中華民國內政部建築研究所中華民國內政部建築研究所

我國智慧建築標章制度於民國93年(2004年)開始實施，迄今已有十餘載，期間內政部滾動調整修訂「智慧建築解說與評估手冊」 (2003,2011)及「智慧建築評估手冊」 (2016)，並編撰「智慧建築規劃設計技術彙編」 (溫琇玲，2014;內政部建築研究所，2015)，而為健全體制，內政部亦頒布「智慧建築標章申請認可認可及使用作業要點」 及「智慧建築標章認可專業機構申請指定作業要點」，以指定認可專業機構方式落實技術與行政分立，讓「智慧建築標章評估系統」更趨近產業需求與帶動經濟發展，獲得「候選智慧建築證書」與「智慧建築標章」之建築案例數逐年快速增加，得到極佳的績效。
本研究透過分析取得2016年版與2011年版智慧建築標章之案例，探討智慧建築等級與各評估指標之關聯性，發現我國智慧建築標章的發展雖持續成長，惟仍集中6都與我國傳統都會區的發展相近；此外2016年版智慧建築部分評估項目迄今均無案件申請之狀況。爰本研究提出以下建議事項：
建議一、探討2016年版智慧建築評估手冊少數指標無人申請原因，並納入新版手冊滾動檢討：立即可行建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：智慧建築標章審查作業精進計畫執行單位
建議二、研擬加強6都以外行政區之智慧建築標章推廣宣導計畫：中長程建議
主辦機關：內政部建築研究所
協辦機關：智慧建築標章審查作業精進計畫執行單位

Taiwan's intelligent building standard system was implemented in 2004, and it has been more than ten years since the Ministry of the Interior adjusted and revised the "Intelligent Building Interpretation and Evaluation Manual" (2003, 2011) and the " Intelligent Building Evaluation Manual". (2016), and compiled the " Intelligent Building Planning and Design Technology Compilation" (Wen Xiuling, 2014; Architecture Research Institute of the Ministry of the Interior, 2015). In order to improve the system, the Ministry of the Interior also issued the " Intelligent Building Mark Application Approval, Evaluation and Use Operation Points" And " Intelligent Building Mark Evaluation Professional Institutions Applying for Designated Operation Points", to implement the separation of technology and administration by designating professional evaluation agencies, so that the "Smart Building Mark Evaluation System" will be closer to industry needs and drive economic development, and obtain the "Candidate Wisdom" The number of construction cases of "Building Certificate" and "Smart Building Mark" has been rapidly increasing year by year, achieving excellent performance.
This research analyzes the cases of intelligent building Labels obtained in the 2016 and 2011 editions, and explores the correlation between intelligent building grades and various evaluation indicators. It is found that although the development of intelligent building labels in Taiwan continues to grow, it is still concentrated in 6 cities and traditional cities in Taiwan. The development of the district is similar; in addition, there is no case application status for some evaluation projects of the 2016 version of the intelligent building so far. The study puts forward the following recommendations:
Recommendation 1. Explore the reasons why few indicators of the 2016 version of the Intelligent Building Evaluation Manual were not applied for, and include them in the rolling review of the new version of the manual: immediate and feasible recommendations
Organizer: ABRI, MOI
Co-organizer: Implementation Unit of Intelligent Building Mark Review Work Improvement Plan
Suggestion 2: Research and plan to strengthen the promotion and publicity plan of intelligent building signs in administrative regions other than 6 metropolises: medium and long-term suggestions
Organizer: ABRI, MOI
Co-organizer: Implementation Unit of Intelligent Building Mark Review Work Improvement Plan