中華民國內政部建築研究所中華民國內政部建築研究所

一、研究緣起
內政部「智慧建築標章」評估制度自2002年完成作業要點暨評估系統，並於 2004 年起正式受理智慧建築標章之申請，隨著國內外智慧建築產業快速發展，滾動調整修訂「智慧建築解說與評估手冊」(2003,2011)及「智慧建築評估手冊」(2016)，並編撰「智慧建築規劃設計技術彙編」(溫琇玲，2014;內政部建築研究所，2015)，內政部「智慧建築標章申請認可評定及使用作業要點」及「智慧建築標章評定專業機構申請指定作業要點」，以指定評定專業機構方式落實技術與行政分立，讓「智慧建築標章評估系統」更趨近產業需求與帶動經濟發展，獲得「候選智慧建築證書」與「智慧建築標章」之建築案例數逐年快速增加，得到極佳的績效。
內政部自2004年起完成智慧建築標章制度相關規定及「智慧建築解說與評估手冊2003年版」，受理智慧建築標章之申請，隨著智慧建築相關技術發展，滾動調整修訂完成「智慧建築解說與評估手冊2011年版」、「智慧建築評估手冊2016年版」。其中，依「智慧建築標章申請審核認可及使用作業要點」第10點規定，智慧建築標章有效期限為5年，期滿得依第8點規定申請延續認可。惟目前續用辦理因屬自願性，且尚無相關管制或獎助，建築物若有更新或劣化，申請單位仍需依照原有手冊進行繁瑣的計算，並檢附完整的書圖，耗費大量的人力物力。爰此，以「建築生命週期」來看，建築物生命週期長達40至50年以上，取得「智慧建築標章」後，其標章有效期限為5年，考量在生命週期之營運使用階段，需投入適當之維護經費以維持智慧建築性能，應是設計智慧建築營運使用評估制度之重要課題，本研究爰就提升智慧建築標章續用意願、簡化評估制度等議題進行探討。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究計畫蒐集國內、外有關智慧建築、標章續用與簡化等文獻資料，研究成果及實施實例等資料，主要收集ISO標準、臺灣EEWH、美國LEED、英國BREEAM、日本CASBEE、新加坡GreenMark等標章之續用與簡化制度等彙整，並參考「智慧建築標章評定項目」(智慧建築評估手冊，2016年版)及「智慧建築規劃設計技術彙編」等內容，藉以擬定簡化評估項目之架構內容。依「智慧建築評估手冊」內容，研提「智慧建築標章延續認可簡化查核表及評定認可流程」(草案)，以2場專家工作會議邀請對智慧建築、機電、空調、建築、產業技術、政策、法律..等方面學有所長之專家學者，進行提出之簡化與流程討論，並聘請專家學者針對評定項目及簡化合宜程度進行審查，提出內容修正及增刪之意見，加強本研究內容之參考依據，並擇期辦理期中、期末簡報說明研究案執行的成效、進度及所遭遇的問題，藉由擬定之「智慧建築標章延續認可簡化查核表」進行討論，以此修正簡化查核評定項目與差異值之訂定，並可提供量化數據聚焦續用標章之必要查核項目。
三、重要發現
本研究發現：(1).智慧建築標章申請與認可數量逐年成長，在相關政策引領下(公共工程、都市更新、危老重建..等)，公有建築物與民間建築物申請智慧建築標章與候選智慧建築大幅增加，帶動智慧建築產業發展，增加智慧建築標章普及率。(2).智慧建築標章續用比例偏低問題，主要原因為標章續用「尚未簡化評估項目」，在5年後有效標章到期時續用階段，需重新評定並檢視其「原申請標章評定內容」，易引起智慧建築標章之續用申請人產生困難與退卻，形成續用阻力之一。(3).本研究依目前有效期之「智慧建築標章」統計數據資料(截至2021年09月止)共計有167件(適用2003年展延共1件、適用2011年版共100件、適用2016年版共66件)，候選智慧建築證書為429件，隨著最初「智慧建築解說與評估手冊2003年版」，滾動調整修訂「智慧建築解說與評估手冊2011年版」、「智慧建築評估手冊2016年版」，已累計不同適用版本之「智慧建築標章」建築物，然「續用智慧建築標章」之案例數累計僅5案(適用2003年版共3案、適用2011年版共2案)，爰此，本研究分別依據2011年版與2016年版智慧建築解說與評估手冊內容，提出「續用標章認可之簡化評估方式」(草案)，大幅減少原評定項目，在2011年版簡化續用查核項目減至7項、2016年版簡化續用查核項目減至19項，供標章續用時簡化評估與查核使用。(4).本研究辦理專家諮詢會議，徵求申請延續認可簡易評估項目及評定認可處理流程草案之各界意見，具體建議申請延續認可簡易評估項目及評定認可處理流程必須「簡化」與「重點查核」，以確保智慧建築各項目之性能及持續維護管理，並能夠提升「申請續用標章」之意願及續用比率。(5).研議「續用標章認可之簡化評估方式」(草案)針對屆期案例試算，在不影響原標章評定內容、維持性能不變及容許劣化或更新下，以變動量小於原始申請量的25%作為可容許之誤差範圍，以利續用簡化之查核認定。
四、主要建議事項
根據上述研究發現，本研究針對「智慧建築續用標章認可之簡化評估方式」，可依其「性能維持」與「營運使用完善」的目標下，將評定項目簡化成「續用現場查核項目」，並進一步依其原適用版本，作為續用現場簡化查核項目，容許其在性能或功能不變條件下，因設備使用週期而產生些微劣化差異，作為查核容許事項與使用營運階段之性能確保，提出下列建議事項：
建議一、智慧建築標章延續(續用)認可簡化查核表之修正與使用：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
持續邀集內政部建築研究所、評定專業機構、評定小組成員、智慧建築標章精進計畫團隊、產業代表等討論研議續用簡化之查核表評估方式，並以不同類別智慧建築作為探討，以確保簡化評估能維持標章原有性能與效益，並可搭配智慧建築標章追蹤查核作業，共同建立完整智慧建築標章延用(續用)簡化評定機制，確保智慧建築標章品質。
建議二、積極擴大宣傳標章及續用簡化說明：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：財團法人台灣建築中心
針對標章屆期案積極主動通知與增加簡化程序之宣傳，強化標章續用誘因，讓智慧建築標章申請者能獲得相關資訊，並由評定專業機構積極協助相關續用申請作業，讓標章申請者認同智慧建築標章之續用效益。

The Smart Building Label has officially accepted applications for the Smart Building Label since 2004. According to the current validity period of the "Smart Building Label" statistical data (as of September 2021), a total of 167 pieces (applicable to the 2003 extension total 1 A total of 100 for the 2011 version and 66 for the 2016 version), the number of candidate smart building certificates is 429. According to point 10 of the "Smart Building Label Application Review and Approval and Operation Points," the intelligent building label is valid. The period is five years, and upon expiration, you can apply for renewal of the accreditation following the provisions of point 8. However, the current renewal application is voluntary, and there is no relevant control or subsidy. If the building is updated or deteriorated, the applicant still needs to perform cumbersome calculations under the original manual and attach a complete book map, which costs much money.  Therefore, it is necessary to review the evaluation methods and procedures for renewal to promote the continuity and impact of smart building policies and consider that during the operation and use stage of the life cycle, appropriate maintenance funds need to be invested in maintaining the performance of smart buildings. This should be an important topic for designing a smart building operation and use evaluation system. This study aims to increase the willingness to continue using smart building labels and simplify the evaluation system. And other topics to discuss.
The Ministry of the Interior's "Smart Building Label" evaluation system has completed the main points of operation and evaluation system in 2002 and formally accepted applications for the smart building label in 2004. With the rapid development of the smart building industry at home and abroad, the "Smart Building Commentary" has been adjusted and revised. And Evaluation Manual" (2003, 2011) and "Smart Building Evaluation Manual" (2016), and compiled the "Smart Building Planning and Design Technology Collection" (Wen Xiuling, 2014; Institute of Architecture, Ministry of the Interior, 2015), and the Ministry of the Interior "Smart Building Standards Chapter Application Accreditation Assessment and Use Operation Points" and "Intelligent Buildings Label Evaluation Professional Institutions Applying for Designated Operation Points," implement the separation of technology and administration in the form of designated assessment professional institutions, so that the "Smart Building Label Evaluation System" is closer to the needs of the industry In order to promote economic development, the number of construction cases that have obtained the "Candidate Smart Building Certificate" and the "Smart Building Label" has been rapidly increasing year by year, achieving excellent performance.
Since 2004, the Ministry of the Interior has completed the relevant regulations of the Smart Building Labeling System and the "Smart Building Explanation and Evaluation Manual 2003 Edition" and accepted applications for smart building labels. With the development of smart building-related technologies, rolling adjustments and revisions have been completed to complete the "Smart Building Commentary" And Evaluation Manual 2011 Edition", "Smart Building Evaluation Manual 2016 Edition". Among them, according to point 10 of the "Smart Building Label Application Review and Approval and Operation Points for Use," the validity period of the smart building label is five years. The end of the period can be applied for renewal according to point 8. However, the current renewal application is voluntary, and there is no relevant control or subsidy. If the building is updated or deteriorated, the applicant still needs to perform cumbersome calculations under the original manual and attach a complete book map, which costs manpower and material resources. Therefore, from the perspective of the "building life cycle," the life cycle of a building is more than 40 to 50 years. After obtaining the "Smart Building Label," the validity period of the label is five years, considering the operation and use stage of the life cycle. The need to invest appropriate maintenance funds to maintain the performance of smart buildings should be an important topic in designing the evaluation system for the operation and use of smart buildings. This research will discuss issues such as increasing the willingness to continue using smart building labels and simplifying the evaluation system.
The purpose of the research is as follows:
1.Collect and investigate cases, systems, and related materials for the renewal of the approval of the relevant construction label evaluation system at home and abroad.
2.Investigate and analyze the cases of building renewal of smart buildings in my country and the factors that affect the willingness to apply for renewal, and put forward suggestions to increase the rate of renewal of smart buildings.
3.Under the content of the "Smart Building Evaluation Manual," the "Smart Building Label Continuation Accreditation Simplified Checklist and Evaluation and Accreditation Process" (draft) was developed.