中華民國內政部建築研究所中華民國內政部建築研究所

一、研究緣起與目的
聯合國於2015年公布「2030永續發展議程」，「韌性城市」列入「永續發展目標」（SDGs）(2016-2030年)之目標11：「建設具有包容、安全、韌性及永續的城市與人類聚落」。在聯合國先頭引領之下，相關之國際組織大力推動都市韌性(或韌性都市)之建構。惟相關之國際組織對都市韌性(或韌性都市)之著重重點與推動方式各有不同，本研究擬以探討在國際組織建構韌性都市政策之架構下，其作法與配套規劃工具等項，以供參考。
二、研究方法與過程
（一）研究方法:
1.文獻分析法：本研究蒐集推行韌性都市之主要國際組織所採用之韌性都市參考政策文件，並加以分析。
2.比較分析法：分析主要國際組織之韌性都市作為與工具，加以比較分析。
（二）研究過程:
1.蒐集主要國際組織韌性都市建構之參考政策文件。
2.分析韌性都市參考政策文件。
3.主要國際組織對韌性都市推動作為與工具，進行比較分析。
三、重要成果
（一）本研究分析6個主要國際組織推動韌性都市之作法、規劃程序等項可供參考。筆者認為，考慮臺灣目前地方政府仍未將韌性都市納入施政主流之情勢下，不易推動綜合規劃型（全面課題型）之韌性都市建構，集中於災害對應型之韌性都市建構，似較為務實。
（二）可考量臺灣之政治環境，透過新訂或增訂規範性、制度性之法令規章，以較低行政成本之方式推動韌性都市，較容易全面性實施。
（三）基於目前臺灣尚未將韌性都市納入施政主流之情勢下，集中於災害對應型之韌性都市建構較為務實可行。
四、主要建議事項
建議一
針對以土地使用及建管策略推動韌性都市之案例都市為對象，進行細緻之研究: 立即可行建議
主辦機關:內政部建築研究所
協辦機關:無
建議二
探討以投入低行政成本之方式推動韌性都市之作法:中長期建議
主辦機關:內政部建築研究所
協辦機關:無
建議三
可自與都市計畫較為相關之聯合國人類居住署之政策脈絡為基礎，後續進行相關研究:中長期建議
建議四
可透過實際都市案例進行實證研究，探討符合臺灣需求之項目，以期符合在地化之需求:中長期建議
主辦機關:內政部建築研究所
協辦機關:無
建議五
可由各地文化在面對災害與復原的文化層面，討論韌性都市的意涵:中長期建議
主辦機關:內政部建築研究所
協辦機關:無

A.Background
UN announced 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda in 2015.“Resilient Cities” is included in Goal 11 of the “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) (2016-2030) as "Building inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable cities and human settlements". Under the lead of the United Nations, the relevant international organizations vigorously promote the construction of urban resilience (or resilient cities).
Due to the relevant international organizations have different emphasis and promotion methods on urban resilience (or resilient cities).
This study intends to explore the framework of a resilient city policy from international organizations.
B.the research methods and processes:
(I)Research methods:
1.Literature review analysis method: This study collects and analyzing the reference policy documents of resilient city adopted by major international organizations that promote resilience cities.
2.Comparative analysis method: analyze the resilience cities of major international organizations as tools and making comparative analysis.
(Ⅱ)research process:
1.Collect reference policy documents for the construction of resilient cities by major international organizations.
2.Analyze resilient city reference policy documents.
3.Major international organizations compare and analyze the promotion of resilient cities as a tool.
C.Result
(1)This study analyzed the practices and planning procedures of 6 major international organizations to promote resilient cities for reference. Due to the local governments in Taiwan  have not yet put the resilient city policy into  mainstream of governance. It is not easy to promote a comprehensive planning (comprehensive project) for resilient cities construction, better  focusing on disaster-responsible purpose for resilient cities construction.
(2)To promote normative and institutional approach by drafting or amending laws and regulations, will easier to implement the resilient city policy with lower administrative costs.
(3)Based on the political environment that the government in Taiwan have not yet incorporate the resilient city policy into mainstream of governance. The construction of the resilient city focuses on disaster-response is more practical and feasible.
D.Recommendations
Recommendation 1:
To conduct meticulous researches for case studies of resilient cities promoted by land use regulation and building code  management strategies : short term.
Sponsor: ABRI
Co-authority: No
Recommendation 2:
To explore ways to promote resilient cities with low administrative costs: long term.
Sponsor: ABRI
Co-authority: No
Recommendation 3:
To conduct follow-up related research based on the policy context of UN-HABITAT, which is more relevant to urban planning: long term.
Sponsor: ABRI
Co-authority: No
Recommendation 4:
To conduct empirical research through real city cases study for exploring way to meet needs of Taiwan, with a localization viewpoint: long term.
Sponsor: ABRI
Co-authority: No
Recommendation 5:
To explore the meaning of resilient cities by  discussing local cultures with facing disasters and recovery: long term.
Sponsor: ABRI
Co-authority: No