善、空調及建築物外殼節能改善、再生建材技術研發及推廣產製、綠建材標章制度、推廣綠建築觀念、綠建築國際接軌、推動綠建築法令分階段全面實施等，期塑造國內建築、投資業界之新風潮，鼓勵業者以人類永續生存為訴求，用全面性、多元化的設計理念、使用幫助地球環境永續之建築為目標，俾達到生態、節能、減廢、健康、再生與高性能等目的，減輕對地球環境的衝擊與資源之浪費。
政府為賡續執行綠建築政策，2008年起頒佈施行「生態城市綠建築推動方案」，訂定公有建築物需先取得「綠建築標章」，始得辦理結算驗收；2009年7月1日起「建築技術規則」中訂定室內裝修總面積，綠建材使用率需增加至30％，2020年1月1日再度提升至60%以上，內政部特於2010年起推動指定綠建築、綠建材及智慧建築標章評定專業機構，符合前開標章之「評定專業機構申請指定作業要點」規定之機構，皆能辦理綠建築、綠建材及智慧建築評定業務，另於2013年7月1日起訂定總造價2億以上之公有新建建築物需取得候選智慧建築證書及智慧建築標章，藉由各界資源參與公共事務，以擴大相關辦理業務、增加綠建築節能效益、綠建材的環保效益及智慧建築的便利性，另為為與國際趨勢接軌，經參酌國際能源總署(IEA)「全球能源部門2050年淨零排放路徑」報告，及歐盟、美國、日本等國際發展概念，內政部在我國綠建築標章制度內導入建築能效評估及標示系統，以綠建築標章日常節能指標之建築物外殼節能效率、空調系統節能效率及室內照明系統節能效率計算建築能源效率，評定建築能效等級，為評估建築能源效率最核心的政策工具，以作為邁向2050淨零建築的重要基礎。
本年度已完成針對內政部認可通過之綠建築標章、綠建材標章、智慧建築標章及建築能效標示案件，協助辦理綠建築標章暨候選綠建築證書、綠建材標章證書、智慧建築標章、候選智慧建築證書、建築能效標示及候選建築能效證書之製作，並彙整認可通過之綠建築標章及候選綠建築證書案件之案件數、指標數、節能節水、減碳效益、綠建材標章案件之案件數、廠商數及產品總數、智慧建築標章及候選智慧建築證書案件之案件數、指標數等，建築能效標示之案件數、等級數等，透過網站公告，將可擴大宣導民眾綠建築、綠建材、智慧建築及建築能效標示之成效，已完成六大工作項目。
", "英文摘要": "As the environmental protection issue had become the primary emphasis worldwide since the Earth Summit 1992, the international community has been taking a series of practical actions and successive policies in pursuing environmental sustainability. A variety of concepts related to green cities, sustainable cities, and GHG emission reduction, have been thus enthusiastically advocated and concretely put into practice for enhancing the human living environmental quality and achieving the co-existential harmony between the built environment and natural ecosystem.
Never lagging behind, Taiwan echoed such an urgent call for actions on environmental issues to not only conduct relevant institutionalization work but also promote the “Green Building Promotion Program” from 2001 and 2007 for thoroughly embedding sustainable design concepts into building construction. The program contained the mandatory green building design for newly-constructed buildings in the public sector, green building renovation for existing buildings, energy saving improvement for air-conditioning system and building envelope, research and development of recycled material technology and promotion, green building material labeling system, green building concept promotion and international interchange, as well as phased implementation of green building regulations. It was aimed to create a new evolution of building practices and investments in Taiwan and to encourage all the stakeholders to adopt holistic and diverse design concepts in buildings that are profitable to human living environment and earth sustainability, so that the goals of green building can be gradually achieved, covering ecological friendliness, energy saving, waste reduction, human health, reuse and recycling, and high performance. The impacts of building construction on earth environment and resources can be alleviated as well.
For continuously promoting the green building policy, the government of Taiwan implemented the follow-on “Eco-city and Green Building Promotion Program” in 2008 and strengthened the mandatory green building design via requiring the acquisition of a green building label prior to the official acceptance and auditing process. In addition, effective since July 1, 2009, the percentage of green building material utilization in the Building Technical Regulations has been elevated to 30% of total floor area for interior finishing. January 1, 2020, the percentage of green building material utilization in the Building Technical Regulations has been elevated to 60% of total floor area for interior finishing. In order to meet the expected soaring growth of green building label and green building material label evaluation demand, the Ministry of the Interior (MOI) started to introduce designated professional organizations to conduct the evaluation process of green building label, green building material label, and intelligent building label. Any organization complying with the “Operational Directions for Applying for Professional Evaluation Organization” for individual labels described above can be designated by the MOI to take charge of the evaluation work. Besides, the newly-constructed publicly-owned building that the construction cost is above 200 million NTD is required to pass the mandatory intelligent building evaluation certification too, which has been effective since July 1, 2013. Through the participation of different stakeholders on these public affairs and the extension of the evaluation work, the environmental effects of building energy saving and green building material utilization and the convenience of intelligent building and its application can be further increased.
In the project, the Taiwan Architecture and Building Center (TABC) will assist in green building evaluation for label and candidate certificate, intelligent building evaluation for label and candidate certificate, green building material label evaluation, plaque and certificate making, as well as statistical data collection and analysis, including: 1) numbers of green building labels, candidate certificates and evaluation indicators, 2) effects on energy saving, water saving, and carbon reduction, 3) numbers of green building material labels, companies and products, 4) numbers of intelligent building labels, candidate certificates and evaluation indicators, etc. The statistical information will be regularly announced on the website for extensively promoting green building, green building material, and intelligent building to the public.
", "相關檔案": "114年度資訊揭露成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340202/f1c26834-7078-424c-8d6d-88d5721b0194.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336828", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:51:00 GMT", "title": "氣候變遷下土地使用減災科技發展架構先期研究", "計畫主持人": "王榮進", "協同主持人": "吳杰穎", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-05-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "安全防災組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "氣候變遷調適、土地使用減災、國土韌性", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
隨著氣候變遷加劇，極端降雨、淹水、坡地災害與都市熱環境問題日益顯著，傳統以工程補強為主之防災思維，已難以單獨因應跨尺度、跨部門之複合型風險。土地使用作為空間治理核心工具，若能結合減災思維與科技支援機制，將可從源頭降低災害暴露與脆弱度，提升國土整體韌性。
近年我國已陸續推動《氣候變遷因應法》、國家氣候變遷調適行動計畫（112–115年）及相關國土與水利法規修訂，顯示土地使用減災調適已逐步制度化。然而，各項政策與科技計畫之間仍存在工具分散、資料未整合、缺乏整體發展架構等問題。因此，本研究以「氣候變遷下土地使用減災科技發展架構」為主軸，進行制度盤點、工具分類與優先行動篩選，作為後續中長期科技計畫規劃之先期基礎。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究採取「政策盤點」、「工具建構」、「行動篩選」，最後連結至「科技對應」之系統性分析流程，主要方法與過程如下：
（一）文獻回顧與理論建構
回顧國內外氣候變遷調適政策與土地使用調適理論，並整理綜效（Synergy）、權衡（Trade-off）與共效益（Co-benefits）之三效分析架構，建立後續
評估基礎。
（二）政策與法規系統性彙整
彙整國土計畫法、水土保持法、氣候變遷因應法及歷年國家調適行動計畫，並盤點六都氣候變遷政策執行現況，分析制度銜接與落差。
（三）土地使用減災調適工具分類建構
本研究為避免調適措施概念混淆與工具重疊，採取制度層級、空間操作尺度與技術屬性三項維度作為分類依據，系統性建構土地使用減災調適工具之分類架構。透過政策文本分析、法規盤點及既有科技計畫內容比對，歸納出六大類調適工具類型，形成具層級性與操作指向之分析體系。
六大類型包括：
1.用途分區與制度管制（制度／規劃層級）
2.開發限制與建築退縮（開發行為層級）
3.滯洪與水文管理
4.低衝擊開發（LID）
5.自然為本解方（NbS）
6.多功能空間利用
（四）優先調適行動計畫篩選
透過專家諮詢與篩選程序，從既有政策與研究計畫中辨識土地使用減災相關之優先調適行動項目。
（五）建築與城鄉減災相關研究計畫工具對應分析
盤點近年相關科技計畫，進行調適工具對應，並運用三效分析架構，辨識研究缺口與未來發展潛力。
三、重要發現
（一）六大類調適工具提供三效分析之系統性架構
本研究建構用途分區與制度管制、開發限制與建築退縮、滯洪與水文管理、低衝擊開發（LID）、自然為本解方（NbS）及多功能空間利用等六大類調適工具，作為分析基礎。透過此分類體系，得以從制度層級、流域尺度、基地尺度與空間整合層級進行跨尺度比較，建立具結構性的三效分析框架。
（二）不同工具類型呈現差異化三效特性
分析結果顯示，各類工具在綜效、權衡與共效益面向上呈現明顯差異：工程導向之滯洪與水文管理工具，多聚焦單一災害風險降低，綜效範圍較為集中；低衝擊開發工具在基地尺度具有一定共效益潛力；自然為本解方與多功能空間利用類型，則在生態服務、都市韌性與公共空間品質等面向展現較高之共效益與跨部門綜效潛力。此結果顯示，工具屬性將直接影響其三效表現結構。
（三）現行研究分布偏重工程型工具，生態整合型研究仍有深化空間
盤點建築與城鄉減災相關研究計畫後發現，現有科技資源配置仍以工程型與水文管理工具為主，自然為本解方與多功能空間整合之系統性三效驗證研究相對不足，顯示未來研究方向應朝向跨工具整合與複合型調適策略深化。
（四）三效分析有助於辨識優先深化之關鍵調適工具
透過三效架構檢視，可辨識具高綜效潛力且權衡風險較低之工具組合，並作為後續科技計畫優先投入與深化研究之依據。此一分析結果亦為中長期
（116–119年）科技發展藍圖規劃提供決策基礎。
四、主要建議事項
建議一
建構跨尺度之建築與城鄉土地使用減災韌性分析架構：立即可行建議
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
協辦機關： 內政部國土管理署、水利署、國家科學及技術委員會
本研究指出，國內近年土地使用調適相關研究涵蓋都市計畫審議、土地使用分區管理、基地水文量化、建築韌性規範及多功能減災空間配置等面向，然成果多分散於不同年度計畫與研究團隊，缺乏跨尺度與跨領域之整合架構，致使調適工具運用邏輯與韌性評估方法難以系統化銜接，亦不利於制度推動與技術標準化。
為統整土地使用調適知識體系，建議由建築研究所主導建構「建築—街廓—都市—區域」之多尺度減災韌性分析架構，整合本研究提出之81項調適工具、三大發展架構與十項發展面向，形成可供都市計畫、開發許可與工程規劃程序運用之共通分析體系。該架構定位為調適工具、規劃制度與技術評估之中介整合層，補強其邏輯銜接，作為後續氣候調適科技發展與制度研擬之基礎。
建議二
推動智慧監測減災技術整合與防災社區能力培力：中長期建議
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
協辦機關： 水利署、國土管理署、國家科學及技術委員會、地方政府
本研究指出，水文監測、淹水預警、崩塌偵測與都市災害資訊揭露等技術成果，多分散於不同年度計畫，尚未形成統一整合架構，且難以有效回饋至土地使用管理、都市計畫審議與社區防災行動層級。地方政府亦反映跨部門資料格式不一與介接困難，影響監測成果之實務應用效益。
建議由建築研究所協同水利署及國科會推動「智慧監測減災技術整合計畫」，建構跨部門資料介接與視覺化應用架構，整合淹水、雨量、河川、坡地及都市災害監測資訊，並發展預警與風險揭露模組。同時強化社區端防災能力，使監測資料轉化為支援社區避難、滯洪空間管理及基本生活資源（Food–Energy–Water, FEW）備援之行動依據。此策略定位為跨部門資料整合與在地應用之中介層，與既有水情預警與研究資料平臺互補，旨在強化智慧監測成果於地方韌性治理之落實深度。
建議三
建立避難收容空間規劃、配置與管理策略：中長期建議
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
協辦機關： 內政部國土管理署、水利署、地方政府、消防署
本研究指出，隨極端降雨與複合災害風險上升，避難收容空間在調適治理中的角色日益重要。然而現行避難空間多由不同單位分別推動，缺乏整體規劃準則，亦未充分整合滯洪空間、公園與校園等多功能公共設施；地方政府在容量評估、設備配置、避難動線與弱勢族群需求納入等面向仍待強化。
建議由建築研究所主導建立「避難收容空間規劃與管理策略」，依不同區位特性發展容量評估模式、選址原則與功能配置標準，並整合滯洪公園、防災公園及校園等空間，建構可轉換之避難體系。同時強化避難路網與疏散機制設計，提升收容空間之安全性與運作韌性。此策略定位於都市規劃層級之空間整合架構，與既有避難管理機制功能互補，有助於建構更完整之都市災害防救體系。
", "英文摘要": "Background and objectives
As climate change intensifies, extreme rainfall, flooding, slope-related hazards, and urban heat stress have become increasingly prominent. Traditional disaster prevention approaches that rely primarily on engineering reinforcement are no longer sufficient to address cross-scale and cross-sectoral compound risks. As a core instrument of spatial governance, land use—when integrated with disaster risk reduction strategies and technological support mechanisms—can reduce hazard exposure and vulnerability at the source, thereby enhancing overall territorial resilience.
In recent years, Taiwan has enacted the Climate Change Response Act, implemented the National Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan (2023–2026), and revised relevant national land and water-related regulations, indicating the gradual institutionalization of land-use-based disaster risk reduction and adaptation. Nevertheless, fragmentation of tools, limited data integration, and the absence of a comprehensive development framework remain persistent challenges across policies and technology programs. Accordingly, this study centers on developing a “Technological Development Framework for Land-Use-Based Disaster Risk Reduction under Climate Change,” undertaking institutional review, tool classification, and priority action screening to establish a foundational basis for medium- to long-term science and technology planning.
Method and approach
This study adopts a systematic analytical framework comprising policy review, tool construction, action screening, and subsequent technology
alignment. The principal methods and processes are as follows:
(1) Literature Review and Theoretical Framework Development
A comprehensive review of domestic and international climate change adaptation policies and land-use adaptation theories was conducted. Based on this review, a three-effect analytical framework—encompassing Synergy, Trade-off, and Co-benefits—was synthesized to establish the foundation for subsequent evaluation.
(2) Systematic Compilation of Policies and Regulations
Relevant legislation and policy instruments—including the National Land Planning Act, Soil and Water Conservation Act, Climate Change Response Act, and successive National Climate Change Adaptation Action Plans—were systematically compiled. Implementation status across the six special municipalities was further examined to identify institutional linkages and gaps.
(3) Construction of a Classification Framework for Land-Use-Based Disaster Risk Reduction Tools
To avoid conceptual ambiguity and overlap among adaptation measures, this study developed a classification framework based on three dimensions: institutional level, spatial scale of operation, and technological attributes. Through policy text analysis, regulatory review, and comparison of existing science and technology programs, six major categories of land-use-based disaster risk reduction tools were identified, forming a hierarchical and operational analytical system:
1.Zoning and regulatory control (institutional/planning level)
2.Development restrictions and building setbacks (development control level)
3.Flood detention and hydrological management
4.Low Impact Development (LID)
5.Nature-based Solutions (NbS)
6.Multi-functional spatial utilization
(4) Screening of Priority Adaptation Actions
Through expert consultation and screening procedures, priority adaptation actions related to land-use-based disaster risk reduction were identified
from existing policies and research programs.
(5) Tool–Technology Alignment Analysis of Building and Urban Disaster Reduction Research Programs
Recent science and technology projects were reviewed to map their alignment with the classified adaptation tools. Using the three-effect analytical framework, research gaps and future development potential were identified.
Main results
(1) The Six Categories of Adaptation Tools as a Systematic Framework for Three-Effect Analysis
This study establishes six categories of adaptation tools—zoning and regulatory control, development restrictions and building setbacks, flood detention and hydrological management, Low Impact Development (LID), Nature-based Solutions (NbS), and multi-functional spatial utilization—as the analytical foundation. Through this classification system, cross-scale comparisons can be conducted across institutional levels, watershed scales, site scales, and spatial integration levels, thereby forming a structured framework for three-effect analysis (Synergy, Trade-off, and Co-benefits).
(2) Differentiated Three-Effect Characteristics across Tool Types
The analysis indicates that different categories of tools exhibit distinct patterns in terms of synergy, trade-offs, and co-benefits. Engineering-oriented flood detention and hydrological management tools primarily focus on reducing specific hazard risks, resulting in a relatively concentrated synergy profile. LID measures demonstrate certain co-benefit potential at the site scale. In contrast, Nature-based Solutions and multi-functional spatial utilization approaches show comparatively higher co-benefits and cross-sectoral synergies, particularly in ecological services, urban resilience, and public space quality. These findings suggest that tool attributes directly shape their three-effect performance structures.
(3) Current Research Emphasizes Engineering-Based Tools, While Ecological Integration Requires Further Development
A review of recent building and urban disaster reduction research programs reveals that existing science and technology investments remain concentrated on engineering and hydrological management tools. Systematic three-effect validation studies focusing on Nature-based Solutions and multi-functional spatial integration remain relatively limited, indicating that future research should prioritize cross-tool integration and composite adaptation strategies.
(4) Three-Effect Analysis as a Basis for Identifying Priority Adaptation Tools
Application of the three-effect framework enables the identification of tool combinations with high synergy potential and comparatively low trade-off risks, thereby informing priority investment and research deepening in subsequent science and technology programs. These findings also provide an analytical foundation for medium- to long-term (2027–2030) technological development planning.
Major suggestions
This study proposes one short-term and two long-term strategies as follows:
For Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior, ROC (short-term strategy)
t is recommended to establish a cross-scale analytical framework for building and urban land-use-based disaster resilience. Although recent research covers urban planning review, zoning management, hydrological quantification, building resilience standards, and multi-functional mitigation spaces, outcomes remain fragmented across annual programs and lack an integrated cross-scale framework, limiting institutional coherence and technical standardization.
The Architecture and Building Research Institute should lead the development of a multi-scale framework structured across building–block–city–region levels. Integrating the 81 adaptation tools, three development frameworks, and ten development dimensions identified in this study, the framework would serve as a common analytical system for urban planning, development permitting, and engineering procedures. As an intermediate integrative layer linking adaptation tools, planning institutions, and technical evaluation, it would provide a foundation for future climate adaptation policy and technology development.
For Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior, ROC (long-term strategy 1)
It is recommended to promote the integration of smart monitoring technologies and strengthen community resilience capacity. Current hydrological monitoring, flood warning, landslide detection, and disaster information systems remain fragmented and insufficiently connected to land-use management and community action. Inconsistent data formats and cross-departmental integration barriers further limit practical application.
The proposed “Smart Monitoring Disaster Reduction Technology Integration Program,” led by the Architecture and Building Research Institute in collaboration with relevant agencies, should establish cross-departmental data linkage and visualization mechanisms, integrate multi-hazard monitoring data, and develop early warning and risk disclosure modules. Community capacity should be enhanced so monitoring information supports evacuation planning, flood detention management, and basic Food–Energy–Water (FEW) preparedness. This strategy complements existing warning systems by strengthening data integration and local application within resilience governance.
For Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior, ROC (long-term strategy 2)
It is recommended to establish an integrated planning and management strategy for evacuation and shelter spaces. With increasing compound disaster risks, shelter spaces require coordinated planning rather than fragmented implementation. Current systems lack unified standards and insufficiently integrate multi-functional public facilities such as flood detention parks and school campuses.
The Architecture and Building Research Institute should lead the development of a strategy that defines capacity assessment models, site selection principles, and functional standards across different locational contexts. By integrating flood detention parks, disaster prevention parks, campuses, and other facilities into a convertible evacuation system and strengthening evacuation routing mechanisms, this strategy would enhance operational safety and resilience. Positioned at the urban planning level, it complements existing shelter management systems and supports a more comprehensive disaster response framework.
", "相關檔案": "印製--氣候變遷下土地使用減災科技發展架構先期研究(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336828/b73c588b-1385-4aef-9b6c-e05bb0b86881.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336829", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 12 Feb 2026 08:43:00 GMT", "title": "公寓大廈雨水貯集滯洪設施管理維護與智慧監控技術之研究", "計畫主持人": "朱慶倫", "協同主持人": "廖朝軒", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-05-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "安全防災組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "雨水貯集滯洪設施、智慧監控、建築管理、參考指引", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
為減少都市開發對雨水逕流的影響，內政部國土署於民國102年頒訂《建築技術規則》之建築設計施工編第4條之3規定都市計畫地區新建、增建或改建之建築物應設置雨水貯集滯洪設施，旨在降低建築基地向外排放的雨水逕流，進而實現減洪與滯洪功能。配合中央規範，各地方政府陸續制定相關自治條例與技術規定，除明訂建築基地應具備的最小雨水貯集滯洪容量外，部分縣市更進一步設立最大允許排放量與出流控制標準，以確保在極端降雨事件下，能有效延緩洪峰形成、減緩逕流對下游地區所造成之衝擊。經濟部水利署於2018年修正《水利法》新增「逕流分擔與出流管制」專章，並於2019年訂頒相關子法，進一步完善了雨水貯集滯洪設施的法規架構。這些法規的實施，旨在透過集水區內的雨水貯集滯洪設施與土地共同分擔雨水逕流，從而降低極端降雨事件帶來的災害風險。
自相關規定施行以來，許多建築物已依規定設置雨水貯集滯洪設施，然由於中央法規目前對於設施建置後的檢查與維護尚缺乏明確的規範，使建築負責人、管委會或管理業者多數未將該設施納入日常設施管理範疇，甚至對其存在與功能皆無明確認知，導致設施失效或閒置之情況普遍存在，難以實現當初設計時所預期之水量削減效益與滯洪貢獻。雖然臺北市、新北市等部分地方政府已制定自治條例，針對滯洪設施之年度檢查與豪雨應變進行管理，但對於日常維護作業內容、定期功能檢測與管理人員操作制度等面向，仍缺乏具體指導與制度性安排，使建築使用者於實際管理上難以落實。內政部建築研究所於113年度辦理「建築物雨水貯集滯洪設施管理制度納入智慧監控系統之研究」，調查現況並規劃智慧監控模組設計，初步編擬使用維護操作指引草案，期能作為建築負責人日常管理之參考，提升其維管認知與操作能力。惟現行法規對於公寓大廈等建築物設置智慧監控或自動監測設備，尚未建立明確規範。為此，本研究將進一步研擬智慧監控系統之功能層級與推動架構，並增修指引草案內容，強化法規於設施設置、審查、檢查與營運制度之完備性，最終建構具前瞻性與永續性的管理制度，促進建築物智慧化滯洪管理整合發展。
二、研究方法及過程
本計畫主要規劃4項研究內容，其工作項目如下：
1.國內外建築物雨水貯集滯洪設施智慧化監管相關資料蒐集，並進行公寓大廈雨水貯集滯洪設施智慧化監管的功能層級分類與進程規劃。
2.初擬公寓大廈雨水貯集滯洪設施智慧化監管之系統安裝與操作維護相關內容。
3.公寓大廈雨水貯集滯洪設施操作與維護參考指引草案編修與出版前置作業。
4.舉辦公寓大廈雨水貯集滯洪設施操作與維護培訓講習會。
本研究旨在建構公寓大廈雨水貯集滯洪設施管理維護與智慧監控技術之內容，提升設施之操作維護效率與資訊化管理能力，並強化使用者、維運單位與管理者對於系統功能之認知與執行效能。計畫將延續113年研究成果，蒐集並分析國內外有關建築物雨水貯集滯洪設施智慧化監管相關制度、技術架構與案例經驗，進一步針對公寓大廈情境進行適用性評估，擬定符合實務需求之功能層級分類與推動進程規劃。同時，將初擬公寓大廈雨水貯集滯洪設施智慧化監管系統安裝標準與操作維護之內容，並且為強化制度應用層面，將依據調查結果與專家意見，完成建築物雨水貯集滯洪設施使用維護操作參考指引(草案)之增修及出版前置作業，提供業界與管理機關具體可行之執行依據。進而為提升建築專業人員、物業管理人員與設施使用者之知識水準與實務能力，計畫將辦理相關操作與維護之培訓講習會，推廣智慧化監管理念與技術應用，促使設施得以長期穩定運作，進而發揮雨水貯集滯洪設施於都市洪災調適與災害韌性提升之關鍵效益。
三、重要發現
1.完成國內外雨水管理現況調查與案例分析
本計畫針對公寓大廈已建置之雨水貯集滯洪設施進行訪談與資料蒐整，調查其設施型態、使用與維護現況。透過中央與地方法規比較發現，我國制度多著重設置與容量規範，對維護與稽核機制仍不完善，且地方規範標準不一，致管理出現落差。國內智慧化示範已證實感測與通訊技術具可行性，但整合應用仍在初期；可借鏡國外經驗運用AI與IoT建立即時監測與預測排放系統，實現分散式儲水與協同管理。綜上，推動智慧監控層級與制度整合，為提升建築基地滯洪設施韌性與效能之關鍵方向。
2.完成智慧監控功能層級分類與操作維護內容初擬及推動策略研擬
為促進智慧化技術於建築雨水貯集滯洪設施之應用，本計畫依系統複雜度與管理需求，建構「基本監測」、「智慧監控」與「整合監管」三層級架構，且前兩者更細分為基礎型與進階型。推動上將以「基礎監測」為起點，逐步提升資料可得性與操作能力，進而擴充至自動控制與整合管理。推動策略分為三階段：短期以教育訓練與示範推廣為主，中期建立示範場域與查核制度，長期則強化法規整合與制度銜接，實現建築與都市排水系統協同運作的智慧化管理模式。
3.完成建築物雨水貯集滯洪設施使用維護操作指引（草案）編修
本計畫依據實務調查與技術研析成果，完成《建築物雨水貯集滯洪設施使用維護操作參考指引（草案）》修訂，重點在增訂智慧監控技術導入內容，提升操作與維護之系統性與實用性。修訂除補充操作流程、異常應變與巡檢紀錄範例外，並針對不同設施型態提出維護建議，依智慧監控層級分類對應設備與維護需求。本次新增第3.4節「智慧化監測配置架構」、第4.3節「水位監測與紀錄」，並強化第4.4節「檢查與維護」，使指引更貼近智慧監控推動趨勢，建構兼具操作性與擴充性的管理框架。
4.完成培訓講習會試辦推廣
為強化管理單位及相關維護人員對雨水貯集滯洪設施之認知與操作能力，本計畫初步建構培訓講習內容，涵蓋設施功能原理、操作與維護重點、巡檢紀錄撰寫、異常判斷與智慧監控系統應用等，並規劃實地操作輔導，以提升學員實務理解與操作能力。本年度共辦理五場講習會暨工作坊，分別針對不同類型公寓大廈實例進行現地說明與經驗交流，協助與會人員了解操作實務與維管重點。活動中亦廣泛蒐集管理單位與維運廠商之意見與建議，作為後續課程修正與制度化推動之參據。
四、主要建議事項
建議一
持續修訂維護操作指引並結合實務培訓課程推廣應用：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心、台灣綠色生態設施協會及相關學協會
建議持續優化指引內容，擴充不同設施型式與建築場域之操作維護流程，並增列異常判斷、應變與智慧監控應用案例，以提升實務操作性。同時延續本計畫講習會暨工作坊成果，持續辦理實作與推廣活動，強化管理人員、物業單位與技術廠商間之知識交流，提升操作維護與智慧監控能力，促進制度落實與長期管理成效，建構永續的教育與管理體系。
建議二
智慧監控系統模組化設備研發與建設規劃：中長期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
截至目前，計畫執行建築物雨水貯集滯洪設施設置智慧監控系統相關研究，因為創新的系統設計，故系統所使用的設備購自不同的設備廠商，且設備整併需考量運作性能、穩定度且利於通訊連結與整合才進行採用，因此在工業電腦主機、控制設備、感測設備(水位計、流量計)、網域建置以及資通訊的測試，設置上比較費時費工；而在歷時多次的測試與架構優化，為提升未來推廣落實的便利性，擬研發模組化設備架構，使系統設置連結更容易、簡化系統設定介面，並使系統具輕巧性以及設置價格更為合理，其成果將可做為未來都市雨洪管理智慧相關產業發展之參考。
建議三
建立建築端雨水管理智慧化制度推動機制與法規整合路徑：長期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署、經濟部水利署、各地方政府
建議由中央主管機關統整既有法令架構，參酌《建築技術規則》、《公寓大廈管理條例》與地方自治條例內容，研議納入或另訂定智慧監控管理相關條文與辦法以及研訂技術參考指引，建立建築端雨水設施智慧化管理推動機制，作為長期都市洪災調適與智慧治理策略之一。
", "英文摘要": "1.Purpose of the research
To reduce the impacts of urban development on stormwater runoff, the National Land Administration of the Ministry of the Interior amended Article 4-3 of the Building Design and Construction Chapter of the Building Technical Regulations in 2013. The amendment requires that new buildings, additions, and renovations within urban planning districts install rainwater harvesting and detention facilities to lower off-site discharge and achieve peak reduction and detention functions. In alignment with the central regulations, local governments subsequently enacted self-governing ordinances and technical provisions that specify minimum storage and detention capacities for building sites. Some jurisdictions further set maximum allowable discharge and outflow control standards to delay peak formation and mitigate downstream impacts during extreme rainfall.
In 2018, the Water Resources Agency of the Ministry of Economic Affairs amended the Water Act to add a dedicated chapter on “Runoff Allocation and Outflow Control,” followed in 2019 by related sub-regulations. These measures aim to distribute runoff between land and rainwater detention facilities across catchments and thereby reduce disaster risk during extreme events.
Since these requirements came into force, many buildings have installed rainwater harvesting and detention facilities. However, because central regulations still lack clear provisions for post-installation inspection and maintenance, many building owners, condominium associations, and management firms do not include these facilities in routine management, and awareness of their presence and function is limited. As a result, facilities are often idle or ineffective, and the anticipated benefits for runoff reduction and detention are not realized. Although some local governments such as Taipei City and New Taipei City have adopted ordinances for annual inspections and heavy-rain response, there remain gaps in daily maintenance procedures, periodic performance testing, and operator protocols, which hampers implementation.
In 2024, the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI) of the Ministry of the Interior conducted the project “Incorporating Smart Monitoring into the Management System for Building Rainwater Harvesting and Detention Facilities.” The project surveyed current conditions, planned smart-monitoring module designs, and drafted a preliminary Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Reference Guideline to support day-to-day management by building owners and improve operator awareness and capability. Nonetheless, explicit regulations for installing smart monitoring or automatic sensing equipment in buildings such as condominiums have not yet been established. This study therefore develops functional tiers and a promotion framework for smart monitoring systems and revises the guideline draft to strengthen the completeness of regulations covering installation, review, inspection, and operation. The goal is to build a forward-looking and sustainable management system that advances integrated, smart detention management at the building scale.
2.Methodology and procedures
The following are the four primary research topics and associated tasks for this project:
Collect domestic and international information on smart oversight of rainwater harvesting and detention facilities in buildings, and develop functional tiering and a staged roadmap for condominiums.
Draft content on system installation and O&M for smart oversight of condominium rainwater harvesting and detention facilities.
Revise the draft O&M Reference Guideline for condominiums and complete pre-publication procedures.
Organize training workshops on O&M for condominium rainwater harvesting and detention facilities.
3.Major findings
Survey of Current Conditions and Case Analyses
Interviews and data collection were conducted for condominiums that have installed rainwater harvesting and detention facilities, examining facility types and O&M practices. A comparison of central and local regulations shows an emphasis on installation and capacity, with insufficient provisions for maintenance and auditing. Standards vary across jurisdictions, creating management gaps. Domestic pilot projects have demonstrated the feasibility of sensing and communications technologies, though integrated applications are still in early stages. Internationally, AI and IoT have been applied to real-time monitoring and predictive discharge control to enable distributed storage and coordinated management. Advancing smart monitoring tiers and integrating regulatory systems is therefore a key pathway to improve the resilience and performance of building-scale detention.
Functional Tiers, Preliminary O&M Content, and Promotion Strategy
Based on system complexity and management needs, the study proposes three tiers: Basic Monitoring, Smart Control, and Integrated Oversight. The first two tiers are further divided into basic and advanced types. Implementation begins with Basic Monitoring to enhance data availability and operational capability, then expands to automated control and integrated management. The promotion strategy has three phases: short-term emphasis on education and demonstration, mid-term establishment of pilot sites and auditing mechanisms, and long-term integration of laws and institutions to achieve a smart management model that coordinates buildings with urban drainage systems.
Revision of the Draft O&M Reference Guideline
The guideline is revised to add smart monitoring content and to enhance the systematic and practical nature of O&M. The revisions supplement operating procedures, contingency responses, and inspection record examples, and provide maintenance recommendations tailored to facility types, aligned with the smart-monitoring tiers and associated equipment and O&M needs. New sections include 3.4 “Architecture for Smart Monitoring Deployment” and 4.3 “Water Level Monitoring and Recording,” with Section 4.4 “Inspection and Maintenance” strengthened to reflect current smart-monitoring trends and to build a management framework that is both operable and expandable.
Pilot Training and Outreach
The project developed pilot training modules covering facility functions, O&M essentials, inspection recordkeeping, anomaly diagnosis, and smart system applications, and also planned on-site coaching to improve practical understanding and capability. Four workshops were held this year using different condominium case studies for on-site explanation and experience sharing. Feedback from management units and service providers was widely collected to inform subsequent course refinement and institutionalization.
4.Major recommendation items
Through this research, following three recommendations are made for immediate- and middle- to long- term period:
Recommendation 1
Ongoing revision of the O&M guideline combined with practical training and outreach: immediate
Organizer: Architecture and Building Research Institute, MOI
Co-organizers: Taiwan Architecture and Building Center, Taiwan Green Infrastructure Association, and related professional societies.
Continue to refine the guideline by expanding O&M procedures for diverse facility types and building contexts and by adding cases on anomaly diagnosis, emergency response, and smart monitoring applications. Sustain hands-on workshops and outreach to strengthen knowledge exchange among managers, property firms, and technology vendors, improve O&M and smart-monitoring capability, support regulatory implementation, and build a sustainable education and management system.
Recommendation 2
R&D on modular smart-monitoring equipment and deployment planning: medium to long term
Organizer: Architecture and Building Research Institute, MOI
Co-organizers: Taiwan Architecture and Building Cente.
Given that current innovative system designs often integrate devices from multiple vendors and require performance, stability, and communications compatibility, installation and testing of industrial PCs, controllers, sensors (water level and flow), networks, and ICT can be labor-intensive. After multiple rounds of testing and architecture refinement, the study recommends developing modular equipment to simplify interconnection and system configuration, reduce size and cost, and facilitate broader adoption. The results can support future smart urban flood management industries.
Recommendation 3
Establish a promotion mechanism and regulatory integration pathway for smart building-side rainwater management: long- term
Organizer: Architecture and Building Research Institute, MOI
Co-organizers: National Land Administration, MOI; Water Resources Agency Cente, MOEA; local governments.
The central government should consolidate the existing legal framework and, referencing the Building Technical Regulations, the Condominium Administration Act, and local ordinances, consider adding clauses or technical guidelines for smart monitoring management. This will create a structured promotion mechanism for smart management of building-side rainwater facilities as part of long-term urban flood adaptation and smart governance strategies.
", "相關檔案": "114協資料蒐集分析報告(公寓大廈雨水貯集滯洪設施管理維護與智慧監控技術之研究)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336829/da258c99-014d-46a1-9a4e-a93ccf9200cf.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336845", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:32:00 GMT", "title": "台灣都會區域計畫之內水減洪韌性規劃（二）", "計畫主持人": "羅偉誠", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "財團法人成大水利海洋研究發展文教基金會", "執行行程": "2025-05-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "安全防災組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "氣候變遷、減洪韌性、都市計畫、水理分析、雲端平台", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
近年在氣候變遷影響下，極端降雨發生頻率與規模已有增強的趨勢，短延時強降雨的暴雨事件已漸為常態，都會區的洪泛災害若僅以傳統工程手段進行減洪，其可達之減災績效顯已趨近極限，土地使用計畫等非工程手段逐漸受到重視。為因應氣候變遷極端降雨對都市土地之浸淹衝擊，如能分析出具有減災效能的土地使用規劃，將可朝向降低淹水風險、建構具有淹水承受能力之韌性城鄉目標邁進。
然而，都市內水減洪涉及土地使用規劃與水理演算等跨領域知識，兩者均備之技術門檻較高。本研究期能以建立可跨越土地使用規劃與水理演算之減洪韌性評估技術應用，並建構一減洪韌性雲端平台，協助土地使用規劃人員評估氣候變遷及未來土地使用情境下受淹水影響之土地，檢視未來土地使用規劃因應淹水之合宜性，進一步可輔助地方政府進行氣候變遷下國土計畫規劃方案之評估。
本研究從宏觀角度及流域觀點，檢視都會區域上、中、下游開發或都市發展影響。面對氣候變遷衝擊，若能從流域觀點探討區域範圍內之各該區位之都市或地區的逕流分擔措施及其內水減洪調適成效，進而應用於整體都會區域計畫之內水減洪韌性將更能顯現其績效。為此，本研究以六都為研究區域，規劃四年期計畫，應用地文性淹水排水模式（Physiographic drainage-inundation model, PHD-model），並就都會區域範圍內所有水系擬一併進行逕流模擬，並期能將降雨情境轉化成各計畫區之逕流，俾符合各縣市政府國土計畫的審議與管理需求。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究以桃園市和臺中市為案例地區，蒐集研究範圍相關計畫、水文資料（包括雨量、水位、流量及潮位）、地文資料（包括地形地勢、交通系統、水利設施、土地利用及都市計畫概況等），以瞭解研究案例地區之水文與地文特性，並完成地文性淹排水模式之檢定與驗證，以完成水理模式之建置。
本研究以重現期10年24小時延時及其氣候變遷情境下之雨量作為雨量情境之設定，另以現況土地利用及配合氣候變遷之未來土地使用作為土地情境設定，以地文性淹排水模式進行現況土地利用於重現期10年雨量情境下之逕流模擬演算並作為基礎情境（baseline），再進行未來土地使用於氣候變遷雨量情境下之逕流模擬演算，透過都市計畫範圍之重現期雨量及其氣候變遷雨量情境之淹水分析，針對案例地區都市計畫範圍之淹水範圍及盤點公有土地及國營事業土地以進行內水減洪調適韌性規劃，並運用水理運算分析技術，探討桃園市的南崁都市計畫區內高速公路沿線、桃園高鐵特定區計畫內南北兩側區域、桃園市中壢平鎮都市計畫位於老街溪、新街溪流域之區域、桃園市楊梅區位於老街溪、新街溪流域之區域；以及臺中市的臺中高鐵站附近區域及梧棲區附近區域等區域之減淹策略與建議。
透過軟硬體架構、平台介面、資料庫佈署、擷取模組及可靠性監控規劃與備份機制建置雲端平台系統，再進行資料管理架構的建立，接著將地理圖資透過GIS展示於網頁，並將地文性淹排水模式之逕流演算成果展示於平台，以完成資料系統規劃與減洪韌性雲端平台雛型建構。
上述內水減洪調適韌性規劃成果以座談會之形式，邀集內政部國土管理署國土計畫組、內政部國土管理署城鄉發展分署、桃園市政府都市發展局及臺灣省都市計畫技師公會等進行跨領域之產、官、學交流，並針對內水減洪調適韌性規劃成果及減洪韌性平台階段性成果進行討論。
三、重要發現
本研究以桃園市與臺中市為研究案例對象，使用「地文性淹排水模式」模擬在10年重現期及氣候變遷降雨等雨量情境，以及土地利用現況及都市計畫情境之逕流現象，針對逕流演算成果，再進行後續之氣候變遷雨量情境及都會區域計畫範圍內土地之內水減洪韌性規劃情境之逕流現象模擬，以分析與探討演算各情境之影響，針對本研究之成果可得重要發現如下。
(一)經氣候變遷暴雨增量分析，可發現桃園市及臺中市於氣候變遷情境下，降雨量均有顯著提升，最大之增量可超過50.8%。又模擬結果顯示現況易淹區域於未來氣候變遷情境下，淹水範圍及深度均有上升，尤以都市發展核心區（如：桃園市中壢區）和新興發展區（如：桃園市平鎮區、大園區）影響最顯著，顯示氣候變遷加劇都市計畫地區受淹水災害之風險。
(二)桃園市及臺中市可利用減洪措施潛力區位資源
1.桃園市減洪措施潛力區位中以埤塘土地占比較高，符合「千塘之鄉」之名號，桃園市於氣候變遷降雨情境下具3,062.45公頃的減洪措施潛力區位，然模擬顯示埤塘多位於較遠位置，對減淹效果有限，建議未來應協商整合淹水範圍內土地，並以公園用地及短、中距離可蓄洪埤塘串聯藍綠系統，以最大化桃園市整體減洪效益。
2.臺中市減洪措施潛力區位以未開闢農2公有地占比最高，占整體減洪措施潛力區位34%，其次為城1農業區公有地，達整體比例達26%，各類減洪措施潛力區位之土地面積達3,427.23公頃。
(三)減洪措施潛力區位之建議
1.建議整合淹水潛勢區內未開闢農2公有地、城1農業區公有地、農5農業區公有地、城1公園綠地、埤塘土地、未開闢臺灣糖業股份有限公司土地資源，於未來土地辦理開發作業時予以保留，同時規劃作為滯洪設施及綠色基盤設施設置區位之儲備用地。
2.流域或行政區內淹水範圍可利用減洪措施潛力區位較少或無可利用資源者，考量其區位已有淹水情形且無足夠之可利用資源，為避免淹水範圍擴大增加，建議於土地規劃作業時應以避免持續擴大及開發為原則（如桃園市南崁都市計畫區內高速公路沿線農業區、桃園市楊梅位於老街、桃園市新街溪之農牧用地、臺中市梧棲區之農業區）。如地方政府考量經濟發展或既有產業設施聚集效益，確有開發利用之需求，建議整合周邊可利用之減洪措施潛力區位進行系統性減洪規劃；針對區域內現有以兩面光、三面光形式之人工排水系統，應逐步推動韌性化與生態化排水改善再造，採取透水性底材、植生護岸、緩坡化渠岸及側溝滯洪池化等方式，恢復水體的調蓄與涵養能力，降低開發後淹水災害對地區之影響；針對大面積之街廓型態城市，得建議透過基地保水策略減洪；針對已開發之建成區域環境，得強化軟體面因應，如籌組防災社區、研提防災計畫、繪製防災地圖，強化社區韌性減災能力。
(四)減洪韌性雲端平台除了各式功能模組的精進外，今年度已著手進行情境需求的功能開發，目前已經完成雨量、潮位的編修功能，可讓土地使用相關規劃人員自訂歷史氣候條件，俟下期高程編修與土地利用編輯模組完成後，即可進行線上分析作業。
四、主要建議事項
本年度已完成台灣都會區域計畫之內水減洪韌性規劃（二）之研究，本研究針對短及中長期提出以下建議：
建議一
推動以水理分析為基礎之全國性都市內水調適規劃框架：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
去年度完成台灣都會區域計畫之內水減洪韌性規劃（一）之臺南市、高雄市研究，本年度完成台灣都會區域計畫之內水減洪韌性規劃（二）之桃園市與臺中市研究，規劃明、後年度完成臺北市及新北市之研究。建議未來可同樣以跨流域之單一縣市行政區為案例，應用水理分析技術，演算並分析建成區域計畫空間規劃情境之洪災潛勢，並逐步完成全臺之內水減洪調適規劃，自水理分析觀點針對地方層級國土計畫通盤檢討氣候變遷調適相關內容提供建議，規劃成果可供相關單位推動相關都會區域計畫、直轄市、縣（市）國土計畫參考使用。
建議二
減洪韌性雲端平台之後續維護管理：中期建議
主辦機關：內政部國土管理署城鄉分署
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
透過歷年研究，減洪調適水理技術應用於空間規劃已趨於成熟，本研究據此已初步建構減洪韌性雲端平台，並提供臺南市、高雄市、桃園市、臺中市之演算網格資料，由於本研究之減洪韌性雲端平台建置之目的在於協助土地使用規劃人員評估氣候變遷及未來土地使用情境下受淹水影響之土地，檢視未來土地使用規劃因應淹水之合宜性，進一步可輔助地方政府進行氣候變遷下國土計畫規劃方案之評估。圖資的更新在模式的準確度提升與土地情境的設定具有其重要性，故需要經常性維護與定期資料更新，且本平台偏向屬於減洪水理演算成果之模擬與展示，與常見之GIS展示平台屬性不同，建議需要專業人員進行維護，建議減洪韌性雲端平台後續維護管理可由整合圖資之政府機關進行辦理。
建議三
建議水理演算技術考量土地使用之動態關係以提升完整性：中期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署
建議本研究水理演算模擬之應用，後續可針對演算網格之曲線號碼值（CN值）之界定另擬情境，進一步探討土地利用與CN值本身之動態關係，使逕流量淹水潛勢帶來的影響得更加精確，同時考量自然邊界（流域涉及範圍）與人文邊界（行政區）之差異，以完整考量上、中、下游之承洪韌性策略。
建議四
建議水理演算技術納入大型計畫規劃過程參考使用：中、長期建議
主辦機關：直轄市、縣（市）政府、經濟部水利署水利規劃分署
建議本研究水理演算模擬之應用，後續可做政府單位於擬定大型計畫時，針對計畫涉及淹水潛勢部分進行相關淹水模擬及研提配套減洪策略所用，如直轄市、縣（市）政府得於辦理直轄市、縣（市）國土計畫通盤檢討或都市計畫通盤檢討過程中，使用本案淹水模擬為參考，進而提出相關配套處理策略，或如經濟部水利署水利規劃分署，得於擬訂流域特定區域計畫過程中，依據本案之淹水模擬成果為參考，適當調配流域上、中、下游之土地使用規劃。
", "英文摘要": "Background and objectives
In recent years, under the influence of climate change, both the frequency and magnitude of extreme rainfall events have increased, and short-duration intensive storms have gradually become the norm. Consequently, the disaster-reduction benefits achievable by relying solely on traditional engineering measures for flood mitigation in metropolitan areas are nearing their limits, and non-structural approaches such as land-use planning are receiving growing attention. If land-use planning strategies with proven disaster-reduction effectiveness can be identified, urban areas can move toward reducing inundation risk and building resilient cities and communities with greater flood tolerance.
However, pluvial flooding mitigation in urban areas requires cross-disciplinary expertise in both land-use planning and hydraulic modeling, each of which entails a high technical threshold. This study aims to develop a flood-mitigation resilience assessment technique that bridges land-use planning and hydraulic modeling, and to establish a flood-mitigation resilience cloud platform. The platform will help planners evaluate lands affected by inundation under climate change and future land-use scenarios, verify the appropriateness of planning responses to flooding, and further support local governments in assessing national land-planning alternatives under climate change.
From a macro and watershed perspective, this study examines how upstream, midstream, and downstream development or urban growth within metropolitan regions influences runoff. In response to climate-change impacts, investigating runoff-sharing measures and their pluvial flooding mitigation and adaptation effectiveness across different locations within a watershed—and then applying these findings to metropolitan regional planning—will better demonstrate overall flood-mitigation resilience. Accordingly, the study takes the 6 special municipalities as the research area and implements a four-year program, using the Physiographic drainage-inundation model （PHD-model） as the analytical core. Runoff simulations will be conducted for all water systems within the metropolitan regions, with the goal of translating rainfall scenarios into planning-area runoff so as to meet the review and management needs of national land plans across counties and cities.
Method and approach
This study selected Taoyuan City and Taichung City as the case study areas. Relevant plans within the study scope were collected together with hydrological data—including rainfall, water level, discharge, and tidal level—and physiographic data—including topography, transportation systems, water-conservancy facilities, land use, and an overview of urban planning. These datasets were used to understand the hydrological and physiographic characteristics of the case areas, and to calibrate and validate the PHD-model, thereby completing the construction of the hydraulic model.
Rainfall scenarios were defined using a 10-year return period rainfall event with a 24-hour duration, together with a corresponding climate-change rainfall scenario. The land-use scenarios included both current land use and future land use aligned with climate-change conditions. The PHD-model was first applied to simulate runoff under current land use with the 10-year return-period rainfall scenario as the base-line, and then to simulate runoff under future land use with the climate-change rainfall scenario. Based on inundation analyses within the Urban planning scenario areas under both rainfall scenarios, the study delineated inundation extents and inventoried Public Land and land of State-owned enterprise to support pluvial flooding mitigation and adaptation resilience planning. In addition, hydraulic analysis techniques for flood mitigation were employed to examine flood-reduction strategies and recommendations at key locations. These included sites in Taoyuan City, such as the National Highway corridor within the Nankan Urban Plan area, the northern and southern sections of the THSR Taoyuan Station Special District Plan area, areas of the Zhongli–Pingzhen Urban Plan within the Laojie Creek and Xinjie Creek basins, and areas of Yangmei District within the same basins; as well as sites in Taichung City, including the vicinity of the THSR Taichung Station and areas near Wuqi District.
A cloud platform system was established by developing the hardware/software architecture, platform interface, database deployment, data-extraction modules, reliability monitoring, and backup mechanisms. After building the data-management framework, geographic datasets were displayed on the web through GIS, and runoff-simulation results from the PHD-model were presented on the platform. This completed the data-system planning and the prototype construction of the flood-mitigation resilience cloud platform.
The pluvial flooding mitigation and adaptation resilience planning results were then reviewed through stakeholder workshops, bringing together cross-disciplinary participants from government, industry, and academia, including the National Land Planning Division and the Urban and Rural Development Branch of the National Land Management Agency （Ministry of the Interior）, the Taoyuan City Government Urban Development Bureau, and the Taiwan Provincial Association of Urban Planning Technicians. These sessions discussed both the resilience-planning outcomes and the phased achievements of the flood-mitigation resilience cloud platform.
Main results
This study takes Taoyuan City and Taichung City as case study areas. Using the PHD-model, it simulates runoff under rainfall scenarios including a 10-year return period rainfall event and climate-change rainfall scenarios, as well as under current land-use conditions and urban planning scenarios. Based on the runoff-simulation results, the study further conducts additional simulations for pluvial-flood mitigation and adaptation resilience planning scenarios within metropolitan planning areas under climate-change rainfall conditions. By comparing and analyzing the impacts across these scenarios, the study derives the following key findings.
1.The incremental analysis of climate-change torrential rainfall indicates that rainfall in both Taoyuan City and Taichung City increases markedly under climate-change scenarios, with the maximum increase exceeding 50.8%. Model simulations further show that areas prone to inundation under current conditions will experience greater inundation extent and depth in future climate-change scenarios. The impacts are especially significant in urban development core areas （e.g., Zhongli District, Taoyuan City） and emerging development areas （e.g., Pingzhen and Dayuan Districts, Taoyuan City）, indicating that climate change intensifies flood risk within urban planning areas.
2.Potential sites for flood-mitigation measures were identified in both cities.
(1)In Taoyuan City, pond lands account for a relatively high proportion of potential sites, reflecting its well-known reputation as the “Land of a Thousand Ponds.” Under the climate-change rainfall scenario, Taoyuan City has 3,062.45 ha of potential sites; however, simulations show that many ponds are located farther from inundation hotspots, resulting in limited flood-reduction effectiveness. It is therefore recommended to negotiate and integrate lands within inundation areas, and to connect park lands with short- and medium-distance flood-detention ponds to form a blue-green network, thereby maximizing overall flood-mitigation benefits in Taoyuan City.
(2)In Taichung City, undeveloped Public Land of Agricultural development zones Type 2 （Agri-2 Public Land） constitutes the largest share of potential sites （34%）, followed by Public Land of Urban-rural development zones Type 1 （Urban-1 Agricultural Public Land）, accounting for 26%. The total area of potential sites for flood-mitigation measures reaches 3,427.23 ha.
3.Recommendations for utilizing potential sites include:
(1)It is recommended to integrate and reserve key land resources within inundation-potential areas—such as undeveloped Agri-2 Public Land, Urban-1 Agricultural Public Land, Agri-5 Agricultural Public Land, Urban-1 park and greenery areas, pond lands, and undeveloped land of Taiwan Sugar Corporation—during future development processes. These lands should be designated as reserved sites for detention on-site facilities and Green Infrastructure.
(2)In basins or administrative districts where potential sites are scarce or unavailable within inundation areas, land-use planning should prioritize avoiding further expansion and development to prevent worsening flooding. Where development is unavoidable, surrounding potential sites should be systematically integrated into a coordinated flood-mitigation plan. Existing artificial drainage systems with concrete lining should be gradually upgraded toward resilient and eco-friendly drainage through measures such as permeable channel substrates, vegetated revetments, gentler channel slopes, and converting side ditches into small-scale detention spaces. For large-block urban forms, water conservation strategies can be applied to reduce runoff, while built-up areas should strengthen non-structural adaptation measures such as disaster-preparedness communities, emergency response plans, and hazard maps.
4.In addition to refining the functional modules of the flood-mitigation resilience cloud platform, scenario-based functionalities were initiated this year. Editing tools for rainfall and tidal conditions have already been completed, allowing land-use planners to customize historical rainfall conditions. Once the elevation-editing and land-use-editing modules are completed in the next phase, full online analytical operations will be enabled.
Major suggestions
This year, the study completed the second phase of the Pluvial Flood Mitigation and Resilience Planning for Metropolitan Regional Plans in Taiwan. Based on the research results, the following short-term and mid- to long-term recommendations are proposed:
1.Study on Integrated Urban Flood Adaptation Strategies under Climate Change
For Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior （short-term strategy）
Over the past two years, the study has progressively advanced the Pluvial Flood Mitigation and Resilience Planning for Metropolitan Regional Plans in Taiwan, beginning with Tainan City and Kaohsiung City in Phase I, followed by Taoyuan City and Taichung City in Phase II.In the coming years, the research will extend to Taipei City and New Taipei City, gradually completing a comprehensive national assessment.
It is recommended that future studies continue to apply the methodological approach adopted in this research—selecting single municipal jurisdictions that span multiple watersheds as case areas and using hydraulic analysis techniques to simulate and evaluate flood hazards under various spatial-planning scenarios within built environments. This approach facilitates the development of a nationwide framework for pluvial flood adaptation, enabling consistent assessment of flood risks and adaptation strategies across different metropolitan regions.
From the perspective of hydraulic analysis, the resulting insights can serve as technical guidance for integrating climate-change adaptation measures into the periodic comprehensive reviews of local-level national spatial plans. The analytical outcomes generated through this study can further support government agencies in formulating and implementing metropolitan regional plans as well as municipality or county （city） spatial plans, ensuring that land-use decisions are better aligned with pluvial flood risks and long-term climate resilience objectives.
2.Ongoing Maintenance and Management of the Flood-Mitigation Resilience Cloud Platform
For Urban and Rural Development Branch, National Land Management Agency Ministry of the Interior （mid-term strategy）
Through years of research, the application of hydraulic analysis techniques for flood mitigation in spatial planning has become increasingly mature. Building on this foundation, the study has established the initial version of the flood-mitigation resilience cloud platform, along with computational cell datasets for Tainan City, Kaohsiung City, Taoyuan City, and Taichung City. The purpose of developing this platform is to assist land-use planners in evaluating areas affected by inundation under climate-change and future land-use scenarios, assessing the appropriateness of future land-use planning in response to flooding, and supporting local governments in evaluating Spatial Plan alternatives under climate-change conditions.
Maintaining updated spatial datasets is essential for improving model accuracy and developing appropriate land-use scenarios. Therefore, the platform requires regular maintenance and periodic data updates. Moreover, the platform differs from conventional GIS visualization systems, as it focuses primarily on simulating and presenting hydraulic computation results for flood-mitigation analysis. As such, professional personnel are needed for maintenance. It is recommended that the long-term maintenance and management of the flood-mitigation resilience cloud platform be handled by government agencies responsible for integrated spatial data management.
3.Enhancing the Completeness of Hydraulic Simulation by Incorporating Dynamic Land-Use–Runoff Relationships
For Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior （mid-term strategy）
It is recommended that future applications of the hydraulic simulation framework developed in this study incorporate additional scenarios that adjust the Curve Number （CN） values assigned to computational cells. This would make it possible to examine the dynamic relationship between land use and CN values, thereby improving the accuracy of assessing runoff and pluvial flooding potential. At the same time, future analyses should account for the differences between natural boundaries （watershed extents） and human-defined administrative boundaries （administrative districts）, ensuring that flood-resilience strategies for upstream, midstream, and downstream areas are evaluated in a more comprehensive and integrated approach.
4.Recommending the Use of Hydraulic Simulation Techniques as Reference in the Planning of Major Projects
For Governments of special municipalities and counties （cities）; Water Resources Planning Branch, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs （mid to long-term strategy）
It is recommended that the hydraulic simulation framework developed in this study be adopted by government agencies as a technical reference when formulating major development plans, particularly for evaluating pluvial flooding potential within project areas and proposing corresponding flood-mitigation strategies. Governments of special municipalities and counties （cities）, for example, may refer to the inundation-simulation results of this study during the periodic comprehensive review of national spatial plans or periodic comprehensive review of urban plans to develop appropriate supporting measures and spatial responses.
Similarly, the Water Resources Planning Branch, Water Resources Agency may apply the inundation-simulation outputs in the preparation of the basin-specific regional plans, using the results to guide appropriate allocation of land-use planning across upstream, midstream, and downstream areas within the basin.
", "相關檔案": "1150202台灣都會區域計畫之內水減洪韌性規劃(二)_成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336845/69698376-024d-49cd-a386-00bf4e9da128.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339145", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:35:00 GMT", "title": "高齡者居住社區的社會經濟狀況與都市設施可及性對健康風險的影響", "計畫主持人": "朱慶倫", "協同主持人": "孫振義", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-25", "執行行程(結束)": "2026-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "綜合規劃組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "高齡者、社會經濟條件、都市設施、健康風險", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
隨著全球人口老齡化，如何為高齡者提供更友善的居住環境，並減少其健康風險，成為都市規劃與公共政策的重要課題。本研究目的在於透過大數據分析技術，探討高齡者的社會經濟背景及居住社區內都市設施的可及性對其健康風險的影響。為進行大數據分析，本研究將彙整內政大數據及相關統計資料庫，並選擇符合「居住於城市中」、「高齡者（年齡65歲及以上）」的家庭作為研究對象，並提取家庭成員統計數據，就收入、婚姻狀況、學歷等背景資料進行分析，最終依據數據成果研討各項因子對於健康風險的影響。
具體而言，研究對象為居住在都市中（例如以雙北市為例）的高齡者（年齡65歲及以上）的家庭，研究流程係將樣本從已蒐集的家戶成員數據中篩選出來，並透過內政大數據篩取家庭收入、婚姻狀況、學歷等背景資料，作為分析基礎數據。研究變數的自變數（影響因子），包括社會經濟狀況（例如家戶成員收入、婚姻狀況、離婚狀況、學歷、弱勢身分）、都市設施可及性（例如距離家戶的都市醫療院所分佈、運動休閒場所分佈、公園綠地分佈、公共交通、市場分佈）、居住環境密度（都市建築密度）。依變數（結果因子）包括健康風險指標（例如根據家戶用電量與用水量間接衡量高齡者的健康風險，較低的用電量或用水量可能暗示高齡者的活動減少或健康狀況下降）。
通過大數據分析，揭示高齡者社會經濟狀況與都市設施（醫療、運動、休閒、市場等）可及性對健康風險的複雜關係。透過這些分析結果，將作為政府有關單位參考，以更精確地調整公共設施的分佈與配置，從而提升高齡者的生活品質，降低高齡者的健康風險。
二、研究方法
（一）文獻分析法
本研究採用文獻分析法，系統性蒐集政府公報、白皮書、法規與學術文獻，聚焦醫療照護、長期照護、無障礙設計與住宅安全等議題，以掌握高齡者居住環境的政策背景與制度演變。透過內容分析與脈絡詮釋，提煉具政策意涵的核心概念，作為後續研究假設與指標設計的理論基礎。此方法有助於整合政策工具與學術知識，辨識現行制度支持與資源配置的落差，並分析政策落實的可及性與成效。最終將形成針對高齡住宅環境議題的分析架構，為量化研究與政策建議提供基礎支撐。
（二）定量研究法
本研究透過定量方法，檢驗高齡者社經條件與環境資源可及性對健康風險的影響。研究假設涵蓋個人社會經濟資料與相關資源分布等多項參數，健康風險則預計以高齡者行動能力、身心障礙人數比例及身心障礙等級作為間接衡量指標。社經資料來源主要來自於內政部大數據中心之去識別化統計資料，環境參數則以GIS地理資訊系統分析住宅與醫療、長照、綠地、交通等設施的點、線、面狀分布，將資料轉換為空間資訊納入統計分析。為提升結果精確性，將爭取納入臨床或照護相關資料，如醫療利用頻率、長照申請紀錄、ADL/IADL分數與死亡或重症通報等，反映健康狀態與服務需求。若無法取得，將使用替代性指標，進行敏感性分析，最後製成健康風險分布圖，將研究成果的視覺化呈現。
（三）焦點團體法
本研究擬於完成初步量化分析後，辦理焦點團體訪問(專家座談會)，作為補充與驗證分析結果的重要質性工具。專家座談擬邀請產官學研各界代表，包括政策制定者、建築與照護專家、實務工作者等，討論居住環境與健康風險的關聯性、指標解釋與政策挑戰。會議將由研究團隊主持，依據半結構式綱要進行討論，主題包括量化結果詮釋、現行制度適切性、未反映之風險因子與可行政策建議。全程錄音並轉寫，後續進行主題分析，強化研究的實務連結與應用價值。
三、重要發現
(一)高齡者健康風險的形成並非單一問題，包含社會環境(經濟條件、教育及社交)及個人習慣層面
本研究採用內政統計資料之分析結果，社會經濟條件、設施可及性(共九項設施)與高齡者行動能力、身障比例為中低度相關，正負相關情形與符合預期，顯示都市設施可及性與社會經濟條件是影響因子之一，但非唯一或主要因素，高齡者健康程度係由多重社會環境及個人因素交織而得。
(二)各國多依據自身環境與社會條件，提出高齡者健康發展相關指標
為促進高齡者健康發展，各地政府或組織團體分別提出發展指標，其中呼應影響高齡者健康風險之結論，社會經濟、環境兩大項皆為國內外檢視的重點，包含環境汙染、生活便利性(大眾運輸)、步行空間或自行車空間，皆屬兩大項範疇之細項，未來政府為降低高齡者健康風險，對於前開項目應增加關注，並適時適區投入政策資源。
(三)社會經濟狀況、都市設施可及性與高齡者行動能力、是否為身心障礙互為因果關係
社會經濟狀況、都市設施可及性與高齡者行動能力、是否為身心障礙互為因果關係。以教育程度與收入情形為例，推測教育程度或收入較低者，因未能吸收或採行健康生活習慣或尋求適當醫療服務，致使行動能力加速退化；然而亦有部分高齡者為先天性行動不便者，在升學及就業上面臨較多困難，且不論都市或鄉村地區，皆面臨此課題，顯示各項影響高齡者健康之因子，不僅相互交織影響高齡者健康，更可能與健康互為因果關係。
(四)從空間角度，高齡者居住社區在都會帶、都會邊緣市鎮與鄉村分別面臨不同課題
都會帶或都市核心區域具有都市設施服務可及性之顯著優勢，教育程度、收入普遍較高，但亦伴隨著較多人口聚居之情境，由於設施並非可到達即可，尚須能夠實際滿足高齡者需求，在高齡人口比例不斷上升下，服務提供單位能否有足夠服務量能，是都市社區類型之主要課題。此外，部分都市核心區域，由於未隨都市發展進步，出現老舊窳陋、地區經濟條件下降情境，對於當地高齡者亦將產生健康風險。
都市邊緣區域多為新興發展區域，如新北市、桃園市、臺中市屯區、臺南市中西區之周邊行政區、高雄市鼓山區、鳳山區等，因吸引較多年輕人口移入，故高齡者比例皆較原市區核心低，是目前健康風險相對較小之區域。但隨著未來移入者逐漸老化，其目前設施服務可及性若無法跟上，風險將隨之上升。
至於鄉村方面，如花東及雲嘉地區，高齡者人數雖少，但高齡者比例較都市來得高，且老老照顧或獨居之比例多在中位數之上，在當地缺乏年輕輩照護，且固定設施服務便利性不如都市下，高齡者生活所需之服務將難以滿足，面臨「極限村落」議題。
(五)依據計算公式呈現各行政區域風險係數圖
本研究參考國家災害防救科技中心之災害風險計算方式，分別以鄉鎮尺度與二級發布區尺度，計算高齡者健康風險係數，並以圖面呈現數據差異。其中，高齡者健康風險來源多元，包含高齡者人口數、人口比例、收入、教育程度、居住情形、設施可及性等，針對風險圖顯示風險係數較高之區位，建議分別檢視其相對較高之參數，並分別評估策略。
地理資訊系統可清楚呈現各地區之人口數據、社會經濟條件、設施可及性等，並快速比對風險係數，使有關公私部門可鎖定風險較高之地區投入資源或預先準備。惟大數據與空間分析僅能呈現數據成果，無法針對特定高齡者個案進行瞭解、研究，其中數據相同並不表示其課題之核心原因相同，故於鎖定風險區位後，仍應前往當地進行瞭解，使資源投入或公共設施(都市計畫)規劃配置之效益能夠事半功倍。
四、主要建議事項
建議一
賡續宣導通用(無障礙)建築設計：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：地方政府建築管理單位
建議賡續鼓勵建築物採用通用(無障礙)設計或提供輔具，並適時宣導最新設計或設備方案。另針對新建公有建築物，建議參考高齡者熱區人數與比例，以提供足夠的高齡友善空間或服務量能，如社會住宅提供一定比例供高齡身障者、高齡低收入者居住。
建議二
賡續宣導既有建築物通用(無障礙)設計改善與補助或優惠：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：地方政府建築管理單位
為提升高齡者外出意願，建議加強政令宣導，鼓勵民眾利用高齡者補助或優惠資源，於既有建築物新增通用(無障礙)設施設備，使民眾能順利外出從事戶外活動，以延緩高齡者行動能力退化，並增進智能刺激以延緩失智症。
建議三
逐年編列預算改善市區道路之人行道環境：中長期建議
主辦機關：內政部國土管理署
協辦機關：地方政府工務及建築管理相關局處
建議賡續編列預算改善市區道路之人行空間整平、通用(無障礙)設計、排除私人占用行為，並在符合安全條件下，配置座椅、公廁，以利高齡者外出獲取所需生活服務。
建議四
建議循既有機制，多元化公共設施服務提供方式：立即可行建議
主辦機關：行政院公共工程委員會
協辦機關：地方政府財政單位
建議可整合既有建築物空間，在安全、衛生為前提下，以多目標方式，多元化提供公共服務，包含由各部會評估是否得將高齡者醫療、長照、運動、藝文活動等空間場域相互結合。此外，得以Community-Oriented Development(社區導向發展)為理念，整合社區既有空間，依據社區在地課題與需求，分別提供服務，如少子化後之小學閒置空間可複合使用，提供高齡者所需生活服務。
考量各項都市設施皆有設置門檻規模，如服務人數不足將使設施無法有效營運，因此高齡者居住之冷區(鄉村地區)，建議非設置硬體設施，而是提供替代性服務方案(如需求反應式交通、醫療巡迴專車)，以滿足高齡者生活需求。
建議五
建議針對社會經濟條件較差區位，強化保健宣導：立即可行建議
主辦機關：衛生福利部
協辦機關：地方政府衛生單位
為降低城鄉社會經濟條件對於高齡者健康之影響，針對偏鄉地區，可結合在地宮廟或社區主要活動場域，配合當地活動時期宣導有關保健知識，以提升高齡者醫療觀念，進而使高齡者能夠進行防範與及時就醫，避免疾病造成長期性的健康負面影響。
", "英文摘要": "1.Background
With global population aging accelerating, providing age-friendly living environments and reducing health risks for older adults has become a pressing issue in urban planning and public policy. This study aims to examine how socioeconomic background and access to urban amenities within residential communities influence the health risks of older adults, through the application of big data analytics. The study will integrate government open data and statistical databases, focusing on households with members aged 65 and over living in urban areas. Key variables such as income, marital status, and educational attainment will be extracted to analyze their impact on health outcomes.
The research targets urban households composed of elderly individuals—using, for instance, the Greater Taipei Area as a representative case. Sample selection will be based on household registry data, while socioeconomic indicators are derived from internal government databases. Independent variables include household income, marital/divorce status, education level, and vulnerable group status. Accessibility to urban facilities (e.g., proximity to healthcare institutions, parks, leisure facilities, markets, and public transit), as well as residential density, are also factored in. The dependent variable—health risk—is indirectly measured using household electricity and water consumption, with lower usage possibly indicating reduced physical activity or deteriorating health status.
Through regression analysis of these big data indicators, the study seeks to reveal the complex relationship between health risks and both socioeconomic status and spatial accessibility to key services. The findings are expected to inform government decision-making in optimizing the allocation and spatial planning of public infrastructure, thereby improving quality of life and reducing health risks for older adults.
2.Research Methods
(1) Documentary Analysis
This study adopts documentary analysis to explore the policy background and institutional evolution of elderly housing environments. Key documents such as government gazettes, white papers, laws, and academic literature will be systematically reviewed, with emphasis on topics like healthcare, long-term care, universal design, and housing safety. Through content and contextual analysis, policy-relevant concepts will be extracted to construct a theoretical foundation for hypothesis development and indicator design.
This method facilitates integration of policy tools and academic insights, identifies gaps in resource allocation and institutional support, and assesses the effectiveness of policy implementation. The results will help establish an analytical framework that underpins subsequent quantitative analysis and evidence-based policy recommendations.
(2) Quantitative Analysis
The study uses quantitative methods to examine how the socioeconomic conditions of older adults and the spatial accessibility of urban facilities influence health risk. Hypotheses are based on multiple variables, with household electricity and water usage serving as proxy indicators of health status. Socioeconomic data is drawn from the Ministry of the Interior’s big data system, while environmental statistical parameter are derived via GIS-based spatial analysis of the distribution and proximity of facilities such as hospitals, long-term care institutions, parks, public transit, and markets. These statistical parameter are converted into spatial indicators for spatial autocorrelation analysis.
To enhance accuracy, the study will seek access to clinical or care-related datasets, including frequency of medical visits, long-term care service applications, ADL/IADL scores, and mortality or critical illness reports. Where such data is unavailable, alternative indicators will be used, supported by sensitivity analysis. A health risk map will be developed to visualize spatial disparities in health risks among older adults.
(3) Focus Group Method
To complement and validate the findings from quantitative analysis, the study will conduct focus group interviews with experts from government, academia, industry, and frontline care sectors. These discussions will explore the relationship between housing environments and elderly health risks, interpretation of indicators, and challenges in policy implementation.
Moderated by the research team using a semi-structured guide, discussions will focus on the interpretation of quantitative results, appropriateness of current systems, unaddressed risk factors, and practical policy recommendations. All sessions will be recorded and transcribed, followed by thematic analysis. This qualitative component strengthens the practical relevance of the research and supports the formulation of actionable, evidence-based policies.
3.Major Outcomes
(1)Health risks among older adults do not stem from a single factor but arise from both social-environmental and individual dimensions
Based on analyses of statistical data from the Ministry of the Interior, socioeconomic conditions and accessibility to facilities (nine categories) show low to moderate correlations with the mobility and disability rates of older adults. The positive and negative correlations align with expectations, indicating that urban facility accessibility and socioeconomic conditions are among the influencing factors, but not the only or primary ones. The health status of older adults is shaped by an interplay of multiple social, environmental, and personal factors.
(2)Countries establish indicators for healthy aging based on their own environmental and social conditions
To promote healthy aging, governments and organizations around the world have developed various indicators. Consistent with the findings on factors affecting health risks among older adults, socioeconomic and environmental aspects are major areas of assessment domestically and internationally. These include environmental pollution, convenience of daily living (public transportation), walkability, and bicycle infrastructure—all of which fall under these two domains. To reduce health risks for older adults, governments should increase attention to such factors and invest resources appropriately across different regions.
(3)Socioeconomic status, urban facility accessibility, mobility, and disability status among older adults exhibit bidirectional causal relationships
Socioeconomic status and accessibility to urban facilities have bidirectional causal relationships with mobility and disability status among older adults. For example, older adults with lower educational attainment or income may lack access to information, healthy lifestyle habits, or appropriate medical care, accelerating mobility decline. Conversely, some older adults are born with mobility impairments, facing greater challenges in education and employment regardless of urban or rural context. This indicates that factors influencing older adults’ health not only interact but may also form reciprocal causal relationships with health outcomes.
(4) From a spatial perspective, communities in metropolitan cores, urban fringes, and rural areas face different challenges
Metropolitan cores have significant advantages in facility accessibility, with residents generally having higher education and income levels. However, dense populations place greater demands on services, meaning that accessibility alone is insufficient—facilities must adequately meet the needs of a growing older population. In addition, some urban centers have deteriorated over time, with aging buildings and declining local economic conditions, creating additional health risks for older residents.
Urban fringe areas—such as parts of New Taipei, Taoyuan, Taichung’s Tuen District, peripheral districts of Tainan’s West Central area, and Kaohsiung’s Gushan and Fengshan districts—often attract younger populations, resulting in lower proportions of older adults and relatively lower current health risks. However, as residents age, insufficient facility accessibility may eventually increase risks.
In rural areas such as Hualien–Taitung and Yunlin–Chiayi regions, the number of older adults is smaller, but the proportion is higher. Higher rates of “elderly caring for the elderly” and solitary living, limited availability of younger caregivers, and lower accessibility to facilities contribute to unmet needs for daily services among older adults, raising concern over the issue of “extreme aging villages.”
(5) Risk maps of administrative areas based on the calculated risk coefficients
Drawing on the National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction’s methodology for risk assessment, this study calculates health risk coefficients for older adults at township and second-level district scales and visualizes results through maps. Sources of health risks include population size, proportion of older adults, income, education levels, living arrangements, and facility accessibility. For areas with higher risk coefficients, each contributing factor should be examined to formulate targeted strategies.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) clearly present population structures, socioeconomic conditions, facility accessibility, and risk coefficients, enabling public and private sectors to identify high-risk areas and allocate resources accordingly. However, big-data spatial analyses only reveal aggregated patterns—they cannot capture the underlying issues of individual older adults. Identical data values do not necessarily reflect identical challenges. Therefore, after identifying high-risk locations, field investigations remain essential to ensure that resource allocation and public facility planning yield effective outcomes.
4.Suggestioms
Suggestioms 1：Continue promoting universal (barrier-free) building design：Short-term / immediately actionable
Host Agencies：Architecture and Building Research Institute, MOI
Co-host Agencies：Local government building authorities
Encourage the adoption of universal (barrier-free) design and assistive devices in buildings, accompanied by timely dissemination of updated design guidelines or equipment. For new public buildings, refer to the number and proportion of older adults in high-concentration areas to provide adequate age-friendly spaces and service capacity—for example, reserving a proportion of units in social housing for older adults with disabilities or low-income status.
Suggestioms 2：Continue promoting improvements and subsidies for universal (barrier-free) design in existing buildings：Short-term / immediately actionable
Host Agencies： Architecture and Building Research Institute, MOI
Co-host Agencies：Local government building authorities
To encourage outdoor activities among older adults, strengthen public awareness of existing subsidies and incentives for adding universal-design facilities to existing buildings. Such improvements can help older adults go out more easily, delay mobility decline, and increase cognitive stimulation to reduce the risk of dementia.
Suggestioms 3：Allocate budgets annually to improve pedestrian environments in urban areas：Medium- to long-term
Host Agencies：National Land Management Agency, MOI
Co-host Agencies：Local public works and building management departments
Continue allocating budgets to improve sidewalks through surface levelling, universal design, and removal of private encroachments. Where safe and appropriate, provide seating and public restrooms to facilitate older adults’ access to daily services.
Suggestioms 4：Diversify public facility service models through existing mechanisms：Short-term / immediately actionable
Host Agencies： Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan
Co-host Agencies：Local government finance departments
Integrate existing building spaces to provide multi-purpose public services, ensuring safety and hygiene. Government ministries may consider combining medical, long-term care, sports, and cultural activity spaces for older adults. Additionally, apply Community-Oriented Development principles to integrate community spaces and tailor services based on local needs—for example, repurposing underutilized school spaces in low-birth-rate areas to provide services needed by older adults.
In rural “cold spots” where populations are insufficient to meet facility operation thresholds, it is recommended to provide alternative service models instead of constructing physical facilities—such as demand-responsive transport or mobile medical units.
Suggestioms 5：Strengthen health-promotion outreach in areas with weaker socioeconomic conditions：Short-term / immediately actionable
Host Agencies：Ministry of Health and Welfare
Co-host Agencies：Local health departments
To reduce the impact of socioeconomic disparities on older adults’ health, especially in rural areas, collaborate with local temples and community venues to promote health knowledge during community events. This can enhance medical awareness among older adults, enabling preventive care and timely treatment to avoid long-term negative health consequences.
", "相關檔案": "高齡者案資料蒐集分析報告書11411(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339145/4900f0ef-3a88-40bb-9c17-19bc6320c6df.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340204", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:20:00 GMT", "title": "綠建築推廣宣導計畫", "計畫主持人": "王婉芝", "協同主持人": "林純如", "執行單位": "社團法人台灣綠建築發展協會", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "智慧綠建築、示範基地、推廣講習、低碳旅遊、近零碳建築", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "近年來，全球暖化造成極端氣候事件頻繁，為減緩氣候變遷問題，全球目前已有150餘個國家（歐盟、美國及日本等）宣示2050淨零排放目標，且於113年11月舉辦了「聯合國氣候變化綱要公約第29次締約方大會」（UNFCCC COP29），地點位於亞塞拜然巴庫，並於當地時間上午11點開幕（臺灣時間下午3點）。該會議以「提升企圖心」和「促進行動」為主軸，目標是結合關鍵要素，確保所有締約方承諾制定具企圖心的國家計畫並保持透明度；並且強調資金的重要作用，將企圖心轉化為行動。首要任務是立即實現深度、快速且持續的減量，以控制氣溫並保持在1.5°C升溫以下，同時確保不遺落任何國家，會議結論聚焦在每年提供3000億美元氣候融資協議給低收入及發展中國家、針對全球碳市場提出「國際可轉讓減緩成果」（International Transferable Mitigation Outcome, ITMO）概念以及建立一個全球通用的碳信用額度交易機制，最後是提出巴庫氣候團結協議，除了著重減碳外，也應建置防洪設施、透過屋頂綠化降溫、打造韌性建築等方式以提升氣候韌性。
為因應氣候變遷，蔡英文總統於110年1月1日新年談話，宣布將積極與各界展開對話，找出最符合臺灣未來永續發展的氣候治理路徑，為臺灣的永續發展找出新方向；接續在110年10月10日國慶大會演說中正式宣告政府將積極朝向「淨零轉型」目標邁進。依行政院111年3月30日公布之「2050淨零排放政策路徑藍圖」，2050年近零碳建築目標為100%新建建築物及超過85%建築物達到近零碳建築，依內政部規劃之淨零建築路徑藍圖，將採分年分階段方式辦理，以公有建築帶頭做起，引導民間跟進，並由相關部會署及地方政府共同推動；同時針對耗能量大之建築物優先推動，逐步擴展至其他建築物，以邁向近零碳建築。
賴清德總統於2024年4月22日「世界地球日」以錄影致詞方式出席地球解方2024永續設計行動年會，宣告上任後的淨零轉型5大策略，包括啟動第2次能源轉型、數位與綠色的產業雙軸轉型、形塑淨零永續的綠生活、政府做淨零轉型後盾、不遺落任何人的公正轉型。2024年5月20日在賴總統宣示中提出國家希望工程，以綠色成長與2050淨零轉型為國家願景，透過希望工程五大策略作為策略方針，並利用六大部門減碳旗艦計畫與淨零12項關鍵戰略作為行動計畫。其中住宅部門減碳行動以推廣近零建築作為主要策略，內容包含研提建築能效制度、近零碳建築評估、既有建築減量管理與推廣綠建築等，用以推動建築能效改善與智慧淨零雙軸轉型，以達成2030年與2050年減碳目標。
根據上述淨零規劃提出階段里程碑，以建築、運輸、工業、電力與負碳技術做為我國2050淨零目標主要推動方向。為加強民眾對綠建築節能減碳觀念的認識，內政部建築研究所規劃一系列綠建築宣導推廣工作，綠建築示範基地參訪活動、低碳觀光綠建築知性之旅、綠建築講習宣導說明會及綠建築推廣宣導與宣導品設計製作，透過各項活動使業界與民眾了解未來綠建築發展與淨零建築政策推動方向，力求將最新資訊提供給產、官、學及大眾參考及應用。
本（114）年度為強化宣導建築能效評估系統，於12月底前共辦理綠建築教育示範基地參訪活動42場次、低碳觀光綠建築知性之旅活動61場次，以及完成3場綠建築講習會、1場綠建築專業研習會及2場導覽解說人員培訓課程、建置1案VR線上導覽頁面，引導民眾參與綠建築相關推廣宣導活動，期能藉此將綠建築概念導入社會大眾，進一步強化民眾對綠建築之認知。
", "英文摘要": "In recent years, global warming has led to increasingly frequent extreme weather events. To mitigate climate change, more than 150 countries worldwide—including the European Union, the United States, and Japan—have pledged to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. In November 2024, the 29th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC COP29) was held in Baku, Azerbaijan, and officially opened at 11:00 a.m. local time (3:00 p.m. Taiwan time). The conference centered on the themes of “raising ambition” and “accelerating action,” aiming to integrate key elements to ensure that all Parties commit to ambitious national plans and maintain transparency. It also emphasized the critical role of finance in translating ambition into concrete action. The top priority is the immediate realization of deep, rapid, and sustained emissions reductions to control global temperature rise and keep it below 1.5°C, while ensuring that no country is left behind. The conference outcomes focused on an agreement to provide USD 300 billion annually in climate finance to low-income and developing countries; the proposal of the concept of International Transferable Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs) for global carbon markets; the establishment of a globally applicable carbon credit trading mechanism; and the introduction of the Baku Climate Solidarity Agreement, which emphasizes not only carbon reduction but also the enhancement of climate resilience through measures such as flood control infrastructure, rooftop greening for cooling, and the development of resilient buildings.
In response to climate change, President Tsai Ing-wen announced in her New Year’s address on January 1, 2021, that the government would actively engage in dialogue with all sectors of society to identify the most appropriate climate governance pathway for Taiwan’s sustainable future and to chart a new direction for sustainable development. Subsequently, in her National Day address on October 10, 2021, she formally declared that the government would actively advance toward the goal of a “net-zero transition.” According to the “2050 Net-Zero Emissions Policy Pathway Blueprint” released by the Executive Yuan on March 30, 2022, the target for near-zero carbon buildings by 2050 is to achieve 100% of new buildings and more than 85% of all buildings meeting near-zero carbon standards. Under the net-zero building pathway blueprint planned by the Ministry of the Interior, implementation will proceed on a phased and staged basis, with public buildings taking the lead to guide private-sector participation, jointly promoted by relevant central government agencies and local governments. Priority will be given to buildings with high energy consumption, with gradual expansion to other building types, in order to move steadily toward near-zero carbon buildings.
On April 22, 2024, World Earth Day, President Lai Ching-te delivered a video address at the “Earth Solutions 2024 Sustainable Design Action Annual Conference,” announcing five major net-zero transition strategies for his administration: launching a second energy transition; advancing dual-track industrial transformation through digitalization and green development; shaping net-zero and sustainable green lifestyles; positioning the government as a strong backbone for the net-zero transition; and ensuring a just transition that leaves no one behind. On May 20, 2024, President Lai further unveiled the National Hope Project, establishing green growth and the 2050 net-zero transition as the national vision. The project adopts five major strategies as guiding principles and implements action plans through six sectoral flagship carbon reduction programs and twelve key net-zero strategies. Within these, carbon reduction actions in the residential sector prioritize the promotion of near-zero buildings, including the development of building energy efficiency systems, near-zero carbon building assessments, management of emissions reductions in existing buildings, and the promotion of green buildings. These measures aim to advance building energy efficiency improvements and the dual-track transformation toward smart and net-zero development, in order to achieve the carbon reduction targets for 2030 and 2050.
Based on the above net-zero planning, phased milestones have been established, with buildings, transportation, industry, power generation, and negative carbon technologies identified as the primary driving forces toward Taiwan’s 2050 net-zero goal. To enhance public awareness of energy conservation and carbon reduction concepts in green buildings, the Architecture and Building Research Institute of the Ministry of the Interior has planned a series of green building promotion and outreach initiatives. These include visits to green building demonstration sites, low-carbon tourism–oriented green building educational tours, green building workshops and briefing sessions, as well as promotional campaigns and the design and production of outreach materials. Through these activities, industry stakeholders and the general public are informed about future green building development trends and the policy direction for net-zero buildings, with the objective of providing the latest information for reference and application by industry, government, academia, and the public.
In the current year (2025), to further strengthen the promotion of building energy efficiency assessment systems, a total of 42 visits to green building educational demonstration sites and 61 low-carbon tourism–oriented green building educational tours were conducted by the end of December. In addition, three green building workshops, one professional green building training seminar, and two training courses for tour guides and interpreters were completed, along with the establishment of one VR-based online guided tour platform. These initiatives aim to encourage public participation in green building promotional activities, introduce green building concepts to society at large, and further enhance public understanding and awareness of green buildings.
", "相關檔案": "2025綠建築推廣宣導計畫成果報告1141222(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340204/8df4057d-2f03-4e5c-b0b8-511d405e70d9.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340203", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:14:00 GMT", "title": "優良綠建築作品評選計畫", "計畫主持人": "周光宙", "協同主持人": "王婉芝、廖婉茹", "執行單位": "社團法人台灣綠建築發展協會", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "綠建築、優良綠建築設計", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "隨著全球氣候變遷及溫室效應所造成的全球暖化，已漸漸威脅到人類生活，節能減碳及永續發展成為全球關切的課題，2021年國際能源署提出「2050淨零路徑」報告作為各國政府的行動準則，我國國家發展委員會也於隔年發布「台灣2050淨零路徑」，要求所有公有新建建築物於2030年以前達到1級能效或近零碳建築目標，50%以上既有建築應於2040年達到1級能效或近零碳建築目標；100%新建建築物及超過85%建築物應於2050年以前達到近零碳建築之目標，揭示淨零建築為我國重要的國家政策方向。
由於我國建築產業的能源消耗佔了全國總耗能28.3%，為落實永續環境理念，內政部多年來積極推動生態、節能、減廢、健康之綠建築，藉以打造安全健康、舒適便利且節能永續的居住環境，並於1999年針對我國亞熱帶高溫高濕的氣候特性，建立適合亞熱帶氣候之本土EEWH綠建築評估系統及綠建築標章，成為亞洲第一個上路的評估系統。
為落實永續綠建築政策，普及綠建築，推動綠建築設計，內政部建築研究所自92年起賡續辦理優良綠建築作品評選，以表彰建築師、起造人等，對提升綠建築設計的貢獻，原則每2年舉辦1次，至今已辦理12屆評選，並評選出130件得獎作品，本計畫114年依據內政部修正發布之「優良綠建築作品評選獎勵作業要點」，辦理第13屆優良綠建築作品評選，以表揚優良業界或建築師，激發全民對綠建築之重視，進一步強化綠建築觀念，具體呈現臺灣綠建築政策落實之成果。
本評選計畫於114年5月8日上網公告周知，後於6月16日下午5時停止受理申請，且於114年7月18日召開初選會議，本屆參選案件共計40件。入圍初選名單共計19件，其中有2件既有建築改善類不限現勘，本次共規劃5個場次現場勘查並於9月18日完成現勘，最後於10月3日召開決選會議確認得獎作品為優良綠建築12件以及優良綠建築既有建築改善類2件。確認得獎作品後於12月11日至12月14日配合「第54屆建築師節慶祝大會暨第22屆台灣建築論壇」展示得獎作品展板、安排獲獎建築師舉辦案例分享論壇以及作品頒獎典禮等。另本計畫就優良綠建築設計成果效益，已委託專業編輯團隊承攬製作優良綠建築作品專輯，紀錄與簡介得獎作品之設計策略與成效，提供相關建築從業人員與一般民眾對獲獎作品有更深刻的介紹與理解。
", "英文摘要": "With the intensification of global climate change and the greenhouse effect leading to global warming, human living environments are increasingly under threat. Energy conservation, carbon reduction, and sustainable development have therefore become issues of global concern. In 2021, the International Energy Agency (IEA) released the Net Zero by 2050 Roadmap as an action guideline for governments worldwide. In the following year, Taiwan’s National Development Council announced the Taiwan 2050 Net-Zero Pathway, which stipulates that all newly constructed public buildings must achieve Level 1 energy efficiency or meet near-zero carbon building standards by 2030. Furthermore, more than 50% of existing buildings are required to reach Level 1 energy efficiency or near-zero carbon building standards by 2040, and by 2050, 100% of new buildings and over 85% of all buildings nationwide should meet near-zero carbon building targets. These goals clearly establish net-zero buildings as a key national policy direction in Taiwan.
As the building sector in Taiwan accounts for approximately 28.3% of total national energy consumption, the Ministry of the Interior has actively promoted green building policies over many years to advance ecological sustainability, energy efficiency, waste reduction, and healthy living environments. These efforts aim to create safe, healthy, comfortable, convenient, and energy-efficient living spaces. In response to Taiwan’s subtropical climate characterized by high temperatures and humidity, the government established the localized EEWH Green Building Assessment System and Green Building Label in 1999. This system became the first green building assessment framework to be implemented in Asia.
To further implement sustainable green building policies, expand the adoption of green buildings, and encourage green building design, the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI) of the Ministry of the Interior has continuously organized the Outstanding Green Building Awards since 2003. The awards recognize architects, developers, and other stakeholders for their contributions to advancing green building design. In principle, the awards are held biennially. To date, twelve award cycles have been completed, with a total of 130 award-winning projects selected. In 2025 (Year 114 of the Republic of China calendar), in accordance with the revised Guidelines for Incentives for Outstanding Green Building Awards issued by the Ministry of the Interior, the 13th Outstanding Green Building Awards were organized. The awards aim to commend outstanding professionals and industry practitioners, raise public awareness of green buildings, strengthen green building concepts, and concretely demonstrate the achievements of Taiwan’s green building policies.
The award program was officially announced online on May 8, 2025. Applications were accepted until 5:00 p.m. on June 16, 2025. A preliminary selection meeting was held on July 18, 2025, with a total of 40 submissions received. Nineteen projects were shortlisted for the preliminary stage, including two projects in the category of existing building renovations that were exempt from on-site inspections. Five rounds of on-site inspections were conducted and completed by September 18, 2025. The final selection meeting was held on October 3, 2025, during which 12 projects were confirmed as Outstanding Green Buildings and 2 projects were awarded in the Outstanding Green Building—Existing Building Renovation category.
Following the confirmation of the award-winning projects, the results were showcased from December 11 to December 14, 2025, in conjunction with the 54th Architects’ Day Celebration and the 22nd Taiwan Architecture Forum. Activities included exhibitions of award-winning project panels, case-sharing forums presented by the awarded architects, and the award ceremony. In addition, this project commissioned a professional editorial team to produce a dedicated publication compiling the Outstanding Green Building Award winners. The publication documents and introduces the design strategies and performance outcomes of the award-winning projects, providing building professionals and the general public with a deeper understanding and appreciation of these exemplary green building works.
", "相關檔案": "2025優良綠建築作品評選計畫成果報告1223(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340203/7387a5cd-4334-4818-b694-dd0d62308846.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340185", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:06:00 GMT", "title": "智慧建築標章審查作業精進及推廣宣導計畫", "計畫主持人": "温琇玲", "協同主持人": "繆嘉成", "執行單位": "社團法人台灣智慧建築協會", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "智慧建築、智慧建築標章、候選智慧建築證書、評定審查作業精進、智慧建築推廣", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
我國自93年推行智慧建築標章以來，截至114年10月底止共有2,159件建築物取得候選智慧建築證書及智慧建築標章，其中478件取得智慧建築標章，1,681件取得候選智慧建築證書。為使「智慧建築標章」評定作業更具專業性、明確性、透明性及一致性，同時加強國內智慧建築標章的認識與普及，將持續精進智慧建築標章的評定作業，提升智慧建築標章評定專業機構的執行效率，執行評定專業機構之案件查核作業、加強評定小組成員的專業教育訓練、智慧建築規劃設計技術彙編之技術內容持續增修訂以及推廣智慧建築之成果。
二、研究方法及過程
本計畫的執行圍繞兩大主軸：「智慧建築標章審查作業之精進」與「智慧建築推廣宣傳工作」。在審查作業方面，計畫採行系統查核機制來控管評定專業機構的評定品質，以實現「審查同軌、信賴倍增」的目標。具體作法包括定期辦理評定專業機構之行政業務查核、智慧建築標章案件評定查核、智慧建築標章案件評定實務及檢討座談會及智慧建築標章評定專業機構評定小組成員及其專任技術、專任行政人員教育訓練。透過參與相關會議，計畫團隊能實地觀察審查流程、彙整審查委員意見，並針對申請資料完整性、評定流程順暢性及評定標準一致性等問題進行分析與研議。此外，計畫亦針對「2024年版智慧建築評估手冊」進行滾動檢討與內容修正，並於11月26日與評定機構召開「技術小組會議」，全面檢討手冊增(修)訂條文適切性，並製作Q&A及會議決議事項公告週知，以持續優化評估基準。同時，亦檢視並修訂「智慧建築規劃設計技術彙編」，確保技術內容與時俱進。在推廣宣導方面，辦理國內智慧建築大型專業展區、及優良智慧建築案例觀摩參訪活動，並舉辦「2024年版評估內容」之宣導講習會，以擴大智慧建築的推廣效益。
三、重要發現及主要建議
本計畫在強化智慧建築標章制度的專業性與推廣效益方面，已產生顯著成效。透過嚴謹的查核機制，（包括評定機構查核3場次、案件評定查核2場次、現場勘查會議4場次與追蹤查核4場次），確保評定作業具備高度的專業性、透明度與一致性。雖查核中發現專業人員培訓時數不足、審查委員工作負荷集中等問題，計畫亦對症提出標準作業流程（SOP）建置與強化訓練機制等具體建議，成功縮減評定落差，進一步優化智慧建築政策的推動基礎。在市場推廣層面，智慧建築標章申請數量呈現逐年成長趨勢，尤以銀級與黃金級案件增幅最為顯著，民間自主申請比例亦攀升至41%。這不僅彰顯政策示範效益，更反映民眾對智慧化提升居住品質的高度認同與實際行動。技術成果方面，計畫完成了《2024年版評估手冊》的勘誤修訂，並新增「智慧設備預測告警平台」及「多層級智慧建築整合管理平台」兩項技術內容，協助降低規劃設計門檻，並確保評估標準與最新AIoT科技發展趨勢相符。此外，藉由辦理優良案例觀摩參訪活動與《2024年版評估手冊》講習會，不僅提升智慧建築知識之普及率與實務應用深度，更強化業界對智慧建築理念與技術的整體認知與接受度，全面推升制度推廣成效。
四、主要建議事項
立即可行建議 | 主、協辦機關 |
強化審查一致性與行政效率： 建立標準化補件模板、文件範例與影音佐證規範，降低申請與審查認知落差。 加速評定書核發流程，回應業界對時程的實務需求。 明確規範設計成果與施工成果之一致性，減少現勘階段即時修正所造成的爭議。 | 主辦： 內政部建築研究所 財團法人台灣建築中心 協辦： 社團法人台灣智慧建築協會 |
加強教育訓練與專業支持： 針對評定委員與評定機構人員，持續辦理以 2024 年版評估手冊為核心的專業訓練。 過案例說明與實務經驗分享，提升審查標準的共同理解。 | 主辦： 內政部建築研究所 協辦： 社團法人台灣智慧建築協會 |
完善技術與案例資料庫： 持續補充各評估指標（功能、安全、節能、健康、便利等）之申請範例與參考資料。 強化案例觀摩活動紀錄與重點整理，作為後續推廣與實務應用之參考。 | 主辦： 內政部建築研究所 協辦： 社團法人台灣智慧建築協會 |
中、長期建議 | 主、協辦機關 |
推動智慧建築標章制度之整體優化： 持續檢討評估手冊內容，建立滾動式修正機制，以因應新興技術與產業發展趨勢。 在「效率與公正、彈性與一致性」之間取得制度平衡，提升整體制度韌性。 深化資料治理與追蹤管理機制： 研議智慧建築標章後續追蹤查核與營運資料管理制度，確保標章長期有效性。 因應未來不動產資訊揭露政策，提前規劃資料整合與管理配套。 強化政策連結與產業發展支持： 從政策層面檢視智慧建築標章與都市更新、容積獎勵等制度之長期連動性。 彙整實務界與申請單位回饋，作為後續制度調整與智慧建築發展策略的重要依據。 | 主辦： 內政部建築研究所 協辦： 社團法人台灣智慧建築協會 |
I.Origin of research
Since Taiwan implemented Intelligent Building Label in 2004, a total of 2,159 buildings granted Candidate for Intelligent Building Label and Intelligent Building Label at the end of Oct.,2025, 478 of which were granted with the Intelligent Building Label and 1,681 gained the Candidate for Intelligent Building Label. In order to make the Evaluation of “Intelligent Building Label" more professional, clear, transparent and consistent, and at the same time to strengthen the understanding and popularization of intelligent building label domestically, we will continue to improve the evaluation of intelligent building label, improve the execution efficiency of professional institutions for intelligent building label evaluation, execute cases review of professional evaluation agency, strengthen the professional education and training of evaluation team members, amend the intelligent building planning and design technology compilation continuously and promote the achievement of intelligent building.
II.Research methods and processes
The implementation of this project centers on two major pillars: enhancing the review procedures of the Intelligent Building Label and promoting intelligent building practices. To strengthen review operations, a systematic audit mechanism was adopted to monitor the assessment quality of professional evaluation agencies, thereby achieving the goal of “consistent reviews and increased credibility.” Key measures include conducting regular administrative audits of professional evaluation agencies, Audits of Intelligent Building Label assessment cases, practical review and discussion meetings, and Training programs for assessment committee members as well as full-time technical and administrative personnel. Through participation in these meetings, the project team was able to observe review procedures on-site, consolidate committee members’ feedback, and analyze issues related to document completeness, process smoothness, and assessment consistency. The project also carried out rolling reviews and revisions of the 2024 Intelligent Building Evaluation Manual and convened a Technical Working Group Meeting on Nov. 26 to examine the suitability of newly added or revised provisions, produce Q&A materials, and publish resolutions to further optimize the assessment criteria. In parallel, the team reviewed and updated the Technical Compilation for Intelligent Building Planning and Design to ensure technical content remains current. In terms of promotion, the project organized major domestic exhibition zones, arranged visits to exemplary intelligent building cases, and held workshops on the 2024 assessment content to enhance the overall impact of intelligent building promotion.
III.Research Findings & Suggestions
The project has achieved significant progress in enhancing the professionalism and promotional effectiveness of the Smart Building Label system. Through a rigorous audit mechanism—including three administrative audits, two case evaluation audits, four on-site review meetings, and four follow-up audits—the project ensured a high degree of professionalism, transparency, and consistency in the evaluation process. Although issues such as insufficient training hours for professionals and uneven workloads among review committee members were identified, the project responded with targeted recommendations, including the establishment of standard operating procedures (SOPs) and the reinforcement of training mechanisms, effectively reducing evaluation discrepancies and strengthening the foundation for smart building policy implementation. On the market side, the number of Smart Building Label applications has shown steady annual growth, with the most notable increases in Silver and Gold-level projects, while voluntary applications have risen to 41%. This reflects not only the demonstrative impact of government policy but also the public’s strong recognition of and active participation in improving living quality through smart technologies. In terms of technical achievements, the project completed revisions to the 2024 Edition of the Smart Building Evaluation Manual and added two new sections to the Technical Compendium: the “Smart Equipment Predictive Alert Platform” and the “Multi-Level Smart Building Integrated Management Platform.” These updates help lower the planning and design threshold while aligning evaluation standards with the latest AIoT technology trends. Furthermore, by organizing site visits to exemplary smart building cases and hosting training seminars on the 2024 Edition Manual, the project not only broadened the reach and practical understanding of smart building knowledge but also deepened the industry’s overall awareness and acceptance of smart building concepts and technologies, thereby amplifying the effectiveness of the entire system’s promotion.
", "相關檔案": "114建研所成果報告v2.4(核定會議記錄調整)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340185/73257a43-1499-4e21-86c6-3225da57b6e4.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340053", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 07 Aug 2026 02:03:00 GMT", "title": "綠建材標章審查作業精進計畫", "計畫主持人": "陳振誠", "協同主持人": "李訓谷", "執行單位": "國立臺北科技大學", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "綠建材、綠建材標章", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、計畫緣起
「綠建材標章」自民國93年受理申請，截至114年10月已累計核發4,238件標章，涵蓋30,849種產品，今(114)年度至10月底止已有348件綠建材標章產品通過，創歷史新高，顯見綠建材標章的品牌價值，已經獲得產消費者與廠商廣泛的認同，為賡續推廣綠建材標章制度並優化評定審查作業，讓綠建材標章評定審查作業更佳精進。
本計畫為業務委託延續性計畫，主要內容依據「綠建材標章申請審核認可及使用作業要點」進行綠建材標章相關評定基準及政策研議、評定審查作業精進及持續辦理國內綠建材標章宣導講習。另依據內政部「綠建材標章評定專業機構申請指定作業要點」，針對綠建材標章評定專業機構評定業務予以查核。此外為達成「臺灣 2050 淨零排放路徑目標」，如何加強綠建材節能減碳效益，共同達成淨零與永續發展即為重要課題，本計畫持續滾動檢討綠建材標章制度的推動，並強化涉及之政策建議，以及協助評定專業機構審查機制之精進、後市場管理機制之強化，以保障消費者權益、維護綠建材標章之公信力與促進產業發展。
二、計畫執行方法與過程
本計畫的工作項目分成六個部分，研議綠建材標章制度與其相關政策建議，以及本年度評定審查過程中產生之相關疑義、客訴、檢舉或建議事項等議題，邀集相關專家學者召開專家會議(至少3場次)，提供解決問題之建議、因應淨零排放政策，研議強化綠建材標章節能減碳內涵之策略，並召開1場次專家會議、綠建材標章評定專業機構審查精進與查核作業(3次)、綠建材宣導推廣作業及推廣「2024年綠建材解說與評估手冊」內容宣導。執行方法與過程分述如下：
（一）研議綠建材標章制度與其相關政策建議
本年度的工作項目包含(1).研議綠建材標章與其相關政策法令及制度之配套建議、 (2).2024年綠建材解說與評估手冊實施後之申請及評定狀況分析、(3).針對一般建材通路進行追蹤查核以瞭解標章誤用或冒用情形(2場)。
針對綠建材標章與其相關政策法令及制度提出配套建議，完成2場針對一般建材通路進行追蹤查核以瞭解標章誤用或冒用情形之調查，持續對114年7月1日正式實施之「2024年綠建材解說與評估手冊」實施後申請及評定狀況彙整資訊與分析。而在針對一般建材通路進行追蹤查核以瞭解標章誤用或冒用情形部分，分別在114年6月30日北部(臺北)及7月26日南部(高雄)於一般消費者可取得建材之大型建材賣場進行調查，共查核431件產品，外包裝標示綠建材產品共48件，經查核產品無誤用或冒用標章情形發生。
（二）針對綠建材標章發展相關議題，以及本年度評定審查過程中產生之相關疑義、客訴、檢舉或建議事項等議題，邀集相關專家學者召開專家會議(至少3場次)，提供解決問題之建議。
本年度邀集相關專家學者召開專家會議（召開3場次），計畫在114年06月13日召開第一次專家會議，會議議題為相關產業單位提出意見訴求，針對「再生綠建材標章評定基準中建材可使用之回收材料”爐石粉”其來源認定議題」與「2024年版綠建材解說與評估手冊」中表6-1再生綠建材評定基準表第23.項輕質隔熱建築材料與第24.項屋頂隔熱磚之內容修訂進行討論，此次會議涉及再生綠建材之一致性原則，且回收材料以去化本土產生之廢棄物為主，尚有許多需更進一步完整資料進行研究，例如產業對爐石粉之近年供需量與市場銷量等，後續將由產業代表提供更多資訊與充分研究評估後，再召開專家會議討論。隨後在114年10月27日召開第二次專家會議，由產業單位提議，「2024綠建材解說與評估手冊」中再生綠建材標章「綠混凝土」回收材料使用比例進行討論，其回收材料來源(本土或進口)之認定，因涉及環境部與經濟部等不同單位權責，將持續瞭解其增修訂相關規定及內容後進行研議。再生綠建材之綠混凝土使用回收材料（例如，爐石粉、飛灰等）比例等評定基準，仍須各界意見與提供數據資料瞭解產業需求。在114年11月26日召開三次專家會議，會議議題針對「2024 綠建材解說與評估手冊」表6-1再生綠建材評定基準建議予以討論，包含綠混凝土之評定基準增修訂等內容。
（三）綠建材標章評定專業機構審查精進與查核作業
本年度的工作內容包含舉辦1場「綠建材評定審查作業精進講習會」，及進行3次「綠建材標章評定專業機構」評定業務查核作業。
針對評定專業機構「第一次正式查核」於114年6月5日辦理完成，第二次查核時間為9月16日辦理，第三次查核時間為11月20日辦理完成，而「綠建材精進講習會」於10月22日舉行，評定專業機構共有28位評定小組成員與會完成教育訓練。
綠建材標章評定專業機構查核作業結果，「評定小組人員」之教育訓練因應2024年更新版綠建材解說與評估手冊之正式實施，積極安排人員參與本年度相關教育訓練以符合「綠建材標章評定專業機構申請指定作業要點」(第八點)規定與符合「評定審查一致化」原則。另一方面，「諮詢時程過長」問題，訂定其時程管理機制並已具體縮短諮詢時間，另評定書誤繕率為2.7%，可再進一步精進，透過常見誤繕檢核表方式分層檢核易錯誤之處，以有效提升評定品質。另後市場追蹤查核部分，本年度有1案查核送驗不通過，進行改善與複驗，此部分查核委員建議，應修正評定專業機構訂定之「綠建材標章追蹤查核作業程序」，針對查核抽驗產品不符問題，應予以抽驗產品再複驗，而非待改善後再複驗。評定作業數位化部分，建議加速建置「數位化審查系統」(SSO)，並可衍生將諮詢案件納入，以提升評定作業時效。
(四) 因應淨零排放政策，研議強化綠建材標章節能減碳內涵之策略
內政部建築研究所積極將2050淨零排放路徑目標納入建築相關制度中，包括「綠建築標章與建築能效評估標示」、「低蘊含碳建築評估標示制度」、「智慧建築標章」..等，引導我國建築營建產業朝向淨零轉型，其中，「綠建材標章制度」亦是推動與達成臺灣2050淨零排放路徑目標的配套措施之一。「綠建材標章」制度訂定之初，即以「人本健康•地球永續」為核心價值，並考量不同建材生命週期而分成「生態、健康、高性能與再生」綠建材標章四大分類，提供不同建材特性供建築物與室內及室外環境應用。而在減碳效益部分，「綠建材標章」配合國家「2050年淨零排放目標」政策，綠建材為鼓勵性標章，基準優於一般法令標準與規範，在建築碳排生命週期之「蘊含碳排」(Embodied Carbon ,EC)及「使用碳排」(Operational Carbon ,OC)各階段綠建材標章產品皆能提供「實質減碳效益」，例如，生態綠建材及再生綠建材即能對應「蘊含碳」減量，實質具有材料減碳效益，而高性能綠建材與健康綠建材則可對應「使用碳排」減量，協助建築物達成淨零建築目標。精進計畫持續因應淨零排放政策，研議強化綠建材標章節能減碳內涵策略，目前先以通則鼓勵申請廠商揭露碳足跡或低碳循環建材等方式，其中「再生」與「生態」之綠建材蘊含碳排放量，除產品碳足跡計算外，亦可由調查其生產量轉換之減碳量進行估算，此部分專家會議亦建議，未來廠商申請綠建材標章時可進行生產量資料填報，並定期更新，以統計其減碳效益。
（五）綠建材宣導推廣作業
本年度的宣導推廣作業包含辦理北、中、南(共3場)綠建材標章制度推廣講習會、參與1場國內建築或建材展覽、完成廣告文宣1則。推廣講習會計畫書已完成並公告辦理，分別規劃於7月5日(台北)、7月22日(臺中)、7月25日(高雄)進行推廣講習活動，共計528人參與講習會，而建材展部分則報名2025第37屆台北國際建築建材暨產品展(12月11-14日)，綠建材宣傳內容與發放折頁已完成更新設計。廣告文宣二則已刊登於雜誌5月份營造天下197期與A&S雜誌9月號刊登。
（六）推廣「2024年綠建材解說與評估手冊」內容宣導
本年度配合「2024年版綠建材解說與評估手冊」之更新內容，在上述「綠建材標章制度推廣講習會」(北中南共三場次)中，主題內容以「2024年更新版手冊內容」作為教育宣導目的，並在「建材展覽」等宣傳展覽推廣更新版手冊內容，包含海報、折頁等宣傳文宣品，並透過雜誌刊載方式，說明新版手冊內容，並藉由內政部建築研究所網頁與評定專業機構(臺灣建築中心)之網頁與諮詢服務，提供相關新版手冊內容與資訊。
三、重要發現
（一）綠建材解說與評估手冊(2024年更新版)內容已於114年7月1日公告實施，本次手冊內容增修訂許多標章評定項目與基準，對於產業發展具有帶動之效益，新增項目與內容配合國家淨零碳排與健康近零碳建築及永續經濟活動等政策，今年度通過之綠建材標章數量，已創歷史新高(114年10月底已通過348件)，透過綠建材標章效益，可帶動營建產業加速升級與發展。
（二）透過專家會議方式，討論再生綠建材標章評定基準中建材可使用之回收材料”爐石粉”其來源認定議題，與會產業單位提出國外進口爐石於國內研磨製作後作為回收材料比例認定，爐石粉添加取代水泥用量有極高的減碳與耐用效益，此部分因涉及再生綠建材一體適用認定原則，並與環境部、經濟部、公共工程委員會等單位政策權責相關，建議持續彙整相關資料與分析評估後，再邀集產業代表與專家召開會議討論，以順應產業需求發展滾動式調整制度。
（三）臺灣邁向2050年淨零排放路徑，規劃與國際重要的永續政策接軌，包括永續報告書ESG、永續綠色金融、歐盟碳邊稅等影響臺灣營建產業之政策。同時內政部積極推動「淨零轉型」，推動建築能效評估系統(BERS)、低蘊含碳建築評估標示制度(LEBR)、低碳循環建材、碳足跡標籤、減碳標籤..等，都能與綠建材標章制度相互架接，在「 低蘊含碳」部分，綠建材標章一般通則要求中，已於「綠建材解說與評估手冊(2024年更新版)」中鼓勵建材廠商揭露相關碳足跡或碳排放資訊以供各界作為減碳應用。綠建材標章四大分類配合內政部「低蘊含碳建築評估標示制度」，在「生態綠建材」與「再生綠建材」兩大類標章產品可直接對應減碳效益，在「使用碳排」(OC)部分，「高性能綠建材」之「高性能節能綠建材」與「高性能透水綠建材」可與「綠建築標章」(EEWH)及「建築能效評估系統」(BERS)連結共同減碳，以共同達成淨零排放目標。
（四）本計畫業經查核綠建材定機構，目前綠建材評定天數符合要點要求，然而正式申請案件前之諮詢階段時程過長，諮詢流程與作業需進一步提出改善機制，目前評定專業機構正建置「數位化審查系統」(SSO)，建議可透過資訊數位化及開發AI等方式減少人力負荷，將申請標準化與時程透明化，並往前延伸至「諮詢服務階段」，以增進標章申請與評定效率。另攸關標章公信力之後市場追蹤查核部分甚為重要，建議每季方式管考以利掌握追蹤查核進度，並適度修正評定專業機構訂定之「綠建材標章追蹤查核作業程序」，將查核送驗不符之產品進行複驗確認，並依要點規定辦理。
四、主要建議事項
建議一、綠建材標章評定電子化作業時程管理機制：立即可行建議
主辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
協辦機關：內政部建築研究所
評定專業機構在廠商申請綠建材標章評定作業，時程管理上目前雖符合評定天數要求，但其衍生之諮詢服務與評定時程資訊透明化，並減少評定作業誤繕，已開始建構「數位化審查系統」(SSO)方式進行「系統時程管理」，而在諮詢時已有諮詢表單(三聯單)與收件憑證等表單文件資料，建議可強化諮詢階段轉為電子化管理方式，以優化其時程管理，由系統提醒諮詢時程預警機制，以利申請廠商及評定人員相互確認申請文件、時程、可正式申請評定期程..等建立共識，減少諮詢多次往返等問題，以縮減時間及評定時程，並可減輕評定人力負荷與正確度。
建議二、2024年版綠建材解說與評估手冊追蹤及檢討：立即可行建議。
主辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
協辦機關：內政部建築研究所
綠建材解說與評估手冊(2024年版)在114年7月1日起正式實施，本計畫持續進行更新版手冊之追蹤檢討，適時滾動調整手冊內容，與國內政策及國際趨勢密切接合，並符合產業需求達到永續健康淨零之共同目標。藉由召開專家方式調整評定項目與基準，例如針對產業淨零需求檢核再生綠建材之綠混凝土其回收材料比例，或新增產業所需之低碳生態或高性能等建材產品，提供自薦申請方式或納入新增受理項目方式於下一版本手冊內容增修訂。
建議三、使用綠建材標章產品擴大淨零建築整體效益：中長期建議。
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
協辦機關： 財團法人台灣建築中心
綠建材是營建產業的循環產業，建議可從政策連結提供綠建材內需市場的動力建材產業上下游的連結。具體發展方針可參考如下：
(1)擴大受理項目：未來建議擴大受理項目，並搭配建築技術規則、綠建築標章、建築能效標示與低蘊含碳建築標示及綠色金融等相關政策相互配套推廣，逐步擴大綠建材受理項目。
(2)建管法規配套：綠建材標章產品項目在主結構：如結構體、屋頂、牆面等建築部位，與次結構：如室內牆、板、裝修等部位皆有認證通過產品，涵蓋面向廣泛，而綠建材設計技術規範中所納入計算的建築部位較為著重於建築室內裝修設計，也間接造成綠建材標章各分類發展不均的現象，因此，可從建管法規中綠建材使用率之計算加以檢討，逐步增加對於建築結構體、外裝修、景觀與設備等項目納入考量。
(3)綠建築標章之配套：綠建築新版手冊中，二氧化碳減量指標與廢棄物減量指標已納入再生綠建材標章之特別加分，對於推動循環經濟將有實質之助益。可納入更多項目如「新型技術認定」、「低碳工法」、「能效標示」等，以更加促進標章之間的連結。綠建材標章與綠建築標章的項目有相當多之直接對應關係，取得「綠建材標章證書」的綠建材產品，在綠建築標章的認證(得分)系統中仍有更多的對應空間可增大相互連結，提升標章之市場效益。
", "英文摘要": "", "相關檔案": "綠建材成果報告_1215(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340053/e7764a8c-e8f4-4d98-b1c5-90ec8f5cc015.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340052", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 07 Aug 2026 01:55:00 GMT", "title": "綠建築標章及建築能效標示審查作業精進計畫", "計畫主持人": "林子平", "協同主持人": "潘振宇", "執行單位": "國立成功大學", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "綠建築、綠建築標章、建築能效標示", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、計畫緣起
我國綠建築標章及建築能效標示為亞洲第一個綠建築評估系統，執行至今已歷經二十餘年，具有公平、公正、公開之完整制度。自民國88年受理申請，截至113年12月已達13,670案件申請通過。足見其成果受到我國政府及民眾之信任及肯定，部分地方政府亦在各地方自治條例、環境影響評估及都市更新條例中納為重點評估項目之一，並要求一定等級之綠建築認證。綠建築標章及建築能效標示認證已成為我國永續環境發展至關重要之一環，本計畫致力於維持綠建築標章及建築能效標示審查作業之評定品質，同時依環境變遷及國際永續目標時時檢討更新我國綠建築發展方向。
本計畫根據內政部112年5月修正發布之「綠建築標章及建築能效標示評定專業機構申請指定作業要點」，監督指定綠建築標章及建築能效標示評定專業機構，目前我國之指定評定專業機構為財團法人台灣建築中心。本計畫依據上開要點第9點規定，針對評定專業機構進行業務查核並協助修正相關執行細節及評估制度。藉由評定業務行政及技術查核協助檢討各項行政作業及標準作業流程之執行與改善。並依上開要點針對指定評定機構聘任之專任技術人員、專任行政人員及評定小組成員進行教育訓練，將國內綠建築及建築能效最新發展動向、新上路之綠建築評估手冊、建築能效評估手冊、評定業務查核成果及改善建議確實傳達給各個在綠建築標章及建築能效標示業務第一線之承辦人員及評定小組成員。
因應我國2050淨零碳排之目標，綠建築評估手冊家族在111年增加建築能效評估系統(BERS)及既有建築類(EB)，並於112年配合建築能效評估制度改版完成修訂2023年版綠建築評估手冊-基本型(BC)及住宿類(RS)、113年完成出版建築能效評估手冊2024年版，以及完成修訂2025年版綠建築評估手冊-廠房類(GF)及社區類(EC)草案。為使各類綠建築評估系統版本皆能進行建築能效評估，本計畫114年度將持續蒐集綠建築及建築能效評估手冊之執行意見及其他相關建議，滾動檢討手冊內容，辦理手冊之編排與協助出版等相關事宜，除手冊內容之執行實務須持續追蹤外，本計畫也持續追蹤前年度評定專業機構查核結果之執行事項及建議。
本計畫所有工作項目獲得之反饋及實務經驗將謹慎參考並回饋至綠建築評估手冊及建築能效評估手冊之精進與修正，提升我國綠建築及建築能效評估內容、制度之整體品質及執行效率，貫徹評定機構「審查同軌，信賴倍增」之目標。
本計畫之目標為精進我國綠建築標章及建築能效標示制度，並提升評定專業機構之評定品質及評定專業度，辦理下列事項：
(一) 完成2025年版綠建築評估系列手冊基準之滾動檢討並提出建議。
(二) 完成綠建築及建築能效評定案件之抽查，依每年度100件及相關原則執行，並抽取當年度3-5件評定案件進行查核，供評定業務技術查核會議一併檢討，並彙整查核問題及結果提供評定專業機構參考精進。
(三) 完成行政查核會議及技術查核會議各1場次，行政查核會議查核評定專業機構之行政管理；技術查核會議自前項當年度案件抽查中檢討評定專業機構執行評定業務技術內容。維持及精進評定機構之評定業務品質。
(四) 協助評定專業機構統計評定作業實際執行時程、完善標準作業流程及其他作業流程狀況，提出改善建議，並追蹤綠建築技術認定小組執行情形，促進評定制度之品質及效率。
(五) 完成綠建築標章及建築能效標示評定小組成員教育訓練1場次。
(六) 完成綠建築標章及建築能效標示專任技術人員及專任行政人員教育訓練1場次。
二、執行方法及過程
本計畫係內政部建築研究所委託之第三方監督單位，主要任務包括兩大方向：其一，執行指定評定專業機構之查核與監督作業，透過個案查核及評定業務查核會議，全面檢視其行政與技術作業流程之合規性與執行效能，並於查核過程中主動發掘可精進之處，協助評定專業機構持續優化評定標準作業程序，以確保評定品質之專業性與一致性。其二，針對國內綠建築標章及建築能效制度進行精進與更新作業，除依據我國永續建築政策推動制度調整外，也參酌國際上綠建築與能效評估體系之發展趨勢，確保我國制度與國際接軌，持續強化建築環境永續表現。
此外，為呼應我國「2050淨零排放策略」之推動方向，監督與精進綠建築與建築能效制度為落實建築部門節能減碳的重要路徑。透過建立透明、公正且具前瞻性的評定與查核機制，推動建築在設計、施工及營運階段能效相關管理措施，以強化整個建築生命週期的減碳效益，實現國家淨零目標。計畫執行方式包括研究討論、會議召開及教育訓練等形式，並廣納產官學研界專家意見，建立即時回饋與修正機制，以確保我國綠建築與建築能效制度持續精進，朝向高效、公正與永續並行之淨零建築體系邁進。
三、重要發現
本計畫依據過去多年執行經驗及當年度查核結果，彙整指定評定專業機構需精進之項目，藉由查核會議、統計數據及申請人對評定機構之意見回饋，納入後續追蹤與制度修正之建議。我國指定評定機構（台灣建築中心）運作已久，累積豐富之評定經驗。然而，綠建築制度因應極端氣候挑戰需持續更新，自發布淨零政策以來，建築部門即以建築能效制度回應，自2022年底正式上路，並仍有多項待完善之處。今年度更因實務檢討與評估公式之更新，發布建築能效評估手冊2024年版，內容變動幅度甚大。由於其他綠建築評估手冊家族之能效評估多以該手冊為依據，亦需儘速同步修訂，以利申請人依循作業並確保評估一致性。
綜觀近年制度發展，無論是綠建築或建築能效手冊，皆有諸多需持續檢討與調整之處，使評定機構在執行新制度與評定作業時面臨更高挑戰。本年度計畫重點在於檢討現行制度之可行簡化與精進流程，並針對手冊內容研議多項待更新或優化議題。其中，建築能效評估手冊2024年版的更新實施情形為本年度關注重點。新制度上路後，申請人與使用者需投入時間熟悉新版手冊內容與申請辦法，並在既有工作負荷下額外投入人力與時間，以因應新增的評估項目及永續認證要求。
評定機構亦須持續落實近年逐步優化之制度措施，如申請人列席詢答機制、小規模案例評定流程及線上作業系統等，以提升整體行政與技術效能。為此，本年度召開多次專家學者會議及評定業務查核檢討會議，持續研議作業流程之精進方向。最終，本計畫將各項討論成果彙整為年度建議事項，作為未來綠建築及建築能效標章制度與評估手冊修訂之重要依據，持續推動制度之完善與國家淨零建築目標之實現。
四、建議事項
建議一、綠建築評定標準作業流程精進 (短期建議)
主辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
協辦機關：國立成功大學
依據本年度行政查核結果，仍有待完善之評定標準作業流程。如評定會議效率精進項目，如何執行跨區評定、增加副召集人及申訴抱怨之預防等細節。其次為小規模案例之標準作業流程、案例規格及評定會議執行方式。本計畫持續與評定機構研議各個評定作業標準流程執行細節及方向，精進整體綠建築及建築能效評定流程。
建議二、滾動檢討綠建築標章及建築能效標示之制度 (中期建議)
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：國立成功大學
隨著極端氣候影響日益加劇，全球淨零行動已成為各國建築政策發展之核心方向。為回應此趨勢，國內建築部門相關政策與制度亦持續滾動修訂與精進。目前建築相關標章與標示制度種類繁多，涵蓋能源效率、環境品質、資源循環及減碳管理等多重面向，雖能多方推動永續議題，然亦造成制度間重疊與行政負擔之挑戰。在國際邁向淨零排放的背景下，我國建築標章制度需朝向整合化、數位化與高效化發展，使永續政策更具可行性與普及性。未來應透過制度簡化與標章整合，建立一致的評定架構與指標鏈結，提升政策執行效率，並使業界與申請者能更明確理解制度目標與申請流程。
此外，綠建築及建築能效制度與多項技術規則及政策法規高度關聯，其修訂需兼顧技術可行性、執行連貫性及政策一致性。因此，應持續研議修正方向與優先順序，確立滾動檢討之運作機制，以確保制度更新能與國際淨零推動路徑同步，並有效降低行政作業及執行程序之複雜度，使建築永續制度更具前瞻性與實質成效。
建議三、滾動檢討綠建築及建築能效評估手冊 (中期建議)
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：國立成功大學
綠建築及建築能效評估手冊近年因應淨零政策及環境變化，多次配合改版，去年完成修訂GF、EC、RN三版手冊，然因推動方向規劃，今年僅出版GF及EC兩版本，RN版則因專家意見及整合規劃，預計未來與EB版合併。也因最新BERS 2024版手冊今年公告實施，今年亦同步編修BC、RS 2026版手冊。由於氣候變遷快速，手冊之更新修訂也需時常檢討配合更新，並需顧及各版本間之參照及正確性，及各界之意見回饋。本計畫在編修過程中，均將各界意見納入編修依據及參考，討論及研議最適切之方式，納入手冊之更新修訂中，以確實落實公正、公平及有效之建築永續政策。
", "英文摘要": "Taiwan’s Green Building Label (officially named Ecology, Energy, Waste Reduction, Health; EEWH) and Building Energy-Efficiency Rating System (BERS) were the first green building assessment systems in Asia. Having been implemented for over two decades, these systems are supported by a comprehensive, fair, impartial, and transparent framework. Since the acceptance of applications in 1999, a total of 13,670 projects had been certified as of December 2024. This demonstrates the high level of trust and recognition they have earned from both the Taiwanese government and the public. Furthermore, some local governments have incorporated these systems as key assessment criteria in local self-government ordinances, environmental impact assessments, and urban renewal regulations, often requiring a certain level of green building certification.
The Green Building Label and BERS certifications have become crucial components in promoting sustainable environmental development in Taiwan. This project is committed to maintaining the quality of the certification review process for both the Green Building Label and BERS. It also continuously reviews and updates Taiwan’s green building development strategies in response to environmental changes and international sustainability goals.
In accordance with the “Guidelines for Application and Designation of Professional Assessment Organizations for Green Building Label and Building Energy-Efficiency Rating System,” amended and promulgated by the Ministry of the Interior in May 2023, this project oversees the designated professional assessment organization—currently the Taiwan Architecture & Building Center (TABC). In line with Article 9 of the aforementioned guidelines, this project conducts operational audits of the designated assessment organization, assists in refining execution details and assessment mechanisms, and provides administrative and technical audits to help improve administrative procedures and standard operating procedures.
Additionally, the project provides training programs for full-time technical staff, administrative personnel, and evaluation team members employed by the designated assessment organization, ensuring that frontline personnel and assessment team members involved in Green Building Label and BERS certification are kept up to date with the latest domestic green building developments, newly released green building assessment manuals, BERS manuals, audit findings, and improvement recommendations.
In response to Taiwan’s 2050 net-zero carbon emission target, the green building assessment manual series expanded in 2022 to include the Building Energy-Efficiency Rating System (BERS) and the Existing Buildings category (EB). In 2023, revisions were completed for the 2023 versions of the Green Building Assessment Manual – Basic Category (BC) and Residential Category (RS) to align with the updated BERS framework. In 2024, the BERS Manual (2024 edition) was published, and drafts for the 2025 editions of the Green Building Assessment Manual – Factory Category (GF) and Community Category (EC) were completed.
To ensure that all versions of the green building assessment systems incorporate BERS evaluations, this project will continue in 2025 to gather feedback on the implementation of the assessment manuals and collect additional suggestions for continuous revisions. The project will also handle tasks such as organizing, compiling, and assisting in the publication of the manuals. In addition to tracking the practical application of manual contents, this project will continue monitoring the implementation of audit findings and recommendations from previous years’ assessments of the designated professional organization.
All feedback and practical experiences obtained through the project will be carefully considered and integrated into future revisions and improvements of the Green Building Assessment Manual and BERS Manual. These efforts aim to enhance the overall quality, content, and execution efficiency of Taiwan’s green building and energy-efficiency assessment systems, in line with the designated assessment organization’s goal of “Consistent Evaluation, Increased Trust.”
This plan aims to improve the quality and professionalism of EEWH and professional assessment institutions, handle the following tasks:
(1) Revise the 2025 edition of the EEWH Family.
(2) Spot check assessment case.
(3) Check the implementation status of professional assessment agencies.
(4) Assist professional assessment institutions to improve the standard process of assessment operations.
(5) Handle the training of members of the green building assessment team.
(6) Handle the training of members of the green building assessment technical staff and administrative staff.
Implementation Methods and Process
This project, commissioned by the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI) of the Ministry of the Interior, serves as a third-party supervisory body with two primary missions.
First, it conducts audits and supervision of designated professional assessment institutions. Through case reviews and assessment audit meetings, the project comprehensively examines the compliance and operational efficiency of both administrative and technical processes. During the audit process, potential areas for improvement are proactively identified to assist the designated institutions in continuously optimizing their standard operating procedures, thereby ensuring professionalism and consistency in assessment quality.
Second, the project aims to refine and update Taiwan’s Green Building Label and Building Energy Efficiency (BEE) systems. In addition to aligning with national sustainable building policies, it also references international developments in green building and energy efficiency assessment frameworks to ensure Taiwan’s systems remain compatible with global standards and continue to enhance environmental performance in the building sector.
Furthermore, in response to Taiwan’s “2050 Net-Zero Emissions Strategy,” strengthening the supervision and advancement of green building and energy efficiency systems represents a crucial pathway for achieving energy conservation and carbon reduction in the building sector. By establishing a transparent, impartial, and forward-looking auditing and evaluation mechanism, the project promotes energy efficiency management throughout the design, construction, and operational phases of buildings, thereby enhancing carbon reduction benefits across the entire building life cycle and contributing to national net-zero goals.
The project is implemented through various means such as research discussions, formal meetings, and training sessions. It also incorporates feedback from experts across industry, government, and academia to establish a responsive review and correction mechanism, ensuring continuous improvement of Taiwan’s green building and energy efficiency systems toward a highly efficient, equitable, and sustainable net-zero building framework.
Key Findings
Drawing on years of implementation experience and annual audit results, this project consolidates areas for improvement among designated professional assessment institutions. Insights from audit meetings, statistical data, and applicant feedback are incorporated into recommendations for future monitoring and system refinement.
Taiwan’s designated assessment institution—the Taiwan Architecture & Building Center (TABC)—has long been in operation and has accumulated extensive assessment experience. However, as green building systems must evolve continuously to address the growing challenges of climate change, and in alignment with the national Net-Zero Emissions Policy, the building sector has responded by implementing the Building Energy Efficiency system, which officially commenced at the end of 2022 but still contains several areas requiring refinement.
In 2024, following practical reviews and updates to assessment formulas, the Building Energy Efficiency Assessment Manual (2024 Edition) was published, introducing significant changes. Because other green building assessment manuals within the same framework reference this manual for energy-related evaluations, prompt synchronization and revision are necessary to guide applicants and maintain assessment consistency.
Given recent developments, both the green building and energy efficiency manuals require continuous review and revision, posing new challenges for assessment institutions in implementing and evaluating under updated systems. This year’s project focuses on reviewing feasible simplifications and process optimizations, as well as identifying key topics for future updates or enhancements. Among these, the implementation of the 2024 Edition of the BEE Manual is a major focal point.
As new systems are introduced, applicants and users must dedicate additional time and resources to familiarize themselves with the updated manuals and application procedures while managing their existing workloads. Assessment institutions, meanwhile, must continue implementing procedural improvements established in recent years—such as applicant participation in inquiry sessions, evaluation processes for small-scale cases, and online operation systems—to enhance administrative and technical efficiency.
Accordingly, multiple expert and audit review meetings were convened this year to discuss directions for further process improvement. The outcomes of these discussions were compiled into annual recommendations, which will serve as an important reference for future revisions of Taiwan’s Green Building Label and Building Energy Efficiency assessment systems. These efforts collectively support the continued refinement of institutional frameworks and the realization of Taiwan’s net-zero building objectives.
", "相關檔案": "114年度精進計畫成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340052/9d0323c9-cd48-49d0-b114-cc83c5df109f.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340049", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 07 Aug 2026 01:46:00 GMT", "title": "健康綠建材評定項目與基準增修訂之研究", "計畫主持人": "羅時麒", "協同主持人": "陳振誠", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "綜合規劃組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "綠建材標章、健康綠建材、室內空氣品質、總揮發性有機化合物、甲醛", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
國家發展委員會在111年3月正式公布「臺灣2050淨零排放政策路徑藍圖」，提供至2050年淨零之軌跡與行動路徑，促進關鍵領域之技術、研究與創新，引導產業綠色轉型；另公布「國家發展計畫」（民國114至117年）擬定八大施政目標，其中「創新經濟智慧國家」與「綠色成長與2050淨零轉型」策略，以打造「健康近零碳建築」為達成執行策略目標;爰此，內政部推動「綠建材標章」即是積極落實「永續健康與淨零建築政策」。
綠建材標章自2004年開始受理標章評定起，推動至113年止已累計核發3,890件標章，超過27,000餘件產品，廣受各界認可使用。綠建材標章分為「生態、健康、高性能與再生」四大分類，目前累計通過標章數量，健康類約占73.8%、高性能類約占16.12%、再生類約占9.62%，生態類低於1%，顯示「健康綠建材」為目前評定通過之最多標章，其評定項目為低甲醛逸散與低總揮發性有機化合物之室內使用建材產品。研究依「綠建材標章申請審核認可及使用作業要點」之第八點「綠建材標章性能規格評定書之評定，依本部建築研究所出版之綠建材解說與評估手冊所定基準辦理。」，參考「2024年版綠建材解說與評估手冊」(114年7月1日實施)內容之一般通則與健康綠建材標章評定基準進行研究探討，召開專家會議討論「健康綠建材評定項目與基準增修訂」，提供內政部建築研究所之綠建材標章制度參考建議。
二、研究方法及過程
「綠建材標章」評定基準係參考「綠建材解說與評估手冊」內容，2024年手冊更新版，手冊內容已擴充更新通則及各分類標章產品評定基準，然研議過程中各界提出相關建議課題，尚需持續進一步深度研究與討論。「健康綠建材標章」目前標章產品數量及比例最高，可進一步因應產業與各界需求增修調整評定項目與基準，本研究透過文獻分析、數據統計分析、專家諮詢等方法，探討健康綠建材可受理評定項目之議題，例如，塗料類油性塗料、現場兩液型調製塗料、促進健康之無機材料等，性能評定基準部分，則可探討與國際接軌12項VOC之擴充可能、複合型建材及全尺寸建材(家具)標準檢測方式等，以持續協助精進綠建材標章評定作業與制度，做為未來推動方向參考。
三、重要發現
本研究旨在「彙整分析健康綠建材標章產品之評定項目與基準」，以深入了解目前國際上綠建材產品在健康與淨零方面等新的評定項目。其中包括目前國際上廣泛使用的建材標準如美國 UL GreenGuard認證及新加坡 SGBP之綠色建材產品認證與日本 Eco Mark認證..等進行比對，從「評定項目」與「評定基準」等進行差異探討，提出健康綠建材評定項目與基準國際接軌內容，供標章制度應用參考，研究成果如下：
(一)、研究彙整「健康綠建材標章產品」之項目與逸散分級等資料內容進行分析與檢討，截至114年9月底「健康綠建材」有效標章共有620件標章產品，其中健康綠建材標章之「塗料類」數量最多共有310件(佔健康綠建材有效標章之50%)。而健康綠建材「塗料類」產品中，「水性塗料」共有109件(佔健康綠建材「塗料類」有效標章之37.7%)，「環氧樹脂塗料類」共有84件(佔健康綠建材「塗料類」有效標章之27%)，而其中「水性環氧樹脂塗料類」共有14件約佔「環氧樹脂塗料類」之16.6%，亦即其他溶劑型等「環氧樹脂塗料類」約佔83.4%。「聚胺酯塗料類」共有40件(佔健康綠建材「塗料類」有效標章之12.9%)，而健康綠建材「塗料類」之「屋頂用」共有15件(佔健康綠建材「塗料類」有效標章之4.8%)，健康綠建材「塗料類」之「室外用」共有56件(佔健康綠建材「塗料類」有效標章之18%)。
(二)、分析國際建材相關標章在健康評定項目上之基準、方法與認證數量，作為未來調整我國健康綠建材評定內容增修訂之參考，我國健康綠建材標章在「評定項目」部分主要分為8大類別，涵蓋「地板類、牆壁類、天花板類、填縫劑類、塗料類、黏著(合)劑類、門窗類、固定式隔屏或櫥櫃類」，而美國UL GreenGuard認證則涵蓋包含32大類別，與我國健康綠建材受理範圍明顯具有差異。另一方面我國健康綠建材評定基準包括「一般通則之限制物質」與「建材低逸散甲醛與TVOC」，主要需檢測「重金屬含量、石綿、天然放射性物質、水泥製品之氯離子含量以及甲醛與TVOC之逸散速率」，而TVOC檢測項目臺灣健康綠建材對應環境部室內空氣品質標準以12種VOCs做為指標污染物，與美國UL GreenGuard認證、新加坡SGBP之綠色建材產品認證與日本Eco Mark認證不同並各有差異，以美國UL GreenGuard認證為例，其檢測項目眾多涵蓋C6-C16範圍之VOCs污染物質，遠多於我國健康綠建材檢測VOCs項目，對於實驗室檢測能力與量能負荷與成本等皆須考量。
(三)、在「評定基準」部分，我國健康綠建材依照CNS 16000標準(參考ISO 16000標準)及ASTM標準檢測，並以「逸散速率」作為檢測基準分為1級、2級、3級，與美國UL GreenGuard認證及新加坡 SGBP之綠色建材產品認證皆有差異，主要是在VOCs以單一物質基準與TVOC檢測逸散基準與濃度不同，可進一步借鏡探討與研議，逐步增加VOCs物質項目類別及增加「塑化劑」與「阻燃劑」等SVOC物質檢測(含量或逸散量)，以利與國際接軌並確保民眾健康安全。
(四)、研究彙整分析健康綠建材受理評定項目及評定基準之建議內容，研議具體回應策略與作法，並召開專家諮詢會議，會議中對於與國際接軌「逐步擴大健康綠建材受理評定項目」與「增加VOCs物質檢測項目」及「提升調整TVOC逸散速率分級基準」以有別於「一般通則」之「限制性物質甲醛與TVOC逸散速率規定」等有所共識。油性塗料、兩液型調製塗料及環氧樹脂類塗料之評定範圍與基準增修訂之建議，則認為塗料因應國際趨勢應朝向「水性」溶劑發展，現階段「塗料類」應參考「CNS 15080 建築用塗料之揮發性有機化合物最大限值」標準進行檢測，以符合健康安全規範。
四、主要建議事項
建議一、健康綠建材塗料類產品可依據CNS 15080國家標準之VOCs最大限值進行檢測評定，落實綠建材通則中一般要求規定：立即可行建議
主辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
協辦機關：內政部建築研究所
針對塗料類產品，綠建材通則中一般要求規定「綠建材之產品功能應符合既定之國家標準」，而環境部依據空氣污染防制法訂定「建物及工業維護塗料揮發性有機物成分標準」，另經濟部標準檢驗局訂定國家標準「CNS 15080 建築用塗料之揮發性有機化合物最大限量值」與公告建築用防火塗料、調和漆、瓷漆、水性水泥漆、溶劑水泥漆等5種塗料類別列為應施檢驗塗料，而CNS 15080對於12類建築用塗料依「水性塗料」與「溶劑型塗料」訂出不同VOCs最大限量值，在綠建材部分應可直接參考標準與落實檢測評定。
建議二、因應國際間健康綠建材趨勢與提升健康綠建材評定基準性能，建議調整健康綠建材逸散分級TVOC 之3級基準與增加VOCs類別，以利國際同軌與提升健康綠建材標章性能：中長期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
研究分析國際間建材標章與標準在VOCs部分與我國健康綠建材之VOCs(12種污染物)有所差異，而在環境部對塗料類產品規範VOCs最大限量值與CNS 15080在塗料類VOCs最大限量值中，其VOCs檢測物質種類皆多於目前健康綠建材之VOCs(12種污染物)，因此，考量產業技術發展時程與檢測實驗室數量能力等，建議可分階段增加檢測VOCs類別(酯類、酮類、醚類..等) 增加「塑化劑」與「阻燃劑」等SVOC物質檢測，並提升健康綠建材逸散分級TVOC 之3級基準與一般通則限制物質之「甲醛與TVOC逸散速率規定」，健全綠建材標章均衡發展。
", "英文摘要": "Since the launch of the Green Building Material (GBM) Label certification program in 2004, a total of 3,890 labels have been granted by 2024, covering more than 27,000 certified products that have been widely recognized and adopted across various sectors.The GBM Label is categorized into four major types: Ecology, Health, High Performance, and Recycled. Among these, the Health category accounts for approximately 73.8%, followed by High Performance (16.12%), Recycled (9.62%), and Ecology (below 1%).
This distribution indicates that “Healthy Green Building Materials” constitute the majority of certified products, primarily focusing on indoor building materials with low formaldehyde emissions and low total volatile organic compound (TVOC) release.This study follows Article 8 of the “Operational Guidelines for the Review, Approval, and Use of the Green Building Material Label”, which stipulates that the “performance specifications for GBM Labels shall be evaluated in accordance with the criteria set forth in the Green Building Material Explanatory and Assessment Manual published by the Building Research Institute (BRI), Ministry of the Interior.”Accordingly, the research references the 2024 Edition of the Evaluation Manual for Green Building Materials (effective July 1, 2025), examining both the General Provisions and the Evaluation Criteria for Healthy Green Building Materials. Expert consultations were convened to deliberate on the revision and enhancement of assessment items and evaluation standards for the Health category, with the objective of providing policy and technical recommendations to the Building Research Institute (BRI) for the future improvement of the GBM labeling system.
", "相關檔案": "健康綠建材評定項目與基準增修訂之研究（成果最終板)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340049/c599250c-cf53-4046-8536-6fa286824eca.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339789", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:09:00 GMT", "title": "建築能效制度整合綠色金融之研究", "計畫主持人": "王榮進", "協同主持人": "孫振義", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "綠建築標章、建築能效標示、綠色金融、永續發展、財務誘因、綠建築政策", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
隨著各國政府致力於達成淨零碳排的目標，綠建築標章及建築能源效率標示政策逐漸成為減少建築業碳排放的重要手段。這些政策背後的理論基礎源自於永續發展與應對氣候變遷的策略。建築物不僅是能源消耗的主要來源，也是溫室氣體排放的主要貢獻者之一。推動建築能源效率的提升以及綠建築的發展，成為各國減緩氣候變遷與達成淨零碳目標的重要策略。
金融機構在綠建築及能源效率建築融資方面扮演著關鍵角色。透過提供優惠的融資條件，可以進一步鼓勵企業及開發商選擇符合環保要求的建築方案。許多國家也透過政策激勵金融機構參與這一過程，包括稅收減免、風險分擔機制等。本研究在探討如何透過政策及金融機構的合作，推動綠建築及能源效率建築的發展，並提升金融機構對此類項目的融資意願。
二、研究方法及過程
(一)文獻分析法
本研究將釐清國內外各國金融機構如何提供「綠建築標章」與「建築能效標示」建築物優惠融資條件，並比較其成功案例與實施狀況。
文獻分析的範圍涵蓋：1國內外綠色金融政策發展脈絡與理論基礎；2建築能效評估制度與綠建築標章認證機制；3金融機構綠色融資商品設計與優惠條件。此過程不僅有助於理解歷史背景、發展脈絡及關鍵理論，也能辨識出學術與實務上的理論空白，為後續專家訪談與問卷調查提供堅實的理論依據與政策參考。
(二)專家訪談法
訪談的目標在於釐清「建築能效制度與綠色金融整合」過程中可能遇到的挑戰，並探討政策設計的適切性、金融機構的實務運作，以及建築業界、代銷業者（購屋者）對此機制的回應。訪談過程將採用半結構化訪談方式，在自然環境下進行雙向互動，並透過敏銳的觀察能力收集語文與非語文訊息，以確保研究品質與結果的可靠性。
(三)專家問卷法
專家問卷法透過設計結構化問卷，系統性地蒐集金融界與產業界專家對「建築能效制度整合綠色金融」相關議題的看法，並對各影響因素進行量化評估，以作為政策調整與金融產品設計的參考依據。此方法具有匿名性、反覆循環問卷、專家小組提供意見等特性，能夠避免群體互動產生的干擾，維持研究結果的公信力。
問卷擬定以下三個主要問題方向：1優惠融資條件享有判準之設計；2階段性激勵機制之設計；3綠色金融商品從企業延伸至消費者之可能性。問卷內容與題項將根據後續專家訪談及初步測試結果進一步修訂與完善。藉由收集專家對上述問題的評價與建議，期望能為後續研究建立一個合理且具參考價值的評估架構，以輔助政策制定。
(四)專家座談法
座談會將針對專家問卷的結果與初步結論進行討論，並共同研擬提升金融業（尤其是銀行業）給予符合「綠建築標章」與「建築能效標示」建築物優惠融資條件的政策建議。此外，座談會也期望能進一步討論優惠融資條件如何延伸至綠色貸款等實際綠色金融商品的構建，以促使市場與政策的有效對接。
為進一步了解各方需求並補充相關資料，計劃邀請以下幾個領域的專家參與座談會，具體安排如下：1金融銀行端座談會：邀請銀行業者、金融監管機關代表，探討綠色融資商品設計與風險管控機制；2建設公司座談會：邀請建築開發業者及相關產業代表，了解綠建築標章申請與建築能效提升的實務挑戰；3學者專家座談會：邀請學術界專家及跨領域學者代表，探討綠色金融與永續建築標章整合之政策建議修訂與優化方向。
三、重要發現
本研究透過多面向方法整合，顯示臺灣建築能效制度與綠色金融的結合已建立初步基礎，並具發展潛力，惟需持續優化認知與執行層面以強化整體效能。綠建築標章因長期政策累積而獲得較高認同與應用，建築能效標示則處於推廣初期階段，兩者發展差異反映出市場參與的階段性特徵。建設公司重視成本效益與政策誘因，金融機構注重風險控管與資料透明，學者專家則強調跨領域協調，三方觀點互補有助於形塑平衡的整合策略。效期管理宜採彈性認定方式，輔以既有建築再融資評估，以擴大淨零涵蓋範圍；既有建築改造融資需求值得關注，可透過集體機制與重點補助推進轉型；國際經驗借鑑強調標準化評估與誘因設計的結合，臺灣可參考針對住宅與中小建商制定包容方案。整體而言，統一標章標準、建置數位平台、強化財稅與融資誘因、推動跨部會協作及提升市場認知，將有助於促進永續建築與綠色金融的協同發展，逐步實現淨零建築願景。
", "英文摘要": "I.Research Background
As governments around the world strive to achieve net-zero carbon emissions, green building labeling and building energy efficiency certification policies have become key strategies for reducing carbon emissions in the construction sector. These policies are grounded in the broader framework of sustainable development and climate change mitigation. Buildings are not only major sources of energy consumption but also significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, improving building energy efficiency and promoting green building development are essential strategies for achieving net-zero emission goals.
Financial institutions play a crucial role in facilitating financing for green and energy-efficient buildings. By offering preferential lending conditions, they can encourage developers and enterprises to adopt environmentally responsible building practices. Many countries have introduced policy instruments—such as tax incentives and risk-sharing mechanisms—to promote the participation of financial institutions in this process. This study therefore aims to explore how collaboration between public policies and financial institutions can promote the development of green and energy-efficient buildings, while enhancing the willingness of banks and financial actors to finance such projects.
II.Research Methods and Process
(1)Literature Review
This study investigates how domestic and international financial institutions provide preferential financing conditions for buildings certified with Green Building Labels and Building Energy Efficiency Labels. Comparative analysis is conducted on successful cases and policy implementations across countries.
The literature review covers: (1) the development context and theoretical foundation of green finance policies; (2) building energy performance assessment systems and green building certification mechanisms; and (3) the design and preferential conditions of green financing products offered by financial institutions.
This analysis clarifies the historical evolution, theoretical underpinnings, and practical gaps in both academia and policy practice—forming a solid foundation for subsequent expert interviews and survey design.
(2)In-depth Interview
The expert interviews aim to identify challenges encountered in integrating building energy performance systems with green finance mechanisms, and to examine the suitability of policy design, practical operations of financial institutions, and responses from developers, real estate agents, and buyers.
A semi-structured interview format is adopted to enable two-way interaction in a natural setting. Both verbal and non-verbal information are collected
to ensure the reliability and validity of the research results.
(3)Expert Questionnaire Method
A structured expert questionnaire is used to systematically collect opinions from professionals in finance and the construction industry regarding issues related to the integration of building energy performance systems with green finance. The method quantitatively evaluates influencing factors and serves as a reference for future policy adjustments and green product design.
The questionnaire design follows the characteristics of anonymity, iterative feedback, and expert consensus—avoiding bias caused by group
dynamics and enhancing research credibility.
Preliminary questionnaire themes include: (1) design of eligibility criteria for preferential financing, (2) formulation of phased incentive mechanisms, and (3) potential expansion of green finance products from corporate to consumer markets. The questionnaire will be refined based on pilot testing and expert feedback to establish a robust evaluative framework for policy recommendation.
(4)Expert Panel Discussion Method
The panel discussions will focus on the results and preliminary conclusions of expert questionnaires and jointly develop policy recommendations for enhancing the financial industry's (especially the banking sector's) provision of preferential financing conditions for buildings that meet "green building certification" and "building energy efficiency labels." Additionally, the panel discussions are expected to further discuss how preferential financing conditions can be extended to the construction of actual green financial products such as green loans, promoting effective alignment between market and policy.
To further understand the needs of all parties and supplement relevant data, the plan proposes inviting experts from the following fields to participate in panel discussions, with specific arrangements as follows: (1) Financial banking sector panel discussion: inviting banking industry representatives and financial regulatory agency representatives to explore green financing product design and risk management mechanisms; (2) Construction company panel discussion: inviting building developers, architects, and related industry representatives to understand practical challenges in green building certification applications and building energy efficiency improvements; (3) Academic Expert Panel: Invite academic and cross-disciplinary experts to discuss revisions and optimization directions for policy recommendations regarding the integration of green finance and sustainable building certification.
III.Key Findings
Through the integration of multiple approaches, this study indicates that the integration of building energy efficiency systems and green finance in Taiwan has established a preliminary foundation and has development potential, but requires continued improvement in awareness and implementation to strengthen overall effectiveness. The Green Building Label has achieved higher recognition and application due to long-term policy accumulation, while the Building Energy Efficiency Label is still in the early promotional stage; this difference reflects phase-related characteristics of market participation. Developers emphasize cost-effectiveness and policy incentives, financial institutions focus on risk control and data transparency, and academic experts stress cross-disciplinary coordination; these three perspectives are complementary and help shape a balanced integration strategy. The management of validity periods (or certification validity) should adopt a flexible recognition approach and be supplemented by refinancing assessments for existing buildings to expand net-zero coverage; financing demands for retrofitting existing buildings merit attention and can be advanced through collective mechanisms and targeted subsidies. International experiences emphasize the combination of standardized assessment and incentive design; Taiwan may consider inclusive measures targeted at residential projects and small-to-medium developers. Overall, unifying labeling standards, building digital platforms, strengthening fiscal and financing incentives, promoting inter-ministerial collaboration, and enhancing market awareness will help foster the synergistic development of sustainable buildings and green finance and gradually realize the vision of net-zero buildings.
", "相關檔案": "1141029建築能效制度整合綠色金融之研究 期末報告書 v4(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339789/116ef0c8-4d47-47a7-adb8-bba0aaaa5506.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339788", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:56:00 GMT", "title": "建築資源零廢棄技術指引研訂之研究", "計畫主持人": "朱慶倫", "協同主持人": "黃榮堯", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "資源零廢棄、循環建築、可逆式設計", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
隨著氣候變遷與資源枯竭問題日益嚴峻，建築產業作為高資源耗用與大量廢棄物產出的領域，其轉型壓力與永續挑戰日益迫切。根據聯合國環境規劃署資料顯示，建築與拆除廢棄物約佔全球總廢棄物量三至四成。對此，我國於「2050淨零排放策略總說明」中明定「資源零廢棄」為十二項關鍵戰略之一，顯示建築資源循環管理已成為我國永續發展的重要政策任務。
本研究係由內政部建築研究所主導，延續110至112年已完成之「建築規劃設計導入循環經濟發展理念之研究」、「建築循環設計構件材料循環度之評估研究」及「可逆式建築設計與應用之初步探討研究」等成果，進一步整合建築生命週期四大階段（設計、施工、運營、拆除）之資源循環技術，研擬一套具系統性、操作性與本土適用性的「建築資源零廢棄技術指引」。
二、研究方法與過程
文獻探討與制度盤點：針對國內外與建築資源零廢棄相關之政策制度、技術指引、建材再利用規範及模組化設計準則等進行系統性文獻蒐集與比較分析，建立理論基礎，並分析國際推動策略之異同與可借鏡之處。
案例分析：收集具代表性之國內外建築資源零廢棄成功案例，分析其技術導入內容、材料使用策略、解構與回收流程、政策支援機制等，歸納實務執行重點與成效指標，作為技術指引撰寫與政策建議擬定之依據。
專家訪談與焦點座談法：邀請具備建築設計、結構工程、營建管理、建材科技與資源循環政策等領域之專家學者，針對技術可行性、現行法規限制與政策落地可能性進行深度訪談與焦點討論，提升研究內容之現場適配性與操作性。
系統化整合與策略規劃：綜整前述各階段成果，依據建築生命週期與資源流向邏輯，建構建築資源零廢棄技術指引草案，並進一步提出包含激勵措施、
法規建議、導入流程與推廣架構之分階段推動計畫。
三、重要發現
本研究以「建築資源零廢棄」為核心理念，整合建築生命週期各階段的資源循環策略，建立具系統性與操作性的《建築資源零廢棄技術指引（草案）》。研究成果顯示，建築資源零廢棄的推動須從「可回收設計」、「可逆式設計」、「模組化施工」、「延壽使用」與「解構拆除」等策略出發，並輔以建材履歷資訊透明化、再利用法規制度化及產業教育推廣等配套措施，以形成跨部門協作的循環推動機制
研究整合國內外制度與實務案例，包含日本上勝町零廢棄中心、英國 Brighton Waste House、荷蘭浮動辦公室、美國 Contra Costa 行政大樓與臺中花博荷蘭館等，歸納出可作為我國技術與政策發展參考的五大特徵：一是建築即材料銀行（Building as Material Bank）的設計思維；二是導入可分解與可逆式施工技術；三是模組化構件標準化；四是再生建材高值化利用；五是資訊化追蹤與驗證機制的建立
此外，研究透過專家座談及制度比對，明確指出現行營建事業廢棄物再利用管理辦法、建築物拆除施工規範及建築拆除施工指引等制度，已可作為零廢棄政策的基礎，惟尚須補強再生建材品質驗證與循環資訊管理系統。中程推動計畫進一步提出，藉由建立示範工程、媒合平台與教育訓練機制，逐步將建築資源零廢棄理念落實於公共工程與市場應用。
四、主要建議事項
建議一
完成「建築資源零廢棄技術指引」並持續深化「建築資源零廢棄技術指引」內容與推廣應用：立即可行建議
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
協辦機關： 財團法人台灣營建研究院
本研究所研擬之「建築資源零廢棄技術指引」已完成主要架構與技術內容，建議後續持續進行內容延伸與實務化作業，作為指引正式化之前置工作。且持續蒐整國內既有工程案例與再生建材應用資料，依不同建築型態補充技術示例，並依現行法規檢討其操作可行性與制度銜接性，以提升指引之適用性與參考價值。同時，同步辦理教育訓練與說明活動，協助建築師、營造業者及地方政府技術人員熟悉指引內容，強化產業界對建築資源零廢棄理念的理解與實務操作能力。藉由持續修訂、驗證與推廣，使本技術指引能從研究成果逐步轉化為可供業界遵循之實務依據，並成為後續政策推動與建築資源管理制度化的重要基礎。
建議二
擴大推動「建築資源零廢棄」技術試點與成本效益分析研究：中長期建議
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
協辦機關： 財團法人台灣營建研究院
為建立具代表性的技術與經濟可行性依據，建議未來擴大辦理建築資源零廢棄技術之試點與成本效益分析研究，選取不同建築類型導入技術指引中所列之措施，包括模組化施工、可回收構件設計、再生建材應用與解構施工法等，並評估實際施工可行性與經濟回收期。透過試點案例的系統性分析，可建立國內建築資源零廢棄成本效益資料庫，掌握各類建築採行循環技術後的成本差異、材料再利用比例，作為政策補助、技術規範修訂及後續驗證制度設計的重要依據。此舉除可深化研究成果外，亦能形成推動建築循環化轉型的長期支撐機制，提升技術成熟度與市場接受度，逐步落實建築資源零廢棄之政策願景。
", "英文摘要": "Topic
With the intensification of climate change and the depletion of natural resources, the construction industry—known for its high material consumption and large waste generation—faces increasing pressure to transition toward sustainability. According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), construction and demolition (C&D) waste accounts for 30–40% of total global solid waste. In response, Taiwan’s “2050 Net-Zero Emissions Pathway and Strategy” designates “Zero Waste of Resources” as one of its twelve key strategies, underscoring the importance of circular resource management in the built environment.
Commissioned by the National Building Research Institute (NBRI), this research continues the outcomes of prior projects from 2021–2023, including: the integration of circular economy principles in building design, assessment methods for material circularity in components, and preliminary studies on reversible architecture. The goal is to formulate a comprehensive and practical “Technical Guideline for Zero Waste of Building Resources,” applicable across the four main stages of the building lifecycle: design, construction, operation, and deconstruction.
Key achievements in the midterm phase include: (1) a comparative analysis of global regulatory frameworks and case studies, such as the EU’s Circular Economy Package, Japan’s Kamikatsu Zero Waste Center, the Floating Office Rotterdam, and the TRUE-certified Contra Costa County building in the U.S.; (2) the compilation of a recommended materials list based on Taiwan’s Green Mark system, Green Building Materials Label, and MOEA’s Recycled Product Registry; (3) the development of a preliminary matrix of zero-waste techniques and workflows corresponding to each lifecycle stage, validated through an expert roundtable discussion involving stakeholders from academia, industry, and government.
Findings suggest that achieving zero waste in construction requires coordinated strategies including “design for recyclability,” “modular and prefabricated construction,” “extended service life,” and “planned deconstruction.” These must be supported by transparent material documentation (e.g., material passports), enabling policy frameworks, and sector-specific capacity building. The draft guideline and mid-term roadmap serve as foundational tools to normalize material reuse and reduce life-cycle carbon emissions and waste outputs.
In the next phase, the study will refine the guideline content, develop training modules for industry practitioners, and propose pilot implementation projects along with incentive-based policy suggestions. Ultimately, the finalized technical guideline is expected to become a shared reference across sectors, driving Taiwan’s building industry toward a future of high efficiency, low environmental impact, and regenerative circularity.
Result
1.Completed data collection and analysis of successful cases domestically and internationally for zero-waste construction technology, building material recycling, and modular design.
2.Completed the draft "Zero-Waste Construction Technology Guidelines."
3.Proposed the draft "Zero-Waste Construction Promotion Plan" and policy recommendations.
", "相關檔案": "建築資源零廢棄技術指引研訂之研究-資料蒐集分析報告v4(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339788/e345eb56-d52b-43c5-a461-11882f002886.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339786", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:38:00 GMT", "title": "綠建築基地保水設施維護管理指引研訂之研究", "計畫主持人": "欒中丕", "協同主持人": "廖朝軒", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "綠建築、基地保水、維護管理、培訓制度", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "由於都市的持續發展，導致地表不透水面積增加，使得保水與入滲能力下降，進而造成都市水循環失衡、地表逕流量增加、都市熱島效應加劇及生態系統退化等多重環境問題。為改善前述環境的衝擊，國內自1999年推動綠建築標章制度，並將「基地保水指標」列為核心評估項目之一，藉由提升建築基地涵養雨水與促進入滲的能力，達到調節氣候、涵養水源及促進生態永續的目標。2005年內政部國土管理署進一步制定《建築基地保水設計技術規範》，提供設計與施工的技術依據，並針對名詞定義、基地保水指標評估基準、八項保水設施項目、實例計算方式與12項設計注意事項進行補充，協助實務設計人員更有效地應用技術規範。《綠建築評估手冊基本型》亦自2001年起多次精進修編，補充設施設計原則與示意圖，增進規劃設計與審查實務的準確性與一致性。
惟過往的研究調查中發現，多數基地保水設施未能依據基地的實際地文與水文條件進行適切規劃與設計，並缺乏建置後的維護管理指引與制度，導致即使設施在設計階段符合指標計算需求，而其實際運作效益卻不如預期。反觀目前國際發展的趨勢，許多國家已針對基地保水相關設施（如：低衝擊開發設施(Low Impact Development, LID)、綠色基礎設施(Green Infrastructure, GI)…等）建立涵蓋規劃、設計、施工至維護管理各階段的完整技術手冊與操作指引；然而，國內則在此方面整體技術指引與管理架構尚未臻於完善。內政部建築研究所於2024年執行「綠建築基地保水設施技術規劃設計指引之應用與推廣」計畫，系統性整理各類基地保水設施之規劃原則與設計流程，並完成規劃設計指引草案，提供設計與審查單位作為專業依據。然而目前成果主要聚焦於基地保水設施建置前的階段，對於建置後的運維機制尚未建立。為確保設施得以長期穩定運行並發揮涵養雨水及貯集滲透之能力，本年度將聚焦於基地保水設施建置後的維護管理制度建構，研擬符合國內法規與在地環境條件之維護策略與操作準則，促進都市水資源治理及永續發展目標之實現。
二、研究方法及過程
本計畫主要規劃5項研究內容，其工作項目如下：
1.蒐集彙整國內外有關基地保水設施維護管理的相關措施、法令規範、維護管理問題、調查需求及解決策略。
2.彙整國內外基地保水專業人員培訓之相關課程與制度。
3.初擬基地保水設施培訓制度與課程內容之推動方針(草案)。
4.研擬綠建築基地保水設施維護管理指引(草案)。
5.辦理基地保水設施維護管理及專業人員培訓專家諮詢座談會2場次。
本研究計畫旨在研擬基地保水設施維護管理機制之初步架構，作為未來建構完整制度之參考基礎，俾利基地保水設施於建置後維持穩定運作，並有效發揮其應有功能。研究初期將針對現行國內外基地保水相關的維護管理機制與培訓制度進行整合討論與評估，探討目前推動層面所面臨之問題與需求，並諮詢相關領域專家學者研議對策，進而初步建構基地保水設施維護管理專業人員之培訓制度架構與課程內容，以強化維護管理方法與相關技術內容。同時編制基地保水設施維護管理指引(草案)，提供管理單位、使用者及一般民眾作為參考，以提升基地保水設施的規劃設計與維護管理品質，確保其永續運行與效能發揮。
三、重要發現
1.完成國內外基地保水設施維護管理制度與法規之蒐整與分析
本計畫完成國內基地保水設施相關政策、法令、技術規範及管理指引之彙整，並比較不同主管機關所訂定之技術要求與檢核標準，發現現行制度雖已涵蓋設計階段之規範要求，但在設施建置後的維護管理責任劃分、操作紀錄保存與定期查核機制方面仍屬不足。相比國外，本計畫彙整美國、日本、澳洲及歐盟等國家之雨水管理制度及維管手冊，其維護管理制度較具有明確的責任要求、巡檢表格及教育訓練制度之特性，將可作為後續我國制度精進之參考依據。
2.完成國內基地保水設施現行維護管理現況與問題初步分析
本研究完成調查需求之問卷表格制訂，並完成初步現地調查與訪談，針對公寓大廈、社會住宅及一般建築物之保水設施進行調查，結果顯示多數設施雖具備基本功能，但因缺乏例行維護及專責管理人員，常見問題包括：滲透層堵塞、集水口沉積、維護紀錄缺乏等。維管責任多由物業管理公司或清潔廠商兼任，缺乏專業知識與技術指引，易導致設施效能逐年衰減。因此，維護管理及教育訓練制度之建立實屬必要。
3.完成基地保水設施專業培訓課程與制度推動方針之研擬
本研究初步建立基地保水設施專業培訓制度，分三階段：初期以建立課程架構與試行制度為主，由政府與專業學協會合作開辦短期課程並頒發結訓證明；中期推動課程標準化與師資認證，依設計、施工及維運需求開設多層次模組課程，並研議法令配套，規範專業人員須具訓練資格始得執業；長期則建置數位學習與知識管理平台，整合教材、案例與監測資料，並與國際機構合作建立互認機制，以確保制度持續更新與國際接軌。課程區分基礎（3小時）與進階（3.5小時）兩級，採模組化修課與分級認證方式，學員完成各模組可獲結訓證書，完成一路徑則授予「基礎」或「進階」培訓證書，作為制度建構之初步方針。
4.完成基地保水設施規劃設計暨維護管理指引（草案）之研擬
本研究完成基地保水設施規劃設計暨維護管理指引（草案）之編擬，明確界定設施所有權人、管理單位與施工廠商之責任分工，建立管理與執行間之權責架構。針對維護作業流程與紀錄保存方式提出具體規範，訂定檢查週期、操作步驟及異常回報機制，並彙整常見缺失與成因，提出改善原則與操作建議，供管理人員現地維運時依循。指引同時分析不同角色於維護管理過程中所需之專業知識與技能，作為後續教育訓練設計之依據。此草案可作為中央及地方主管機關、建築師與管理單位推動實務操作與政策研擬之參考，並為未來制度化推廣及專業培訓體系建立奠定基礎。
四、主要建議事項
建議一
試辦綠建築基地保水設施規劃設計及維護管理課程：短期可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心、台灣綠色生態設施協會及相關專業學協會
建議先行試辦「綠建築基地保水設施規劃設計及維護管理課程」，以作為後續制度化推廣之前導階段。課程內容可涵蓋基地保水設施之設計原理、施工重點、維護管理流程及法規要求，並納入案例觀摩與操作演練，以提升學員之實務應用能力。試辦課程應同時檢驗教材完整性、授課時數、師資資格及學員反饋，以作為建立正式培訓與認證制度的依據。透過試行機制，可逐步修正課程架構與授課內容，確認制度運作的可行性與實效，並為後續全國推廣奠定基礎。
建議二
推動基地保水設施維護管理制度化與法制配套：中期可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署、地方建管機關
建議未來研議將基地保水設施之維護管理要求與實務人員的技術條件，納入各地方政府的建築自治條例或相關規則，明確訂定建築物使用後的定期檢查、維護紀錄保存等機制；對於具一定規模之案件，並可要求維運人員須完成指定培訓並取得證書後方得執行相關工作。此舉有助於強化保水設施的法定維護責任與專業執行標準。
建議三
建立長期教育平台與國際合作機制：長期可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心、學協會與國際專業認證組織
建議建置基地保水設施維護管理數位學習平台，整合教材、案例資料庫及修課紀錄，形成滾動更新的知識體系，並推動與國際組織合作之教育認證制度，建立課程互認與資格審查機制。此舉不僅可確保專業知識與國際接軌，亦能長期支援我國建築ESG推動及氣候調適政策目標。
", "英文摘要": "1.Purpose of the research
Continuous urban development has led to increased impervious surface areas, resulting in reduced water retention and infiltration capacities. Consequently, issues such as urban water cycle imbalance, increased surface runoff, intensified heat island effects, and ecosystem degradation have emerged. To mitigate these environmental impacts, Taiwan launched the Green Building Label system in 1999, designating the “On-site Rainwater conservation Index” as one of its core assessment items. This initiative aims to enhance the ability of building sites to retain and infiltrate rainwater, thereby contributing to climate regulation, groundwater recharge, and ecological sustainability.
In 2005, the National Land Management Agency of the Ministry of the Interior formulated the Technical Specifications for On-site Rainwater conservation Design, providing technical guidelines for design and construction. The document elaborates on terminology, evaluation criteria for the retention index, eight facility types, sample calculations, and twelve design considerations, thereby assisting practitioners in applying technical requirements more effectively. The Green Building Evaluation Manual (Basic Version) has also undergone several revisions since 2001, supplementing design principles and illustrations to improve planning, design, and review consistency.
However, past studies revealed that most rainwater conservation facilities were not appropriately planned or designed according to local topographic and hydrological conditions and lacked post-construction maintenance and management mechanisms. As a result, facilities that met design-phase performance requirements often failed to achieve expected operational effectiveness. In contrast, many countries have established comprehensive technical manuals and operational guidelines covering all stages—from planning, design, and construction to maintenance and management—for systems such as Low Impact Development (LID) and Green Infrastructure (GI). Yet, Taiwan still lacks a complete technical and management framework in this regard.
In 2024, the Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI) of the Ministry of the Interior implemented the project Application and Promotion of Technical Guidelines for On-site Rainwater conservation Facilities in Green Buildings, which systematically organized design principles and processes and completed a draft design guideline for reference by designers and reviewers. Nonetheless, current achievements focus mainly on pre-construction stages, with post-construction operation and maintenance mechanisms yet to be established. To ensure the long-term stability and effectiveness of rainwater conservation facilities, this year’s study centers on constructing a maintenance and management framework tailored to domestic regulations and local environmental conditions. The goal is to develop feasible maintenance strategies and operational standards that support urban water governance and sustainable development objectives.
2.Methodology and procedures
The following are the five primary research topics and associated tasks for this project:
Collect and analyze domestic and international measures, regulations, management issues, survey needs, and solutions related to the maintenance of on-site rainwater conservation facilities.
Compile training programs and systems for professional personnel in on-site rainwater conservation, both domestically and abroad.
Draft a preliminary framework for a training system and curriculum for rainwater conservation facilities.
Develop a draft Maintenance and Management Guideline for On-site Rainwater conservation Facilities in Green Buildings.
Organize two expert consultation workshops on maintenance management and professional training for on-site rainwater conservation facilities.
3.Major findings
This study systematically reviewed domestic and international systems related to the maintenance and management of on-site rainwater conservation facilities. The analysis revealed that while Taiwan’s current regulations provide comprehensive technical requirements at the design stage, there remain clear deficiencies in post-construction maintenance responsibilities, documentation procedures, and inspection mechanisms. In comparison, systems implemented in countries such as the United States, Japan, Australia, and those within the European Union demonstrate well-defined accountability frameworks, standardized inspection procedures, and comprehensive professional training programs. These international practices provide valuable insights for strengthening Taiwan’s future maintenance and management framework.
Field investigations and questionnaire surveys were conducted to assess current maintenance conditions in condominiums, social housing, and general buildings. The results showed that although most facilities still function as intended, the absence of routine inspections and qualified management personnel often leads to issues such as clogged infiltration layers, sediment accumulation, uncleansed storage tanks, and incomplete maintenance records. The majority of maintenance work is performed by property management or cleaning companies that lack adequate technical training, resulting in the gradual decline of facility performance. Therefore, establishing a formal maintenance management mechanism and a professional training system is urgently required to ensure long-term functionality.
To address these challenges, the study proposed a three-stage training and certification framework for professionals responsible for rainwater conservation facilities. The short-term phase focuses on developing course structures and pilot programs through collaboration between government agencies and professional associations. The mid-term phase emphasizes the standardization of course content, instructor accreditation, and the introduction of legal requirements mandating certified training for practitioners. The long-term phase envisions the establishment of a digital learning and knowledge management platform that integrates training materials, case studies, and monitoring data while fostering international cooperation and mutual recognition of qualifications.
Finally, the study drafted the Maintenance and Management Guideline for On-site Rainwater conservation Facilities in Green Buildings, which defines the responsibilities of owners, management units, and contractors, and specifies detailed maintenance procedures, inspection frequencies, and recordkeeping requirements. The guideline also compiles common deficiencies with corresponding corrective measures and outlines the professional knowledge and skills required for various management roles. This draft serves as a key reference for authorities, designers, and property managers, providing a foundation for future institutionalization and the establishment of a national professional training and certification system.
4.Major recommendation items
Through this research, following two recommendations are made for short- and middle- to long- term period:
Recommendation 1
Pilot training courses on on-site rainwater conservation facility planning, design, and maintenance management: short-term
Organizer: Architecture and Building Research Institute, MOI
CO-organizer: Taiwan Architecture & Building Center, Taiwan Green Infrastructure Association, and related professional societies
It is recommended to pilot short-term training courses covering design principles, construction highlights, maintenance processes, and legal requirements, incorporating case studies and hands-on exercises. The pilot program should also evaluate teaching materials, course duration, instructor qualifications, and participant feedback to serve as a foundation for formalized training and certification systems.
Recommendation 2
Institutionalization and legal integration of maintenance and management systems: middle-term
Organizer: Architecture and Building Research Institute, MOI
CO-organizer: National Land Management Agency, MOI; Local Building Authorities
It is recommended that future discussions consider incorporating the maintenance requirements and technical qualifications for personnel responsible for rainwater retention facilities into municipal building ordinances or related regulations. Clear mechanisms for periodic inspections and maintenance record keeping after building occupancy should be established. For projects exceeding a certain scale, personnel responsible for operation and maintenance may also be required to complete designated training and obtain certification before undertaking such work. These measures would strengthen the legal responsibility and professional standards for maintaining rainwater retention facilities.
Recommendation 3
Development of a continuous education platform and international collaboration mechanism: long-term
Organizer: Architecture and Building Research Institute, MOI
CO-organizer: Taiwan Architecture & Building Center, academic and professional associations, and international certification organizations
It is recommended to establish a digital learning platform integrating educational materials, case databases, and training records to create a continuously updated knowledge system. Collaboration with international organizations should be promoted to implement education and certification reciprocity mechanisms, ensuring global alignment while supporting national ESG initiatives and climate adaptation policies.
", "相關檔案": "綠建築基地保水設施維護管理指引研訂之研究-成果報告_251231(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339786/48a5beac-e489-4c50-b47c-92651402f9e7.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339785", "ModifyDate": "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 07:39:00 GMT", "title": "生態綠建材評定架構及基準之研究", "計畫主持人": "羅時麒", "協同主持人": "李訓谷", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "生態綠建材、天然材料、淨零排放、全生命週期", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
臺灣現有綠建材標章制度雖已行之有年，但生態綠建材申請評定數量較低，目前僅有天然木竹材料、天然石材等申請項目，且生態綠建材現有定義為低人工處理及無匱乏危機之建材，相關定義使生態綠建材評定範圍的擴充造成限制，本研究之目的即是希望廣泛蒐集國內外基準及文獻，分析可納入生態綠建材評估之建材種類，再依據建材種類及特性，分別訂定適宜的定義與基準。
此外，因應全球氣候變遷，建築部門的碳排放已成為關注焦點。據統計，建築產業約占全球碳排放量的39%，其中建材生產過程的蘊含碳排放占比更高達11%。台灣作為全球供應鏈的重要成員，已承諾2050年達到淨零排放目標，建築部門的減碳轉型刻不容緩，綠建材標章目前尚未針對低碳進行評估，考量綠建材既有四大分類：生態、健康、再生、高性能，低碳納入生態綠建材評定較為可行，本研究將研訂生態低碳建材的評定基準，透過發產生態低碳綠建材，不僅能有效減少建築物的碳足跡，更能帶動產業轉型升級，也為實現2025淨零排放目標貢獻一份心力。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究探討現有的生態綠建材評定架構及基準，並嘗試建立一個更完善的受理評定架構。研究過程中也會關注各國生態綠建材定義與標準的差異性，以及目前評定架構採用的主要評估指標，含評定過程中可能面臨的挑戰與限制。本研究以文獻回顧探討臺灣本土環境及在地脈絡，並以專家訪談法作系統性的補充，協助研究團隊從實務角度檢視文獻內容，再以多準則決策分析結合生命週期評估之研究方法進行研析，在研究中，團隊將多準則決策分析法視為整體架構設計的方法論指導，而生命週期評估則作為環境面向量化評估的主要工具。這種整合性方法能夠確保生態綠建材評估不僅關注環境影響，也兼顧經濟可行性和社會責任，符合永續發展的核心理念。並於研究最終階段，選取市場上具有生態低碳潛力的既有建材，應用於所提出的評估框架中進行實證研究。透過對不同類型建材進行系統性評估，檢視生態綠建材架構在應對多元建材時的適應性，依據實際應用結果進行必要的調整與優化。期待依此研究成果建構更完整適用於臺灣的生態綠建材評定架構。
三、重要發現
1.本研究發現聯合國自1972年起逐步建構綠色建材發展框架，歷經五個階段演進，目前已進入循環創新階段，強調建材減碳與循環利用。台灣生態綠建材定義需與國際趨勢接軌，歐盟、香港、新加坡等地標章均要求生命週期碳足跡量化（A1-A3階段）及循環性評估。台灣生態綠建材應在保持「取之於自然、用之於自然」本土特色的同時，納入科學化碳排放評估與循環經濟指標，建立既符合國際規範又適合台灣產業結構的評定系統。
2.本研究透過國際標章比較分析與產業實務調查，提出生態綠建材評定架構之系統性修正方案。在定義修正方面，將原料範圍擴大為「生生不息或無匱乏危機」之天然材料，並依循生命週期時序邏輯，明確區分原料、製造、使用與廢棄四階段之特性要求，使其符合ISO 14040系列標準架構。評定基準修正上，木竹建材與天然石材均新增產品碳足跡評估報告(A1-A3階段)及製造廢料回收計畫等選擇性指標，與歐盟Ecolabel、香港G-pass等國際標章接軌。
3.本研究提出「生態綠建材標章推廣策略(草案)」包括：成立輔導單位提供碳盤查技術支援，協助中小企業跨越技術門檻；連結政府採購優先、綠色金融優惠與容積獎勵等市場機制，創造明確經濟誘因；建立標竿示範計畫帶動產業跟進；強化消費者教育與數位行銷，提升市場需求。同時特別關注社會公平議題，建議參考國際經驗提供弱勢群體補助措施，確保環境永續、產業轉型與社會公平三者平衡發展，擴大生態綠建材標章之產業效益。
四、主要建議事項
本研究計畫藉由蒐集國外生態綠建材相關標章之受理範圍與評定基準，深入瞭解國內外生態綠建材產業相關產業發展現況，研擬綠建材產業因應對策，並且針對標章制度導入節能減碳資訊揭露進行策略研析。為擴大本研究產出後續實質成果，提出下列建議：
建議一：
鼓勵法人機構與建材相關協會籌組綠建材輔導團，輔導標竿生態綠建材標章企業執行生態綠建材標章示範計畫：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：綠建材標章評定機構、台灣綠建材産業發展協會、社團法人台灣永續綠營建聯盟、中華民國建築材料商業同業公會全國聯合會、台灣省建築
材料商業同業公會全國聯合會
建議由內政部建築研究所為指導單位，結合財團法人台灣建築中心、台灣綠建材產業發展協會、台灣永續綠營建聯盟及相關建材公協會，成立「生態綠建材輔導團」。執行方式包括：(1)選定木竹材、石材各1-2家產業龍頭進行「從原料到產品」完整追溯試點；(2)提供碳盤查技術輔導、永續認證文件取得協助及循環回收計畫建立等一站式服務；(3)建立成功案例並辦理產業觀摩會，透過標竿企業示範效應，形成同業跟進機制，降低中小企業申請疑慮，建立可複製推廣模式，逐步擴大生態綠建材標章市場規模，並引導建材廠商與國家淨零排放政策及國際永續發展目標逐步接軌，並降低產業衝擊。
建議二：
建立世界各國合法認可之國際礦場或獲得永續礦場之資料庫，以解除國內石材業者申請生態綠建材評定基準文件準備之瓶頸：中長期可行建議
主辦機關：財團法人石材暨資源產業研究發展中心
協辦機關：台灣區石礦製品工業同業公會、台北市石材商業同業公會、綠建材標章評定機構、台灣綠建材産業發展協會、中華民國建築材料商業同業公
會全國聯合會
目前國內石材業者申請生態綠建材標章時，面臨最大的困難在於需要提供進口石材來源礦場的合法營運證明與環境管理文件，然而各國礦業管理制度差異極大，文件格式、語言、認證標準皆不相同，業者往往曠日費時透過國外供應商逐一取得各類證明文件，且經常因為文件不齊全、翻譯公證費用高昂、或不了解評定機構的具體要求而反覆補件，嚴重影響申請進度與意願，甚至部分業者因為文件準備困難而放棄申請，不利於推動石材產業的永續發展目標。建立一個整合世界各國合法認可礦場與永續礦場資訊的資料庫，不僅能提供業者一個便捷的查詢管道，更能透過標準化的文件格式與審查機制，大幅降低個別業者的文件準備成本與時間，同時也有助於綠建材評定機構建立更有效率的審查流程，此外這個資料庫的建立也展現台灣在推動永續建材供應鏈管理的積極態度，可提升國內石材產業在國際市場的競爭力與形象，並協助政府掌握進口石材的環境合規性，確保生態綠建材標章的公信力，因此由具有產業專業背景的石材暨資源產業研究發展中心主導，結合相關公會與評定機構的實務經驗，共同建置這個資料庫，是解決當前申請瓶頸最直接且可行的方案。
", "英文摘要": "I.Research Background
Taiwan's existing green building certification scheme has been in operation for many years, yet the number of applications for ecological green building materials remains low. Currently, only natural timber and bamboo materials, natural stone materials, and similar items are submitted for assessment. Furthermore, the current definition of ecological green building materials is restricted to those requiring minimal artificial processing and posing no risk of depletion. This definition constrains the expansion of the assessment scope for ecological green building materials. The objective of this study is to extensively collect domestic and international standards and literature, analyse the types of building materials that can be included in ecological green building material assessments, and then establish appropriate definitions and standards based on the types and characteristics of the materials.
Furthermore, in response to global climate change, carbon emissions from the construction sector have become a focal point. Statistics indicate that the construction industry accounts for approximately 39% of global carbon emissions, with embodied carbon emissions from building material production contributing as much as 11%. As a key member of the global supply chain, Taiwan has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, making the carbon reduction transformation of the construction sector imperative. The Green Building Materials Label currently does not evaluate low-carbon attributes. Considering the existing four categories of green building materials—ecological, health-related, recycled, and high-performance—incorporating low-carbon criteria into ecological green building material assessments is more feasible. This study will develop assessment criteria for ecological low-carbon building materials. By promoting the production of ecological low-carbon green building materials, we can not only effectively reduce the carbon footprint of buildings but also drive industrial transformation and upgrading, thereby contributing to the achievement of the 2025 net-zero emissions target.
II.Research Methods and Process
This study examines existing ecological green building material assessment frameworks and criteria, and endeavours to establish a more comprehensive evaluation system. The research process also addresses variations in definitions and standards for ecological green building materials across different countries, alongside the primary assessment indicators employed in current frameworks, including potential challenges and limitations encountered during the evaluation process. The study employs a literature review to examine Taiwan's local environmental context and regional circumstances, supplemented systematically through expert interviews. This approach assists the research team in critically evaluating the literature from a practical perspective. Analysis is then conducted using a methodology combining multi-criteria decision analysis with life cycle assessment. Within the study, the team regarded MCDM as the methodological guide for the overall framework design, while LCA served as the primary tool for quantifying environmental aspects. This integrated approach ensures that ecological green building materials assessment addresses not only environmental impacts but also economic viability and social responsibility, aligning with the core principles of sustainable development. In the final research phase, existing building materials with ecological and low-carbon potential were selected from the market and applied within the proposed assessment framework for empirical testing. Through systematic evaluation of diverse material types, the framework's adaptability to varied building materials was examined, with necessary adjustments and optimisations made based on practical application outcomes. It is anticipated that these research findings will contribute to establishing a more comprehensive ecological green building materials assessment framework tailored to Taiwan's context.
III.Important Findings of this Research Project
1.This study finds that since 1972, the United Nations has gradually built a framework for the development of green building materials, evolving through five stages and now entering the circular innovation stage, which emphasizes carbon reduction and material circularity. Taiwan’s definition of Eco-Label Green Building Materials should align with international trends. Certification schemes in the European Union, Hong Kong, and Singapore all require quantified life cycle carbon footprint assessments (A1–A3 stages) and circularity evaluations. Taiwan’s Eco-Label Green Building Materials should retain its local philosophy of “derived from nature, returned to nature” while incorporating scientific carbon emission assessments and circular economy indicators to establish an evaluation system that both complies with international standards and suits Taiwan’s industrial structure.
2.Through comparative analysis of international eco-labels and industrial practice surveys, this study proposes a systematic revision framework for the evaluation of Eco-Label Green Building Materials. In terms of definition, the scope of raw materials is expanded to include natural materials that are renewable or non-depletable, and the four life cycle stages—raw material, manufacturing, use, and disposal—are clearly defined in accordance with the ISO 14040 series standards.Regarding evaluation criteria, both timber/bamboo materials and natural stone now include optional indicators such as the product carbon footprint assessment report (A1–A3 stages) and manufacturing waste recycling plans, aligning with international labels such as the EU Ecolabel and Hong Kong’s G-pass.
3.This study proposes a Draft Strategy for Promoting the Eco-Label Green Building Materials Program, which includes establishing support units to provide carbon inventory technical assistance, helping small and medium-sized enterprises overcome technological barriers; linking the label with government green procurement priority, green finance incentives, and floor area ratio bonuses to create clear economic incentives; launching benchmark demonstration projects to encourage industry participation; and strengthening consumer education and digital marketing to increase market demand. The strategy also pays particular attention to social equity, recommending subsidy measures for disadvantaged groups based on international experiences to ensure a balanced development of environmental sustainability, industrial transformation, and social fairness, thereby expanding the overall industrial benefits of Taiwan’s Eco-Label Green Building Materials program.
IV.Main Recommendations
This study collected information on the scope and evaluation criteria of international eco-labels for green building materials to gain a deeper understanding of the development status of the domestic and international eco-green building materials industries. It also formulated corresponding strategies for the green building materials sector and conducted strategic analyses on the integration of energy-saving and carbon-reduction information disclosure into the labeling system. To expand the tangible outcomes of this study, the following recommendations are proposed:
1.Encourage legal entities and building material-related associations to organize Green Building Material Advisory Teams to assist leading enterprises with the Eco-Label Green Building Material Demonstration Projects: Immediate Action Recommendation
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Co-organizing Agencies: Eco-Label Green Building Material Evaluation Bodies, Taiwan Green Building Material Council, Taiwan Sustainable Green Construction Union , National Chamber of Commerce of Building Material Taiwan, Taiwan Provincial Federation of Building Materials Commerce
It is recommended that the Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior, serve as the supervising authority and collaborate
with the Taiwan
Architecture & Building Center, Taiwan Green Building Material Council, Taiwan Sustainable Green Construction Union, and relevant construction material associations to establish an Eco-Green Building Material Advisory Team.
Implementation measures include:
(1)Selecting one to two leading enterprises each from the timber/bamboo and stone industries to carry out a complete “from raw material to product”
traceability pilot project;
(2)Providing one-stop services such as carbon inventory technical guidance, assistance in obtaining sustainability certification documentation, and
establishing circular recycling plans;
(3)Developing successful case studies and organizing industry observation meetings. Through the demonstration effect of benchmark enterprises, a follow-up mechanism among peers can be formed to reduce application concerns for small and medium-sized enterprises, establish a replicable and scalable promotion model, gradually expand the market scale of the Eco-Label Green Building Material program, and guide building material manufacturers to align progressively with national net-zero emission policies and international sustainable development goals, thereby mitigating industrial impacts.
2.Establishment of a Database of Internationally Recognised Legal Quarries or Sustainably Certified Quarries Worldwide to Address Documentation Bottlenecks for Domestic Stone Material Manufacturers in Applying for Ecological Green Building Material Evaluation Standards: Medium-term Action Recommendation
Lead Agency: Stone and Resource Industry Research and Development Centre
Collaborating Agencis: Taiwan Stone and Mineral Products Industrial Association, Taipei Stone Commercial Association, Green Building Material Certification Evaluation Organisations, Taiwan Green Building Materials Industry Development Association, National Federation of Building Materials Commercial Associations of the Republic of China
Currently, domestic stone material manufacturers encounter considerable difficulties when applying for ecological green building material certification, primarily due to the requirement to provide legal operation certificates and environmental management documentation from the quarries of origin for imported stone materials. However, given the substantial variations in quarrying management systems across different countries, including disparities in document formats, languages, and certification standards, manufacturers typically expend protracted periods obtaining various certification documents through foreign suppliers on a case-by-case basis. Furthermore, the application process is frequently impeded by incomplete documentation, prohibitively high translation and notarisation costs, or insufficient understanding of the specific requirements stipulated by evaluation organisations, resulting in repeated supplementary submissions that significantly affect application progress and willingness to participate. Indeed, certain manufacturers have abandoned their applications altogether owing to documentation preparation difficulties, which undermines efforts to advance sustainable development objectives within the stone material industry. The establishment of a comprehensive database integrating information on legally recognised and sustainably operated quarries worldwide would not only provide manufacturers with a convenient enquiry channel but would also substantially reduce the documentation preparation costs and time required by individual manufacturers through standardised document formats and review mechanisms, whilst simultaneously facilitating more efficient review processes for green building material evaluation organisations. Moreover, the establishment of this database would demonstrate Taiwan's proactive approach towards promoting sustainable building material supply chain management, thereby enhancing the competitiveness and international standing of the domestic stone material industry, and assisting governmental authorities in monitoring the environmental compliance of imported stone materials, thus ensuring the credibility of ecological green building material certification. Consequently, the construction of this database, spearheaded by the Stone and Resource Industry Research and Development Centre, which possesses specialised industrial expertise, in collaboration with relevant trade associations and evaluation organisations drawing upon their practical experience, represents the most direct and feasible solution to addressing the current application bottleneck.
", "相關檔案": "114年建研所資料蒐集分析報告_生態綠建材評定架構及基準之研究-1141219修-送印二版(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339785/5d82a7f8-fbbe-4040-a3af-9ceef50877df.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339758", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:01:00 GMT", "title": "循環建築設計整合標準化及數位化評估之研究", "計畫主持人": "黃正翰", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "循環經濟、循環建築、循環度評估、循環建築評估、減碳", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
隨著全球氣候變遷日益嚴重，各國政府已將其視為首要議題。建築產業作為溫室氣體排放的重要來源，其施工及使用階段對環境影響深遠。為達成 2050 年淨零碳排放目標，台灣營建產業亟需轉型 。鑑於過往循環建築評估多面臨計算繁複與資料不一致的挑戰，本研究旨在建立「循環建築暨減碳效益」之數位評估與導入方法，透過完善建築資訊模型（BIM）應用與標準化程序，提升評估效率與準確度，協助產業落實資源循環與減碳目標 。
二、研究方法與過程
本研究採用以下四種方法進行標準化與數位化評估模式的建立：
1.文獻與工具回顧
深入分析國內外關於 BIM 結合建築循環度評估（BCA）及低碳建築評估（LEBR）之最新進展，並參考國際標準（如 EN15978、ISO 21931）與既有評估工具（如 MCI、WBCI-LCA），確立整合評估之理論基礎 。
2.數位化評估流程建置
研擬基於 BIM 的標準化作業流程，開發「從 BIM 產出數量清單」、「擴增循環參數之標準化試算表」以及「網頁計算平台」之串接模式。確立了「手動上傳」與「自動連動」兩條數位評估路徑，解決現有 BIM 模型缺乏循環參數之痛點 。
3.案例試算與驗證
選取「桃園平鎮一號社會住宅」（RC結構）與「台北南港機廠社會住宅1區」（SRC結構結合既有建物再利用）進行實際試算，驗證數位工具之可行
性，並比較不同構造與設計策略之循環效益 。
4.專家諮詢與推廣
透過專家學者會議與推廣說明會，檢視評估參數（如降級回收係數、拆解特性）之合理性，並推廣數位化評估工具之應用 。
三、重要發現
以下為本研究之重要發現：
1.數位化評估效益顯著：
建立之 BIM 數位工具與標準化表單能有效解決傳統人工盤查的誤差與高門檻。透過自動化擷取建材資訊與參數連動，可快速計算並視覺化呈現建築循環
度（BCI）與減碳效益 。
2.結構系統為循環度關鍵：
案例分析顯示，結構體（樑、柱、樓板）佔建築總重量與碳排之絕大比例。南港社宅因採用 SRC 結構（鋼材回收性高）及既有結構再利用，其拆除階段循環度（CI-EOL 78.61%）與整體 BCI（40.72%）均顯著優於採用傳統 RC 結構的平鎮社宅（BCI 23.28%）。
3.既有建築再利用之減碳潛力：
南港全區評估證實，保留既有構件能大幅提升製造階段循環度（CI-CON 達 38.35%）並創造顯著的減碳比例（37.62%），證明「延壽與再利用」是比
「新建」更具效益的循環策略 。
4.非結構系統之模組化優勢：
室內輕隔間與鋁窗系統因具備高回收性與模組化特性，展現出極高的減碳潛能（如南港案室內系統減碳比例達 55.69%），是提升建築整體循環度的高潛
力項目 。
四、主要建議事項
本報告之主要建議事項歸結如下：
建議一
強化結構體循環設計與低碳材料導入 :立即可行建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人臺灣營建研究院
建議在結構設計中積極推廣預鑄（PC）模組化工法以提升可拆卸性；同時設定混凝土中替代性膠結材料（如爐石粉）與再生骨材之最低使用比例，從源頭降低水泥用量與蘊含碳排，這是提升 RC/SRC 結構循環效益之最直接途徑 。
建議二
激勵既有結構延壽與都市更新再利用:立即可行建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人臺灣營建研究院
依據研究數據，既有結構再利用之環境效益巨大。建議政府透過容積獎勵或稅務減免等政策誘因，鼓勵都市更新案優先考慮結構延壽與整建維護，而非
全面拆除重建，以落實循環經濟之核心精神 。
建議三
推動非結構系統之模組化與乾式施工 :中長期建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人臺灣營建研究院
針對室內裝修與外殼系統，應避免傳統濕式黏結工法。建議推廣可拆卸、模組化之地板與牆體系統，並結合再生材料（如再生鋁窗、循環地磚），以提
升建築在更新修繕階段的循環度與靈活性 。
建議四
深化數位工具應用與材料護照制度 :中長期建議。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人臺灣營建研究院
建議持續優化 BIM 數位評估流程，並研議導入「材料護照」概念，在 BIM 模型中強化材料追蹤功能。確保設計階段輸入的循環參數能與營運及拆除階段對接，建立完整的建築資材循環資料庫，提升產業應用意願與評估準確性。
", "英文摘要": "Research Background
As global climate change becomes increasingly severe, governments worldwide have pri-oritized it as a critical issue. The construction industry is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, with both construction and operational phases having profound environmental im-pacts. To achieve the goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, Taiwan's construction indus-try is in urgent need of transformation. Given that past circular building assessments often faced challenges regarding complex calculations and data inconsistency, this study aims to establish digital assessment methods and implementation strategies for "Circular Building and Carbon Reduction Benefits." By refining the application of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and standardized procedures, the study seeks to enhance assessment efficiency and accuracy, assist-ing the industry in realizing resource circulation and carbon reduction goals.
Research Methodology and Process
This study employs the following four methods to establish standardized and digital as-sessment models:
1.Literature and Tool Review
An in-depth analysis of domestic and international progress on integrating BIM with Building Circularity Assessment (BCA) and Low Embodied-carbon Building Rating (LEBR) was conducted. Reference was made to international standards (e.g., EN15978, ISO 21931) and existing assessment tools (e.g., MCI, WBCI-LCA) to estab-lish the theoretical basis for integrated assessment.
2.Establishment of Digital Assessment Processes
A BIM-based standardized workflow was developed, creating a connected model com-prising "BIM-derived Quantity Take-off," "Standardized Spreadsheets with Augmented Circularity Parameters," and a "Web-based Calculation Platform." Two digital assess-ment paths—"Manual Upload" and "Automatic Linkage"—were established to resolve the issue of missing circularity parameters in existing BIM models.
3.Case Study Simulations and Verification
Two cases, "Taoyuan Pingzhen No.1 Social Housing" (RC structure) and "Taipei Nangang Depot Social Housing District 1" (SRC structure combined with existing building reuse), were selected for actual trial calculations. These trials verified the feasi-bility of the digital tools and compared the circularity benefits of different structural and design strategies.
4.Expert Consultation and Promotion
Expert meetings and promotional workshops were held to examine the rationality of as-sessment parameters (e.g., downcycling coefficients, disassembly characteristics) and to promote the application of digital assessment tools.
Key Findings
The key findings of this study are as follows:
1.Significant Benefits of Digital Assessment
The established BIM digital tools and standardized forms effectively address errors and high entry barriers associated with traditional manual inventories. Through the automat-ed extraction of building material information and parameter linkage, Building Circu-larity Indicators (BCI) and carbon reduction benefits can be rapidly calculated and visu-alized.
2.Structural Systems are Key to Circularity
Case analysis shows that the structural body (beams, columns, slabs) accounts for the vast majority of a building's total weight and carbon emissions. The Nangang Social Housing project, due to its adoption of an SRC structure (high steel recyclability) and reuse of existing structures, demonstrated a disassembly stage circularity (CI-EOL) of 78.61% and an overall BCI of 40.72%, significantly outperforming the Pingzhen Social Housing project (BCI 23.28%), which used a traditional RC structure.
3.Carbon Reduction Potential of Reusing Existing Buildings
The comprehensive assessment of the Nangang project confirmed that retaining existing components can substantially increase the manufacturing stage circularity (CI-CON reached 38.35%) and create a significant carbon reduction ratio (37.62%). This proves that "life extension and reuse" is a more effective circular strategy than "new construc-tion."
4.Modular Advantages of Non-structural Systems
Interior lightweight partitions and aluminum window systems, due to their high recycla-bility and modular characteristics, exhibited extremely high carbon reduction potential (e.g., the interior system of the Nangang project achieved a carbon reduction ratio of 55.69%). These are high-potential items for improving overall building circularity.
Key Recommendations
The main recommendations of this report are summarized as follows:
Recommendation 1
Strengthen Circular Design of Structural Bodies and Introduction of Low-Carbon Ma-terials
It is recommended to actively promote Precast Concrete (PC) modular construction meth-ods in structural design to enhance disassemblability. Simultaneously, setting a minimum usage ratio for alternative cementitious materials (such as blast furnace slag powder) and recycled ag-gregates in concrete is suggested. Reducing cement usage and embodied carbon at the source is the most direct pathway to improving the circularity efficiency of RC/SRC structures.
Recommendation 2
Incentivize Life Extension of Existing Structures and Reuse in Urban Renewal
According to research data, the environmental benefits of reusing existing structures are immense. It is recommended that the government use policy incentives, such as floor area bo-nuses or tax reductions, to encourage urban renewal projects to prioritize structural life exten-sion and renovation over complete demolition and reconstruction, thereby implementing the core spirit of the circular economy.
Recommendation 3
Promote Modularity and Dry Construction in Non-structural Systems
For interior decoration and envelope systems, traditional wet bonding methods should be avoided. It is recommended to promote detachable, modular flooring and wall systems, com-bined with recycled materials (e.g., recycled aluminum windows, circular floor tiles), to en-hance the circularity and flexibility of buildings during renovation and maintenance stages.
Recommendation 4
Deepen the Application of Digital Tools and Material Passport Systems
It is recommended to continuously optimize the BIM digital assessment process and delib-erate on introducing the "Material Passport" concept to strengthen material tracking functions within BIM models. Ensuring that circularity parameters input during the design phase can in-terface with operational and demolition phases will help establish a complete building material circularity database, thereby increasing industry willingness to adopt these tools and improving assessment accuracy.
", "相關檔案": "循環建築設計整合標準化及數位化評估之研究成果報告-V04(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339758/0f541019-4d5b-4fbb-b454-c18d9cb3757f.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339755", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 23 Jul 2026 01:20:00 GMT", "title": "室內溫熱環境與建築外殼隔熱U值適切性之研究", "計畫主持人": "潘振宇", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "建築外殼、U 值、熱傳透率、建築能效", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "建築外殼隔熱與室內溫熱環境及空調能耗息息相關，界定隔熱好壞以U值來判斷。U值單位為W/m2·K，稱熱傳透率(又稱熱貫流率)，每平方公尺一小時內通過的熱量，以室內外溫差1℃為基準，數值越小代表隔熱性越佳。建築應用上主旨在隔絕或降低室內外的熱量傳遞，根據室內用途需求決定隔熱程度，較需要確保室內溫熱環境穩定的空間例如特定研究機關、文物保存或藥劑研發等特定空間通常就要求較低的U值外殼，這些特殊建築除了建築壁體隔熱性能的要求，對於室內隔間動線、溫濕度穩定性與空調換氣系統等要求也越高。但對於一般建築空間的外殼隔熱考慮的是多層面整合與平衡，較低的U值外殼確實有良好的隔熱效果，但相反的卻是高建築成本與室內進出動線與開口面積限制等條件，決定建築壁體的隔熱程度需考量空間使用行為、建物所在地區、氣候環境、建築規模、用途、建置成本、開窗開口率以及在地工法習慣等不同條件綜合，兼顧保溫隔熱與使用成本平衡決定在地最適切的U值，本研究主題就是針對台灣現階段隔熱U值綜合探討，根據建築使用行為與能耗和氣候條件及建置投資等研究分析當前建築外殼隔熱的規定值適切性，並且探討是否有其修改調整的需求性與相關影響，研究範疇包含國內外現階段外殼隔熱值彙整、國內外殼隔熱構造現況、空調能耗影響與法規沿革分析。
台灣現階段屋頂的隔熱U值0.8W/m2k、外牆平均2.0~2.75 W/m2k，詳細分析項目可發現台灣對於屋頂U值的設定較大於美德日等國，與新加坡考量方式雷同，其他牆面、玻璃、開口處等設定值各國都有不同的數值與制定規範。建築外殼的隔熱性能直接決定室內溫熱環境與熱負荷變化，隔熱性較好的外殼可阻擋室內外熱傳透量，但建築空間室內溫熱環境除了室外熱傳影響以外還會受到開窗開口的直射熱影響、內部發熱負荷如人體發熱、照明、器具發熱、換氣熱負荷等各總活動時產出熱負荷，建築空間並非完全封閉且不像冰箱一樣需要要完整保存內部溫熱不受外部影響，建築外殼需定量的進出開口應付活動進出及照明採光，這些都會直接影響室內外熱負荷變動，與隔熱值高低無關。另外，台灣位處亞熱帶地區，冬夏季氣候環境與終日的日射條件也都是設定外殼U值需通盤考量的因素，如果U值過低，可能造成過度隔熱導致室內外氣流量降低等影響濕度囤積，反之如果U值過高則可能使室內容易受到外界環境影響造成內部溫熱環境不穩而耗費更多空調換氣能源。因此，制定平衡U值既能確保節能性又能維持室內舒適溫熱環境，都是需多方面考慮的課題。本研究針對建築外殼隔熱U值平衡性，從區域性、建築用途、規模、成本、空調換氣設備容量、投資影響、溫熱需求等綜合層面探討台灣適當的U值改善策略，根據現行規範架構著重於屋頂、方位、區域、開口部等隔熱值的討論與分析。
", "英文摘要": "The insulation of the building shell is closely related to the indoor thermal environment and air conditioning energy consumption. The quality of thermal insulation is determined by the U-value. The unit of U-value is W/m2·K, which is called thermal transmittance (also known as heat permeability). It is the amount of heat that passes through one square meter per hour, based on a 1°C temperature difference between indoor and outdoor temperatures. The smaller the value, the better the thermal insulation. The main purpose of building applications is to isolate or reduce heat transfer between indoor and outdoor. The degree of thermal insulation is determined according to the needs of indoor use. Spaces that need to ensure a stable indoor thermal environment, such as specific research institutions, cultural relics preservation, or pharmaceutical research and development, usually require a lower U-value shell. In addition to the requirements for building wall insulation performance, these special buildings also have higher requirements for indoor compartment traffic flow, temperature and humidity stability, and air conditioning ventilation systems. However, for the shell insulation of general building spaces, it is necessary to consider multi-level integration and balance. A lower U-value shell does have a good insulation effect, but on the contrary, it is subject to high construction costs and indoor access lines and opening area restrictions. The degree of insulation of the building wall must be determined by considering a combination of different conditions such as space usage behavior, building location, climate environment, building scale, purpose, construction cost, window opening rate, and local construction methods. Taking into account the balance between thermal insulation and usage costs, the most appropriate U-value for the local area is determined. The theme of this study is a comprehensive discussion on the current insulation U-value in Taiwan. According to the building usage behavior and energy consumption, climate conditions and construction investment, the appropriateness of the current specified value of building shell insulation is analyzed, and whether there is a need for its modification and adjustment and related impacts. The research scope includes the current shell insulation value summary at home and abroad, the current status of domestic shell insulation structure, the impact of air conditioning energy consumption and the analysis of regulatory evolution.
Taiwan's current roof insulation U-value is 0.8 W/m²k, while exterior walls average 2.0-2.75 W/m²k. A detailed analysis reveals that Taiwan's roof U-value settings are higher than those in countries like the United States, Germany, and Japan, similar to Singapore's approach. The values for other surfaces, such as walls, glass, and openings, vary across countries, with different values and established standards. The thermal insulation performance of a building's envelope directly determines indoor thermal environments and heat load fluctuations. A well-insulated envelope can block heat transfer from both indoor and outdoor spaces. However, in addition to outdoor heat transfer, indoor thermal environments are also affected by direct heat from window openings, internal heat loads such as human heat, lighting, appliance heat, and ventilation heat load, among other factors. Buildings are not completely enclosed and, unlike refrigerators, need to completely preserve internal heat without external influences. The building envelope requires a certain amount of access openings to accommodate movement and lighting. These factors directly impact indoor and outdoor heat load fluctuations, regardless of insulation value. In addition, Taiwan is located in the subtropics, and the winter and summer climate conditions and daytime solar radiation conditions are also factors that need to be considered when setting the U-value of the shell. If the U-value is too low, it may cause excessive insulation, resulting in reduced indoor and outdoor air flow, affecting humidity accumulation. Conversely, if the U-value is too high, the indoor environment may be easily affected by the external environment, resulting in an unstable internal thermal environment and consuming more air conditioning and ventilation energy. Therefore, formulating a balanced U-value that can ensure energy saving while maintaining a comfortable indoor thermal environment is a topic that requires multi-faceted consideration. This study focuses on the balance of U-values in building shell insulation, and explores appropriate U-value improvement strategies in Taiwan from a comprehensive perspective, including regionality, building use, scale, cost, air conditioning and ventilation equipment capacity, investment impact, and thermal demand. Based on the current regulatory framework, it focuses on the discussion and analysis of insulation values such as roofs, orientations, regions, and openings.
", "相關檔案": "室內溫熱環境與建築外殼隔熱U值適切性之研究成果報告 20251125-2(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339755/654bfcbd-a5a8-4fb1-8cf9-b488419678eb.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339437", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:16:00 GMT", "title": "台灣都市通風地圖系統應用與驗證分析(二)", "計畫主持人": "陳希舜", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "國立臺灣科技大學", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "工程技術組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "都市風廊、計算流體力學、類神經網路、地理資訊系統、氣象資料、風速機率", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
因應極端氣候變遷與都市熱島效應的挑戰，都市風廊概念成為減緩都市熱島問題的重要策略。都市風廊分析需因地制宜，蒐集並精確分析都市的物理與環境條件。內政部建築研究所基於此理念，建置了台灣都市通風地圖系統(TUVM)，整合類神經網路分析、中尺度大氣模式、計算流體力學模擬、衛星地表溫度推估及都市建築資訊，匯入地理資訊系統，並以線上查詢平台形式提供包含區域氣候、熱島強度、建築資訊與風場等多維度資料，俾都市規劃人員及地方政府能快速取得相關分析資訊，進行風廊管制區與主要風廊的科學指認與規劃決策。
本計畫第一期已完成大台北地區都市通風地圖資料建置，並參考國際風廊規劃方法，整合多元大數據與分析結果，確立管制區域及風廊識別方法並公開相關資料。同時，於林口AI園區完成IoT監測設備布建規劃、首次光達風速剖面及無人機熱紅外線測量，以因應該區域持續開發造成的建築密度與風場變化。透過連續實地監測、風洞實驗及數值模擬，進行風廊效益評估，具實證指標意義。前期亦深化國內外都市風廊政策分析，結合TUVM參數，規劃系統的實務落地與應用路徑，推動都市通風環境改善。
二、研究方法及過程
本年度計畫以TUVM系統為基礎，針對桃園市及台中市等人口與建築密集區域進行資料建置與系統優化，涵蓋區域氣候、都市熱島強度、建築資訊及風場分析，並依區域特性採用CFD模擬與經驗公式推估通風潛力，整合納入線上查詢平台。同時推動TUVM系統功能擴展及AI技術應用可行性研究，並協調系統資料公開與風廊管制策略。
實場監測方面，利用光達風速剖面量測及無人機高解析度地表溫度量測獲得之數據，建立物理模型以推估通用熱氣候指數UTCI，作為監測區舒適性指標。另於布建定點氣象設備，建立即時資料庫並部署即時觀測系統，並逐步擴展至都市重點功能區。應用推廣部分，透過跨界座談與示範區策略實證，結合風洞及CFD模擬驗證風廊設計效益。編製操作手冊並規劃系統與國土計畫圖資之介接方案，並邀請實務工作者試用系統，持續優化以確保實務需求相符。
三、重要成果
(1) 本計畫經由對現有圖資數據及使用者需求之深入分析，對入口網站進行結構性優化與風格全面更新，新增完整操作指引與示範案例，提升整體使用體驗並實現一站式服務。網站架構涵蓋主頁、資訊前導頁、TUVM圖台、聯絡頁及通風潛力初評系統等主要模組，分別提供背景說明、系統導覽、圖資互動、便捷聯絡及專業分析工具，確保使用者在資訊查閱與功能運用上獲得流暢且全面的支援，為未來都市規劃及通風環境評估提供穩健且高效的數位平台。
(2) 針對都市風廊規劃需求，本計畫開發出一套通風潛力初評模型。該模型依據都市建築型態與氣流分布之關聯，透過地塊規模測試、資料篩選、資料正規化及模型建構與驗證等環節，達成對建築阻抗影響下都市區域風速與風量分布的快速且合理推估。此通風潛力指標能有效反映地表阻抗對近地表風況的影響，為都市風廊的識別與分析提供堅實的理論基礎與實務工具，進而支援都市規劃中風環境評估的需求。此外，基於前述模型建置都市通風潛力線上初評系統，為規劃設計階段之通風潛力評估提供便利且可行的分析工具。
(3) 本研究提出的都市通風環境規劃流程，主要分為三個階段，分別為基地及周邊區域概況評估、規劃與改善對策研擬，以及效益評估。第一階段藉由掌握基地與周邊區域的通風條件與環境特性，以奠定第二階段之規劃與改善對策研擬之基礎。最後，針對不同空間尺度，提出不同的設計重點與策略，並在第三階段以碳排放量作為效益評估的核心指標，檢驗整體規劃的可行性與永續性。為支援各階段分析與決策，本研究提出對應工具，包含TUVM系統、CFD模擬軟體、風洞實驗，以及舒適度與能耗相關的各項評估指標，協助進行通風趨勢研判、細部模擬與方案優選，並推估所降低之碳排放潛力。透過此完整且可操作的應用架構，都市通風環境的規劃設計能從大尺度的區域規劃逐步落實至建築尺度設計中。
(4) 本研究彙整歸納國內外通風系統之規劃與設計方法，並釐清街廓或社區基地開發與建築基地開發規模，及其影響之物理環境尺度，包括都市風廊道尺度與行人風場尺度，進而明確開發規模在都市通風系統中之功能定位，依空間尺度將設計方法進行分類與繪製，最後草擬「都市通風系統之規劃設計操作手冊」，以作為通風系統規劃設計時之具體參考。
(5) 本計畫於實場監測區建構 10 點風速監測網絡，有利於未來累積豐富微氣候數據。監測網絡系統採用離網型太陽能供電，即使連續陰雨亦能穩定運作，以落實都市環境監測的可行性。另透過模組化設計、輕量級通訊協定與雲端整合，建構高可靠度及易於擴充的 IoT 微氣候監測系統，而監測系統資料則透過網路傳輸至「即時監測數據平台」，發揮整合即時監控、歷史趨勢分析、UTCI 舒適度計算及異常警示功能，提供完整的資料管理與視覺化解決方案，有助於後續分析、決策以及成果展示。
四、 主要建議事項
建議一
立即可行建議：TUVM圖資擴展與管理工作
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所、國立臺灣科技大學
協辦機關：內政部國土管理署、中華民國風工程學會
本年度建置完成TUVM系統之大台北地區、桃園市以及台中市通風資料，並檢核這些地區都市、非都市區域之氣象站分析資料、都市熱島強度、通風潛力、主要/次要風廊等資訊。後續再針對台南市、高雄市進行系統資料建置，以完備系統之廣度以及深度。同時應規劃資料架構之標準化及後台資料上傳管理機制，同時撰編TUVM系統操作及管理手冊，建立完善之操作維護規範與技術指引，同時進一步確立系統資料庫管理、資料整備分析等流程，並訂立定期更新維護作業辦法，有效提升系統維運效率與資料管理品質。
建議二
中長期建議：都市建成區綠覆與水體降溫策略研究
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所、國立臺灣科技大學
協辦機關：中華民國風工程學會
針對本研究所彙整之通風系統規劃與設計方法，對應台灣現行之空間規範與法規體系，進行納入相關都市通風系統評估之內容建議，以提高都市通風系統之重視度與實務應用。有鑑於都市建成區內建築密集、風速普遍偏低，相關設計手法多以提升綠覆比例與配置景觀水體作為主要降溫策略。建議未來研究可進一步針對地表輻射溫度或環境輻射溫度進行討論，並檢視其於通風與熱環境模擬中之設定參數與規定，以提升評估結果之準確性與應用效益。
建議三
立即可行建議：都市通風潛力初評系統之優化
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所、國立臺灣科技大學
協辦機關：中華民國風工程學會
本計畫針對都市風廊規劃需求，成功開發一套通風潛力初評模型。該模型基於都市建築型態與氣流分布之相互關聯性，透過地塊規模測試、資料篩選、資料正規化及模型建構與驗證等系統化程序，達成對建築阻抗影響下都市區域風速與風量分布的快速且合理推估。本通風潛力指標能有效量化地表阻抗對近地表風況之影響機制，為都市風廊的識別與分析提供堅實的理論基礎與實務工具，並支援都市規劃中風環境評估之量化需求。同步建置都市通風潛力線上初評系統，為規劃設計階段之通風潛力評估提供便利且可操作之分析平台。
就模型發展方向而言，本年度採用多變數回歸模型建立建築型態與通風潛力間之關聯，惟因通風潛力與型態參數具非單一對應特性，現階段評估結果僅能取得眾數範圍內之對應結果，適宜作為區域開發或規劃方案比對之參考依據，而非絕對預測值。未來應進一步導入類神經網路模型或深度學習演算法，以提升預測準確度與應用可信度。同時應積極擴充都市通風潛力初評系統之功能面向，包括優化輸入資料格式之相容性、豐富評估報告之呈現樣式、強化規劃設計之建議內容等，俾符合都市規劃與建築設計實務應用需求，並提升決策支援之效能。
建議四
中長期建議：即時監測數據平台之推廣與應用
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所、國立臺灣科技大學
協辦機關：各縣市政府、中華民國風工程學會、淡江大學
本期計畫實場監測區之儀器佈設，展現IoT技術於都市環境監測之應用潛力。透過太陽能供電、MQTT通訊、雲端資料管理與視覺化平台之整合，建立了一套可複製、可擴充之監測系統原型。本計畫成果不僅能支援都市風廊規劃與熱島緩解策略，亦可作為建築設計與都市微氣候模擬的資料基礎，強化環境數據於決策層面的應用價值。
後續應用可朝以下幾個面向進行發展，在都市規劃，可提供通風廊道設計驗證資料，協助規劃單位評估都市開發對風場之影響；在建築設計領域，提供建築師參考鄰近地區之風場與熱環境特性，優化建築配置與開窗設計；在氣候變遷研究上，長期監測資料可分析都市熱島效應之時空變化趨勢；在公共衛生方面，透過UTCI指數預警高溫風險，提醒戶外工作者與敏感族群注意防護；而於智慧城市整合應用中，資料可串接至智慧城市平台，與交通、能源、環境等系統整合運用。
本平台有多項可深入發展的層面，首先是感測器層面，可於更多測站配置黑球溫度計與長波輻射計，提升UTCI計算之準確性；其次於空間擴展，將監測網絡拓展至其他都市地區，建立跨區域比對資料庫；再者於模式整合部份，整合CFD模擬系統之資料串接，實現監測與模擬之雙向驗證；同時探索機器學習應用，利用累積資料建立預測模型，提供未來數小時之風場與熱舒適度預報；最後可開放資料共享，供民眾查詢，提升環境意識與科學素養。整體而言，後續應持續推動感測網絡空間擴展、技術深化與跨域整合，期發展成為全方位之都市微氣候智慧監測與預警體系，為永續城市建設與氣候適應政策提供具科學基礎之工具。
", "英文摘要": "", "相關檔案": "期末報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339437/549be488-742f-40e6-a3a4-494152e7b730.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336816", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 10 Feb 2026 02:55:00 GMT", "title": "停車場增設排煙設備影響滅火設備及與換氣設備合併效益評估之研究", "計畫主持人": "鍾基強", "協同主持人": "陳又嘉", "執行單位": "社團法人台灣防火材料協會", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "安全防災組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "地下停車空間火災、煙控系統、通風換氣設備", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起：
現行室內停車空間『非屬』《各類場所消防安全設備設置標準》(民國113年04月24日版本)第28條規定應設置排煙設備之場所，然而隨電動車市占率逐漸上升且地下建築空間其空間特性較為封閉且動線複雜，其火災風險不容忽視。電動車潛在危害包含：感電、電池化學液滲漏、可燃氣體危害，以及電動車電池模組於火災發生時易產生瞬時高熱與鋰離子活性不易滅火之特性，隨著燃燒時間延長，濃煙亦將持續增長流竄。因此，當地下停車空間若不幸發生電動車火災，濃煙易造成受困人員迷航且伴隨能見度差、通訊不良、氧氣補給困難等附加危害，將增加救援難度與危險性【1】。
另一方面，順應國際規範趨勢及因應電動車火災須大量水降溫以侷限火勢，內政部於113年4月24日修正《各類場所消防安全設備設置標準》第18條，將自動撒水設備納入室內停車空間得選設使用之滅火設備，有效降低該類場所火災擴大延燒之風險。本研究案爰為控制地下停車場火災時濃煙於大空間擴散，提升消防搶救可行性與逃生避難安全性，擬就停車場設置排煙設備，惟參考FM Global- INSTALLATION GUIDELINES FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS規範發現，密閉式撒水頭需偵熱後動作，當設置排煙設備可能破壞其偵熱感應動作或導致減緩動作時間。因此，該建築物連結機械通風或排煙設備啟動，是否會造成非排煙區風險提高或致使火災無法順利排煙等風險疑慮，以及撒水頭是否仍能有效感知火源所產生之煙熱等議題，加以開展本研究課題及討論分析。
二、研究方法與過程：
有鑑於我國停車空間規劃大多設置於地下樓層，同時地下停車空間難以救援且災害發生危險性高，為精進我國停車空間火災安全策略之參考，考量地下停車空間火場高溫煙氣流實務面操作，煙控設計應搭配空間防煙區劃建置，確保火災期間及排煙設備足夠將區劃內濃煙進行排除，確保逃生人員具備充足的救災與人員生存環境條件。
室內停車空間屬半封閉空間且建築結構防火時效大多為1~3小時，因此火災發生如何快速且有規劃的控制及排除高溫煙流，並防止火勢對建築結構強度造成影響則相當重要。現階段國內地下停車空間非屬《各類場所消防安全設備設置標準》第28條規定應設置排煙設備之場所，然而隨電動車市占率逐漸上升且地下停車空間火災風險不容忽視，因而加以開展地下停車空間增設排煙設備或與現有通風換氣設備兼併使用之研究課題。
建築物煙控是為將火災時的煙限定在某區域內，或是改變煙的流動方向，用以控制並降低火災區域的煙霧漫延擴散，並維持人員逃生路徑的通道，以利消防人員進行救援。考量地下停車空間樓高較低且天花板佈滿各式管線，建議既設合法建築物可透過進排氣機房採大面積抽引高溫煙氣排除，若有針對性防護對象(如：逃生梯間、逃生口、機電室等)則需進一步設計與討論；新建建築物則可另案檢討增設排煙設備之設置要求及性能檢討。
三、重要發現：
本研究團隊針對停車場增設排煙設備影響滅火設備及與換氣設備合併效益評估之研究，提出相關結論如下：
1.經蒐集國外之相關文獻，得知新加坡、日本與中國等國，對於地下停車空間均有要求設置排煙設備，差異的地方在於日本與中國針對地下停車空間要求設置專用排煙系統及防煙區劃，而新加坡則是採通風換氣設備兼用排煙設備之方式，可供後續相關主管機關法規精進之參考。
2.以地下停車空間整體環境條件而言，在『小面積停車空間』及『大面積停車空間』的模擬情境下，啟動通風換氣設備皆有助於降低停車空間煙氣危害與高溫危害的範圍。但若是站在人員避難的角度，大面積停車空間因面積較大，開啟通風換氣設備，對於人員避難及消防救災人員救災環境之安全皆具有正面幫助；而小面積停車空間因面積小，濃煙與溫度擴散迅速，開啟通風換氣設備對於人員避難較無明顯幫助，但開啟通風換氣設備仍有助於提供消防救災人員能有更安全之救災環境。
3.通風換氣設備於災時啟動能夠改善火場能見度與溫度，惟需留意火源與排氣機房的相對位置，當火源發生於鄰近進氣機房時，高溫煙氣流可能會隨氣流推向非起火區域。因此當採用通風換氣設備兼併排煙功能時，建議當進氣機房附近的火警自動警報設備偵知到火災發生時，進氣機房風機立即切換運轉模式為排氣(正逆轉)，以利排煙並避免將煙氣推向非起火區域。
4.依據電腦模擬結果可知，當將通風換氣設備之進排風機性能提升為排煙設備風量等級並設置排煙風管後，火源附近溫度大約可降低約55%，濃煙使能見度不足10m之時間可延緩約300秒左右。顯見通風換氣設備性能提升為排煙設備風量等級並設置排煙風管後，以地下停車空間整體環境條件而言有相當程度之助益。
5.另由電腦模擬結果分析中發現，起火點若靠近排氣機房，通風換氣設備排煙之效果較佳。故建議「①電動車輛充電樁應設置於排氣機房附近、②排氣機房應避免規劃於避難直通樓梯附近、③直通樓梯可考量規劃加壓防煙」等內容可考量納入內政部於114年所公布《戶外、建築物室內與公共場域設置電動車輛充換電站安全管理指引》之中。
6.本研究團隊彙整噴頭作動時間發現，現行通風換氣設備啟動與否，對於鄰近起火點(三顆撒水頭範圍內)的密閉式撒水頭或泡沫感知噴頭而言，其動作時間影響甚微(差異皆在2秒左右)。因此通風換氣設備兼併災時排煙，其所產生的空間氣流擾動對火源鄰近撒水頭(指噴撒防護範圍與火源燃燒面積重疊)的啟動時間影響甚微，其撒水頭仍能在火源初期具備即時撒水滅火之作用。
四、主要建議事項：
建議ㄧ
立即可行之建議：研擬地下停車空間設置專區排煙設備及人員避難逃生安全設計技術手冊之可行性。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部消防署、內政部國土署
現行建築物地下停車空間『非屬』《各類場所消防安全設備設置標準》第28條規定應設置排煙設備之場所。然而隨電動車市占率逐漸上升且地下建築空間其空間特性較為封閉且動線複雜，當地下停車空間電動車發生火災時，其火勢快速延燒將可能對建築結構強度造成極大影響，不僅可能大幅降低其耐震能力，甚至因無法承受其高溫而有倒塌的風險。
避難設計相當重要的一個考量因素即為『煙氣』控制。地下停車空間煙控設計首要工作即將高溫煙氣阻擋於起火區進而避免影響人員避難與救災。有鑑於此，針對新建建築物地下停車空間增設專區區劃與煙控相關設備，需考慮空間排煙量規劃(排煙口、排煙量與防煙區劃之規劃)，利用正壓防煙或負壓排煙之煙控設計，使煙氣沉降速度減緩或與人員避難動線錯開。
為了確保上述人員避難動線與搶救路線之安全，針對新建建築物地下停車空間建議均應考量設置特別安全梯(或戶外安全梯)與緊急用昇降機可通達地下層與避難層，其所屬之排煙室應考量採用正壓防煙設計為主，以防止地下停車空間發生火災時濃煙侵入梯間。
參考日本、新加坡與中國等國均有針對地下停車空間設置相關排煙設備(或兼用通風換氣設備)之規定，故建議針對新建建築物地下停車空間為主，探討增設專區區劃與煙控相關設備設置原則與建築物地下停車空間人員避難行為、時間之可行性分析，並研擬相關技術手冊。
建議二
中長期之建議：研擬地下停車空間充換電站及充電專用停車位應設置排煙設備與獨立防火防煙區劃。
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：內政部消防署、內政部國土署
鑒於內政部於114年4月公布《戶外、建築物室內與公共場域設置電動車輛充換電站安全管理指引》，其中第8條僅要求充換電站(設備、樁)及充電專用停車位在同一防火區劃應集中設置，充電專用停車位不宜緊鄰人員密集場所，且應與樓梯、安全梯、特別安全梯、昇降機道及緊急昇降機間等垂直區劃之水平距離保持6公尺以上，且不得緊鄰鍋爐室、發電機室、配電室、垃圾處理空間等區域，應將充換電站與充電專用停車位設置於在靠外牆或車道出入口，且通風相對良好區域，與出入口水平距離不大於60公尺處。
惟電動車燃燒所產生高溫煙氣流可能迅速向四周擴散，此時若要加強地下停車空間高溫煙流預防而研擬停車空間全區設置排煙設備恐實務難以推動，因此建議可先以充換電站及充電專用停車位作為示範對象或初期要求對象，要求該區域應設有排煙設備與防煙區劃。
", "英文摘要": "1.Research Background:
Indoor parking spaces are currently not categorized as areas required to install smoke exhaust systems under Article 28 of the “Standards for Installation of Fire Safety Equipment in Various Occupancies” (April 24, 2024 version). However, as the market share of electric vehicles (EVs) continues to increase and considering that underground structures are enclosed and spatially complex, the fire risks associated with such environments cannot be ignored.
Potential hazards of EVs include electric shock, leakage of battery electrolytes, combustible gas release, and the high heat and persistent combustion characteristics of lithium-ion battery modules, which make extinguishing difficult once ignited. As burning continues, dense smoke will rapidly accumulate and spread. Consequently, if a fire occurs in an underground parking area, heavy smoke may easily disorient occupants and lead to secondary hazards such as poor visibility, communication failure, and reduced oxygen supply—significantly increasing the difficulty and danger of firefighting and rescue operations【1】.
To align with international trends and address the need for substantial water cooling during EV fires, the Ministry of the Interior amended Article 18 of the “Standards for Installation of Fire Safety Equipment in Various Occupancies” on April 24, 2024, allowing automatic sprinkler systems to be optionally installed in indoor parking spaces. This measure effectively reduces the risk of fire escalation.
This study aims to investigate the installation of smoke exhaust systems in underground parking lots to limit the spread of smoke during fires, enhance firefighting efficiency, and improve evacuation safety. According to the FM Global Installation Guidelines for Automatic Sprinklers, closed-type sprinklers are heat-activated, meaning that smoke exhaust systems could interfere with heat detection or delay activation. Therefore, this research explores whether the activation of mechanical ventilation or smoke exhaust systems may inadvertently increase fire risk in non-smoke zones, hinder smoke removal, or affect sprinkler sensitivity—issues that warrant detailed study and analysis.
2.Research Methods and Process
Most parking facilities in Taiwan are located underground, where fire rescue is difficult and risks are high. To improve fire safety strategies for underground parking facilities, this study considers the behavior of high-temperature smoke in real fire conditions. Effective smoke control design must incorporate compartmentation to ensure that smoke can be adequately removed within designated zones, providing sufficient conditions for occupant survival and emergency response.
Indoor parking facilities are semi-enclosed spaces with structural fire resistance typically ranging from one to three hours. Therefore, rapid and systematic control and removal of high-temperature smoke are critical to prevent structural weakening. Currently, underground parking spaces are not required to install smoke exhaust systems under Article 28 of the national standard, yet the increasing prevalence of EVs necessitates re-evaluating this regulation. This research explores the feasibility of integrating smoke exhaust functions into existing ventilation systems.
Smoke control aims to confine smoke within a defined area or redirect its flow to prevent spread, maintain evacuation routes, and facilitate rescue operations. Given that underground parking spaces have low ceiling heights and complex ceiling layouts with numerous pipes, it is recommended that existing legal buildings utilize large-scale extraction fans in mechanical rooms for smoke removal. For key areas such as stairwells, exits, and electrical rooms, further design and analysis are advised. For new buildings, performance-based assessments for additional smoke exhaust systems should be conducted.
3.Key Findings
Based on this study’s evaluation of how installing smoke exhaust systems impacts existing firefighting and ventilation systems, the following conclusions were drawn:
(1)International Comparison: Countries such as Singapore, Japan, and China all require smoke exhaust systems in underground parking facilities. Japan and China mandate dedicated smoke exhaust systems and smoke compartmentation, whereas Singapore allows the ventilation system to serve dual purposes for both ventilation and smoke removal. These approaches can serve as references for improving local regulations.
(2)Effectiveness by Scale: Simulations show that activating ventilation systems during fires helps reduce heat and smoke hazards in both small and large parking spaces. In large facilities, it significantly improves evacuation and rescue safety; in smaller spaces, although smoke spreads faster and benefits are less evident for evacuation, the system still improves firefighting safety.
(3)Airflow Risks: While ventilation improves visibility and lowers temperature, the location of the fire relative to air inlets and outlets is critical. If the fire occurs near an air intake room, airflow may push hot smoke into non-fire zones. Thus, if ventilation is used for smoke exhaust, air intake fans near detected fire areas should automatically reverse operation to function as exhaust fans, preventing smoke spread.
(4)Simulation Results: When ventilation fans are upgraded to smoke exhaust capacity with appropriate ducting, the temperature near the fire source can be reduced by approximately 55%, and visibility below 10 m can be delayed by about 300 seconds. This indicates significant environmental improvement.
(5)Design Recommendations: Simulations also show that smoke exhaust performance is best when the fire occurs near the exhaust room. Therefore, it is recommended that (1) EV charging stations be located near exhaust rooms, (2) exhaust rooms be placed away from direct escape stairwells, and (3) pressurization smoke control be considered for stairwells. These measures could be incorporated into the Guidelines for the Safety Management of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in Outdoor, Indoor, and Public Spaces (to be issued by the Ministry of the Interior in 2025).
(6)Sprinkler Activation: The activation or deactivation of ventilation equipment has minimal impact (within 2 second) on the activation time of enclosed sprinkler heads or foam sensor nozzles near the fire source.Therefore, ventilation equipment that also functions as a smoke exhaust system has minimal impact on the activation time of sprinkler heads near the fire source (meaning the sprinkler protection area overlaps with the fire combustion area). These sprinkler heads can still provide immediate fire suppression in the early stages of a fire.
4.Major Recommendations
Recommendation 1 — Immediate Action:
Study the feasibility of integrating existing ventilation systems with emergency smoke exhaust functions in underground parking spaces.
Lead Agency: Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Cooperating Agencies: National Fire Agency, National Land Administration
Under current regulations, underground parking spaces in buildings are not classified as locations required to install smoke exhaust systems under Article 28 of the “Standards for Installation of Fire Safety Equipment in Various Types of Places.” However, as the market share of electric vehicles continues to rise and underground building spaces are generally enclosed with complex circulation paths, a fire involving an electric vehicle in an underground parking area may spread rapidly and severely affect the structural strength of the building. This could not only significantly reduce its seismic resistance but also pose a risk of collapse due to the inability to withstand high temperatures.
One of the most critical factors in evacuation design is the control of “smoke.” The primary task in smoke control design for underground parking spaces is to confine high-temperature smoke to the fire zone so as to prevent interference with occupant evacuation and firefighting operations. Accordingly, when adding zoned compartments and smoke control–related equipment in underground parking spaces of newly constructed buildings, it is necessary to consider planning the required smoke exhaust capacity (including the layout of exhaust openings, exhaust volume, and smoke compartmentation). Through the use of positive-pressure smoke prevention or negative-pressure smoke exhaust design, the descent speed of smoke can be reduced or separated from evacuation routes.
To ensure the safety of evacuation routes and rescue access paths, it is recommended that underground parking spaces in all newly constructed buildings consider the installation of special safety staircases (or exterior safety staircases) and emergency elevators that connect to underground levels and refuge floors. The associated smoke-proof vestibules should primarily adopt positive-pressure smoke prevention design to prevent dense smoke from entering stairwells when a fire occurs in the underground parking area.
Since countries such as Japan, Singapore, and China have established regulations requiring the installation of smoke exhaust equipment (or combined ventilation systems) in underground parking spaces, it is recommended that, with a focus on newly constructed buildings, principles for the installation of zoned compartments and smoke control equipment be studied. In addition, feasibility analyses of occupant evacuation behavior and evacuation time in underground parking spaces should be conducted, and relevant technical manuals should be developed.
Recommendation 2 — Medium- to Long-Term Measure:
Require dedicated smoke exhaust systems and smoke compartments for EV charging stations and EV-designated parking spaces in underground facilities.
Lead Agency: Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Cooperating Agencies: National Fire Agency, National Land Administration
According to the 2025 guidelines, charging stations and EV-designated parking spaces must be grouped within the same fire compartment, located at least six meters from staircases, elevators, and other vertical shafts, and situated near outer walls or driveways with good ventilation and less than 60 m from an exit.
However, high-temperature smoke from EV fires may still spread rapidly. Installing full-area smoke exhaust systems throughout the entire parking structure may be impractical. Therefore, as an initial step, it is recommended that smoke exhaust systems and smoke compartments be required specifically for areas containing EV charging stations and EV-designated parking spaces.
", "相關檔案": "停車場增設排煙設備影響滅火設備及與換氣設備合併效益評估之研究成果報告-115-01-27 Ver.2(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336816/c35b762f-e5b9-4bda-a40e-b57c4e7ec8cf.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=336807", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 10 Feb 2026 01:34:00 GMT", "title": "社會住宅公共空間之使用者需求與空間模式研究", "計畫主持人": "陶其駿", "協同主持人": "鄭人豪", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-04-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "綜合規劃組", "執行方式": "協同研究", "關鍵詞": "社會住宅公共空間、使用後評估、行為觀察與使用者需求、空間模式語彙", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
隨著臺灣社會快速邁入高齡化與家庭結構多元化階段，住宅空間不再僅是滿足居住需求的場域，更是支撐社區互動與社會支持的重要基礎。社會住宅政策在推行過程中，逐漸從「量的供給」轉向「質的共居」，公共空間遂成為促進居民交流與社區凝聚的關鍵要素。本研究聚焦於台灣當代垂直型社會住宅之公共空間，關注其在高密度、少子高齡化與家庭結構轉變脈絡下，如何回應居民日常生活需求並承擔社會支持功能。從文獻與制度面釐清社會住宅公共空間之角色與應具備之空間特性，並透過實際場域之使用後評估（POE）與行為觀察，分析不同公共空間類型之使用樣態與關鍵影響因素。最後建構可供設計與政策實務運用之公共空間模式語彙與設計準則，作為未來社會住宅發包與審查之參考依據。總結研究目的為（一）分析現行垂直型社會住宅公共空間的使用現況、問題與潛力。（二）探討不同年齡層、家庭結構與族群在公共空間中的需求差異。（三）建立以使用者需求為導向的公共空間設計與管理模式。以期提升公共空間的可用性與社會效益，作為後續政策與設計規劃之依據。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究將透過國內外文獻及中央指引手冊，整理社會住宅公共空間相關理論、制度架構與設計原則，並彙整既有研究與次級資料。並以臺北市廣慈博愛園區社會住宅為主要案例，採質性個案研究法，進行現地調查、空間觀察與圖面分析，搭配系統性行為觀察、使用後評估（POE）與訪談，以掌握不同族群（高齡者、照護者、親子家庭等）之實際使用路徑、活動型態與停留特徵。最後，綜整質化資料，歸納空間特性與行為關聯，建構模式語彙與設計建議。
三、重要發現
研究結果顯示，垂直型社會住宅公共空間之使用效能，關鍵不在面積多寡或設施數量，而在於是否符合「可及性」、「可視性與透明性」、「多功能性」、「人本尺度設計」、「半公共性與過渡空間」、「社區意識與地方認同」及「活動規劃」等七項特性；同時，「日常性、可及性與順道性」對於誘發穩定使用尤為重要。本研究進一步歸納出通行節點型、社交交流型、照護支持型、學習成長型與健康休閒型等五類公共空間模式語彙，說明各類空間在垂直社區中的典型位置、服務對象與行為樣態，並揭示現行制度下設計、管理與實際使用之間的落差，特別是前期需求調查不足與缺乏系統性POE所造成之配置與營運不符。
綜合上述，本研究主張應將社會住宅公共空間視為承載日常生活與社會支持的「社會性基礎設施」，並建議在發包需求計畫書與設計審查程序中導入公共空間模式語彙與評估指標，強化前期需求調查與後續用後評估機制，並結合公私部門與社區培力，以縮小設計、管理及使用落差。研究成果除對台灣社會住宅公共空間之設計與治理提供具體操作框架，亦為未來居住行為研究與高齡共融空間之長期追蹤奠定實證基礎。
四、主要建議事項
根據本研究以廣慈社會住宅公共空間為例，針對垂直型社會住宅公共空間之使用觀察與訪談分析結果，顯示現行空間設計、管理制度與實際使用之間仍存有明顯落差。為促進公共空間融入居民日常生活、提升可用性與社會互動功能，以下分別從立即可行建議及中長期建議加以列舉。
建議一
導入公共空間模式語彙於社會住宅設計及審查程序，以建立設計指導架構：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部國土管理署
協辦機關：國家住宅及都市更新中心、各級政府建築管理及相關單位
本研究歸納出五類公共空間模式（通行節點型、社交交流型、照護支持型、學習成長型、健康休閒型），建議將模式語彙納入發包需求與設計審查：要求設計團隊在平面配置與說明書標示模式類型並說明服務對象、使用時段與預期行為；於設計審查檢核表中納入七項空間特性（可及性、可視性與透明性、多功能性、人本尺度、半公共性與過渡空間、社區意識與地方認同、活動規劃），並採用五項硬體設計原則作為細部設計評估標準，促使規劃以使用者行為與日常需求為導向。
建議二
嚴格落實前期需求調查及使用後評估機制：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部國土管理署
協辦機關：國家住宅及都市更新中心、各級政府建築管理及相關單位
建議將前期需求調查制度化，將住戶、鄰里與未來營運單位需求調查列為發包必備附件；並在招標文件明訂，投標團隊須以需求調查為基礎提出公共空間配置與營運計畫；評選階段將需求調查完整性、營運可行性與生命週期成本（LCC）納入實質評分，並在簽約前確認未來營運主體（取得或承接意向書或協議）；同時建立竣工後定期辦理POE與住戶滿意度回饋機制，將調查結果用於設計修正、物管契約與政策滾動修正，避免形式化公設與重複低專用空間，導向多功能、低維護與高日常性的配置。
建議三
引入公私部門資源的整合及應用，納入社區培力及共管治理：中長期建議
主辦機關：內政部國土管理署
協辦機關：國家住宅及都市更新中心、社會住宅主辦機關、相關物業管理單位、民間組織
將社宅公共空間定位為社會性基礎設施，從「管理導向」轉向「治理導向」。於發包前要求提出初期社區活動計畫、居民與服務團隊培訓方案及與在地組織合作策略；中央或地方應提供啟動補助，以協助社區培力並降低物管引入外部資源時的門檻；鼓勵公私協力與跨部門（內政部、地方社會局及衛福部等）政策及資源整合，使公共空間能支援多樣社會需求，如照護、社福、健康促進等多元功能，使社會住宅真正成為支撐城市社會基礎的關鍵節點。
建議四
持續推動當代台灣居住行為與需求調查及社會住宅公共空間使用後評估（POE）與高齡共融研究：長期性建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：國家住宅及都市更新中心、地方政府建築管理單位
建議由內政部建築研究所主導，將「當代台灣居住行為與需求調查」及「社會住宅公共空間使用後評估（POE）」制度化，長期蒐集系統性使用資料並建立可操作的「社宅公共空間使用效能評估架構」。透過持續追蹤與高齡共融研究，提供設計、營運與政策調整的實證基礎，確保公共空間規劃能隨住戶結構與使用型態演變而滾動修正。
", "英文摘要": "As Taiwan undergoes rapid population ageing and increasing household diversity, housing is no longer solely a locus for shelter but also a critical infrastructure for community interaction and social support. Social housing policy has been shifting from quantitative supply toward qualitative co-living, elevating the importance of public space in fostering resident interaction and community cohesion. This study focuses on the public spaces of contemporary vertical social housing in Taiwan, examining how such spaces respond to everyday resident needs and fulfill social-support functions in high-density, low-fertility, and ageing contexts. Through a review of literature and institutional guidance, combined with a field-based post-occupancy evaluation (POE) and systematic behavioral observation at the Guangci Charity Park Social Housing Complex in Taipei, the research analyzes usage patterns and key influencing factors across different public-space typologies. The study then develops a spatial pattern language and design guidelines for practical application in design and policy. The objectives are: (1) to analyze current use, problems, and potentials of public spaces in vertical social housing; (2) to investigate differences in user needs across age groups, household types, and social groups; and (3) to establish user-centred models for public-space design and management that enhance usability and social outcomes, and that can inform subsequent policy and design practice.
1.Research background
Taiwan’s demographic and family-structure shifts necessitate a reconception of social housing public space as an element of urban social infrastructure. National guidance and international literature suggest that the success of public spaces in residential settings depends less on gross area or equipment counts and more on design qualities that enable everyday use, social interaction, and informal care. This study situates vertical social housing public spaces within their institutional and theoretical contexts and uses empirical POE and behavioral observation to bridge planning intent and lived practice.
2.Research methods and procedures
The study synthesizes domestic and international literature and central government guidance documents to clarify theoretical constructs, institutional frameworks, and design principles relevant to social housing public space. Employing a qualitative case-study approach, the Guangci Charity Park Social Housing Complex in Taipei was selected as the principal field site. Empirical methods included on-site spatial inventory, plan analysis, systematic behavioral observation based on Public Space / Public Life (PSPL) methods, post-occupancy evaluation (POE), and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholder groups (older adults, caregivers, parent–child households, property managers, and officials). Qualitative data were integrated to identify relationships between spatial characteristics and user behaviours, and to derive a spatial pattern language and actionable design recommendations.
3.Key findings
The findings indicate that the efficacy of public spaces in vertical social housing is determined primarily by seven spatial characteristics—accessibility; visibility and transparency; multifunctionality; human-scale design; semi-public/transitional spaces; sense of community and place identity; and programming of activities—rather than by gross area or the sheer number of facilities. Dailyness, accessibility, and pass-by convenience (“順道性”) are particularly critical to fostering stable, regular use. The study synthesizes five representative public-space pattern types—(1) circulation-node type (e.g., lobbies, mail areas, primary entrances and arcades), (2) social-interaction type (e.g., lounge areas, semi-outdoor platforms, plazas), (3) care-support type (e.g., seating areas for older adults, companion seats near playgrounds and entrances), (4) learning-and-development type (e.g., reading rooms, multi-purpose classrooms, quiet study spaces), and (5) health-and-recreation type (e.g., lawns, walking trails, rooftop gardens, fitness facilities). These pattern types describe typical locations, target users, and behavioral modalities in vertical communities. Empirical evidence also reveals persistent gaps between design intent, management arrangements, and actual use—chiefly attributable to inadequate front-end needs assessment and the absence of systematic POE mechanisms.
4.Major recommendations
Based on the case analysis at Guangci Charity Park Social Housing and the broader literature, the study recommends treating social housing public spaces as social infrastructure that requires integrated design, management, and governance strategies. Key recommendations are summarized below; each recommendation retains the proposed lead and cooperating agencies for policy uptake.
Recommendation 1 — Introduce a spatial pattern language into social-housing design and review processes (Immediate).
Lead agency: Department of Land Administration, Ministry of the Interior.
Cooperating agencies: National Housing and Urban Regeneration Center; municipal/provincial building management authorities and related units.
Adopt the five pattern types as a common design lexicon to be required in tender documents and design submissions. Require design teams to identify and label pattern types on plans and in specifications, and to indicate target users, typical usage periods, and expected behaviours. Integrate the seven spatial characteristics into review checklists and require explicit designer responses and plan-level cross-references. Apply a set of design principles (noted in the report) as assessment criteria to ensure planning decisions are grounded in user behaviour and everyday needs rather than solely on area or equipment counts.
Recommendation 2 — Institutionalize front-end needs assessment and post-occupancy evaluation (POE) mechanisms (Immediate).
Lead agency: Department of Land Administration, Ministry of the Interior.
Cooperating agencies: National Housing and Urban Regeneration Center; municipal/provincial building management authorities and related units.
Make household, neighbourhood, and future operator needs assessments mandatory attachments in tender documents. Require bidders to base public-space layouts and operational plans on explicit needs studies. Include the completeness of needs assessment, operational feasibility, and life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis as substantive scoring criteria during procurement to reduce over-reliance on initial capital cost. Secure operator commitment (e.g., MOU) before contract signing to mitigate unclear operational responsibilities. Establish routine POE and resident satisfaction surveys after project completion to inform design corrections, contract renewals or adjustments, and iterative policy revisions. Prioritize multi-functional, low-maintenance, and high-daily-use configurations over large but under-used single-purpose amenities.
Recommendation 3 — Integrate public and private resources for community capacity building and co-governance (Medium–long term).
Lead agency: Department of Land Administration, Ministry of the Interior.
Cooperating agencies: National Housing and Urban Regeneration Center; social-housing implementing agencies; property management entities; civil society organizations.
Reposition public spaces as social infrastructure and shift from a management-centric model to a governance-oriented approach. Require proposers to include initial community activity plans, resident and service-team training, and strategies for partnering with local organizations in bidding documents. Provide seed funding or subsidies from central or local governments to support early community capacity building and reduce barriers for property managers to engage external partners. Promote cross-sectoral collaboration (housing, social welfare, public health) to enable public spaces to support caregiving, welfare delivery, and health promotion—thereby strengthening long-term community co-management and social outcomes.
Recommendation 4 — Sustain a national program of contemporary housing-behaviour monitoring and POE with an emphasis on age-friendly design (Long term).
Lead agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI), Ministry of the Interior.
Cooperating agencies: National Housing and Urban Regeneration Center; municipal/provincial building management authorities.
Institutionalize periodic, systematic surveys of contemporary residential behaviours and needs alongside routine social-housing POE. Develop and maintain an operational “public-space performance” evaluation framework to collect longitudinal usage data and evidence for design, operational, and policy adjustments. Emphasize ageing-inclusive research to ensure public spaces evolve with demographic and household-structure changes and to provide robust empirical foundations for future design and governance reforms.
The study contends that embedding a spatial pattern language, strengthening needs assessment and POE, promoting public–private community capacity building, and institutionalizing long-term behavioural monitoring will materially improve the usability and social value of public spaces in vertical social housing. These measures will help align design intent with lived practice and support social housing’s role as essential urban social infrastructure.
", "相關檔案": "社會住宅公共空間之使用者需求與空間模式研究(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/336807/846ce90e-1199-4e89-a297-3db265b37aec.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339180", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 24 Jun 2026 02:41:00 GMT", "title": "智慧建造：基於數位雙生演算與機械手臂列印發展減碳預鑄免拆模鋼筋混凝土柱體工法之研究", "計畫主持人": "顏嘉慶", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-03-28", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "工程技術組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "數位雙生、機器人、電腦輔助製造、營建自動化、鋼筋混凝土", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
建築工程營造業（AEC）正面臨全球性的數位轉型浪潮與淨零排放挑戰，同時國內亦深陷勞動力老化與缺工的結構性困境。傳統營建現場高度依賴勞力密集的木模工法，不僅施工風險高，且產生大量營建廢棄物，不利於國家永續發展目標之推動。雖然「預鑄工法」具備提升品質與降低現場人力的潛力，但現行技術受限於鋼模成本，難以應對現代建築日益複雜的客製化造型需求。為突破此瓶頸，本研究提出以「數位雙生（Digital Twin）」為核心，整合「機械手臂 3D 列印」技術，發展具備高度幾何適應性的「客製化預鑄免拆模鋼筋混凝土工法」。透過數位環境中的模擬運算引導實體製造，將傳統「以模具為中心」的生產模式轉型為「無模具數位製造」，以期達成營建自動化、精準化與減廢之目標。
二、研究方法及過程
本計畫採虛實整合研發策略，首先開發適用於大型構件之速固型水泥基材料，並於 Rhino/Grasshopper 環境中建構整合逆運動學與碰撞檢測之數位雙生系統，以確保製造路徑之精確度；繼而開發參數化殼體演算法，自動生成兼具結構內層與裝飾外層之模組化組裝介面。最終透過 3 公尺足尺柱體之實體列印與核心混凝土澆置，驗證免拆模工法之施工可行性，並完成成本效益與生命週期碳排評估。
三、重要發現
1.數位雙生之預測效益：實證顯示，透過數位雙生環境進行預模擬，能精確預測機械手臂的運動姿態與材料堆疊情形，有效解決了複雜幾何路徑規劃的
難題，大幅降低實體試誤成本。
2.免拆模工法之結構安全性：3D 列印之水泥殼體具備足夠的抗拉強度，能有效承受核心混凝土澆置時的側向壓力，無爆模或漏漿情形，成功解決了複雜
造型與結構規範之間的矛盾。
3.自動化與成本優勢：相較於傳統 CNC 木模工法，機械手臂列印工法顯著減少了模板廢料產生，且將成本重心從「勞力密集」轉移至「數位設計」，在處理高複雜度、低重複性的客製化構件時具備顯著的成本優勢。
4.碳排放挑戰：經 LCA 評估發現，現階段為確保列印材料之速固性與強度，水vii智慧建造：基於數位雙生演算與機械手臂列印發展減碳預鑄免拆模鋼筋混凝土柱體工法之研究泥與化學添加劑用量較高，導致總碳排放量高於傳統工法。此結果指出了未來技術發展的關鍵瓶頸，即「材料低碳化」之迫切性。
四、主要建議事項
建議一
研發低碳替代性列印材料與配比：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
本研究經生命週期評估（LCA）發現，現行 3D 列印混凝土為滿足速凝與堆疊強度需求，往往使用高比例水泥，導致構件隱含碳排（Embodied Carbon）偏高。為落實綠色營造，建議後續研究應鎖定以下重點：
• 低碳配比研發：優先探討使用工業副產品（如高爐石粉、飛灰、矽灰）或地質聚合物（Geopolymer）等膠結材替代部分水泥。目標在不犧牲列印性
（可擠出性、可堆疊性）的前提下，大幅降低材料碳足跡。
• 建立實務參數資料庫：彙整不同低碳配比對應的列印參數（如列印速度、層高、泵送壓力）與硬固後力學性能數據。此資料庫可提供產業界明確的參考依據，減少廠商自行試誤的成本與材料浪費，加速低碳 3D 列印技術的普及應用。
建議二
建立 3D 列印與 BIM 資料交換標準及推廣平台：中長期建議
主辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
協辦機關：中華民國全國建築師公會
本研究已驗證參數化設計端與機器人製造端串接之可行性，惟目前產業間缺乏統一的資訊交換格式，導致技術門檻過高。
• 制定本土化交換標準：建議由台灣建築中心主導，參照國際成熟標準（如英國 NBS 或新加坡 BIM 指南），制定適用於台灣營建環境的「數位製造 BIM元件資料交換標準」。明確定義列印路徑、切片參數及材料屬性在 IFC 格式中的對應欄位，解決異質軟體間資訊斷層問題。
• 建構推廣與應用平台：結合中華民國全國建築師公會的實務網絡，推廣通用型的機器人路徑輸出外掛，降低建築師進入數位製造的門檻。同時利用建築中心既有的標章制度與教育訓練體系，開設數位製造實務課程，協助從業人員無縫接軌新技術，加速產業數位轉型。
", "英文摘要": "1. Research Background and Motivation
The AEC industry faces urgent demands for digital transformation and net-zero emissions, compounded by a severe domestic labor shortage. Traditional timber formwork remains labor-intensive and wasteful, while current prefabrication methods are constrained by high mold costs, limiting architectural customization. To address these challenges, this research proposes a framework integrating ”Digital Twin” technology with ”Robotic 3D Printing” to develop a ”Customized Prefabricated Stay-in-Place (SiP) Reinforced Concrete System.” By utilizing computational simulations to guide physical fabrication, this study aims to transition to ”mold-less digital manufacturing,”thereby enhancing automation, precision, and sustainability in construction.
2. Research Methodology
This project adopted a cyber-physical approach. Initially, a rapid-setting cementitious composite suitable for large-scale printing was developed. A digital twin environment was established within Rhino/Grasshopper, integrating inverse kinematics and collision detection to ensure high-fidelity path planning. A parametric algorithm was then generated to create modular assembly interfaces. The methodology culminated in the robotic printing and casting of a full-scale, three-meter column, validating the SiP method’s feasibility, followed by cost-benefit and life cycle assessment (LCA) analyses.
3. Key Findings
1. Digital Twin Efficacy: Pre-simulation accurately predicted robotic kinematics and material behavior, effectively resolving path planning
complexities for irregular geometries and reducing trial-and-error costs.
2. Structural Integrity: The 3D-printed shell exhibited sufficient tensile strength to withstand lateral pressure during core casting without failure,
satisfying structural compliance.
3. Economic & Environmental Benefits: Compared to CNC timber formwork,robotic printing significantly reduced waste and shifted cost structures from labor to digital design, offering distinct advantages for customized components.
4. Carbon Emission Challenges: LCA results indicate that current printing materials require high cement content for stability, leading to higher carbon emissions than traditional methods, highlighting ”material decarbonization” as a critical future priority.
4. Principal Recommendations
Recommendation 1: Development of Low-Carbon Alternative Printing
Materials (Immediate)
Lead Agency: ABRI | Co-organizer: TABC
To mitigate high embodied carbon, future research must prioritize substituting cement with industrial by-products (e.g., slag, fly ash) or geopolymers without compromising printability. Establishing a practical parameter database for these low-carbon mixes will be essential for accelerating industry adoption.
Recommendation 2: Establishment of 3D Printing and BIM Data Standards
(Mid-to-Long Term)
Lead Agency: TABC | Co-organizer: National Architects Association (NAA)
To lower technical barriers, it is recommended that the TABC lead the formulation of a localized ”Digital Fabrication BIM Data Exchange Standard” (referencing global standards like NBS). This standard should define mapping for printing paths within IFC formats. Concurrently, leveraging the NAA’s network to promote robot path output plugins will facilitate the sector’s digital transformation.
", "相關檔案": "12-智慧建造：基於數位雙生演算與機械手臂列印發展減碳預鑄免拆模鋼筋混凝土柱體工法之研究(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339180/3a1badec-69cc-4bdb-8a6d-60738ce248f5.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340355", "ModifyDate": "Tue, 18 Aug 2026 05:38:00 GMT", "title": "智慧化居住空間展示推廣計畫", "計畫主持人": "周光宙", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "財團法人台灣建築中心", "執行行程": "2025-03-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "智慧建築、智慧化居住空間展示中心、易構住宅實驗屋、智慧科技、 AI 人工智慧", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "自98年起，內政部建築研究所設立「智慧化居住空間展示中心（Living 3.0）」，結合建築設計與國內智慧設備，展示智慧科技如何融入生活，勾勒未來居住新樣貌。到了 110 年，展示中心升級為「Living 4.0」，導入 AI 人工智慧技術，並規劃相關升級配套，讓展示內容更完整、更貼近未來智慧生活的需求。為了更貼近國人的生活型態並活用地方資源，建築研究所也陸續設置了「智慧住宅單元展示區（Smart Unit）」、「智慧住宅南部展示場（Smart Home）」以及「智慧生活系統中部動態展示區（Smart Life）」。這些展示場域整合政府與民間的力量，攜手推廣智慧生活的概念，打造更便利、舒適、安全的居住環境。
本計畫將延續前期執行成果，持續強化內容與推動成效；本年度參觀人數加總北部已達 9,106 人次(包含 360 環景導覽造訪次數 2,472 人次)；中南部達 20,301人次且參觀滿意度達 94%。因應多元參觀需求與遠端體驗趨勢，展示中心與易構住宅實驗屋導入 360 度全景體驗技術，讓民眾無論何時何地皆能身歷其境體驗智慧住宅環境。為配合建築研究所辦公室整合及展示推廣計畫場域調整，本年度新增辦理「辦公室搬遷至材料實驗中心辦公棟之室內翻修設計及估價前置作業」。
隨著 AI、大數據、雲端運算與物聯網技術快速發展，加上近年地震與火災頻仍，南部展示區亦同步更新，導入「智慧化避難引導系統」。當災害發生時，系統可即時啟動警示並自動引導逃生路線，提高災害應變效率，有效保障人員安全。在推廣與教育方面，本年度依不同族群需求辦理多元研習與導覽活動，包括：
客製化導覽、AI 智慧建築節能學習坊、AI 智慧淨零建築互動營隊、AI 設計沙龍、智慧綠建築科技應用種子師資課程等。同時持續更新智慧生活數位教材，促進科學教育普及，並加強與相關產業的技術交流及理念推廣。
", "英文摘要": "Since 2009, “Intelligent Living Space (Living 3.0)” has been built as a demonstration center by Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior. Living 3.0 integrates the idea of interior designs and domestic smart products or equipment to showcase the new ICT smart living lifestyle and vision. With the base of previous implementation results, the project will keep upgrading the contents and effectiveness. The booming development of AI artificial intelligence technology, big data applications, cloud computing and the evolution of the Internet of Things technology provides the greater opportunity for Living 3.0 to upgrade to Living 4.0. “Smart Unit ", "Taichung Smart Home", "Kaohsiung Smart Home" were continually built based on to integrate the resources of public and private sectors and jointly promote the concept of smart lifer.
Building upon previous achievements, this year’s project continues to enhance exhibition content and strengthen promotional effectiveness. Visitor numbers reached 9,106 in the northern venue (including 2,472 visits through 360-degree virtual tours) and 20,301 in the central and southern venues, with an overall satisfaction rate of 94%.
In response to diverse visitor needs and the rise of remote experiences, both the exhibition center and the Prefabricated Housing Experimental House have adopted 360-degree panoramic tour technology, enabling the public to explore smart-home environments anytime and anywhere.To support ABRI’s office integration plan and adjustments to exhibition and promotional spaces, this year the project added preparatory tasks for the “Interior renovation design and cost estimation for relocating offices to the Materials Laboratory Center building.”
With rapid advancements in AI, big data, cloud computing, and IoT technologies—and in light of recent frequent earthquakes and fires—the southern exhibition venue has also undergone upgrades, including the installation of an “Intelligent Emergency Evacuation System.” During emergencies, the system provides real-time alerts and automatically guides evacuation routes, enhancing disaster response efficiency and safeguarding occupants’ safety.In the areas of promotion and education, a variety of workshops and guided activities were organized for different audiences, including customized tours, the AI Smart Building Energy-Saving Workshop, the AI Net-Zero Smart Building Interactive Camp, the AI Design Salon, and the Smart Green Building Technology Instructor Training Program. Digital smart-living learning materials were also continuously updated to advance scientific education and strengthen technological exchange and knowledge promotion within related industries.
", "相關檔案": "114-智慧化居住空間展示推廣計畫期末報告書-FFF(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340355/f8a61a43-a840-488e-9179-0932c2eadeef.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=340220", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 12 Aug 2026 03:18:00 GMT", "title": "建築節能技術推廣與住商部門溫室氣體減量管理計畫", "計畫主持人": "周光宙", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "財團法人台灣建築中心", "執行行程": "2025-03-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "建築節能、智慧綠建築、全球暖化、溫室氣體", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、緣起
為降低氣候變遷及地球暖化造成之衝擊，全球目前有超過150個國家宣示或規劃在2050年達到溫室氣體淨零排放，提出更有效降低建築總體耗能之解決方案。賴清德總統於113年4月宣告推動淨零轉型五大策略，並於113年6月成立「國家氣候變遷對策委員會」，由行政院推動淨零排放相關政策，並由內政部推動近零碳建築政策。為達成2050淨零排放願景目標，亟需導入國內外建築節能技術及推廣宣導工作，由公部門擴散至民間單位，提供一般民眾及建築節能從業人員相關資訊，厚植國內建築從業人員精進建築節能技術，以擴大國內落實建築節能，達到提升建築物能源使用效率、促進公正轉型及帶動建築智慧節能產業發展之多重目標。
二、計畫內容與成果
本計畫依約辦理（1）建築節能技術推廣宣導及展示及（2）住商部門溫室氣體排放管制方案相關工作等2分項計畫，並完成各工作項目，執行成果摘述如下：
(一) 蒐集國內外、國際能源署（IEA）、COP29：亞塞拜然建築節能等措施，並針對我國建築節能分年推動策略提出立即可行與中長期建議。另盤點建築節能措施對利害關係人之影響及衝擊評估，釐清相關利害關係人之影響。
(二) 製作「建築節能技術應用之宣導動畫影片」，係延續上年度製作完成「建築節能技術」宣導動畫影片，本年度增加建築物導入創能、儲能及能源管理系統等三大主題，並融入冒險及闖關元素的故事情節，吸引民眾觀看意願。另製作「建築節能技術應用之30秒入口短影音」，係以上年度及本年度宣導動畫影片製成30秒短影音，提升建築節能宣導推廣之成效。
(三) 辦理北、中、南「建築節能技術推廣講習會」共3場次及「建築節能標竿案場觀摩參訪活動」共3場次，推廣建築節能之政策及技術應用；另辦理「當前住宅政策座談會」1場次，廣邀建築公協會、產業界、學術單位及民間代表參與意見交流，加強社會溝通，蒐集各界建言，以凝聚共識。
(四) 依我國氣候變遷因應法第12條及施行細則第8條規定，部門行動方案成果報告需每年9月30日前提報中央主管機關，本團隊彙整完成住商部門溫室氣體減量行動方案（113年成果報告），提供內政部（建築研究所）於114年9月30日前如期函送成果報告至環境部。
三、結論與建議
(一) 結論
本計畫延續建築節能技術推廣宣導及住商部門溫室氣體排放管制方案相關工作，本（114）年度依約完成分項計畫與工作項目，透過推廣講習、實地參訪、宣導影片等多元方式，宣導我國建築節能政策，並推廣建築物導入節能、創能、儲能及能源管理系統等技術應用，以引導民眾將節能知識轉化為具體行動，共同實踐 2050 淨零排放之願景。
(二) 建議
本計畫建議持續舉辦建築節能技術推廣講習，針對政府機關及建築相關產業從業人員精進建築節能之專業職能，引導新建建築及既有建築導入節能、創能、儲能及能源管理系統等技術應用，提升建築物能源效率，落實建築節能技術之推廣。
", "英文摘要": "I. Rationale
To mitigate the impact of climate change and global warming, over 150 coun-tries worldwide have announced or planned to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. This global consensus necessitates the creation of more effec-tive solutions to reduce the overall energy consumption of buildings. President Lai Ching-te announced the promotion of five major strategies for net-zero transition in April 2024 and established the "National Climate Change Response Commit-tee" in June 2024 to advance related policies, with the Ministry of the Interior (MOI) driving the near-net-zero building policy. To achieve the 2050 net-zero emission target, it is crucial to introduce and promote domestic and international building energy efficiency technologies. This effort aims to disseminate knowledge from the public sector to the private sector, provide relevant information to the general public and energy efficiency professionals, deepening the expertise of local building practitioners. This widespread adoption of building energy efficiency measures is expected to achieve multiple goals: enhancing building energy efficien-cy, promoting a just transition, and driving the development of the smart energy-saving building industry.
II. Project Content and Outcomes
This project involved the execution of two sub-programs: (1) Promotion and Demonstration of Building Energy Efficiency Technologies, and (2) Work Related to the Greenhouse Gas Emission Control Plan for the Residential and Commercial Sector. The key outcomes achieved are summarized as follows:
(1)Strategy Review and Impact Assessment
We collected data on building energy efficiency measures from domestic and international sources, the International Energy Agency (IEA), COP29 (Ba-ku, Azerbaijan), etc. Immediately actionable and medium to long-term recom-mendations were subsequently proposed for Taiwan’s phased implementation strategy for building energy efficiency. Additionally, we assessed the impact and potential conflicts of energy efficiency measures on stakeholders to clarify their relevance and effects on various parties.
(2)Production of Promotional Materials
We produced an "Animated Promotional Film on Building Energy Effi-ciency Technology," which is a continuation of the previous year's video. This year's film incorporated three major themes: Electricity Generation, Storage, and Control (Energy Management) into an adventure and challenge narrative, much like last year’s film, to increase public viewing interest. Furthermore, a 30-second "Short Video Clip on Building Energy Efficiency Technology" was created using footage from both the current and previous year's animated films to enhance the outreach and effectiveness of the energy efficiency campaign.
(3)Events and Social Communication
We successfully organized three "Building Energy Efficiency Technology Promotion Seminars" (in Northern, Central, and Southern Taiwan) and three "Building Energy Efficiency Benchmark Case Site Visits" to promote policies and technical applications. Furthermore, one "Current Housing Policy Sympo-sium" was held, inviting building associations, industry representatives, aca-demia, and civil groups for an opinion exchange. This strengthened social communication, collected diverse feedback, and fostered consensus.
(4)Submission of Sectoral Action Plan Report
In compliance with Article 12 of the Climate Change Response Act of the Republic of China and Article 8 of its enforcement rules, sectoral action plan results must be submitted to the central competent authority before September 30th each year. We completed the compilation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduc-tion Action Plan for the Residential and Commercial Sector (2024 Results Re-port), ensuring its timely submission by the Ministry of the Interior (Architec-ture and Building Research Institute) to the Ministry of Environment before September 30, 2025.
III. Conclusion and Recommendations
(1)Conclusion
This project continued the initiatives related to the promotion of building energy-saving technologies and the greenhouse gas emission control plan for the residential and commercial sectors. In 2025, all sub-projects and designated tasks were completed as specified. Through various channels, such as seminars, on-site visits, and promotional animated films, this project effectively promot-ed building energy-saving policies. By introducing energy-saving, energy-generation, energy-storage, and energy-management systems, this project suc-cessfully guided the public to transform energy-saving knowledge into concrete actions, contributing to the 2050 net-zero emission vision.
(2)Recommendations
Moving forward, we recommend the continuous organization of promotion seminars to further strengthen the professional competencies of public and pri-vate sector stakeholders. By encouraging the adoption of energy-saving, gener-ation, storage, and management applications in new and existing structures, these efforts will drive significant improvements in building energy perfor-mance and facilitate the nationwide implementation of building energy-saving policies.
", "相關檔案": "114建築節能技術推廣與住商部門溫室氣體減量管理計畫 成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/340220/7c4f0964-edbe-4f1b-a82d-7c3cf31eaa06.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339759", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 30 Jul 2026 02:35:00 GMT", "title": "既有建築物營運階段導入智慧建築評估系統案例實證研究", "計畫主持人": "游璧菁", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-03-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "智慧建築、既有建築、評估系統", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究源起
為促進建築與資通訊產業整合，鼓勵善用資通訊主動感知技術，使建築物於使用階段的日常營運更具智慧，於 93 年建立「智慧建築標章」制度，截至113 年 10 月底止，取得智慧建築標章與候選智慧建築證書案件數累計 1,688案。113 年研究已完成既有建築類智慧建築評估手冊(草案)，因應智慧建築標章有效期限為 5 年屆滿後，依簡化查核表查核通過後申請延續認可，有效期限5年再次屆滿者，於智慧建築標章效期屆滿後，部分設備性能衰退或生命周期屆滿，申請人須進行設備、服務更新升級情形，制定合適之既有建築物智慧建築評估系統。
確保系統的可操作性，114 年透過計畫執行抽選既有建築案例，以該(草案)進行案例試評，分析既有建築應用該評估基準之可行性及比較不同基準之差異性，確保草案可引導既有建築達成安全安心、健康舒適、節能永續、貼心便利、淨零轉型等效益，作為內政部建築研究所後續推動之參考。
為精進智慧建築產業發展、鼓勵建築導入智慧化管理與服務，內政部建築研究所於標章制度推動上，已採取二大策略：
(一)簡化取得標章建築延續認可執行機制：智慧建築標章有效期限為5年，為鼓勵已取得標章者於有效期限屆滿後，繼續申請延續認可，內政部112年1月5 日修正「智慧建築標章申請審核認可及使用作業要點」第10點第1項規定，明定已取得標章者，首次有效期限屆滿前6個月內，得由內政部指定之智慧建築標章評定專業機構，依智慧建築標章延續認可簡化查核表派員赴現場查核，通過後向內政部申請延續認可5年，大幅簡化查核項目及申請書圖文件。
(二)鼓勵既有建築申請智慧建築標章：因應依簡化查核表查核通過後，取得智慧建築標章延續認可之既有建築物，於智慧建築標章效期屆滿後，部分設備性能衰退或生命周期屆滿，申請人須進行設備、服務更新升級，制定既有建築物智慧建築評估系統，鼓勵既有建築導入智慧化，以延長建築使用階段生命週期，協助既有建築階段性達成高效、節能、低碳的目標。引導以創新的智慧建築科技應用，達到安全安心、健康舒適、節能永續、貼心便利等目標。
113年已依據2024年版智慧建築標章手冊，完成既有建築類智慧建築評估系統(草案)研訂。援此，114 年擬持續執行「既有建築物營運階段導入智慧建築評估系統案例實證研究」計畫，選取依智慧建築評估手冊2016年版基準取得候選智慧建築證書之案例至少 5 案，進行試評並提出既有建築類智慧建築評估系統之修正，作為內政部建築研究所後續推動既有建築智慧化之參考。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究採用文獻調查分析法、比較分析法、專家諮詢法等，以達成計畫目標。
(一)文獻調查分析法：本計畫將蒐集國內外既有智慧建築案例，探討依既有建築類智慧建築評估系統更新升級之成本效益、受限於既有建築結構、空間、使用條件限制、設備性能衰退等因素可能遭遇之困難、申請更新升級之誘因及經費籌措等課題之因應方式，以作為提出既有建築類智慧建築評估系統之修正之參考。
(二)比較分析法：比較國內外既有智慧建築評估方式，對既有建築類智慧建築評估系統之評估內容、分級、給分等差異內容，進行比較分析，排除既有建築條件限制，鼓勵既有建築導入智慧化，以確保既有建築類智慧建築評估系統之合理性。
(三)專家諮詢法：於提出既有建築類智慧建築評估系統階段，邀請相關專家學者針對分級評估基準進行審議，提出應修正及增刪之意見，供研究團隊參考，據以完成既有建築類智慧建築評估系統，確認評估制度之可行性。
本研究主要係提出既有建築類智慧建築評估系統修正，研提既有智慧建築評估方式，參考國內外既有建築評估方法，採用文獻調查分析法、比較分析法、專家諮詢法等，以達成計畫目標。
113年已依據2024年版智慧建築標章手冊，完成既有建築類智慧建築評估系統(草案)研訂。援此，114 年擬持續執行「既有建築物營運階段導入智慧建築評估系統案例實證研究」計畫，選取依智慧建築評估手冊 2016 年版基準取得候選智慧建築證書之案例至少 5 案，進行試評並提出既有建築類智慧建築評估系統之修正，作為內政部建築研究所後續推動既有建築智慧化之參考。
依前述提出本研究執行預期目標說明如下：
(一)既有建築物實際案例選取及基本資料分析：選取依據智慧建築評估手冊 2016 年版基準，取得候選智慧建築證書之案例至少 5 案，分析申請案件之用途、面積、樓層高度、智慧建築評估得分等特性。
(二)既有建築類智慧建築評估系統實際案例試評分析：完成以上選取5案件之試評，分析試評與原取得智慧建築標章或候選智慧建築證書之等級差異，並統計案例試評結果等級高於及低於原取得智慧建築標或候選智慧建築證書章之等級者之數量及比例；探討既有建築物營運階段導入智慧建築評估系統，為維持其原有智慧建築等級，依據其既有結構、空間、使用等基本條件、資料取得、既有系統等限制條件，應進行之既有建築智慧化改造項目。
另以未曾取得智慧建築標章或候選智慧建築證書之既有建築物，且使用用途、面積、樓層高度等基本條件與選取之試評案件條件接近之3案例進行試評，了解應用該評估基準評估於未曾取得智慧建築標章或候選智慧建築證書之既有建築物之可行性，並進行以上合計8案改造前後之效益評估比較。
(三)既有建築類智慧建築評估系統之修正建議：依據以上分析結果，修正既有建築類智慧建築評估系統，並邀請產學研專家學者召開2場專家座談會，就該系統提出建議，並參酌意見修正建議。
三、重要發現
基於台灣高達 97%的既有建築占比，本研究探討營運階段導入智慧建築評估系統的實務可行性。透過國際制度比較、指標體系修正及實際案例的試評，歸納出以下重要發現：
(一)國際既有建築智慧化評估趨勢：從「設備導向」轉向「效益展現」、「數據驅動」與「以人為本」。研究發現美國、歐盟、新加玻、日本、香港等地區，對既有建築的智慧化評估已由初期的單純節能導向，逐步進展至兼顧資訊化、自動化與使用者體驗的綜合智慧化。例如美國的 SPIRE 系統強調技術與流程的整合效益。共同趨勢在於強調「模組化導入」與「數據驅動」的動態效能監測，而非僅是靜態設施檢查。
(二)修正版評估系統具備高度的「等級鑑別度」，實證研究發現，試評的6件已取得標章或候選證書之案例中，重新評估後的智慧化等級均維持不變。證明修正後的系統在簡化流程的同時，亦能有效反映建築原有的智慧化水準，確保制度推動的穩定性。
(三)市場自發性智慧化動能顯著，未曾申請標章建築亦具備基礎實力，3件從未申請過智慧建築標章的既有建築試評案例，試評結果顯示其仍具備「銀級」或「銅級」的智慧化水準。反映出在當前 ESG 永續治理與節能政策的推動下，產業與業主已依其實際營運需求，自發性地投入智慧化升級(如BEMS系統、AI 能源管理等)，這為未來制度推廣奠定了良好的市場基礎。
四、主要建議事項
基於上述發現，本研究從政策、技術、產業等多個層面提出具體建議，以加速台灣既有建築的智慧化轉型：
(一) 政策與制度層面：建立法規與獎勵的雙軌驅動模式
⚫ 推動強制性與激勵性並行： 建議針對達一定規模的公有建築或大型商辦，在標章屆滿後強制進行智慧化檢核；同時將智慧建築改善納入「綠建築投資抵減」或提供稅賦優惠。
⚫ 連結淨零路徑：將智慧建築評估系統與「建築能效分級」及2050淨零目標串聯，透過智慧化管理達成階段性節能減碳績效。
⚫ 精進延續認可機制：建議未來在標章延續認可時，應加入「數據佐證」要求，確保智慧化設施在 5 年效期後仍能發揮實質效益。
(二) 技術與工具層面：推動數位化平台與標準化格式
⚫ 建置線上自評與申請平台：發展簡便的數位評估工具，讓管理單位能即時輸入營運數據進行等級預測，降低申請負擔。
⚫ 強化數據治理與分享：積極推動採用國內已發布的「智慧建築資料格式標準(TAICS TS-0054)」，提升跨系統整合能力，為未來的 AIoT應用打下基礎。
⚫ 導入AI預測維護：鼓勵採用預測性維修(Predictive Maintenance)與BIM 數位分身技術，將維運模式由「被動修繕」轉為「主動管理」，降低長期營運成本。
(三) 產業與市場層面：發展創新的服務商業模式
⚫ 推行「智慧建築即服務」（SBaaS）： 鼓勵產業由硬體銷售轉向租賃或訂閱模式，降低業主初期一次性投資的壓力。
⚫ 建立「智慧建築改造聯盟」： 整合技術供應商、系統整合商與金融機構，提供從診斷、設計到綠色融資的一站式解決方案。
(四) 實務執行層面：簡化流程並聚焦「功能效益」
⚫ 功能導向取代設施導向：對於既有建築評估，應著重於智慧化後的「實質功能展現」與「管理效益」。
⚫ 放寬送審圖說要求：考量舊建築圖資取得困難，應允許以現場照片、功能說明影片或系統畫面截圖作為佐證資料，並輔以現場查核確認。
(五) 人才培育與研究層面：跨領域能量提升與長期追蹤
⚫ 建立跨域學程：培養結合 ICT、建築、機電與數據分析的智慧建築專業人才。
⚫ 建置長期追蹤資料庫：建議內政部建築研究所建立長期追蹤機制，收集已導入智慧化建築的實質節能數據(如 EUI 改善率)，以作為未來修正指標與制定補助政策的科學依據。
總結而言，既有建築的智慧化不應只是單純的硬體更新，而是一場營運模式的數位轉型。透過評估系統的簡化與精進，搭配明確的政策誘因，台灣可望在提升建築資產價值的同時，也為達成國家永續與淨零碳排目標做出實質貢獻。
", "英文摘要": "I.Origin of research
In order to promote the integration of the construction and information and communication industries and encourage the use of active information and communication sensing technology to make the daily operations of buildings more intelligent during the use phase, the "Intelligent building Label" system was established in 2004. As of the end of October 2024, a total of 1,688 cases have been obtained with intelligent building labels and candidate intelligent building certificates. 2024 years of research has completed the intelligent building assessment manual (draft) for existing buildings. In view of the fact that after the validity period of the intelligent building label expires for 5 years, the applicant must apply for renewal of recognition after passing the simplified checklist. If the validity period of 5 years expires again, after the expiration of the intelligent building label, the performance of some equipment will decline or the life cycle will expire. Applicants must update and upgrade equipment and services to develop a suitable intelligent building assessment system for existing buildings.
To ensure the operability of the system, 2025 selected existing building cases through plan execution, and used the (draft) for case trial evaluation to analyze the feasibility of applying the assessment benchmark to existing buildings and compare the differences between different benchmarks to ensure that the draft can guide existing buildings to achieve safety and security, health and comfort, energy conservation and sustainability, thoughtful convenience, net-zero transformation and other benefits, and serve as a reference for the subsequent promotion of the Architecture and Building Research Institute,MOI.
In order to advance the development of the intelligent building industry and encourage buildings to introduce smart management and services, the Architecture and Building Research Institute,MOI has adopted two major strategies in promoting the marking system:
1.Simplify the implementation mechanism for the renewal of recognition of buildings with the mark: The intelligent building mark is valid for 5 years. In order to encourage those who have obtained the mark to continue to apply for renewal of recognition after the expiration of the validity period, the Ministry of the Interior amended the "Key Points for Application Review, Approval and Use of Intelligent building Marks" on January 5, 2020. It is stipulated that for those who have obtained the mark, within 6 months before the expiration of the first validity period, the intelligent building mark assessment professional organization designated by the Ministry of Interior can send personnel according to the simplified inspection form for intelligent building mark renewal accreditation. On-site inspection, after passing the application, apply to the Ministry of the Interior for renewal of recognition for 5 years, greatly simplifying the inspection items and application documents.
2. Encourage existing buildings to apply for intelligent building labels: For existing buildings that have been approved for intelligent building label renewal after passing the simplified checklist, after the validity period of the intelligent building label expires, the performance of some equipment declines or the life cycle expires. Applicants must update and upgrade equipment and services,formulate a intelligent building assessment system for existing buildings, and encourage the introduction of intelligence into existing buildings to extend the life cycle of the building in use and help existing buildings achieve the goals of high efficiency, energy saving, and low carbon in stages. Guide the application of innovative intelligent building technology to achieve goals such as safety and security, health and comfort, energy conservation and sustainability, and thoughtful convenience.
In 2024, the development of the intelligent building assessment system (draft) for existing buildings was completed based on the 2024 version of the intelligent building label manual. With this in mind, 2025 plans to continue to implement the "Case Study on the Implementation of Intelligent building Assessment System for Existing Buildings in Operation Phase" project, select at least 5 cases that have obtained candidate intelligent building certificates based on the 2016 edition of the Intelligent building Assessment Manual, conduct trial evaluations and propose modifications to the intelligent building assessment system for existing buildings, as a reference for the Architecture and Building Research Institute,MOI to subsequently promote the smartization of existing buildings.
II. Research methods and processes
This study adopts literature survey analysis, comparative analysis, and expert consultation methods to achieve the project objectives.
1. Literature Survey and Analysis Method: This project will collect existing smart building cases both domestically and internationally, exploring the cost effectiveness of upgrading existing smart building evaluation systems for existing buildings, potential difficulties encountered due to constraints such as existing building structures, space, usage conditions, and equipment performance degradation, as well as the incentives for applying for upgrades and funding strategies. This will serve as a reference for proposing revisions to the existing smart building evaluation system.
2. Comparative Analysis Method: Compare existing smart building evaluation methods both domestically and internationally, and conduct a comparative analysis of the differences in evaluation content, grading, scoring, etc., of the smart building evaluation systems for existing buildings. This involves excluding the limitations of existing building conditions and encouraging the integration of intelligence into existing buildings to ensure the rationality of the smart building evaluation system for existing buildings.
3. Expert Consultation Method: At the stage of proposing an assessment system for existing smart buildings, invite relevant experts and scholars to review the graded assessment criteria, offering suggestions for modifications and additions to provide reference for the research team. This will help complete the assessment system for existing smart buildings and confirm the feasibility of the assessment system.
This study mainly aims to revise the existing evaluation system for intelligent buildings, and to develop an evaluation method for existing intelligent buildings. It references both domestic and international building evaluation methods, using literature review and analysis, comparative analysis, and expert consultation methods to achieve the project objectives.
In 2024, based on the 2024 version of the Smart Building Certification Manual, the existing building smart building assessment system (draft) was completed. In this regard, in 2025, it is proposed to continue implementing the "Empirical Research on the Introduction of Smart Building Assessment Systems in the Operation Stage of Existing Buildings" plan, selecting at least 5 cases that have obtained candidate smart building certificates based on the 2016 version of the Smart Building Assessment Manual for trial assessment and proposing modifications to the existing building smart building assessment system as a reference for the Ministry of the Interior's Institute of Building Research to promote the smartization of existing buildings.
Based on the above, the expected objectives of this research are as follows:
1. Selection of actual cases of existing buildings and analysis of basic data: The selection is based on the 2016 edition of the Intelligent building Assessment Manual, and at least 5 cases that have obtained candidate intelligent building certificates are analyzed. The application cases are analyzed in terms of use,area, floor height, intelligent building assessment score and other characteristics.
2. Analysis of the actual case trial evaluation of the intelligent building assessment system for existing buildings: Complete the trial assessment of the 5 cases selected above, analyze the difference between the trial assessment and the original grade of the intelligent building label or candidate intelligent building certificate, and count the number and proportion of case trial evaluation results higher and lower than the original grade of the intelligent building standard or candidate intelligent building certificate; explore the introduction of the intelligent building assessment system in the operation stage of the existing building. In order to maintain its original intelligent building grade, based on its existing structure, space, use and other basic conditions, data acquisition, existing systems and other restrictions, it should be An ongoing smart renovation project for existing buildings.
In addition, 3 cases of existing buildings that have not obtained the Intelligent building Label or Candidate Intelligent building Certificate, and whose basic conditions such as usage, area, floor height, etc. are close to the conditions of the selected trial evaluation cases were used for trial evaluation to understand the feasibility of applying this evaluation benchmark to existing buildings that have not obtained the Intelligent building Label or Candidate Intelligent building Certificate, and conduct a comparison of the benefits before and after the renovation of the above 8 cases in total.
3. Recommendations for the revision of the intelligent building assessment system for existing buildings: Based on the above analysis results, the intelligent building assessment system for existing buildings is revised, and experts and scholars from industry, academia and research are invited to hold two expert symposiums to put forward suggestions on the system and revise the suggestions based on the opinions.
III. Key Findings
Given that up to 97% of existing buildings in Taiwan are in place, this study explores the practical feasibility of implementing a smart building assessment system during the operational phase. Through international system comparisons, indicator system revisions, and trial evaluations of real cases, the following key findings were summarized:
1. International trends in smart building assessments for existing buildings: The focus has shifted from "equipment-oriented" to "benefit-oriented," "data driven," and "human-centered." The study found that in countries and regions like the U.S., EU, Singapore, Japan, and Hong Kong, smart building assessments for existing buildings have gradually advanced from early energy-saving-oriented approaches to comprehensive smart assessments that also consider informatization, automation, and user experience. For example, the U.S. SPIRE system emphasizes the integrated benefits of technology and processes. A common trend is emphasizing "modular implementation" and "data-driven" dynamic performance monitoring, rather than just static facility inspections.
2. The revised assessment system has a high "grade distinguishability." Empirical research found that in six trial evaluation cases of buildings that had already obtained badges or were candidates for certification, the smart building grade remained unchanged after re-evaluation. This proves that the revised system can effectively reflect the original smart level of buildings while simplifying the process, ensuring the stability of system implementation.
3. The market shows significant spontaneous momentum for smart upgrades.
Buildings that have never applied for certification also possess fundamental capabilities. Among three trial evaluation cases of existing buildings that had never applied for smart building badges, the results still showed a "Silver" or "Bronze" smart level. This reflects that, under the current push for ESG governance and energy-saving policies, industries and building owners have proactively invested in smart upgrades (such as BEMS systems, AI energy management, etc.) according to their actual operational needs, laying a solid market foundation for future system promotion.
IV. Main Recommendations
Based on the above findings, this study proposes specific recommendations from multiple perspectives, including policy, technology, and industry, to accelerate the smart transformation of existing buildings in Taiwan:
1. Policy and Institutional Level: Establish a dual-track regulatory and incentive driven model
• Promote Mandatory and Incentive Measures Together: It is recommended that public buildings of a certain scale or large commercial offices undergo mandatory smart assessments once their certifications expire; at the same time, smart building improvements should be included in the 'Green Building Investment Tax Credit' or receive tax incentives.
• Connect with Net Zero Pathways: Integrate the smart building assessment system with 'Building Energy Efficiency Ratings' and the 2050 net-zero targets, achieving phased energy-saving and carbon reduction performance through smart management.
• Improve Certification Renewal Mechanisms: In the future, certification renewals should include 'data verification' requirements to ensure that smart facilities continue to deliver real benefits after the 5-year validity period.
2. Technology and Tools Level: Promote digital platforms and standardized formats
• Build Online Self-Assessment and Application Platforms: Develop simple digital assessment tools to allow management units to input operational data in real time for level predictions, reducing the burden of application.
• Strengthen Data Governance and Sharing: Actively promote the adoption of the domestically issued 'Smart Building Data Format Standard (TAICS TS-0054)', enhancing cross-system integration capabilities and laying the groundwork for future AIoT applications.
• Implement AI Predictive Maintenance: Encourage the use of predictive maintenance and BIM digital twin technologies, shifting operational modes from 'reactive repairs' to 'proactive management' and lowering long-term operating costs.
3. Industry and Market Level: Develop innovative service business models
• Promote 'Smart Building as a Service' (SBaaS): Encourage the industry to shift from hardware sales to leasing or subscription models, reducing owners' upfront investment pressure.
• Establish a 'Smart Building Renovation Alliance': Integrate technology providers, system integrators, and financial institutions to offer one-stop solutions from diagnostics, design to green financing.
4. Practical Implementation Level: Simplify processes and focus on 'functional benefits'
• Function-Oriented Instead of Facility-Oriented: Evaluations for existing buildings should focus on the 'actual functional performance' and 'management benefits' after smart upgrades.
• Relax Documentation Requirements: Considering the difficulty in obtaining plans for old buildings, allow on-site photos, functional explanation videos, or system screenshots as supporting evidence, supplemented by on-site inspections for verification.
5. Talent Development and Research Aspect: Cross-Disciplinary Enhancement and Long-Term Tracking
• Establish cross-disciplinary programs: Train smart building professionals by integrating ICT, architecture, mechanical and electrical engineering, and data analytics.
• Build a long-term tracking database: It is recommended that the Architecture and Building Research Institute of the Ministry of the Interior set up a long term tracking mechanism to collect actual energy-saving data (such as EUI improvement rates) from buildings that have adopted smart technologies, to serve as a scientific basis for future adjustments to standards and subsidy policies.
In summary, the smart upgrade of existing buildings shouldn’t just be a simple hardware update but a digital transformation of operational models. By simplifying and refining the evaluation system and pairing it with clear policy incentives, Taiwan can not only enhance the value of building assets but also make a tangible contribution toward national sustainability and net-zero carbon goals.
", "相關檔案": "114年既有建築物營運階段導入智慧建築評估系統案例實證研究-成果報告20260724(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339759/96a9d467-e77c-4c73-a6ad-8c2c0126a162.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339762", "ModifyDate": "Thu, 23 Jul 2026 03:23:00 GMT", "title": "運用人工智慧物聯網創新技術提升建築室內環境品質之研究", "計畫主持人": "陳振誠", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-03-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "智慧建築、人工智慧物聯網、建築室內環境品質、淨零碳排放、健康舒適", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
因應國家發展委員會111年3月發布「臺灣2050淨零排放政策路徑藍圖」，總統府「國家氣候變遷委員會」永續綠生活之願景。113年行政院國家發展委員會公布「國家發展計畫」（114至117年）擬定八大施政目標，其中「創新經濟智慧國家」與「綠色成長與2050淨零轉型」策略，揭露以人工智慧(AI)來形塑「淨零永續綠生活」，打造「健康近零碳建築」為達成目標，本所將2050淨零排放路徑目標與納入智慧建築推動工作等，引領我國相關產業朝向健康智慧台灣及淨零轉型。智慧建築評估手冊評估指標項目，其中「健康舒適指標」之「環境健康」、「節能管理指標」之「節能技術」及「智慧創新指標」之「智慧創新設計手法、設備或系統」等項目可具體提升智慧建築室內環境品質與節能效益，若能運用AIoT創新技術結合室內環境品質感知與監測及連動控制，如：室內環境品質(Indoor Environment Quality, IEQ)智慧感測、人員密度偵測感控、室內空氣環境、室內溫熱環境、室內光環境、室內聲學環境或大數據ICT雲端應用管理等技術，透過善用AIoT結合室內環境品質技術進行「智慧健康室內環境品質評估」，將可進一步擴大產業發展。然而，「健康舒適」與「節能效益」議題平衡牽涉範圍甚廣，其評估方法眾多，國際上為達成淨零與健康福祉，積極發展人工智慧物聯網室內環境品質技術，提倡室內健康近零碳之整體環境設計(例如，AI預測室內空氣污染物逸散模式、智慧混合式通風系統、整合IEQ數據類神經網絡與決策樹運算技術、AIoT節能管理技術、數位雙生演算可視化管理等)，本研究探討透過整合實務技術於人工智慧預測與連動控制，打造智慧建築健康近零碳室內環境，引導臺灣發展人工智慧物聯網與具健康近零碳之智慧建築產業應用技術。
二、研究方法與過程
本研究的目的是探討智慧建築設施導入人工智慧物聯網應用的可行性，隨著全球重視人工智慧之算力與基礎設備設施建置，智慧建築產業需透過技術創新來提升居住健康舒適品質與淨零減碳效益。本研究將透過文獻蒐集、專家諮詢會議、案例數據演算..等，分析智慧建築設施導入人工智慧物聯網在提升建築室內環境品質的可行性，為我國政府推動物聯網、大數據及人工智慧技術在建築中的應用提供依據。
本研究成果以召開專家工作會議邀請對智慧化建築、建築設備及智慧化技術、AIoT、產業技術、政策等方面之專家學者，進行如何應用人工智慧物聯網及AI模型提出建議與流程討論，加強本研究內容之參考依據，說明研究案執行的成效、進度及所遭遇的問題，可有效聚焦與提供AI應用為參考。
三、重要發現
針對運用人工智慧物聯網創新技術提升建築室內環境品質，（1）國內外運用人工智慧物聯網創新技術提升建築室內環境品質資料蒐集分析；（2）建築物導入人工智慧物聯網提升建築室內環境品質技術之可行性評估；（3）運用人工智慧物聯網之創新技術提升智慧建築室內環境品質效益分析；（4）運用人工智慧物聯網提升建築室內環境品質評估基準建議。
研究成果針對三類不同具有人工智慧物聯網之建築場域（教育空間、小型辦公場域、商業辦公建築）進行感測數據與AI模型進行系統分析：（1）具備完整空氣品質監測與新風控制裝置之空間，其室內 CO₂ 濃度與 PM2.5 濃度能維持在標準範圍內，顯示即時換氣控制對健康環境具有顯著正面效益；（2）搭配時序型資料庫與能耗計量裝置之場域，可有效追蹤用電趨勢與尖離峰負載，有助於後續智慧節能模型之建置；（3）導入 BIM 平台進行設備定位與維運管理，對於既有建築提升能源效率與維修效率具有潛在成效，並能支援多系統協同的能源調度策略；（4）AIoT 平台之情境控制與自動化能力，可依據不同情境與空氣品質特徵條件進行多系統設備之連動協調，展現出人工智慧物聯網之效益潛能。
四、結論與建議
(一)、研究結論
1.研究導入人工智慧技術與智慧建築相關設備應用與整合，未來發展應更進一步強化系統間的協調聯動與資料整合能力，研究參考國內台灣資通產業標準協會與台灣智慧建築協會所共同制訂之TAICS TS-0054及 TS-0022格式標準與TS-0036資安標準，在人工智慧物聯網所牽涉之設備資通訊，應可參考標準格式與資安要求作為資訊轉換使用。現階段多數智慧建築場域已具備基本的環境感測與自動控制功能，例如在智慧建築健康舒適指標與節能管理指標等已具有導入人工智慧評估技術之要求，然而各系統間（如空調、新風換氣、能源管理..等）多為獨立系統邊緣運作後傳輸至智慧建築管理平台決策運作，對於事件發生之即時跨系統智慧決策與預測預防等決策效率較為無法處理。因此，推動設備通訊協定標準化與AI平台化整合，導入AIoT平台以串聯感測、控制與分析功能，虛實整合提升建築管理智慧化程度。
2.本研究導入人工智慧物聯網技術對於提升室內環境品質，透過即時資料分析與AI預測模型，建立之數值運算程序與健康效率評估基準模型，讓AIoT 系統能根據居住者活動、環境變化與歷史趨勢，自動調整通風、溫濕度與光照條件，提供動態且個人化的舒適環境，同時兼顧能源效率。研究透過IoT之大數據量與多層次AI演算模型對「室內環境品質」之「空氣與溫熱因子」及「能源監控數據」進行演算其「因子特徵」與「決策排序」，作為智慧建築之預測及決策決定，進一步將 AI 技術在建築領域的場域驗證與應用模組化開發，加強其在實務運營中的可行性與穩定性，實現以使用者為中心且兼顧永續發展的室內環境品質提升策略。
3.研究提出透過AI 技術演算之「健康效率」評估基準模型，以使用者之「健康舒適度」與「換氣設備能耗」對應「啟動AIOT設備情境事件時間」作為多層次因子「健康效率」決策基準模型，在評估上可依據空間之「健康效率時間數值」為基準，動態滾動方式即時評估整體環境之健康x能耗最適模型，作為未來導入人工智慧物聯網創新技術提升建築室內環境品質之參考。
(二)、主要建議事項
建議一、AIoT導入智慧建築標章評估系統可擴大增加評定項目與應用範圍，並系統連結協同評估「健康x節效」共伴效益，達成智慧健康近零碳建築目的：立即可行建議
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
協辦機關： 財團法人台灣建築中心
目前AIoT導入智慧建築標章評估系統著重於「建築用電管理」與「空調效能」及「室內環境感測與連動」..等，可進一步將AIoT相關設施設備進一步整合，例如，AI運算算力設備與環境感測及能源管理決策等系統整合，並輔以邊緣運算及算力資料擷取交換等作為「智慧決策與管理平台」，本研究以實際案場之「室內空氣監測」搭配「空調」與「新風換氣」設備及「能源監控平台」，進行可動態即時運算之「健康效率」模式平台算力計算，可供智慧建築導入AIoT技術提升建築室內環境品質與能效目的。
建議二、以使用者為中心運用AIoT至智慧建築環境，建構AI算力技術整合平台並應用於智慧建築創新技術之發展：立即可行建議
主辦機關： 內政部建築研究所
協辦機關： 財團法人台灣建築中心
配合行政院「AI新十大建設」國家政策，將AIoT導入智慧建築環境，以使用者為中心運用AIoT創新技術結合室內環境品質感知與監測及連動控制，如：室內環境品質(Indoor Environment Quality, IEQ)智慧感測、人員密度偵測感控、室內空氣環境、室內溫熱環境、室內光環境、室內聲學環境或大數據ICT雲端應用管理等技術，透過AIoT結合室內環境品質技術進行「智慧健康近零碳建築算力技術」，將可進一步擴大產業發展。「健康舒適」與「節能效益」議題平衡牽涉範圍甚廣，其評估方法眾多，未來可積極發展人工智慧物聯網室內環境品質技術，提倡室內健康近零碳之整體環境設計(例如，AI預測室內空氣污染物逸散模式、智慧混合式通風系統、整合IEQ數據類神經網絡與決策樹運算技術、AIoT節能管理技術、數位雙生演算可視化管理等)。
", "英文摘要": "This study explores the feasibility of integrating Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) applications into smart building facilities. As global attention increasingly focuses on AI computing power and infrastructure development, the smart building industry must adopt technological innovations to enhance indoor environmental quality (IEQ), occupant health and comfort, and achieve net-zero carbon emission goals.
Through literature review, expert consultation meetings, and case-based data analysis, this research examines how AIoT integration can effectively improve the indoor environmental quality of smart buildings. The findings aim to provide a reference for the Taiwanese government in promoting the application of IoT, big data, and AI technologies within the building sector.Specifically, the study includes:(1) a comprehensive review of domestic and international practices employing AIoT technologies to enhance building IEQ;(2) a feasibility assessment of AIoT integration in building systems for IEQ improvement;(3) an analysis of performance benefits derived from innovative AIoT-based smart building applications; and (4) recommendations for establishing evaluation criteria for AIoT-enabled indoor environmental quality enhancement in smart buildings.
", "相關檔案": "運用人工智慧物聯網創新技術提升建築室內環境品質之研究-成果報告書(V4)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339762/73124617-7323-4611-83f2-54586502fb5e.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339752", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:07:00 GMT", "title": "綠建築與建築能效評估基準簡化及合理性研究", "計畫主持人": "嚴佳茹", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-03-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "綠建築、建築能效、近零碳建築、低碳建築", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
因應國家發展委員會 111 年 3 月 30 日發布之「臺灣 2050 淨零排放路徑及策略總說明」，總統府「國家氣候變遷委員會」淨零路徑，本部負責淨零建築路徑規劃，為落實 2050 淨零建築政策目標，本部於 112 年 5 月 31 日發布「綠建築標章及建築能效標示申請審核認可及使用作業要點」，本所分別函頒 2022 年版「綠建築評估手冊-建築能效評估系統(EEWH-BERS)」與 2024 年版「建築能效評估手冊(BERS)」，以作為建築能效評估之基準及方法。
現行綠建築評估手冊之基本型(EEWH-BC)及住宿類(EEWH-RS)，於建築能效標示制度實施之初，雖已與綠建築標章制度接軌，然而，因建築能效政策發展與版本更新時效之差異，現行 BC 及 RS 兩本手冊與 BERS 手冊，在計算公式、評估標準、再生能源優惠上有不少出入，恐造成綠建築標章及建築能效標示出現評估基準不一致之現象，亟需整體重新檢視並檢討修正，以利綠建築標章及建築能效標示兩制度能具有一致性之評估基準。
另一方面，我國推動綠建築多年，許多永續綠建築設計理念已成為全民共識，並已納入相關規範，例如:污水及垃圾減量、地下污水管設施等，應進一步檢視我國綠建築標章 9 項指標與相關規範重複檢討之必要性，以利簡化流程，提升審查效率。另有關鳥類因誤撞窗戶玻璃造成傷亡之消息頻傳，顯示窗殺問題已對生態造成影響，亟需針對鳥類友善議題進行研議，以利維護基地內各種生物之棲地環境。
本研究將蒐集相關案例，並試算綠建築標章日常節能指標之綠建築分項評估法及建築能效評估法之差異，採用綠建築評估手冊直接外部引用 BERS 手冊之合理性，調和並簡化 BC 及 RS 兩本手冊內容，並提出消除評估差異之合理方法，達成綠建築標章及建築能效標示兩制度完美接軌之目的。
二、研究方法與過程
以綠建築標章日常節能指標之建築物外殼節能效率、空調系統節能效率及室內照明系統節能效率計算建築能源效率，評定建築能效等級，由高至低依序
分為第1 至 7 級，以作為評定建築能效等級之方法。
本計畫以辦公建築與政府官廳為對象，透過建築業界對建築外殼、空調、照明等被動式節能設計及主動式節能技術之成本調查，分析「建築外殼節能設計效率EEV」、「空調系統設計效率 EAC」、「照明節能設計效率 EL」高低水準的成本，並與新建建築能效標示系統(BERSn)之能效得分比對，以找出建築能效等級設計之投資成本效益，並依此提出有效推動近零碳建築之策略。
三、研究內容
(一)蒐集申請新建建築物之綠建築標章及建築能效評估實際案例，檢討現行綠建築評估手冊日常節能指標之綠建築分項評估法及建築能效評估法之差異
性，並進行試算。
(二)蒐集目前與綠建築標章 9 項指標相關之法規政策，彙整已有規範的指標內容，探討其重複檢討之必要性，並進行簡化可行性分析。
(三)邀集相關單位針對鳥類友善進行研議修正綠建築評估手冊相關內容。
(四)針對試算結果分析其差異及合理性，研提評估方法之簡化及修正建議，並編修下一版本之 EEWH-BC 及 RS 手冊草案。
四、重要成果
(一)完成綠建築分項評估法及建築能效評估法之實際案例蒐集及進行試算，並檢討其差異性。
(二)完成綠建築 9 項指標及鳥類友善相關法規政策之蒐集與分析，提出指標簡化建議(草案)。
五、主要建議事項
建議一(立即可行建議)
正式啟動 EEWH-BC2026、EEWH-RS2026、EEWH-GF2026 三手冊之專家審查、公開閱覽、公告作業
主辦機關:內政部建築研究所
協辦機關:內政部建築研究所
建議二(立即可行建議)
修改「綠建築標章及建築能效標示申請審核認可及使用作業要點」與「建築蘊含碳排標示申請審核認可及使用作業要點」，合併成為綠建築標章、建築
能效、低蘊含碳三軌合一的作業要點
主辦機關:內政部建築研究所
協辦機關: 內政部建築研究所
建議三(立即可行建議)
指定評定機構應依據綠建築標章、建築能效、低蘊含碳三軌合一的制度，調整評定委員會組織、收費機制、簡化申請文件。
主辦機關:綠建築標章指定評定機構
指導機關:內政部建築研究所
", "英文摘要": "Research Background
In response to the “Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions in 2050” released by the National Development Council on March 30, 2022, and the net-zero roadmap promulgated by the Presidential Office’s “National Council for Sustainable Development,” the Ministry is responsible for planning the pathway toward net-zero buildings. To implement the 2050 net-zero building policy, the Ministry issued the “Operational Guidelines for the Application, Review, Accreditation, and Use of the Green Building Label and Building Energy Efficiency Rating” on May 31, 2023. In addition, the Institute released the 2022 edition of the “Green Building Evaluation Manual—Building Energy Efficiency Evaluation System (EEWH-BERS)” and the 2024 edition of the “Building Energy Efficiency Evaluation Manual (BERS),” which serve as the basis and methodology for building energy efficiency assessment.
Although the Basic Category (EEWH-BC) and Residential Category (EEWH-RS) of the current Green Building Evaluation Manuals were aligned with the Green Building Label system during the initial implementation of the Building Energy Efficiency Rating system, inconsistencies have subsequently emerged due to differences in the development and version update cycles of building energy policies. Substantial discrepancies now exist between the BC/RS manuals and the BERS manual regarding calculation formulas, assessment criteria, and renewable energy incentives. These inconsistencies risk producing divergent evaluation outcomes between the Green Building Label and the Building Energy Efficiency Rating, thus necessitating a comprehensive review and revision to ensure consistency across both systems.
Meanwhile, after years of promoting green buildings in Taiwan, many concepts of sustainable green building design have become widely accepted and incorporated into relevant regulations—for example, wastewater and solid waste reduction, and underground sewage piping requirements. There is therefore an urgent need to examine the potential redundancy between the nine indicators of the Green Building Label and existing regulations, with the aim of streamlining procedures and improving review efficiency. In addition, the increasing number of reported bird collisions with building glazing highlights a growing ecological concern. The issue of bird-friendly design requires further study to ensure better protection of habitat conditions for various species within building sites.
This research will collect relevant cases and perform trial calculations comparing the Green Building Label’s daily energy-saving indicator evaluation method with the Building Energy Efficiency evaluation method. It will assess the feasibility of directly referencing the BERS manual within the Green Building Evaluation Manual, harmonize and simplify the contents of the BC and RS manuals, and propose practical approaches to eliminate existing assessment discrepancies. The ultimate objective is to achieve complete alignment between the Green Building Label system and the Building Energy Efficiency Rating system.
Research Methods and Procedures
This study employs the Green Building Label’s daily energy-saving indicators—namely, the energy-saving efficiency of the building envelope, the energy-saving efficiency of air[1]conditioning systems, and the energy-saving efficiency of indoor lighting systems—to calculate building energy performance. The Building Energy Efficiency Rating is assigned from Level 1 to Level 7, in descending order of efficiency.
The project focuses on office buildings and government facilities. Through cost surveys conducted in the architecture and construction industry on passive energy-saving strategies (e.g., building envelope, shading) and active energy-saving technologies (e.g., air-conditioning, lighting), the research analyzes the cost differences associated with varying performance levels of “Envelope Energy Efficiency Value (EEV),” “Air[1]Conditioning System Efficiency (EAC),” and “Lighting Energy Efficiency (EL).” These results are compared with the energy performance scores of the New Building Energy Efficiency Rating System (BERSn). Based on this comparison, the study identifies the cost-effectiveness of different design levels and proposes strategies for effectively promoting nearly zero-carbon buildings.
Research Content
(1) Collect actual cases of new building applications for the Green Building Label and the Building Energy Efficiency evaluation. Review differences between the Green Building Label’s daily energy-saving indicator method and the Building Energy Efficiency evaluation method, and perform trial calculations.
(2) Collect existing regulations and policies related to the nine indicators of the Green Building Label. Summarize indicators already governed by existing regulations and analyze the necessity of repeated review as well as the feasibility of streamlining.
(3) Convene relevant agencies and experts to discuss and review revisions to bird-friendly content within the Green Building Evaluation Manual.
(4) Based on trial calculation results, analyze discrepancies and assess their validity. Propose recommendations for simplifying and revising assessment methodologies and prepare draft revisions for the next versions of the EEWH-BC and EEWH-RS manuals.
Major Results
(1) Completed collection of actual cases and trial calculations comparing the Green Building Label’s sub-item evaluation method with the Building Energy Efficiency evaluation method, and reviewed the associated discrepancies.
(2) Completed compilation and analysis of regulations related to the nine indicators of the Green Building Label and bird-friendly measures, and proposed draft recommendations for indicator simplification.
Key Recommendations
Recommendation 1 (Immediately Feasible)
Formally initiate the expert review, public consultation, and announcement procedures for the EEWH-BC 2026, EEWH-RS 2026, and EEWH-GF 2026 manuals.
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Supporting Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Recommendation 2 (Immediately Feasible)
Revise the “Operational Guidelines for the Application, Review, Accreditation, and Use of the Green Building Label and Building Energy Efficiency Rating” and the “Operational Guidelines for the Application, Review, Accreditation, and Use of Embodied Carbon Labeling.” Merge these into a unified guideline integrating the three tracks of Green Building Label, Building Energy Efficiency, and Low Embodied Carbon.
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Supporting Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
Recommendation 3 (Immediately Feasible)
Require designated assessment institutions to align their review committee structure, fee mechanisms, and application documentation requirements with the integrated three[1]track system for Green Building Label, Building Energy Efficiency, and Low Embodied Carbon.
Lead Agency: Designated Green Building Label Assessment Institutions
Supervisory Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior
", "相關檔案": "綠建築與建築能效評估基準簡化及合理性研究成果報告(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339752/8a1ef1e2-977d-45e9-a4bd-bc1d720ccf20.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339751", "ModifyDate": "Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:46:00 GMT", "title": "淨零建築路徑減碳目標及成效評估之研究", "計畫主持人": "黃國倉", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "", "執行行程": "2025-03-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "環境控制組", "執行方式": "委託研究", "關鍵詞": "建築規模成長、溫室氣體排放、住商部門、建築節能", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
我國於112年通過《氣候變遷因應法》，並設定2050年達成全國淨零碳排放的目標。為實現此目標，國家發展委員會提出2050淨零路徑，內政部負責淨零建築路徑規劃，淨零建築已成為住商部門（即住宅部門及商業部門，其中商業為服務業）減碳之重要策略之一。內政部建築研究所於110年推出「建築能效評估系統」（BERS），作為淨零建築評估的基礎，並由公有建築帶頭做起，引導民間建築跟進，作為推廣的起點與示範。為達總統府「國家氣候變遷委員會」主軸-淨零路徑之規劃，為了確立淨零建築路徑減碳目標與評估成效，建立一個能夠同步考量氣候變遷及住商部門建築規模成長的全國性住商溫室氣體排放基線模型，是重要的參考依據。此模型需持續滾動更新，以正確提供作為住商部門減碳目標的設定與成效評估。基於此基線模型，本研究將確立2050年前推動淨零建築的分階段減碳目標情境推估，並評估各階段目標下其預期的減碳效果與成本效益，最終提出淨零建築溫室氣體減量策略的完整分析草案。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究係針對我國住商部門溫室氣體排放量推估模式之檢討與持續滾動更新推估模式，同時考量未來氣候之變遷、住商部門建築未來規模成長等因子，進行我國住商部門能源消耗與碳排放量之分析及預測。並利用滾動更新建立之住商部門溫室氣體排放量基線(BAU)模型進行各策略減碳情境之模擬，以分析可能之減碳量，再依據過去文獻上有關各策略減碳成本效益之研究成果，據以計算所需之總成本以為政策推行之參考。最後，本研究將彙整上述之研究成果，提出住商部門淨零建築路徑溫室氣體減量策略與措施(草案)。本計畫之研究目的有以下四點：
1.蒐集各國淨零建築路徑的溫室氣體減量目標及相關政策。
2.建立住商部門至2050年全國建築規模成長推估模型。
3.應用最新之能源相關數據滾動更新住商部門碳排放基線模型，以作為達成既定的減碳目標下減碳效益評估基礎。
4.研提淨零建築路徑溫室氣體減量策略與措施(草案)，並分析其效益。
三、重要發現
1.本研究發展住商建築之未來成長模型，住宅部分至2030、2040與2050年時，全國住宅總樓地板面積分別為1,492百萬m2、1,550百萬
m2與1,508百萬m2，相較2024年分別成長5.05%、9.14%與6.24%。
2.服務業部分，其全國服務業之總樓地板面積至2030、2040與2050年時，分別成長為359百萬m2、428百萬m2與501百萬m2，相較2024年分別成長
11.99%、33.48%與56.38%。
3.住宅部門至2030、2040與2050年時，同步考量電力排碳係數下降後之結果，其溫室氣體排放量基線分別為27.33百萬公噸CO2e、28.91百萬公噸CO2e與28.73百萬公噸CO2e，相較2005年，總溫室氣體排放量之增加率分別為-4.91%、0.59%與-0.04%。
4.商業部門至2030、2040與2050年時，同步考量電力排碳係數下降後之結果，其溫室氣體排放量基線分別為25.16百萬公噸CO2e、30.08百萬公噸CO2e與35.41百萬公噸CO2e，相較2005年，總溫室氣體排放量之增加率分別為-12.38%、4.76%與23.33%。
5.在導入綠建築、建築能效法治化以及電力排碳係數下降之影響下，至2050年整個住商部門基期年(2005年)相比，總減碳量為17.79MtCO2e，其溫室氣
體排放總量較基期年(2005年)相比減少28.48%。
6.本計畫最後提出我國淨零建築路徑溫室氣體減量策略與措施(草案)，包括八大減碳策略與行動方案。
四、主要建議事項
建議一：研究氣候變遷對住商部門溫室氣體排放之影響：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：國家發展委員會
氣候變遷導致環境持續高溫化，使都會區的都市熱島效應日益加劇，其對建築碳排放的影響主要反映在空調能耗的增加上。目前，空調系統耗能約占住宅建築全年用電量的20-30%，服務業建築則有的高達50%以上。然而，現行住宅與商業部門的減碳效益評估多未充分納入未來氣候升溫的影響，因而可能高估各項策略的實際減碳成效。由於減碳目標之達成係以各部門最終溫室氣體排放量相較於2005年基期之減量比例為評估基準，未來氣候變化勢必將影響其達標情形。因此，建議在進行減碳效益評估與碳排基線推估時，應同步考量氣候變化情境，評估其對能耗與碳排放的潛在衝擊。此將可使住商部門之溫室氣體排放與減碳量推估模型更貼近實際情況，並有助於制定更具氣候適應性的減碳策略。
具體作法：委託研究有關未來氣候對住商部門溫室氣體排放與減碳量之影響。
建議二：研發建築能效之快速評估法：中長期建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
有鑑於我國已提出2035年新的減碳目標，亟需加速推動減碳作為。借鏡歐盟經驗，為提升整體減碳成效，可考慮針對能效低於一定水準的老舊建築，優先進行翻新，使其達到高能效等級，並以滾動檢討的方式，逐年推動能效較差之建築進行節能改造，加速建築部門的減碳進程。為有效辨識既有建築物之能效等級並提升更新速度，面對龐大的既有建築數量，亟需建立一套快速且具公信力的能效評估與診斷機制，以全面加速老舊建築能效提升的推廣。
具體作法：委託研究建築能效等級之簡易評估方法。
", "英文摘要": "1. Research Background
This project aims to support Taiwan’s transition toward the 2050 national net-zero carbon emissions goal established under the Climate Change Response Act (2023). In alignment with the National Development Council’s 2050 Net-Zero Pathway, the Ministry of the Interior is responsible for formulating the net-zero building pathway, recognizing net-zero buildings as a key carbon-reduction strategy for the residential and commercial sectors. Since 2021, the Architecture and Building Research Institute has implemented the Building Energy Rating System (BERS) as the foundation for net-zero building evaluation, with public buildings serving as early adopters to guide broader market participation.
To ensure effective planning and assessment of the national net-zero pathway, this project establishes a nationwide baseline model for greenhouse gas emissions in the residential and commercial building sectors. The model incorporates both climate change impacts and projected growth in building floor area and will be regularly updated to support accurate target-setting and performance evaluation. Building on this baseline, the project developed staged carbon-reduction scenarios for net-zero buildings through 2050, assessing their expected mitigation outcomes and cost-effectiveness, and produce a comprehensive draft strategy for greenhouse gas reduction in the building sector.
2. Research Methods and Process
This study focuses on reviewing and updating Taiwan’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emission estimation model for the residential and commercial sectors. The updated model incorporates projected growth in building stock to analyze and forecast energy consumption and carbon emissions in these sectors. Using the baseline (BAU) GHG emission model, the study simulated various carbon-reduction strategy scenarios to estimate potential emission reductions. Based on existing literature on the cost-effectiveness of different mitigation strategies, the study further calculates the total required costs to support policy planning. Finally, the research integrated these findings to propose a draft set of GHG mitigation strategies and measures for the net-zero building pathway in the residential and commercial sectors.
The objectives of this project are as follows:
1.To collect and review GHG reduction targets and related policies from international net-zero building pathways.
2.To develop a projection model for national building stock growth in the residential and commercial sectors through 2050.
3.To apply the latest energy-related data to continuously update the baseline carbon-emission model, providing a foundation for assessing mitigation
effectiveness under established reduction targets.
4.To propose a draft set of GHG mitigation strategies and measures for the net-zero building pathway and analyze their expected effectiveness.
3. Key Findings
(1)This study developed a future growth model for residential and commercial buildings. For the residential sector, the total national residential floor area is projected to reach 1,492 million m², 1,550 million m², and 1,508 million m² by 2030, 2040, and 2050, respectively—representing growth of 5.05%, 9.14%, and 6.24% compared with 2024.
(2)For the commercial sector, the total national service-industry floor area is projected to increase to 359 million m², 428 million m², and 501 million m² by 2030, 2040, and 2050, respectively—growth of 11.99%, 33.48%, and 56.38% relative to 2024.
(3)Considering the projected decline in electricity carbon emission factors, the baseline GHG emissions in the residential sector will reach 27.33 MtCO₂e, 28.91 MtCO₂e, and 28.73 MtCO₂e by 2030, 2040, and 2050. Compared with 2005, these represent changes of –4.91%, +0.59%, and –0.04%, respectively.
(4)For the commercial sector, baseline GHG emissions are projected to reach 25.16 MtCO₂e, 30.08 MtCO₂e, and 35.41 MtCO₂e by 2030, 2040, and 2050. Compared with 2005, these represent changes of –12.38%, +4.76%, and +23.33%, respectively.
(5)With the combined impacts of green building measures, the legal enforcement of building energy performance standards, and the decline in electricity carbon emission factors, the residential and commercial sectors together are expected to achieve a total reduction of 17.79 MtCO₂e by 2050 compared with the 2005 baseline year—equivalent to a 28.48% decrease in total GHG emissions.
(6)Finally, this project proposes a draft set of GHG reduction strategies and measures for Taiwan’s net-zero building pathway, consisting of eight major mitigation strategies and corresponding action plans.
4. Key Recommendations
Recommendation 1: Study the Impact of Climate Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Residential and Commercial Sectors – Immediate Action
Climate change intensifies the urban heat island effect in metropolitan areas. Its impact on building carbon emissions is primarily reflected in increased air-conditioning energy consumption. Currently, air-conditioning systems account for approximately 20–30% of annual electricity use in residential buildings, and over 50% in commercial buildings. However, existing assessments of carbon reduction benefits in the residential and commercial sectors have not adequately incorporated the effects of future climate warming, potentially leading to overestimation of the actual mitigation outcomes of various strategies. Since the achievement of carbon reduction targets is evaluated based on the reduction ratio of final greenhouse gas emissions in each sector relative to the 2005 baseline year, future climate changes will inevitably influence progress toward these targets. Therefore, it is recommended that climate change scenarios be incorporated into carbon reduction benefit assessments and carbon baseline projections to evaluate their potential impacts on energy consumption and emissions. This will improve the accuracy of modeling greenhouse gas emissions and reduction potential in the residential and commercial sectors, and facilitate the development of more climate-resilient mitigation strategies.
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI), Ministry of the Interior
Collaborating Agency: National Development Council
Specific Action: Commission research on the impact of future climate change on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon reduction potential in the residential and commercial sectors.
Recommendation 2: Develop a Rapid Assessment Method for Building Energy Performance – Medium to Long-Term Action
Given Taiwan’s newly announced 2035 carbon reduction target, it is imperative to accelerate mitigation efforts. Drawing from the European Union’s experience, improving overall carbon reduction performance may involve prioritizing retrofits of older buildings with substandard energy performance so that they achieve higher energy efficiency levels. A rolling-review mechanism can be adopted to gradually advance energy retrofits of low-efficiency buildings each year, thereby accelerating decarbonization in the building sector. To effectively identify the energy performance levels of existing buildings and enhance renovation efficiency, a rapid and credible energy performance assessment and diagnostic mechanism is urgently needed, especially given the large number of existing buildings. Establishing such a system will be essential for advancing large-scale improvements in the energy performance of aging buildings.
Lead Agency: Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI), Ministry of the Interior
Collaborating Agency: Taiwan Architecture & Building Center
Specific Action: Commission research on simplified evaluation methods for assessing building energy rating levels.
", "相關檔案": "淨零建築路徑減碳目標及成效評估之研究-成果報告0128(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339751/3f085582-2318-4ac0-9fab-391b9d07b3a3.pdf);" }, { "ArticleType": "0", "FileName": "", "Link": "", "Source": "https://www.abri.gov.tw/News_Content_Table.aspx?n=807&s=339330", "ModifyDate": "Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:06:00 GMT", "title": "建築模組化工程實證與推廣計畫", "計畫主持人": "邱建國", "協同主持人": "", "執行單位": "財團法人臺灣營建研究院", "執行行程": "2025-03-01", "執行行程(結束)": "2025-12-31", "GPN": "", "ISBN": "", "MOIS": "", "組別": "工程技術組", "執行方式": "業務委託", "關鍵詞": "建築模組化、營建自動化、BIM、預鑄工法、DfMA", "參考文獻": "", "中文摘要": "一、研究緣起
本期中報告書為「建築模組化工程實證與推廣計畫」業務委託專業服務案的階段性成果。鑑於國內營建產業面臨人力短缺、工期延宕、成本上升以及淨零碳排的挑戰，本計畫旨在透過推廣建築模組化與預鑄工法，並結合建築資訊模型（BIM）技術，以提升施工效率、確保品質並推動產業永續發展 。
二、研究方法與過程
本報告透過文獻回顧與案例分析，系統性地探討國外建築模組化與智慧營造的發展現況。研究內容主要包含：
1.國外推廣機制研析：
分析日本國土交通省的「i-Construction 2.0」策略、中國「十四五」規劃下的裝配式建築推廣模式 ，並比較兩國在政策工具、量化目標與法規上的差
異。
2.BIM-based作業流程研擬：
以SI（Skeleton & Infill）工法為核心，初步研擬並建立從結構設計（ETABS）到建築資訊模型（Tekla Structures）的數位化流程，並應用於預鑄構件的
設計、製造與組裝。
3.聯盟籌組與推廣：
積極籌組「臺灣建築模組化聯盟」，邀請產官學研各界加入，並規劃「臺灣預鑄與模組化建築網」以作為未來推廣平臺。
三、重要發現
以下為研究報告的重要發現：
1.國際趨勢與政策模式：
日本與中國皆以國家戰略高度推動建築模組化。日本採間接引導模式，透過「長期優良住宅」認證提供稅務與金融優惠，鼓勵市場採用高品質預鑄工法。中國則採強制激勵模式，制定明確的「裝配率」量化目標，並搭配容積率獎勵、財政補貼等直接手段加速產業轉型。
2.SI工法核心價值：
無論是日本的「長期優良住宅」標準或是中國的「裝配率」評價，都體現了將建築結構體（Skeleton）與內部設備裝修（Infill）分離的SI工法概念，以提
升建築物在全生命週期的可維護性與可變性。
3.BIM的關鍵作用：
BIM技術在模組化工程中扮演資訊整合中樞。報告初步建立從結構分析到施工圖與製造圖產出的BIM-based流程，可有效減少設計錯誤、優化施工性並提
升效率。
4.臺灣推動現況：
臺灣現行法規（如《建築物預鑄率評定手冊》）主要聚焦於結構構件的預鑄率計算，且缺乏對模組化內裝、設備管線分離等項目的獎勵與標準。這與中
日兩國將模組化視為全系統集成的趨勢有所不同。
四、主要建議事項
該報告的主要建議事項歸結如下：
建議一：深化法規標準
建議借鑑中國經驗，在現有《建築物預鑄率評定手冊》的基礎上，逐步納入模組化內裝、管線分離等指標，並考慮引入綜合評分模式，以引導產業鏈朝
向全面集成發展。
建議二：建立多維度激勵機制
除了公共工程的示範作用，應研擬具體的容積率獎勵、金融補貼或稅務優惠等措施，降低民間開發商導入模組化建築的成本阻力。
建議三：持續推動聯盟與平臺
持續推動「臺灣建築模組化聯盟」的籌組與運作，並透過「臺灣預鑄與模組化建築網」平臺，整合資源、分享案例與技術，為產業提供資訊與技術支
援。
建議四：加速實證與數位應用
以社會住宅作為實證案例，驗證並完善BIM-based模組化流程，並持續開發標準化的模組化接頭元件，為後續的工業化生產與現場組裝提供技術基礎。
", "英文摘要": "1.Research Background
This interim report is a milestone for the "Building Modularization Engineering Practical Verification and Promotion Plan" project. In response to challenges such as labor shortages, project delays, rising costs, and the push for net-zero carbon emissions in Taiwan's construction industry , this project aims to promote modular and prefabrication methods, integrated with Building Information Modeling (BIM), to enhance construction efficiency, ensure quality, and advance sustainable development.
2.Research Methodology and Process
The report conducts a systematic analysis of international developments in modular and smart construction through literature reviews and case
studies. The key research activities include:
1.Analysis of International Promotion Mechanisms
Examining Japan's "i-Construction 2.0" strategy and China's prefabricated building promotion model under its 14th Five-Year Plan , and comparing their policy tools, quantitative goals, and regulatory frameworks.
2.BIM-based Workflow Development
Using the SI (Skeleton & Infill) method as a core concept , a preliminary digital workflow was developed, from structural design (ETABS) to BIM modeling (Tekla Structures), for the design, fabrication, and assembly of prefabricated components.
3.Alliance Formation and Promotion
Actively working on establishing the "Taiwan Building Modularization Alliance," inviting members from industry, government, academia, and research, and planning the "Taiwan Prefabrication and Modular Building Website" as a future promotion platform.
3.Key Findings
The key findings of the study are as follows:
1.International Trends and Policy Models
Both Japan and China have elevated building modularization to a national strategy. Japan adopts an indirect incentive model, using tax and financial benefits from "Long-Life Housing" certification to guide the market toward high-quality prefabrication. China employs a direct incentive model, setting a clear "assembly rate" target with direct rewards like floor area ratio bonuses and financial subsidies to accelerate industry adoption.
2.Core Value of the SI Method
Both Japanese "Long-Life Housing" standards and Chinese "assembly rate" evaluations embody the SI concept of separating the building's structure (Skeleton) from its interior systems (Infill), enhancing a building's maintainability and adaptability over its lifecycle.
3.Crucial Role of BIM
Taiwan's current regulations (e.g., the "Building Prefabrication Rate Assessment Manual") primarily focus on calculating the prefabrication rate of structural components and lack incentives or standards for modular interiors and separate MEP systems. This differs from the international trend of whole-system integration.
4.Key Recommendations
The report's key recommendations are as follows:
1.Deepen Regulatory Standards
It is recommended to learn from China's experience by gradually incorporating metrics for modular interiors and separate MEP systems into the current manual and considering a comprehensive scoring model to guide the industry toward a more integrated development path.
2.Establish Multi-faceted Incentive Mechanisms
Beyond public works projects, specific measures such as floor area ratio bonuses, financial subsidies, or tax incentives should be developed to
reduce the cost barriers for private developers.
3.Advance the Alliance and Platform
Continue forming and operating the "Taiwan Building Modularization Alliance" and use the planned "Taiwan Prefabrication and Modular Building Website" as a platform to integrate resources, share case studies, and provide technical support to the industry.
4.Accelerate Practical Verification and Digital Application
Use social housing projects as practical case studies to verify and refine the BIM-based modular workflow and to standardize prefabricated joint components. This will provide a solid technical foundation for future industrial production and precise on-site assembly.
", "相關檔案": "期末報告-2025.12.31-V25-HYMAN、YS_(送印版)(https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/404/relfile/9489/339330/6f833eda-eeea-4373-a69e-b3a39a744f30.pdf);" } ]