::: Home    Recent Research    Research on Innovative Green Building Materials Evaluation System and Verification System  
Recent Research

Research on Innovative Green Building Materials Evaluation System and Verification System

Abstract


(1)The Origin of Research

In 2004, Taiwan established the green building materials labeling system and began to accept the assessment of ecological, health, high-performance and recycled green building materials. It passed the "Green Building Materials Mark", "Green Procurement System" and "Building Technology Rules", etc. Standardize the use of green building materials, and obtain excellent performance and results. Promoted by the green building materials stamp to prevent poor quality building materials, damage the ecological environment and affect the health of Chinese people, strengthen domestic building materials control, only active innovation is the long-term survival and development of national enterprises.

(2)Research Methods and Processes

In this research, the Green Building Materials Mark is the necessary basic certification. The literature analysis method is adopted to collect relevant information of the latest international building materials specifications, and a set of evaluation factors is established. The fuzzy Delphi method is used to screen the evaluation factors and the opinions of the clusters. After screening through the fuzzy Delphi questionnaire, the second stage of the hierarchical analysis method is carried out to analyze the weight values of each evaluation index and the evaluation item, and the weight of the evaluation item and each factor is established, and then converted into a specific set of scoring methods.

In order to understand the current situation of domestic industries and enterprises and to upgrade the domestic related building materials industry towards the international market, the project is to assist the three manufacturers in the certification of international certification or domestic green building materials, in addition to understanding the industry's views and expectations on green building materials. In the meantime, it will enhance the benefits of building materials manufacturers for environmental sustainability, corporate economic growth, etc. And then promote building materials to the international market.

(3)Important Discovery

1.In this research, the Green Building Materials Mark is the necessary basic certification, and the literature analysis method is adopted to collect the latest “material product standards, specifications, and seals” (circular materials, innovative materials, etc.) and establish an evaluation factor set. The fuzzy Delphi method is used to screen the evaluation factors and to search for cluster opinions.

2.After screening through the questionnaire, the items of the four green building materials stamps are evaluated, and the additional items that are more suitable for the existing green building materials stamps are obtained: 25 projects of innovative ecological green building materials indicators; innovative high-performance green The building materials index has 35 projects; the innovative recycled green building materials index has 36 projects; the innovative healthy green building materials index project has 30 projects.

3.The hierarchical analysis method is based on the most certified health green building materials stamps on the market. It is divided into four categories: “health norms”, “innovation development”, “environmental footprint management” and “corporate social responsibility”. A total of 30 sub-projects, after which the weights of each evaluation index and evaluation project are analyzed, and the weights of the evaluation project and each factor are established, converted into a specific set of scoring methods, and four strategies are proposed for the future. The reference for the improvement and revision of the green building materials stamp.

4.In order to understand the current situation of domestic industries and enterprises and to improve the domestic related building materials industry towards the international market, the project is to provide guidance for three manufacturers, including international certification or domestic green building materials certification, and selected three in the coaching company. Manufacturers of different types of enterprises will provide guidance and interviews. In addition to understanding the industry's views and expectations on Green Building Materials, it is also expected to enhance the benefits of building materials manufacturers for environmental sustainability and corporate economic growth.

(4)Main Rrecommendations

Recommendation one

In order to promote the effectiveness of the green building materials stamp, it is recommended that follow-up research and promotion can strengthen the promotion plan of the project or the promotion of other educational courses in the promotion program to enhance the general public's awareness of the green building materials system: immediate feasibility suggest

Organizer: Institute of Architecture, Ministry of the Interior

Co-organizer:Taiwan Architecture & Building Center

Explanation: The ultimate concept of industrial innovation is to organize new products or processes or services to the market, so as to create more and higher economic value. The main purpose is to pursue economic growth, so the application for new green building materials indicators is also to make products. The sales volume is better. At present, the products certified by Green Building Materials are products with healthy purchase of green building materials, but they are only because of the commercialization of vocabulary, so that the certification of stamps is too concentrated. In the future, there will be no other applications for other certifications in the future, or it is impossible to distinguish the content differences of various types of labels. Therefore, it is recommended that follow-up research and promotion can strengthen the promotion of the program of the intensive project or the promotion of other educational courses in the institute, and further promote the connotation of the green building materials of each category. Once more people accept, understand and recognize the importance of their different types of orientation, companies will have a greater willingness to apply for different classification projects or to achieve self-improvement goals.

Recommendation two

The challenges and suggestions faced by the Institute of the Project are for reference by follow-up researchers: medium and long-term suggest

Organizer: Institute of Architecture, Ministry of the Interior

Co-organizer: None

Note: As the innovation green building materials index scores include environmental footprint management and corporate social responsibility, in these two parts, it is recommended that companies that are agents cannot obtain production information or cannot disclose specific information. It is possible to investigate the relevant agent ideas in the industry to see if it has a way to achieve the project; if not, it is recommended to differentiate the indicators into green building strategies, which are divided into local manufacturers and import agents to make them partially Different evaluation items and specifications. At present, some indicators can be found to be too difficult for the current stage of the manufacturer to reach. Therefore, after the statistics are recommended, the environmental footprint of at least the people will be listed as a selective project to encourage the nature of the bonus points so that the manufacturers can achieve The threshold is the minimum goal, followed by a sub-project.

Recommendation three

The evaluation index of innovative health green building materials is based on the evaluation criteria that are consistent with the feasibility of the development of the domestic building materials industry and the international integration. This study is based on the limitations of the current development of domestic building materials, and the future research can be more detailed scoring criteria: Medium and long term suggest

Organizer: Institute of Architecture, Ministry of the Interior

Co-organizer: None

Note: Due to the limitations of domestic building materials development and related building materials research, the results of grading research on building materials production, production and performance are currently lacking. There is no detailed research basis for building materials evaluation. Therefore, this study is based on “innovation”. Most of the evaluation details are based on the simple scoring method (score 0, score 3, score 5), so that the difference in the degree of completion of the project is relatively reduced. It is suggested that the follow-up study can be used for advanced research on the scoring grade and scoring value of the scoring criteria. Through the grading research on the production, production and performance of related building materials by experts in the building materials field, it is helpful to formulate more detailed scoring grades and to develop more detailed scoring. The numerical value is used to enhance the difference in scores between different projects and to improve the recognition of each project.